Presentation to: 2006 Transportation Research Board Noise & Vibration Conference Williamsburg, VA Supplemental Tools for Environmental Noise Analysis Roger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aircraft Noise and Sound Insulation
Advertisements

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Sensitive Facilities Committee AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Louisville and Jefferson County MITIGATION ISSUES.
Airports and Land Use Compatibility A Practical Overview and Field Tools SWIFT CONFERENCE MONTREAL SEPTEMBER 14, 2011.
Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Prescreening Training Module 3 Noise Review.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
East Hampton Airport Phase I Noise Analysis Interim Report October 30, 2014 Prepared by Young Environmental Sciences and Noise Pollution Clearinghouse.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Environmental Impact Assessment: A Land Use Planning Tool Diane Sherman, Ben Purdy, and Sara Felker Department of Resource Development Introduction Environmental.
Trends & Indicators of Encroachment Association of California Airports 2007 Annual Fall Conference September 20, 2007 Lake Tahoe, CA.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airport Noise Basics Noise Analysis Overview 2010 Hershey Conference Chris Osburn, Env. Protection.
Juneau Flightseeing Noise Informational Work Session November 6, 2000.
1 Comprehensive Management Plan for East Hampton Airport  Safety, Noise and Operations Peter J. Kirsch December 1, 2011.
Katana Consulting | 1 Measuring Airport Noise March 2014 Kevin Terrell Katana Consulting.
Presented to: Hershey Aviation Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, Charlie Campbell & Suki Gill Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Environmental.
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base/Tucson Joint Land Use Study WELCOME! Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) Meeting July 23, 2003.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Natural Infrastructure Management Part II: Implementation Lt Col.
Introduction to Noise Control
Colin Cobbing Health effects of noise and EIA September 2014
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
1 Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Powered Aircraft: EPA Activities & Next Steps For National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Meredith Pedde May 21, 2015.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
OSU Airport – Overview of Master Plan and Draft Environmental Assessment Purpose of an Airport Environmental Assessment (EA) Identify environmental impacts.
IE341: Human Factors Engineering Prof. Mohamed Zaki Ramadan Lecture 6 – Auditory Displays.
San Francisco International Airport Community Managed Noise Mitigation.
EIA: A framework for ESDM. EIA: A Framework for ESDM. Visit Defining EIA Environmentally Impact Assessment is A formal process for.
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group NOISE ABATEMENT STRATEGIES Alternatives and Results New Zion Baptist Church Neighborhood Orientation and Discussion.
How does aircraft noise Affect the expansion of Airports.
Airport Noise and Land Use Compatibility
Canada Health Canada Santé Canada Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau National Guidelines for Environmental Assessment: Health Impacts of.
1 Road Weather Management Performance Metrics Development: An Update Chris Cluett, Leon Osborne, Arthur Handman, Jeff Jenq ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting.
Creating a Shared Vision Model. What is a Shared Vision Model? A “Shared Vision” model is a collective view of a water resources system developed by managers.
Wyle Aviation Services, Arlington, VA www.wylelabs.com Sustaining Your Airport - FAA Can’t Do It For You Wyle Aviation Services Joe Czech October.
INTRODUCTION  Industry-Wide Participation  Room to Improve Nighttime Flight Tracks  Comprehensive Approach  GOALS –Improve Efficiency –Enhance Safety.
Neighbor’s Committee Meeting Paul L. Shank P.E., C.M Chief Engineer July 14, 2015.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
East Hampton Airport Safety, Noise and Operational Management Plan Peter J. Kirsch December 1, 2011.
Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program Update Shreveport Regional Airport.
NEPA, Noise and the F/A-18 E/F Dan Cecchini Head, COMLANTFLT NEPA Support Atlantic Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command 7 April 2004.
East Hampton Airport Phase II Noise Analysis December 2, 2014.
Environmental Impacts Socio-Economic Environment Land Use Transportation System Design & Construction of Facilities Operations & Maintenance Activities.
Cognitive Impact on Children from Airplane Noise 2008.
NextGen for Noise Mitigation Paul Dunholter, P.E. BridgeNet International October 10, 2007.
Review of the Noise Compatibility Program Presentation to the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors October 29, 2002 Reid-Hillview Airport FAR Part 150.
Fourth Public Meeting June 20, 2002 Reid-Hillview Airport FAR Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Study.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Louisville and Jefferson County FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
Winery Ordinance Update Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report County of Santa Barbara July 16, 2014.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Tools for Expedited Regional Transportation Noise Modeling Jim Cowan and Ken Kaliski Resource Systems Group, Inc. White River Junction, VT.
Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval.
Monitoring and Evaluation. Objective Identify appropriate monitoring techniques. Identify approaches to evaluating plan implementation and effectiveness.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Record of Decision (ROD) Announcement Congressional Briefing Name: Steve Kelley Date: September 5, 2007 Federal.
NEPA, Noise and the Super Hornet Fred Pierson Navy East Coast AICUZ/RAICUZ Center of Excellence Center of Excellence NAVFAC Atlantic Division 7 April 2004.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration CHANGING NOISE CONTOURS AN FAA PERSPECTIVE NOISE MITIGATION SYMPOSIUM JOHN SILVA OCTOBER 2, 2006.
Gary Stowell Noise Abatement Manager San Jose International Airport The Next Step - An Airport Perspective.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Airport Land Use Relationship CE 633. errata Surrounding land use is difficult to control. Consider airspace issues with respect to local gov’ts and planning.
POLK RAIL QUIET ZONE ANALYSIS Conditions Assessment CSX “S” Line March 24, 2016.
Role of Environmental Justice in Land Use Planning Shankar B. Prasad, M.B.B.S. Community Health Advisor California Air Resources Board May 11, 2001 Statewide.
Town of Morrisville, NC November 2012 AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES.
Mary Ellen Eagan President Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. Using ‘Supplemental Metrics’ to Address the Effects of Noise on People TRB ADC40 Committee.
Santiago Hills II East Orange General Plan Noise Assessment Matthew B. Jones, P.E. Mestre Greve Associates.
Introduction to Noise Control Environmental Science Ithan B. Zimmer, Ph.D., P.E.
NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Completing the Package
Planning for Airport Noise The Roar of Discontent
Aircraft Noise Exposure Contour Update
Airport Land Use Relationship
9th Noise Expert Group Centre Borschette, Brussels, Belgium.
Airport Noise Modelling - Overview
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to: 2006 Transportation Research Board Noise & Vibration Conference Williamsburg, VA Supplemental Tools for Environmental Noise Analysis Roger Odegard Wyle Research & Consulting Acoustics--Aviation Services--GIS July 10, 2006

