WEDI Innovation Summit Liora Alschuler, Lantana Consulting Group Chief Executive Officer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday August 19, 2013.
HL7 Quality Reporting Document Architecture DSTU
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.
EVital Records Initiative What we learned and what comes next.
HelsIT 2010 Alberto Sáez Torres Sacyl Interoperability Office Junta de Castilla y León Experience of ePrescription in Spain using HL7 V3 September 21 th,
S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG)
Creating a Revolution to Drive Healthcare Transformation Russ Branzell, FCHIME, CHCIO CEO/President November 2014.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Quality Measurement Task Force Summary Deck 2016 Inpatient Prospective Payment System June 15, 2015 Cheryl Damberg, Co-Chair Kathleen Blake, Co-Chair.
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
An Introduction to Electronic Health Records
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Riki Merrick, APHL Anna Orlova, PhD, PHDSC Lise Stevens, FDA Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA – CDC CSTE Conference June 5 th, 2012 The findings and conclusions.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
The Final Standards Rule John D. Halamka MD. Categories of Standards Content Vocabulary Privacy/Security.
Update on Newborn Screening Use Case Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases in Newborns and Children - Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases in Newborns.
Public Health Case Reporting Workflow Brief Profile Proposal for presented to the QRPH Planning Committee John P. Abellera, MPH September 29,
HL7 Webinar: Mobile Health Chuck Jaffe Austin Kreisler John Quinn 19 March 2012.
HITSP’s Scope  The Panel’s mission is to assist in the development of a Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) by addressing the standards-related.
An Update on MUSC Performance in “Meaningful Use” of Electronic Health Record (EHR) Barton L. Sachs, M.D., MBA Professor of Orthopaedics Chief Medical.
1 Health Level Seven (HL7) Report Out Population Science and Structured Documents Workgroup (SDWG) Riki Ohira September 22, 2011.
Toolkit for Planning an EHR-based Surveillance Program | HL7 Clinical Document Architecture An Introduction.
Brief Profile Proposal for 2014/15 presented to the Quality, Research & Public Health (QRPH) Planning Committee Lisa R. Nelson, Lantana Consulting Group.
Public Health Data Standards A View from the Front Lines Bethesda, MD March 17, 2004 Presentation to PUBLIC HEALTH DATA STANDARDS CONSORTIUM 2004 ANNUAL.
EHR System (EHR-S) Functional Requirements Implementation Guide: Laboratory Results Interface (LRI) Kickoff March 3 rd,
Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.
Hospital Information System
Hurdles and Solutions for the Interoperable EHR John W, Loonsk, MD FACMI Chief Medical Officer CGI.
© 2011 Lantana Consulting Group, 1 Open Health Tools Membership Presentation July Lantana Consulting Group Transforming healthcare.
Query Health Vendor Advisory Meeting 12/15/2011. Agenda Provide Overview of Query Health Seek Guidance and Feedback on Integration Approaches.
PHDSC Meeting, MD, Nov. 8-9, 2012 Standards Development in support of Public Health EHDI Program Lisa R. Nelson, MS, MBA Public Health Data Standards Consortium.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
2012 Annual Meeting “Towards Public Health Sector Transformation and Section Unity” ACHIEVING PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS THROUGH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STANDARDIZATION.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 3b National and International Standards Developing.
September, 2005Cardio - June 2007 IHE for Regional Health Information Networks Cardiology Uses.
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development 1.
MATT REID JULY 28, 2014 CCDA Usability and Interoperability.
Andrew Howard Chief Executive OfficerClinical Advisor Mukesh Haikerwal.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
West Virginia Information Technology Summit November 4, 2009.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard University February 24, 2010.
Health Story Project: Using Standards to Get to Meaningful Use: Exchange Basic Records and Meet Early Requirements Kim Stavrinaki s.
Component 3-Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Unit 14-What is Health Information Management and Technology? This material was developed.
Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 14 What is Health Information Management and Technology?
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.
© 2012 Lantana Consulting Group, 1 Analysis Process.
Louisiana’s Vision for Health Information Technology Joshua Hardy State Health IT Coordinator.
Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge -There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.
© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
CDA Overview HL7 CDA IHE Meeting, February 5, 2002 Slides from Liora Alschuler, alschuler.spinosa Co-chair HL7.
Walter G. Suarez, MD, MPH – Kaiser Permanente Floyd Eisenberg, MD, MPH – iParsimony, LLC Co-Chairs, HL7 Clinical Quality Information Workgroup Presented.
Pushing Ahead of Technology for CPCi and PCMH When Providers are Struggling to Catch Up Bryan L. Goddard, M.D. CapitalCare Medical Group Albany, N.Y. December.
Tung Tran, Ph.D. What is the EMR? Computerized legal medical record created by healthcare organizations Enables storage and retrieval of patient information.
© 2014 By Katherine Downing, MA, RHIA, CHPS, PMP.
Case Study: HL7 Conformance in VA Imaging Mike Henderson Principal Consultant Eastern Informatics, Inc.
Pharmacy Health Information Technology Collaborative Date: April 28, 2016 Presenter:Shelly Spiro, RPh, FASCP Pharmacy HIT Collaborative Executive Director.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 2 Clinical Information Standards – Unit 3 seminar Electronic.
An Introduction to Electronic Health Records
eHealth Standards and Profiles in Action for Europe and Beyond
Nutrition in HL7 Standards
Nutrition in HL7 Standards
WP1: D 1.3 Standards Framework Status June 25, 2015
Incentives for Interoperable EHR Adoption…. …
Electronic Health Record Update
Undergraduate Courses
Public Health Electronic Case Reporting (eCR)
Creating fhir® Clinical Documents with Trifolia & Camara
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

