OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Texas Feed and Fertilizer Control Service Agriculture Analytical Service Aflatoxin Risk Management Tim Herrman Professor,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Principles of GMP
Advertisements

Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Grade “A” Laboratory Evaluation Program Ronald G. Brown Dairy Product Specialist/Laboratory Evaluation Officer NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
Public and Private Interests in Animal Research LAT Chapter 1.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
External Defibrillators: Recalls, Inspections, and the Quality System Regulation Melissa Torres Office of Compliance December 15, 2010.
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
1 MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATION’S FOODSERVICE AND RETAIL FOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM.
Good Hygiene Practices Incoming Material Requirements Section 2 - Sub-Module 5.2.
Unit #7 - Basic Quality Control for the Clinical Laboratory
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Counting and Claiming Presented by: Linda Stull Grants Coordination and School Support School Nutrition Training and Programs.
AFLATOXIN REGULATORY ISSUES Garnett E. Wood, Ph.D. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Center for Food Safety and.
Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs)
World Health Organization
OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Texas Feed and Fertilizer Control Service Agriculture Analytical Service OTSC Statistically Derived Risk-Based Plan-of-Work.
West Virginia University Laboratory Training Module 1. OSHA Laboratory Standard.
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
WWLC Standard Operating Procedures Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
FDA Regulatory review in Minutes: What Product Development Executives Need-to-Know. Specifically, frequent causes of recalls and related areas that investigators.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
Section 5: Purchasing Rules
Farmer’s Markets: Approved Foods and Health Licensing
Good Manufacturing Practice. Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations Establishes minimum GMP for methods to be used, and the facilities or controls to.
National Food Service Management Institute The University of Mississippi.
Product Labels – Defending the Use of Processed Foods Michigan Department of Education School Nutrition Programs Annual Conference – June 2015.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service February William C. Smith Assistant Administrator Office of Program.
FDA Recommendations: Sampling Plans for Blood Establishments Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer OBRR/CBER/FDA October 19, 2012.
Important informations
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Laboratory Laboratory (29 CFR ) (29 CFR ) Standard Hygiene Hygiene.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
An Overview of Time, Effort, and Resources Needs in the implementation of Public Law The Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004.
OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Texas Feed and Fertilizer Control Service Agriculture Analytical Service WBFI Ricky Schroeder Manager Feed & Fertilizer.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Field Operations.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Module 2Slide 1 of 26 WHO - EDM Quality Management Basic Principles of GMP Part One.
Product Labels.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
Control Charts and Trend Analysis for ISO 17025
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Animal Raising Claims in the Labeling of Meat and Poultry Products October 14, 2008 United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection.
? Training removes doubt, instills confidence, and lays the foundation for everyone’s skill and experience level.
Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Compliance: GMPs EXPLAINED.
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Draft Labeling Policy Guidance for N- 60 Testing Claims for Boneless Beef Manufacturing.
Introduction to Quality Assurance. Quality assurance vs. Quality control.
APTECA GOOD MORNING - WELCOME
AFLATOXIN REGULATORY ISSUES
Quality is a Lousy Idea-

Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Unit #6 - Basic Quality Control for the Clinical Laboratory
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
Good Laboratory Practices
Lesson 8 Good Production Practice #8
Quality Control Lecture 3
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Presentation transcript:

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Texas Feed and Fertilizer Control Service Agriculture Analytical Service Aflatoxin Risk Management Tim Herrman Professor, State Chemist and Director

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST

Texas Feed and Fertilizer Control Service Agriculture Analytical Service

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST FDA Aflatoxin Action Levels ppbProduct Description 20Corn, peanut products, cottonseed meal, and other animal feeds and feed ingredients intended for dairy animals, for animal species or uses not specified above, or when the intended use is not known 20Corn, peanut products, and other animal feeds and feed ingredients, but excluding cottonseed meal, intended for immature animals 100Corn and peanut products intended for breeding beef cattle, breeding swine, or mature poultry 200Corn or peanut products intended for finishing swine of 100 pounds or greater 300Corn and peanut products intended for finishing (i.e., feedlot) beef cattle

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST

Boryan et al. 2008

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST State Climatologist: Global surface temperatures likely to set a new record this year 2010 NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory false-color image

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Outline  Statistically derived risk-based plan of work  A good utilization of resources  Co-Regulation of aflatoxin risk as a preventive control  Greatly improved aflatoxin testing accuracy in the regulated community and increased confidence  Risk Assessment of the FDA blending waiver  A predictable level of milk contamination in Texas occurred in 2012 from Midwest corn  Policy Considerations  FDA should make permanent and nationwide the blending of 0 to 500 ppb aflatoxin contaminated corn  Use of aflatoxin binders

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Statistically derived risk-based plan of work: binomial probability statistics Wilson interval:

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Harvested Corn Mycotoxin Work Plan Estimated for a 95% Confidence Interval Wilson interval: Total Samples Violation rate Lower limit Upper limit CI length

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Harvested Corn Mycotoxin Work Plan Estimated Sample Size Sample Size: Acceptable error: AnalyteNViolation rate Sample size, min Sample size, max Mycotoxin50,

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Co-Regulation of aflatoxin risk as a preventive control

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Aflatoxin Measurement Accuracy among 43 Grain Elevators in Texas Aflatoxin Control Average (ppb) Low (ppb) High (ppb) Relative Standard Deviation 52 ppb % 378 ppb % 580 ppb %

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Performance of test kits on samples with different levels of mycotoxins

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Approved Equipment Training for Individual Employees Proficiency Verification Process Management & Recordkeeping Monitoring & Corrective Actions  Standardized methods  Standardized training  Verification of employee performance  Documented program outcomes  Monitoring & corrective actions  Reduced market and food safety risk One Sample Strategy Components

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Approval Process 1. Sampling & Testing Plan 2. Training to review criteria 3. Background check 4. Proficiency evaluation 5. Approved as a designee of OTSC

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST X FRONT REAR X X X XXX X 2’ X X X X X X XX FRONT REAR Criteria: Sampling  Minimum 5-pound sample collected from each incoming truck or trailer  USDA representative sampling patterns  6’ spiral hand probe PATTERN 1: 7 probes for trucks or trailers loaded with grain more than 4 feet deep PATTERN 2: 9 probes for trucks or trailers loaded with grain less than 4 feet deep

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Criteria: Grinding  Grind the entire 5 lb. sample  Collect at least 500 grams of the ground sample  70% of the particles pass through a 20 mesh sieve after grinding

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Certificate of Analysis  Elevator collects sample information in an Excel spreadsheet  Elevator prints certificates for incoming & submitted samples >20 ppb aflatoxin  Data is reported to OTSC & shared with RMA

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Full ParticipantOutbound Participant All incoming loads are sampled & grain is always segregated. Seal is attached to outbound documentation. Some or all inbound and/or outbound loads are sampled. Seal is attached to printed outbound test results. Outbound Seals

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST OTSC Monitoring  Employee performance  Equipment performance  Grinder check  Lab scale calibration record  OTSC control standard record  HPLC analysis of verificaton samples

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST 80 ppb Acceptable range: ppb Company A Company B Control Chart

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST OTSC Corrective Actions  Oversee adjustment or repair of equipment  Oversee retraining of personnel  Report missing or non-compliant equipment  Report records that are missing, inaccurate, or appear to reflect poor performance  Suspend or remove an employee or firm

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST A Preventive Approach to Aflatoxin Risk Management 80 ppb Acceptable range: ppb 201 3

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST 2013 Aflatoxin Verification Results

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Performance curve comparing OTSC and One Sample Strategy verification results

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Risk Analysis  There are "known knowns." There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know. Donald Rumsfeld, United States Secretary of Defense Press Conference at NATO Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium, June 6, 2002

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST 2012 Drought in the US corn belt and FDA Blending Provisions The above ‐ referenced Blending Firm hereby agrees that it shall comply with following conditions when blending corn containing aflatoxin in concentrations of higher than 20 ppb (parts per billion) and less than 500 ppb with corn containing aflatoxin in concentrations of less than 20 ppb: a. Corn contaminated with aflatoxin above 20 ppb may be blended with other corn to the extent that the resulting product is below the appropriate aflatoxin action level in corn used as or in animal feed. The blended corn will be shipped in interstate commerce or for use as or in feed for mature poultry, breeding swine, and finishing swine over 100 pounds, breeding cattle and finishing (feedlot) cattle as long as the aflatoxin levels are below the action levels set forth in FDA Guidance Document, Compliance Policy Guide ‐ Section , “Action Levels for Aflatoxin in Animal Feeds.”

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST b. Once the blending operation is completed, each batch of blended corn will be analyzed to determine its aflatoxin level. The analysis shall be performed using US Department of Agriculture Grain Inspection, Packers & Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) approved sampling and analysis protocols and testing procedures. Prior to the use of the blended corn, and before shipment in interstate commerce, the seller will certify that the aflatoxin level of the blended batch does not exceed the action level for the appropriate intended species. c. The Seller of corn blended pursuant to this process will provide the purchaser with a copy of the analytical results generated from the process described in subparagraph “b”. In addition, the seller will obtain written assurance from the purchaser that blended corn will be used as or in feed for mature poultry, breeding swine, finishing swine over 100 pounds, breeding cattle and finishing (feedlot) cattle pursuant to the terms of Compliance Policy Guide ‐ Section d. The blended corn will be clearly identified and labeled for animal feed use only. e. Corn containing aflatoxin levels greater than 500 ppb cannot be blended.

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Quantitative Risk Assessment

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Aflatoxin Policy Considerations: What is Policy  Policy is a guiding principle leading to a course of action or specific program that is pursued by the government.  Agricultural and food policies embody the principles that guide government programs that influence production, the resources utilized in production, domestic and international markets for commodities and food products, food consumption and nutrition, food safety, and the conditions under which people live in rural America.

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Generic List of Governance Options National Research Council 2013; FIGURE 4-1. Options for assigning private-public responsibility to ensure food safety. SOURCE: Adapted from Garcia-Martinez et al. (2007).

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Proposed Policy for Blending OTSC received the following request: … the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to implement a permanent nationwide policy that approves blending corn containing 0 ppb to 500 ppb aflatoxin. We believe the FDA policy should be made permanent and supersede state authority to request this approval since it involves interstate commerce. The policy should include requirements for testing and labeling of corn with aflatoxin that would be uniformly applied on a nationwide basis. This would provide purchasers greater assurance that they are buying properly tested, labeled, and blended grain. The ability to use all levels of corn, even those below 20 ppb, for blending will allow the purchasing sites the ability to blend aflatoxin contaminated corn more safely.

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST POLICY: Texas Approved Aflatoxin Binders Through Rule Making: (a) The provisions of this section apply to the use of aflatoxin binding agents in customer-formula feeds as defined in the Texas Agriculture Code § (7). Labeling requirements for customer-formula feed set forth in § of the Texas Commercial Feed Control Act require the name and number of pounds of the binding agent to be included on the feed label, and the aflatoxin content to meet defined action levels as established in §61.61(a)(6) of this title, poisonous or deleterious substances.

OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Acknowledgements Andrew Buch, Research Specialist Mary Sasser, Manager Field Operations Susie Dai Assistance Research Professor K.M. Lee, Associate Research Scientist OTSC field investigators and laboratory, Ben Jones Associate Director of Compliance