Overview  U.S. Federal Noise Policy  Traditional DNL Analysis  Supplemental Noise Analysis – Review of Metrics and Tools  Supplemental Noise Analysis – Next Steps and Future Research

U.S. Federal Noise Policy Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL) & Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL): U.S. Federal Agencies adopted DNL/CNEL as the primary metrics to describe noise exposure –Ref: EPA Levels Document, FICUN, FICON, FICAN Single-value metrics that defines the long-term, cumulative noise exposure. Defines significant threshold values for NEPA, Part 150, AICUZ, and similar studies. Applicable instrument for noise control around airports –Compatible land-use planning –Zoning restrictions –Sound insulation/acquisition/relocation programs (FAA)

Traditional DNL Analysis Recurring Issues: Reliance on DNL to communicate noise exposure –DNL is often hard to understand; not in lay terms –DNL alone does not fully convey a person’s everyday experience –Applies to community and non-technical decision makers DNL 65 dB Significance Threshold (DoD/FAA) –Historical Goal: maintain balance between the effects on people and the cost/feasibility of reducing the effects –Not a “line-in-the-sand” regulation, only a guideline for long-term planning –FAA defines this value as the threshold for mitigation (i.e., sound insulation and acquisition/relocation) funding –Unintended message that noise issues beyond 65 dB DNL do not need to be addressed Overall result is a mistrust in the validity and use of DNL

Traditional DNL Analysis Major issues not fully addressed by DNL –The use of layman’s terminology –Number, frequency, sound level, duration, and time-of-day for events –Applicability to Rural vs. Urban/suburban environments –Activity interference (speech/sleep) and quality-of-life issues Supplemental noise analysis is often needed to help the public and the decision makers better understand the complex nature of the overall noise environment.

Supplemental Noise Analysis – Metrics and Tools Broad term for analysis used to expand upon and support the traditional DNL analysis. –DNL remains the metric of choice for land-use compatibility and evaluating noise impacts (NEPA, Part 150, AICUZ) –Goal: breakout the component parts of DNL –Endorsed by FICAN in February 2002 position paper Includes graphics, maps, tables, technical analysis, and supplemental noise metrics.

Supplemental Noise Analysis Examples: Flight Density Maps Noise Exposure Maps – Visualization Tools Time-Above a Specified Sound Level (TA) Number-of-events Above a Specified Sound Level (NA)

Flight Frequency Maps Depicts modeled aircraft over- flight frequency and distribution Departure and arrival corridors better understood, in comparison to flight tracks Can focus in on special categories such as aircraft type, time of day, operation type, or air carrier

DNL Noise Exposure Maps Gradual Color Shading Technique DNL noise contours with a gradual color shading –Noise exposure shown beyond 65 dB DNL without requiring outer noise contours –Public response very positive Aerial photograph or base map overlays Helps describe the long-term “flow” of aircraft noise in a snapshot.

Time-Above a Specified Sound Level (TA) Definition - total time (usually minutes) that aircraft noise levels exceed a defined sound level threshold Uses - contour bands or tables at selected grid points. No defined Federal agency threshold levels

Number-of-Events Above a Specified Sound Level (NA) Definition - total number of aircraft events that exceed a defined sound level threshold over a desired time period. Sound level threshold can be defined in terms of Lmax or SEL. NA metric can be displayed as contour bands or tables at selected grid points. No defined federal agency threshold level.

Grid Point Analysis The Components of DNL Condition Averag e Annual Day (24 Hours) Number of Events Above (NA) Specified Sound Levels Time Above (TA) Specified Sound Levels Average Annual Day (24 Hours) Total NA 50+ SEL (ops) Nightti me (10:00 pm - 7:00 am) Average Annual Day (24 hours) DNL NA SEL (ops) NA SEL (ops) NA SEL (ops) NA SEL (ops) NA SEL (ops) NA SEL (ops) NA 80+ SEL (ops) NA 50 SEL (ops) TA 50 (min ) TA 55 (min ) TA 60 (min ) TA 65 (min ) Existing Condition Alternative <100 Change0.31< Existing Condition <1 Alternative <1 Change0.01< Existing Condition <10 Alternative <10 Change0.02<

Supplemental Noise Analysis Next Steps and Future Research Using supplemental analysis tools to extract out information within DNL is useful: –Communicates noise exposure in everyday terms –Decision makers are better informed of potential effects Does not disclose the long-term adverse impacts on: –Speech interference –Sleep disturbance –Other health and quality-of-life issues What thresholds are appropriate for various circumstances?

DoD Supplemental Metrics Guidelines Engage FICAN and JPDO/Environmental IPT to review Federal policy regarding supplemental metrics Literature review of research findings –Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment –Interference with Speech Communication –Sleep Disturbance –Among others Review of Legal Precedence – Studies Relying on Supplemental Analysis

Supplemental Tools for Environmental Noise Analysis Roger Odegard Wyle Research & Consulting Acoustics--Aviation Services--GIS Arlington, VA – El Segundo, CA wylelabs.com