Conclusions du Séminaire sur la modernisation de l’inspection en abattoir 11 juillet 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Advertisements

ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
Evaluation of VS: Addressing Veterinary Statutory Bodies, Private veterinarians and para-professionals Dr. Caroline Planté OIE Sub-regional Representation.
The Role of the Veterinary Services in Food Safety
OIE International Standards The OIE Standard Setting Process Regional Information Seminar for Recently Appointed OIE Delegates Brussels, Belgium, 18 –
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers Proposal for new EU Animal Health Regulation European Parliament, Intergroup on the welfare & conservation of.
Future Meat Inspection Which parts of traditional meat inspection still relevant How to implement conclusions from the EFSA Report How do we address risks.
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers Regulation proposal on Official Controls State of play COM (2013) 265 final.
Seventh Framework Programme Grant Agreement No Improving the Organic Certification System Workshop in Brussels, October 14, 2011 Recommendations.
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers ECPA/ECCA Regulatory conference on March 2014 Developments in the area of pesticide residues – Commission.
Food Safety Legislation
Regulation (EC) No 854 & implementation measures by Ron Dwinger DG SANCO.
UEVP is a section of the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe UEVP GA – BRUXELLES 2010 NOVEMBER 11th REPORT ON FUTURE MEAT INSPECTION Thierry CHAMBON,
Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed
Visual inspection of fattening pigs Using the legislative possibility for risk based meat inspection Charlotte Vilstrup, senior veterinary officer, DVFA.
State of play on activities within the Codex Committee on Meat Hygiene Andrew McKenzie, Chief Executive New Zealand Food Safety Authority State of play.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Dr Marta Hugas Head of Unit Unit on Biological Hazards
Canice Nolan, 12 April Shared healthcare challengesFood Safety in the European Union - Seattle, 12 April Canice Nolan - EC Delegation to the.
EFSA MANAGEMENT PLAN 2008 The Management Plan
DENNIS CRYER Veterinary Meat Hygiene Adviser Food Standards Agency
1 State of play EFSA risk assessment on meat inspection Dr Marta Hugas Head of Unit Unit on Biological Hazards II Round Table on Meat Inspection Brussels,
Animal health and welfare monitoring as integrated part of meat inspection Conference on meat inspection A lberto Laddomada H ead o f U nit SANCO D1 Animal.
Key Elements of Legislation For Disaster Risk Reduction Second Meeting of Asian Advisory Group of Parliamentarians for DRR 5-7 February, 2014, Vientiane,
EU Food/Feed Safety Rules Industry Information Session June 16, 2005 Presented by AAFC.
Health and Consumers Directorate-General (DG SANCO) Howard Batho, Head of import and OIE sector Unit D1, Animal Health and Standing Committees.
The Danish Agricultural & Food Council 1Side Revision of Meat Inspection Bruxelles 18. May 2010 Flemming Thune-Stephensen, DVM, Chief Adviser Danish Agricultural.
Overview report of a series of FVO fact- finding missions and audits carried out in 2012 and 2013 in order to evaluate the systems put in place to give.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
IPC seminar Sustainability in the food & agricultural sector: the role of private sector and government Panel IV: Best practices / sustainability along.
Overview of the EU Food Safety Requirements
Food Safety Assurance August Scope of food quality & food safety The term “food” covers any unprocessed, semi- processed, or processed item that.
DENNIS CRYER Veterinary Meat Hygiene Adviser Food Standards Agency.
Implementation of the animal slaughter regulation Andrea Gavinelli, Head of Unit Animal Welfare Directorate General for Health and Food Safety European.
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers 1 Review of Regulation 882/2004 on official controls Francesca Volpi DG SANCO.E5- Enforcement Council Working.
EU Animal Welfare policies
SANCO-D-4 International Questions (bilateral) General Food Law of the EU – Amman, 29 November 2010 Wolf Maier, DG Health and Consumers, EU Commission.
/ 1 International Workshop for CIS countries “ The use of standards for fresh fruit and vegetables and dry produce in technical regulations and the application.
Action Plan for the future of organic production in the European union State of Play 1.
WHO, Almaty 2002 Food Legislation of the European Union and its effect on Slovak legislation1 Food legislation of the European Union and its effect on.
1 OIE and Codex Cooperation: OIE perspective Regional Seminar for OIE National Focal Points for Animal Production Food Safety, Abu Dhabi, January.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
FOOD IMPORT CONTROL- A national perspective, Italy Romano Marabelli°, Paolo Aureli*, Agostino Macri’**, ° Direction General of Veterinary Public Health,
Federation of Veterinarians of Europe Veterinary Public Health.
Event labelled by the EU Belgian Presidency CONCLUSIONS.
1 OIE standards: Ante- and post-mortem meat inspection Stuart A. Slorach Chair, Animal Production Food Safety Working Group Regional Seminar for OIE National.
Future needs for capacity building and recommendations to the OIE Dr Sarah Kahn Consultant to the OIE
MEAT INSPECTION ROUND TABLE. Brussels Robert REMY Expert Food Policy – BEUC/TEST ACHATS.
Health & Consumers Directorate General EU SPS Notification Authority and Enquiry Point - working methods Brussels, 23 November 2011.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
AGR KIEV, 2 NOVEMBER 2010 Andrzej Chirkowski IDENTIFICATION, REGISTRATION AND TRACEABILITY: FROM FARM TO FORK.
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
 Zagreb University – Law Faculty European Public Law “EU and International Food Law” Seminar II 21 April 2016 Daniela Corona.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Improvement of Supply Chain Inspection in pigs Bert Urlings * VION: Director Quality Assurance * Wageningen University: Supply-Chain Management in Animal.
Improvement of Supply Chain Inspection in pigs Bert Urlings
New official control regulation (OCR) and EURLs agenda item 5 Meeting of the EU Reference Laboratories in the field of animal health and food and feed.
3. Management of EURLs and NRLs
Seminar for National Delegates to the OIE: “Development of public–private partnerships to support Veterinary Services” 10 November 2015, Kaslik.
World Organisation for Animal Health
FOOD AND VETERINARY OFFICE
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Regional Seminar for OIE National Focal Points on Animal Production Food Safety Importance of collaboration between the Veterinary Services and industry.
Role of Industry Self-regulation in Phytosanitary Compliance
State of play in the EU for criteria to identify endocrine disruptors
Seminar on Communication
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
EU-Project: Trade and Private Sector Development (TPSD)
Presentation transcript:

