Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Advertisements

University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Our Mission Statement  Launch a high-power rocket to an altitude of one mile carrying the Operation: Epic Beep payload package. At lift off, the rocket’s.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
The Effect of Acceleration on the Crystallization of Sodium Acetate.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
The Efficiency of Flexible Solar Panels and Changes in the Earth’s Magnetic Field at Altitude.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Harvard-Westlake Rocketry Club SLI FRR.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
UKRA is affiliated to the British Model Flying AssociationBritish Model Flying Association Rocketry.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Dual-Deploy Launch Checklist
2019 First Nation Launch – CDR Virtual Review
Plantation High SL team 1
Target Altitude Safety Document
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008

The Rocket

The Rocket Details The Static Margin for the rocket, if we can build it to the minimum mass of about 9 lbs will be about 5, according to simulation performed in RockSim. The rocket will most likely have a mass of 10 to 11 lbs. This mass will be mainly in the front of the rocket resulting in a Static Margin greater than 5. Our rocket design is stable.

Using the Cesaroni K1440 motor, our average thrust to weight is 32:1 for a 10 lb rocket and the peak thrust to weight is about 48:1 for the same weight rocket. –This is much higher than the “rule of thumb” value of 5:1 for stable flight after the rocket leaves the launch rail. Using an 8 ft launch rail, the rocket leaves the rail with a velocity of 102 mph, according to RockSim. –Using a “rule of thumb” velocity of 30 mph off the launch rail for stable flight, the rocket will be stable off the rail.

Rocket Recovery Drogueless at apogee with 15 ft long Kevlar shock cord connecting the fin can to the upper rocket section –Motor ejection is at 17 seconds from engine cutoff with Loki ARTS II altimeter firing a charge at apogee for backup. A 60 inch Loc Parachute will be ejected at 1000 ft by the Loki ARTS II altimeter with 15 ft of Kevlar shock cord. Descent rate with this parachute is 20 ft/sec assuming the rocket mass is 10 lbs on the launch pad

Test Plans and Procedures Rocket Testing Plan: –Altimeter Testing Change in Pressure Test (Evacuated Jar and diodes/lamp) –Apogee Detection –Dual Deployment Will the altimeter light the E-Match? (Via Laptop) Will the altimeter light two E-Matches? (Via Laptop) Determine black powder amount necessary for ejection charge to shear 3 nylon pins

Payload Testing –Reverse Thrust Motor ignition detection method –Remote transmission of pressure information to base station from electronics payload Distance Integrity –Accurate data from pressure sensors –G-Force robustness of payload

The Scale Model Flight We have successfully flown the scale model with and without the reverse thrust motor ignited! The rocket was stable for both flights. We used an Estes E9 motor as the reverse thrust motor. The only real difference noted was that while flying the rocket with the RTM twice, we noticed there was no wind cocking. –The wind was averaging about 10 mph for both flights with the reverse thrust motor lit.

Dual Deployment Avionics Test The Dual Deployment Avionics uses a Loki ARTS II altimeter. The altimeter will be set to fire an ejection charge at apogee and at 1000ft above ground level. We plan to test the altimeter by placing it in an airtight jar and progressively pumping the air out of the jar. We will then stop and slowly let air back into the jar. We may need to slightly “jar” the altimeter to simulate liftoff of the rocket.

Small light bulbs/ammeters will be attached to the apogee and main parachute connectors to determine if the altimeter attempted to fire the ejection charges. We will also examine the altimeter data to confirm pressure changes.

Ejection Charge Amount Test Using an online calculator, the amount of 4F black powder we need for our ejection charges is 0.67 of a gram. –This yields 15 lbs/in 2 pressure in a 12 inch long 3 inch diameter tube. –This will permit nylon shear pins or nylon shear pins. The current plan utilizes nylon shear pins.

We plan to test our rocket using 1.0 gram of 4F black powder with the rocket flight configured (except for the motor). –This gives approximately 160 lbs of force on the bulkhead. Since each 2-56 pin shears reliably at 35 lbs of force, this should allow three shear pins to be used with our rocket. We will use the laptop to ignite the charges with the rocket configured for flight. A drogue and main separation test will determine if this amount of 4F black powder will break the shear pins and safely separate the rocket. –This is a feature of the Loki ARTS II altimeter software.

Payload Integration Feasibility The electronics payload will be housed in the same bay as the altimeter. –Both will be on the same “sled” with batteries on the backside –Switches for the altimeter and electronics payload will be located on the sled between the two devices Switches will be accessed by a porthole in the payload section that will be plugged during flight. Outer TubeCoupler for Bulkhead Stop Sled for Altimeters Eyebolt Through Rod Assembly Electronics PayloadAltimeter Switches

Wires will run inside a tube from the bottom of the rocket to the electronics payload section. This is for ignition of the RTM. A wire will run from the payload section to the nosecone attached to a thin sheet of Aluminum foil for detecting when the RTM has fired.