1 ND Communities Meeting. 2 Agenda Activity: Planning training and technical assistance Compelling technical assistance requests NDTAC has received Activity:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Keeping Up to Date: Accessing Your N&D Title I Funds For PAFPC Conference April 14, 2008 Don McCrone & Joe Hiznay.
Advertisements

The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
LTCT & Hospital Quarterly Meeting August 12, :00am – 12:00pm PST.
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community 21 October 2014.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk PROGRAM OVERVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ANNUAL REPORTS.
1 Gold ND Community Call October 7, Agenda “That Time of Year”: Data Team Updates A Closer Look: Subgrantee Monitoring Review of Recent TA Requests.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Strategies for Developing Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes Stephanie Lampron, DeAngela Milligan, and Marcia Calloway.
Reporting & Evaluation Workshop Lauren Amos, Liann Seiter, and Dory Seidel.
1 (Almost) Everything You Need To Know About the Annual Count.
1 Planning and Funding Basics Lauren Amos and Liann Seiter, NDTAC Chandra Martin, Arkansas Department of Education.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Equitable Services for Private School Students March, 2012 Consultation Process & Meeting Agenda’s Marcia Beckman, Director Elementary & Secondary Education.
Section 1113 of NCLB, Title I Eligible School Attendance Areas (Does not apply to LEAs with fewer than 1,000 children)
Calculating Your Per Pupil Expenditure (PPE )….. General Selection Requirements 1.An LEA must rank all of its schools (from which the LEA draws its children)
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
ND Community Call Salmon Community October 23, 2013.
Title I-D, Subpart 2 Neglected, Delinquent, and At- Risk Youth Program ESEA Odyssey Summer 2013 Russ Sweet Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
1 Gold ND Community Call June 3, Agenda Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Adapting to the 2014 GED “That Time of Year”: Subgrantee Monitoring A Closer.
AT-RISK STUDENT ELIGIBILITY AND REQUIREMENTS State Compensatory Education Resource information from TEA.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents.
Title I, Part D State Plans Katie Deal, NDTAC State Liaison.
1 Gold ND Community Call October 1, Agenda A Closer Look: Community Day Programs –How prevalent are they in your State? –How do your SAs count.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 What’s It All About?
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
1 Gold ND Community Call February 3, Agenda “That Time of Year”: CSPR Data Submission Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Questions from Community Members.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
1 Mississippi Department of Education 2008 Summer Data Conference School and Student Coding for Federal Programs Office of Innovative Support Presented.
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
Homeless Students and the Expenditure of Title I Part A Funds Rebecca Derenge, N&D Coordinator.
Equitable Services, Part 2 Planning for Equitable Services Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I.
Rebecca Derenge, Title I N&D Coordinator …including information from: Family Ties: The Link Between Engaging Families and Improving Education for Delinquent.
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Annual Counts: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May
Overview of the Counting Process DeAngela Milligan.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Annual Count for Local Agency Programs (Subpart 2) Greta Colombi.
TITLE I, PART D Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community November 4, 2015.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 2 LEAs and TACF Neglected,
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
1 Introductions Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3x5.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
Florida Department of Education Bureau of Federal Educational Programs ECTAC ADMINISTRATOR’S MEETING SONYA G. MORRIS, BUREAU CHIEF MARCH 3, 2016.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community March 8, 2016.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community March 16, 2016.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Call with the US Department of Education and Title I, Part D Coordinators October 17, 2016 Katie Deal.
ND Community Call Salmon Community November 29, 2016.
N&D Community Call Salmon Community March 20, 2017.
Annual October Count of Children in
Title I A Comparability Report
Sarah Martinez Patricia Meyertholen June 23, 2016
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Title ID October Count 2006.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Presentation transcript:

1 ND Communities Meeting

2 Agenda Activity: Planning training and technical assistance Compelling technical assistance requests NDTAC has received Activity: Brainstorming topics for future technical assistance from NDTAC

3 Planning Training and Technical Assistance

4 Discuss approaches to TTA provision. Discuss challenges to and strategies to effective TTA. Determine the following: –A prioritized TTA need –Audience of TTA –Goal(s) of TTA –Content of TTA Identify available resources (Federal, NDTAC, ND Community Peers, State, and local). Plan method of TTA.

5 Compelling Technical Assistance Requests

6 Neglect Programs: Questions 1.Do most States use TIPD for their neglect programs? 2.Do other States using TIPA for their neglect programs also not report data for the CSPR?

7 States Using Part D Funds for Neglect Programs

8 Do Most States Use TIPD for Their Neglect Programs? Number of States Average Number of Neglect Programs Subpart 1 only86 Subpart 2 only1732 Both Subparts617 No Neglect Programs21n/a

9 Neglect Programs: Question 1.Do most States use TIPD for their neglect programs? 2.Do other States using TIPA for their neglect programs also not report data for the CSPR?