WEDI Innovation Summit Liora Alschuler, Lantana Consulting Group Chief Executive Officer

Liora Alschuler, CEO Background in electronic text, how to make large amounts of information usable on a computer I volunteer a lot: HL7, WEDI, HIMSS Health Story Current day job as Lantana CEO Participate in the CDA Academy ( About me

Do We Have the Right Standards and Processes for Implementing New Payment Models?

Standards and Processes ● Standards, pretty much ● Processes, not so much ● We can get there from here ●Quick tour of standards ●A look at some process barriers (& directions) Do We Have the Right Standards and Processes for Implementing New Payment Models?

● Admission, Discharge, Transfer: ADT – Been around for about 20 years – The who/when/where/what (high-level) – In well over 90% of US hospitals – Clinical exchange standards use compatible data set – More than adequate for patient identification Bird’s Eye View of Standards

● ADT ● Laboratory Results – Been around for almost 20 years – Use predominantly local codes – Under MU Stage 1, over 80% of hospitals included structured lab results into an EHR – Recent agreement on HL with LOINC Bird’s Eye View of Standards

● ADT ● Lab ● Standard Terminology – LOINC, ICD, CPT, SNOMED, NUBC, etc. – Unified Medical Language System ® (UMLS) – VSAC

Bird’s Eye View of Standards ● ADT ● Lab ● Standard Terminology ● Context: Templated elements – HL7 Reference Information Model – Constrained to Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) – Constrained by Implementation Guides: Consolidated CDA Templates for ●Data elements ●Sections ●Documents

Bird’s Eye View of Standards ● ADT ● Lab ● Standard Terminology ● Context: Templated elements/C-CDA ● Reporting: CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network – Public reporting of healthcare associated infections – Adopted by CMS for quality reporting on Hospital Compare ● MU Standards for quality reporting – Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA) – Health Quality Measure Format (HQMF)

● ADT ● Lab ● Standard Terminology ● Context: Templated elements/C-CDA ● Reporting: CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network ● MU Standards for quality reporting ● Extensibility: There is always one more data element needed… ●Open templates ●Un-/semi-structured information ● Gaps? – Still assessing methods of validation, quality controls – Yes, still way ahead of industry capacity to implement Bird’s Eye View of Standards

Standards and Processes ● Standards, pretty much ● Processes, not so much ● Bird’s eye view of standards ● Barriers to implementation Do We Have the Right Standards and Processes for Implementing New Payment Models?

● Technical – Application infrastructure oriented to structured information ●Every enterprise has both structured and semi-/unstructured information ●That’s why we have databases & document management – Infrastructure incentives support structured information ●EHR is a database ●We need comparable infrastructure for document management ●Integration between document and data oriented resources – Impact ●Incomplete record ●Overuse of structured “summaries” in place of narrative ●Contributes to continued reliance on manual abstraction for validation Barriers to Implementation

● Technical ● Regulatory – Balance objectives within a long-range roadmap supported by a clear architecture; see GAO EHR Programs – Keep it really really simple Barriers to Implementation

Keep it really really simple Gall's Law is a rule of thumb from John Gall's Systemantics: How Systems Really Work and How They Fail:rule of thumbJohn GallSystemantics –A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. –The inverse proposition also appears to be true: A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be made to work. You have to start over, beginning with a working simple system.

● Technical ● Regulatory ● Economic – Incentives achieve limited objectives, may introduce distortion – Market value of interoperability emerging – Value needs to accrue to those who bear the cost Barriers to Implementation

Standards and Processes ● Standards, pretty much ● Processes, not so much ● Conclusions Do We Have the Right Standards and Processes for Implementing New Payment Models?

Do we have standards & process? We have standards To cover a comprehensive record, implement the simpler standards – Recent ballot for “complete” structured documents provides counter-point – HIMSS Health Story Project eliciting strong positive response Role of regulation & market forces – Regulation strong force, backed by incentives – Alignment of incentives with market required New Payment Models can provide value, encouraging and enabling the adoption and implementation of the standards and processes required – in other words, it is an iterative and symbiotic process – Payment models can incentivize new HIT management – New HIT management can support new payment models A few conclusions

Liora Alschuler, CEO