Course Title: Historical linguistics Course Number: Eng Credit Hours:3 Title: Historical Linguistics: an Introduction Author: Campbell, Lyle

Course Schedule Topics 1 Introduction 2 Sound change 3 The Properties of language 4 Borrowing 5 Analogical change 6 The comparative method and linguistic reconstruction 7 Linguistic classification

8Models of linguistic change 9Internal reconstruction 10Symantec change 11Symantec Change and Lexical change 12 Explaining Linguistic change 13 Areal Linguistics 14 Distant genetic relationships 15 Philology: The role of written records 16 Linguistic prehistory

Historical Linguistics Introduction

Historical linguists study language change. If you were to ask practicing historical linguists why they study change in language, they would give you lots of different reasons, but certainly included in their answers would be that it is fun, exciting and intellectually engaging, that it involves some of the hottest topics in linguistics, and that it has important contributions to make to linguistic theory and to the understanding of human nature.

Why do historical linguists feel their field is important? 1.A grasp of the ways in which languages can change provides the student with a much better understanding of language in general, of how languages work, how their pieces fit together, and in general what makes them tick. 2.Historical linguistic methods have been looked to for models of rigour and excellence in other fields. Historical linguistic findings have been utilised to solve historical problems of concern to society which extend far beyond linguistics. 3.Historical linguistics contributes significantly to other sub-areas of linguistics and to linguistic theory. For example, human cognition and the human capacity for language learning are central research interests in linguistics, and historical linguistics contributes significantly to this goal.

What historical linguistics isn't Some possible misconceptions 1.Historical linguistics is not concerned with the history of linguistics, though historical linguistics has played an important role in the development of linguistic being, the main kind of linguistics practiced in the nineteenth century and indeed historical linguistic notions had a monumental impact in the humanities and social sciences, far beyond just linguistics.

2. Historical linguistics is not concerned with the ultimate origin of human language and how it may have evolved from non-human primate call systems, gestures, or whatever, to have the properties we now associate with human languages in general. 3. Historical linguistics is also not about determining or preserving pure, 'correct' forms of language or attempting to prevent change.

What historical linguistics about historical linguistics deals with language change. Historical linguistics is sometimes called diachronic linguistics (from Greek dia- 'through' + chronos 'time' + -ic), since historical linguists are concerned with change in language or languages over time. This is contrasted with synchronic linguistics, which deals with a language at a single point in time; for example, a grammar of present-day English as spoken in some particular speech community Often the study of the history of a single language is called philology, for example English philology, French philology, Hispanic philology and so on. (The term philology has several other senses as well.

The historical linguist may also study changes revealed in the comparison of related languages, often called comparative linguistics. We say that languages are related to one another when they descend from (are derived from) a single original language, a common ancestor: for example, the modern Romance languages (which include Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese and others) descend from earlier Latin. Some people imagine that historical linguists mostly just study the history of individual, properly called etymology (derived from Greek etumon 'true' (neuter form), that is, 'true or original meaning of a word'). The primary goal of historical linguistics is not etymologies, but accurate etymology is an important product of historical linguistic work. Let us, for illustration's sake, consider a couple of examples. Since word histories have a certain glamour about them for many people, let's check out the history of the word glamour itself. (Home activity)

Let's take goodbye as a second example. This everyday word has undergone several changes in its history. It began life in the late 1500s as god be with you (or ye), spelled variously as god be wy ye, god b 'uy, and so on. The first part changed to good either on analogy with such other greetings as good day, good morning and good night, or as a euphemistic deformation to avoid the blasphemy of saying god (taboo avoidance)or due to a combination of the two. The various independent words in god be with you were amalgamated into one, goodbye, and ultimately even this was shortened (clipped) to bye.

Kinds of Linguistic Changes: An English Example 1.Modern English (The New English Bible, 1961): Shortly afterwards the bystanders came up and said to Peter, 'Surely you are another of them; your accent gives you away!' 2. Early Modern English (The King James Bible, 1611): 2.And after a while came vnto him they that stood by, and saide to Peter, Surely thou also art one of them, for thy speech bewrayeth thee.

Grammatical change: Lexical change: Sound change: Borrowing: Changes in orthography: