September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Ad Hoc Science Committee for the Proposed Laboratory for Science and Engineering at Homestake Who am I and what am I doing here? Goals of the Committee Selection of the Members Charge to the Committee The Process Discussion

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Who am I and what am I doing here? I am a experimental physicist in: –HEP Fermilab E710, E557 –Particle Astrophysics Composition work with ground-based EAS arrays Milagro (Cygnus) Gamma Ray Experiments at Los Alamos – (spokesperson) (current) SuperKamiokande IceCube (current) Professor and Chair – Department of Physics University of Maryland Organizer of NeSS 2002

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Who am I and what am I doing here? How did I get involved in this? –On the NSF Review panel for the proposal –NY Times – “I was only opponent of the lab” –Was in the wrong place at the wrong time! –Ran NeSS 2002 (luckily in right place/right time) –Because of this NSF and South Dakota talk to me What special talents do I bring to this effort? –None! –David Berley, who is helping, brings significant expertise Many years at NSF – HEP, LIGO, etc Experience in HEP and Particle Astrophysics (+ NeSS) What experiment do I want to do in the underground lab? –None – I will be busy with Milagro & IceCube for the foreseeable future

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Who am I and what am I doing here? Why do I want an underground lab? –I am convinced that the science that can be done there is really exciting and worth the effort! I believe that the science coming from these types of experiments is some of the best and most interesting Having a deep lab will stimulate new experiments which push the frontier I believe that the time is right for a lab in Homestake now! –I want to see a strong particle astrophysics program at both DoE and NSF – this will be the flagship of that program –I want a strong advocate for the PA program (a lab director at the table)

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Goals First – get the players working together –You, South Dakota, NSF (DoE?) –Encourage (cajole, push, etc.) everyone to come up with a common plan for the lab Get the entire community behind your effort Solicit input from the entire community on requirements – starting from your plan Have a panel of experts review the plans and community input Make recommendations to your group

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Selection of the Committee Look for people who represent the constituencies who will use the lab (my bias – young people) Talk to NSF, DoE, HEPAP, NSAC, SAGENAP Look for experts in the various fields Look for people with experience running labs and big projects People from the various proposing groups A few engineers from your group and SD Take suggestions from the community

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Charge to the Committee Preamble –Several proposals have been made for a new deep underground science and engineering research facility in the United States. Three such proposals were submitted to the National Science Foundation, each with similar goals but located at three different sites. The NSF decided, based on the status of proposals in May 2003, that the Homestake Mine in Lead SD is the preferred site. Mining operations at Homestake stopped at the end of 2001 and transfer of the mine from the Barrick Gold Corporation to the state of South Dakota is being negotiated. The scientific proponents of the Homestake site submitted a detailed Project Book to the NSF in August This Project Book describes a base plan for the conversion of the Homestake Mine to a laboratory. –The purpose of this Committee is to provide a venue for scientific input and discussion regarding the Homestake Mine conversion and the development of a vigorous program of deep underground science and technology.

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Charge to the Committee Requirements Document –The Requirements Document summarizes the requirements the scientific and engineering program will place on the design and operations of the facility. It will allow the NSF to verify that the facility proposed in the Project Book will meet the community’s needs (and to suggest changes in the proposal if it does not). Similarly it will help South Dakota negotiate a site transfer and use agreement consistent with the community’s proposed use of the site. The committee will draft a requirements document, circulate it broadly in the science and engineering community, and refine the document based on comments received.

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Charge to the Committee Requirements Document –The committee will draft a requirements document, circulate it broadly in the science and engineering community, and refine the document based on comments received. –This will be based on your proposal

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Charge to the Committee Laboratory program. –Comment on the proposed experimental program and educational and outreach program at the laboratory. Scientific Program. –Provide your view of the scope and timescale of programs needed for the support of experiments, theory, and research and development. Also comment on the support needed for experiments at other underground laboratory facilities. National security –National security is expected to be an important activity and is expected to require secure areas. Provide your view on mechanisms to maintain free and open access by other users to their apparatus, while still meeting the requirements for secure activities.

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Charge to the Committee Management Plan. –The Project Book contains a suggested management plan for the laboratory. The committee will be asked to comment on the adequacy of this plan, and to suggest possible improvements. The management plan must define a mutually satisfactory relationship between the NSF, as the responsible federal agency; the scientific manager, which will operate the laboratory under a cooperative agreement with the NSF and a use agreement with the State; and the State of South Dakota, the proposed site landlord. Careful consideration must be given to environmental and safety issues where laboratory manager and state (as guarantor of public safety and as site landlord) responsibilities overlap. Other Laboratories. –Comment on the relationship with other laboratories such as Soudan and WIPP in the US and SNO, Gran Sasso and Kamiokande abroad.

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman The Process - Committee Pick the Committee –Do most work electronically and with conference calls Break out the requirements for the labs facilities from your document (we need your help) Solicit comments –Use Lead/NeSS lists –Use electronic discussion forums Study management and integration plans Get feedback from you Write a report with recommendations to you

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman The Parallel Process Homestake Conversion Project –Created by the State of South Dakota Dick Gowen heads the project w/a number of working groups –They are negotiating with Barrick for transfer of the mine –Gov. Mike Rounds has proposed setting up a "Authority" to take over the legal liability issue for the state's ownership of the mine –The conversion project will do the prep work to facilitate the creation of the Authority by a special session of the SD legislature – liability, safety, environmental, legal, etc. –Gowen has invited full participation by your group in the project! –They will provide funds for engineering work to study the infrastructure, dewatering, etc. –They will provide funds (through Maryland) for the committee’s expenses (phone, travel, web support, etc).

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman The Process What David and I will do –I will organize the effort –I will keep everyone informed of the progress What we want –Support from your group –Support from the community –Open communications Our Goal: –A proposal from you to NSF that has the support of the entire community!

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman What if Things Don’t Work Out at Homestake? If legal, cost, other considerations stop Homestake – –The review of the requirements document will still be useful –The review of issues associated with safety and management will still be useful –Community support for the effort will still be useful

September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman One more thing What if I say/write something you don’t like? –Ask yourself why did I do this? I was busy and I didn’t have time to get it completely right? –I am department chair and very busy with 75 faculty I am an insensitive lout? –I am a physicist – remember the winning bumper sticker I am a moron? –I am a department chair –Call me or send me a note If I didn’t mean it, I will change it If it’s physics and we disagree: –let’s fight about it – that’s the fun part!