10 Part DPart A Funds may be used for a broader purpose than comparable services in a State or local neglect program. Funds are used within a local neglect facility to provide comparable services. Do Other States Using TIPA for Their Neglect Programs Also Not Report Data for the CSPR?

11 Do Other States Using TIPA for Their Neglect Programs Also Not Report Data for the CSPR? To our knowledge, there is no CSPR data collection for TIPA. Neglect programs that only receive TIPA funding should not be included in the TIPD section of the CSPR. However, if programs receive both TIPA and TIPD funds, only the students who benefit from the TIPD funding should be reported in the CSPR. This information is available in more detail in the CSPR Instructional Guide ( delinquent.org/resource/instructional-guide-reporting- title-i-part-d-data-cspr-sy ). delinquent.org/resource/instructional-guide-reporting- title-i-part-d-data-cspr-sy

12 Annual Count: Questions 1.Should youth be adjudicated or court ordered in order to be counted as delinquent on the Annual Survey of Children in Local Institutions? 2.If the facility has a percentage of students who are court ordered, can the facility count all of the youth who are enrolled in the facility? 3.Can a mental health facility or psychiatric hospital claim a youth as neglected if the parents voluntarily enroll him/her in the facility?

13 Who Is Included in LEA’s Delinquent Count? Per the statute’s definitions (Subpart 3: Sec. 1432: Definitions), youth who are delinquent have been adjudicated to be delinquent or in need of supervision.Subpart 3: Sec. 1432: Definitions The count is based on an eligible facility’s October caseload. Any child or youth residing in an eligible institution may be counted if the youth: –Is 5–17 years old during the count window and –Has not also been counted in the State agency annual count or other Title I funding stream count. NDTAC’s “Annual Count Toolkit” (provided here) includes a requirements checklist that you can use to determine count eligibility for LEAs/SAs, facilities, and children/youth, as well as the count window.here requirements checklist

14 Annual Count: Questions 1.Should youth be adjudicated or court ordered in order to be counted as delinquent on the Annual Survey of Children in Local Institutions? 2.If the facility has a percentage of students who are court ordered, can the facility count all of the youth who are enrolled in the facility? 3.Can a mental health facility or psychiatric hospital claim a youth as neglected if the parents voluntarily enroll him/her in the facility?

15 Majority of Facility’s Youth Are Court Ordered— Can You Include All Youth in Count? You should first determine the facilities’ eligibility, then determine the students’ eligibility via the LEA section of the Annual Count Requirements Checklist in NDTAC’s Annual Count Toolkit.Annual Count Toolkit If both criteria are met (facility and student), then yes. A child or youth should only be counted if he or she meets the eligibility requirements (i.e., all children and youth enrolled in a facility cannot be counted simply because the facility is eligible).

16

17

18 Annual Count: Questions 1.Should youth be adjudicated or court ordered in order to be counted as delinquent on the Annual Survey of Children in Local Institutions? 2.If the facility has a percentage of students who are court ordered, can the facility count all of the youth who are enrolled in the facility? 3.Can a mental health facility or psychiatric hospital claim a youth as neglected if the parents voluntarily enroll him/her in the facility?

19 Can Mental Health Facilities Count Students as Neglected Who Have Been Placed by Parents? Student eligibility for the count depends on the eligibility of the LEA/SA and facility. If the mental health facility is deemed eligible, whether a child or youth is counted as neglected (N) or delinquent (D) depends on the facility’s designation as either N or D. –For example, if an eligible institution is designated an “N” facility (e.g., as specified by its charter or license), then all eligible students are counted as N, regardless of their individual status.

20 Can Mental Health Facilities Count Students as Neglected Who Have Been Placed by Parents? As long as the facilities in question meet the definition of an institution that serves N youth, then they can count eligible children and youth. If the type of facilities you are asking about are not identified in the statute, you can confirm their eligibility by requesting such information as their charter or mission statement or information about the type of children and youth they typically serve.

21 Can Mental Health Facilities Count Students as Neglected Who Have Been Placed by Parents? If a facility has not previously participated in the count and does not have a charter available (or it is unclear how to designate itself on the basis of its license), then the designation should reflect the majority of children and youth served. For example, a facility should designate itself as “D” if a greater percentage of students residing in that facility during the past year were D; the same would hold true for an “N” designation.

22 Brainstorming Topics for Future Technical Assistance From NDTAC

23 Brainstorming Topics for Future Technical Assistance From NDTAC What TA could NDTAC provide to assist you with duties as a TIPD coordinator? What TA could NDTAC provide to assist you in “moving the needle” in programs that are funded in your State with TIPD dollars?