Conclusions du Séminaire sur la modernisation de l’inspection en abattoir 11 juillet 2008

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Are we addressing the right hazards through the “traditional” inspection ? Outcome of inspection

It seems more important at that stage to define why and what has to be done in the slaughterhouses or at the other relevant points of the food chain before precising who must do the different tasks Outcome of inspection

Meat inspection should be modernised to address the most prevalent and evaluated food borne pathogens causing human illness as highlighted in the EU annual zoonosis report. Outcome of inspection

The epidemiology of zoonotic agents varies between MS necessitating different priorities for control. Flexibility must permit each MS to target the most important pathogens Outcome of inspection

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

A potential contradiction between the provisions of the food law and the ones of the hygiene package was pointed out as regards the responsibilities of FBO and those of the CA in the field of meat inspection Responsibilities of FBO and CA

The role of the FBO and the official services in ante and post mortem inspections should be revisited Responsibilities of FBO and CA

Official auxiliaries role could be increased according to their competence. Nevertheless, the OV currently remains the key of the sanitary inspection. Responsibilities of FBO and CA

Clarification on the role of official services in terms of giving advice versus enforcement activities is needed Responsibilities of FBO and CA

Inspection in slaughterhouses cannot address all the hazards relevant to public health : primary producer must also be involved Responsibilities of FBO and CA

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

What is relevant food chain information (species by species) ? Is FCI relevant for all species ? What is the effect of FCI on the inspection ? Food chain information (FCI)

How to deal with intra EU trade ? FCI must be provided for all animals that travel between MS and Third countries for slaughter. When data on the animal / flock health status is not available (intra-EU trade or importations), what additional controls should / could be conducted ? Food chain information (FCI)

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Pilot projects have to be transparent for other MS, the Commission and Third countries, as provided in article 17 of Reg 854/2004 Collection of scientific / technical data is important to justify new inspection procedures and show that they provide the same level of protection as “standard” inspection procedures Pilot projects

Modification of the inspection procedures requires acceptance from Third countries trading partners and international organizations, like OIE and Codex Alimentarius. Pilot projects

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Any modernised inspection system should take into account animal health and animal welfare. Animal Welfare

Importance of taking into account animal welfare in approval of establishments and in the controls. FBO should be primarily responsible for animal welfare Animal Welfare

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Training of FBO and CA staff, in all relevant fields, is very important Training

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Bonus malus fees are a good incentive to encourage FBO compliance Fees

It will be difficult to have a single fee throughout the EU. Nevertheless, the conclusion of the ongoing study carried out by the Commission will provide valuable data for a possible adaptation of the current system. Fees

Recommendations from the Seminar for further consideration by the CVOs at their informal meeting in Strasbourg Octobre 2008

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Recommendations

The progress of the implementation of the risk based approach foreseen by the Hygiene Package from farm to slaughterhouse, according to species should be assessed. Based on the experience of certain Member States ways to implement a more risk based meat hygiene verification system should be explored. EFSA and ECDC should establish the criteria or the quantitative data necessary for MS to carry out a risk analysis allowing the adaptation of the general inspection methods provided by the legislation Outcome of inspection

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

During the review following the 2009 report on the Hygiene package, a clarification of the respective responsibilities between FBO and CA in slaughterhouses should be provided Clarification on the tasks of meat inspection that can be delegated as defined in article 5 of Reg 882/2004 Official auxiliaries role could be increased according to their competence Responsibilities of FBO and CA

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Ways to deal with imported animals / flocks from third countries should be established. Herds qualification schemes should be encouraged for the relevant hazards in different species, taking into account risk analysis. Relevance of FCI, species by species, should be assessed, together with its consequences on risk based meat inspection. Food chain information (FCI)

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Pilots projects should be encouraged to explore more risk based inspection systems. MS should collaborate, where possible, while implementing pilot projects, and share the results. Pilot projects

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Animal Welfare Training of staff and approval of slaughterhouses should take into account relevant animal welfare requirements

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Training Exchanges of experience could be encouraged between MS. For Official auxiliaries and FBO staff participating in inspection, consider the possibility of mutual recognition of their respective qualification between MS.

 Outcome of inspection  Responsibilities of FBO and CA  Food chain information (FCI)  Pilot projects  Animal Welfare  Training  Fees Debated issues during the seminar

Base any decision on the evolution of the calculation of the fees on the outcomes of the ongoing study. The level of the fee should reflect the level of compliance and thus the level of official control required. Fees