THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 1 UCB, 07/08/2003 REQUIREMENT DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW Ellen R. Taylor Mission Systems Engineer Space Science Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Advertisements

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR Project Management.
Innovation You Can Count On™ 1 Payload Integration Wendi Otto Systems Engineer, Pegasus and Taurus Launch Vehicles October 4, 2007 All Information Approved.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT I&T Subsystem CDR, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 4 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Aug. 14, 2001 Scott Williams 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Operations Center Scott.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
THEMIS INSTRUMENT PER 1 UCB, May, 2005 EMC / Mag Instrument Test Plan & Results Michael Ludlam University of California - Berkeley.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
FIELDS iCDR Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR Introduction 1Peter Harvey.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Systems Engineering Mike Pryzby Swales Aerospace August 16-17, 2005.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
THEMIS Instrument CDR(1) UCB, April 19 & 20, 2004 Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California - Berkeley.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
THEMIS FDMO Review Management Topics − 1 October 5, 2004 Management Topics Manfred Bester.
THEMIS MISSION PDROVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November 12, UCB/Swales should identify an individual that will assume responsibility for magnetic cleanliness.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section XX 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering WBS Dick Horn.
THEMIS peer Instrument CDR 1 CETP, Paris, April 8, 2004 THEMIS Mission Status at Peer UCB Instrument Critical Design Review UCB, April 19/20, 2004 Vassilis.
Section Number - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Communication Systems Jason A. Soloff NASA/GSFC Code 567 August 16-17, 2005.
THEMIS FGM CDR Peer ReviewBerlin, April 6, UCB/Swales should identify an individual that will assume responsibility for magnetic cleanliness on.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Overview CRaTER PDR 6/27/2005 Craig Tooley.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.
THEMIS SUITE PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1 UCB May 2, 2005 THEMIS Pre-Environmental Review Instrument Verification Overview Ellen Taylor University of California.
THEMIS IDPU PDR I&T REQUIREMENTS- 1 UCB, October 16, 2003 I&T REQUIREMENTS Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
THEMIS MISSION PDROVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November 12, 2003 THEMIS MISSION SYSTEM OVERVIEW Dr. Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
THEMIS INSTRUMENT PDROVERVIEW- 1 UCB, October 15, 2003 THEMIS SYSTEM OVERVIEW Dr. Vassilis Angelopoulos, Science Overview Dr. Ellen Taylor, Mission and.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun Mission Operations Review News Elena Adams 7/16/2015.
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
FM1 Instrument Suite Pre-Ship Review (PSR)INT- 1 UCB September 21, 2005 THEMIS FM1 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) INTEGRATION AND TEST PLANS Jeremy.
THEMIS MISSION PDRINSTRUMENT OVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November, 2003 THEMIS INSTRUMENT PAYLOAD SYSTEM OVERVIEW Dr. Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
September 10, FY 2003 Plans Bob Simmons. September 10, Introduction Overview of Project and Engineering Plans Project Plans Engineering Plans.
ITAR Restricted Data 1THEMIS Mission CDR 6/18/04 System Safety Overview WBS Element Tim Keepers (301)
THEMIS Instrument PDRMission Assurance- 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 THEMIS Mission Assurance Preliminary Design Review Ron Jackson University of California.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 1 STEREO Product Assurance Ron Jackson
THEMIS SRR Mission Requirements - 1 UCB July MISSION REQUIREMENTS Ellen R. Taylor Mission Systems Engineer Space Science Laboratory University.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 9 EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
GLAST LAT ProjectPeer Review & CDR Preparation Document: LAT-PR Preparation Schedule Subsystems Peer Reviews –ACD January 7-8, 2003 –CALMarch.
FM4/FM5 IPSRSYS - 1 UCB, May 5, 2006 THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM4/FM5 PRE-SHIP REVIEW SYSTEM OVERVIEW Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January Instrument Pre-Environmental Review Safety and Mission.
THEMIS MISSION PDROVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November 12, 2003 THEMIS MISSION SYSTEM OVERVIEW Dr. Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) SRR/Mechanical System August 16-18, 2005
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
CINEMA System Engineering
THEMIS Mission Assurance
0.0 Instrument Suite Name Presenter’s name
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Systems Engineering Management
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Click to add title Planning for LSST Verification George Angeli LSST All Hands Meeting Tucson August 15, 2016.
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
HMI Top Level Requirements
PSS verification and validation
Presentation transcript:

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 1 UCB, 07/08/2003 REQUIREMENT DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW Ellen R. Taylor Mission Systems Engineer Space Science Laboratory University of California - Berkeley

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 2 UCB, 07/08/2003 Requirement Process –Requirement Development and Verification Plan –Requirement Flow-down Requirement Documentation –Mission Requirements Database (MRD) Description –Requirements Document Tree –Key Requirement and Interface Documents –Requirement Control Resources –Resource Allocation –Resource Tracking and Control Requirement Overview

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 3 UCB, 07/08/2003 Requirement Development Top-Level requirements developed during Phase A –Concept Study Report provides basic mission concept –Outlines top-level requirements imposed by science and programmatic objectives Mission requirements flown down (to subsystem level), formalized and documented early in Phase B –All elements of the THEMIS CSR concept and mission requirements reviewed by development team Instrument Internal Review - May 25, 26 Probe and Probe Carrier Internal Review - May 26 Ground System Requirements Review - June 2 Science Requirements Review - June 3,4 –Mission Requirements Database (MRD) developed and reviewed Probe and Probe Carrier MRD Review - June 17 Mission MRD Review - June 24, 25 –Finalize Mission Requirements Database and put under Configuration Control System Requirements Review (SRR) - July 8, 9 Ensures requirements are well understood down to subsystem level, attainable and sufficient to meet mission objectives prior to detailed preliminary design

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 4 UCB, 07/08/2003 Requirement Development & Verification Subsystem Interfaces and Component Requirements further detailed in Phase B –Interface Control Documents between Subsystems and Institutions –System and Subsystem Specifications (Electrical Spec, SOWs, etc) –Mission Plans and Policies (Safety Plan, Risk Mitigation Plan, etc) –Control Plans (Magnetics, Electrostatic Cleanliness, Contamination) Requirement Verification Plans developed in Phase B and C –Mission Requirements Document evolves into a Verification Matrix ensuring test or analysis is scheduled for all Mission Requirements in MRD –Performance Verification Plan and Environmental Test Specification provides launch and space environments and outlines comprehensive component, subsystem and system level test program Requirements Compliance and Verification Matrices completed in Phase D –Mission Requirements Document evolves into summary of test program as run –Documents Verification and Compliance Status of all Requirements –Provides direct traceability from requirements to test procedures and reports

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 5 UCB, 07/08/2003 Requirement Flow-down Science Goals/ Objectives Mech. Req. Power Req. Thermal Req. Harness Req. Software Req. ACS Req. Level 1 (Drivers) Level 2 (System/ Segment) Level 3 (Element) Level 4 (Subsystem) Component Level Assembly Level Subassembly Level Part Level Comm. Req. Mech. Req. Harness Req. Gnd Sta. Req. MOC Req. SOC Req. OPS Req. GMAG Req. ASI Req. Site Req. Obs. Req. All lower levels are the responsibility of the Subsystem Leads Instrument Performance Requirements derived directly from Level 1 Science Requirements C&DH Req. RCS. Req. ACS. Req. Thm. Req. FGM Req. ESA Req. SST Req. SCM Req. EFI Req. IDPU Req. WBS 1.2 Level 1 Science Programmatic Constraints WBS 1.1 Budget Schedule R&QA Rules/ Regulations WBS 1 Contract Deliverables Reviews Operations Concept WBS 1.3 Mission Phases States and Modes Space System Requirements WBS 2 Mission Design (Lifetime, orbits, etc) Fault Tolerance, Redundancy Environment (radiation, thermal, etc) Resource Budgets Contamination Interface Requirements Launch Vehicle Requirements WBS 2 Ground System Requirements WBS 3,4,5 Environment (vibration, etc) Constraints (mass, shroud, etc) Test Requirements Launch Site requirements Safety Instrument Requirements WBS 2.1 Probe Bus Requirements Probe Carrier Requirements WBS 2.2.2WBS GBO Requirements Operation/ Ground Station Requirements WBS 3.3 WBS Management WBS Science WBS Systems Engineering WBS 2 - Space Segment WBS 3 - Ground Segment WBS 4 - Operations Preparations WBS 5 - Mission Ops/Data Analysis WBS Instrumentation WBS Spacecraft WBS Mission Operations WBS Science Operations WBS Ground Based Ops WBS 3.1, 3.2 Mission Requirements Mission Flow-down Instrument Derived

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 6 UCB, 07/08/2003 Database Description Requirement Categories tracked explicitly in Database –Functional/Performance Requirements (Science, Mission Design and Operations based) –Resource Requirements (Mass, Power, Data Allocations, etc.) –Interface Requirements (Timing, Power Distribution, etc.) –Environmental Requirements (Thermal, Radiation, Contamination, etc.) Requirement Categories tracked by Program Management –Cost –Schedule –Personnel –Facilities Database Tool –Excel Spreadsheet Tool, developed by Swales –Each requirement has a separate row with Unique ID –Provides direct trace-ability with use of Parent, Child IDs for each requirement

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 7 UCB, 07/08/2003 Database Attributes

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 8 UCB, 07/08/2003 Requirements Document Tree MIDEX Announcement of Opportunity Program Assurance Requirements GSFC-410-MIDEX-002 Quality System based on ANSI/ASQ Q Workmanship Standards NASA-STD-8739 Safety EWR Instructions for EEE Parts Selection GSFC 311-INST-001 GEVS-SE (as applicable) NASA-STD June 1998 AO Proposal Phase A Concept Study Report (CSR) Mission Requirements Database (MRD) Performance Assurance and Implementation Plan (PAIP) Electrical System Specification Contract NASA/UCB SOWs, T&Cs, CDRLs Contract UCB/Swales SOWs, T&Cs, CDRLs Verification Plan and Environmental Specification Contamination Control Plans (MAG/ESC/Cont) Interface Control Documents (ICDs) THEMIS Program Plans Master Schedule WBS & WBS Dictionary Org Chart & Staffing Program CM Plan Risk Mgmt Plan Safety Plan - MSPSP Reporting Requirements Subsystem Specifications Design Documents Schematics Material and Parts Lists Mechanical Drawings Assembly Drawings Procured Component SOWs Acceptance Data Packages Software Development Plans Integration and Test Plans Subsystem Test Plans Test Procedures Probe / Probe Carrier Document Tree Instrument Document Tree Ground System Document Tree NASA Controlled Documents ELV System Safety Milestone & Process Flow Program-Level Req. for the THEMIS Project (Level 1 Science)

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 9 UCB, 07/08/2003 Key Requirement Documents Interface Control Plans: Sign-off by PDR –Instruments-to-IDPU ICDs (covers software, data, electrical) –Instruments-to-Probe ICDs (covers mechanical, thermal, contamination) –Probe-to-IDPU ICD (electrical and mechanical) –Probe-to-Probe Carrier ICD –Launch Vehicle ICD (Boeing Mission Specification) –Ground System ICDs (Space-to-Ground link, Ground Station, Data System) Electrical System Specification: Sign-off by PDR –Provides Electrical Standards for board design –System Plans for grounding, EMI, EMC, etc. Contamination Control Plans: Draft by PDR, Sign-off by CDR –Separate Plans for Magnetics, Electrostatic Cleanliness (ESC) and Molecular Contamination –Provides contamination budgets, best design practice guidelines and verification plans Verification Plan and Environmental Specification: Draft by PDR, Sign-off by CDR –Performance Verification Plan –Qualification Philosophy and Test Levels (Acceptance, Qualification, Protoflight) –Vibration/Loads/Shock Environments –Thermal Vacuum/Balance Environments –EMI/EMC/Magnetics/ESC Test Requirements –Mission Simulations and RF Compatibility Testing

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 10 UCB, 07/08/2003 Requirement Control Mission Requirements Document placed under configuration control after SRR –Sign-off MRD following recommendations from the SRR review team –MRD under revision control until PDR, ownership resides with MSE –Changes to MRD after PDR will require formal notice - Engineering Change Order (ECO) Requirements Control/Concurrence implemented throughout project –All changes to controlled documents require concurrence by appropriate team members Subsystem trades (level 4) can be made within the resources of the subsystem. Systems Engineer insight and involvement. Trades that impact subsystem/system interfaces or resource allocations (level 3/level 2) require concurrence by the Configuration Control Board (CCB): Principal Investigator, Project Manager, Mission Systems Engineer (MSE), Probe Systems Engineer, Mission Operations Manager and affected Team Leads. GSFC Mission Manager insight. Trades that impact Level 1 baseline science/programmatic requirements must include approval by Principal Investigator and GSFC Mission Manager. Trades that impact Level 1 minimum science/programmatic requirements must include approval by NASA HQ. –Document Revision and Signature Pages (with initial approval for each revision) maintains history and protects against uncoordinated/unauthorized change

THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 11 UCB, 07/08/2003 Resource Tracking and Control In order to ensure that the design will meet Mission Requirements, Systems Engineering controls the following key resources: –Mass (dry mass, delta-V, propellant margin) –Power –Telemetry (data budget) –RF Link Margin Resource Requirements have been flowed down to the Probe, Probe Carrier, and Instrument Payload in the MRD Each Instrument and Probe Subsystem includes: –Current Best Estimate (CBE), updated periodically as the design matures –Contingency, based on design maturity Concept 25%, Design 15%, Prior Build 7.5%, Fabrication 4%, Flight 2% –System not-to-exceed allocation (current CBE + contingency) documented in Mission Requirements Database Sum of not-to-exceeds is less than the System Capability providing Program Managers Margin held at UCB All Resources closely tracked throughout program –Continually tracked and updated by System Engineers (Probe and Instrument) –Periodically (once a month) reported to and reviewed by MSE and PM –Periodically (once a month) reported to NASA Mission Manager