LXI Standard Evolution David Owen, Technical Committee Chair LXI Consortium Business Development Manager Pickering Interfaces

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPP Notification and Notification Services White Paper Hugo Parra; Novell, Inc. October 6, 1999 The intent of this paper is to supplement the discussions.
Advertisements

1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
ITU WORKSHOP ON STANDARDS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) ISSUES Session 5: Software copyright issues Dirk Weiler, Chairman of ETSI General Assembly.
United Nations Statistics Division
Configuration Management
WP4 – Task 4.4 LCA Activities
CSD for P802.1AS-REV WG Wednesday, 05 November 2014.
Policy interoperability in electronic signatures Andreas Mitrakas EESSI International event, Rome, 7 April 2003.
<<Date>><<SDLC Phase>>
[Insert Project Name] Detailed Design Review (DDR) [Insert Date of DDR] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services eXpedited Life Cycle (XLC)
1.10 Report Findings to Communicate Research Information to Others
UDDI, Discovery and Web Services Registries. Introduction To facilitate e-commerce, companies needed a way to locate one another and exchange information.
Visibility Information Exchange Web System. Source Data Import Source Data Validation Database Rules Program Logic Storage RetrievalPresentation AnalysisInterpretation.
Doc.: g Draft ETSI ERM TG28 Liaison response on EN March 2010 Larry Taylor, DTCSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
Systems Analysis I Data Flow Diagrams
Database Administration Chapter 16. Need for Databases  Data is used by different people, in different departments, for different reasons  Interpretation.
Toll Free: Project Manager Tutorial.
Development of WIPOSTAD Progress report by the International Bureau Committee on WIPO Standards Geneva May Anna Graschenkova Industrial Property.
The New EMC Directive 2004/108/EC and the DTI transposition Brian Jones and Peter Howick.
IEEE-1588 IEEE-1588 – Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems Defines a Precision Time Protocol.
Tm Aug LXI Consortium – Conformance WG Page 1 CONFORMANCE WORKING GROUP Jochen Wolle August 25, 2005.
LXI Standard – Current and Future David Owen – Pickering Interfaces TC Chair LXI Consortium LXI – “It’s About Your Time”
Chapter 2 Network Design Essentials Instructor: Nhan Nguyen Phuong.
Testing. Definition From the dictionary- the means by which the presence, quality, or genuineness of anything is determined; a means of trial. For software.
Presentation to: Name: Date: ICAO Asia-Pacific AMHS Activities & Status ICAO Asia-Pacific AMHS Activities & Status ATS Message Handling System (AMHS )
SNIA/SSIF KMIP Interoperability Proposal. What is the proposal? Host a KMIP interoperability program which includes: – Publishing a set of interoperability.
Copyright © The Open Group 2011 Your Name Your title 44 Montgomery Street Suite 960 San Francisco, CA USA Tel
15 Maintaining a Web Site Section 15.1 Identify Webmastering tasks Identify Web server maintenance techniques Describe the importance of backups Section.
Guideline for Chapter Web Sites. Chapter Web Sites Options for Chapter Web Sites AUSA’s web publishing system (Plone) – Even those chapters who do not.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 G. Claeys, Agfa Healthcare Audit Trail and Node Authentication.
Profiling Metadata Specifications David Massart, EUN Budapest, Hungary – Nov. 2, 2009.
WPM What’s behind the icon? Work Programme Management.
Layer Architecture Layer architecture simplifies the network design. It is easy to debug network applications in a layered architecture network. The network.
Introduction to the ISO series ISO – principles and vocabulary (in development) ISO – ISMS requirements (BS7799 – Part 2) ISO –
Copyright © 2004 by The Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-I). All Rights Reserved 1 Interoperability: Ensuring the Success of Web Services.
Conformance Mark Skall Lynne S. Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology
*** CONFIDENTIAL *** © Toshiba Corporation 2008 Confidential Creating Report Templates.
Ajh January 2007 CCSDS “Books” Adrian J. Hooke CMC Meeting, Colorado Springs 26 January 2007.
Chunking.
The mandate of this working group is to facilitate effective service interoperability utilizing SIP in heterogeneous network environments as noted below.
Storyboard, Design, Layout.  Create storyboards  Decide upon navigation  Prepare short page summaries.
Managing Challenging Projects Presented to the class of: Dr. Jane Mackay M.J. Neely School of Business.
HIPAA Security John Parmigiani Director HIPAA Compliance Services CTG HealthCare Solutions, Inc.
KMIP Compliance Redefining Server and Client requirements to claim compliance Presented by: Bob Lockhart.
How the NCSX Project Does Business
Official Rules of Competition for Long Range Disciplines Rulebook #13 Updated December 2015 J.B. & M.A.W. International Benchrest Shooters.
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting New York, USA September 15-16, 2015.
IllinoisJobLink.com Training Video Creating a Resume Copyright © 2015, America’s Job Link Alliance–Technical Support (AJLA–TS) All rights reserved. This.
Doc.: IEEE /1219r4 Submission March, 2006 S. Ponnuswamy (Aruba Networks)Slide 1 Virtual AP Presentation Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0356r0 Submission March 2009 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 New WG PARs that WG11 must consider in March 2009 Date: Authors:
KMIP Compliance Redefining Server and Client requirements to claim compliance Presented by: Bob Lockhart.
Accurate  Consistent  Compliant Contact: i4i the structured content company the structured content company.
Doc.: IEEE /0295r0 Submission March 15, 2011 Fei Tong, CSRSlide 1 Reference waveform generator for 11ac Notice: This document has been prepared.
CSS Cascading Style Sheets Prepared By
OSI Model OSI MODEL. Communication Architecture Strategy for connecting host computers and other communicating equipment. Defines necessary elements for.
OSI Model OSI MODEL.
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
Software Project Configuration Management
Full Page Watermarking
LXI Consortium Presentation Aug 5, 2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
ATIS Cybersecurity DOCUMENT #: GSC13-GTSC6-12 FOR: Presentation
INPE, São José dos Campos (SP), Brazil
Regulatory Principles and Tools for QoS Compliance
Technical update 05 of April 2017
About AirPrint AirPrint is an Apple technology that helps you create full-quality printed output without the need to download or install drivers.
OSI Model OSI MODEL.
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Web-based Imaging Management System Working Group - WIMS
Presentation transcript:

LXI Standard Evolution David Owen, Technical Committee Chair LXI Consortium Business Development Manager Pickering Interfaces LXI – “It’s About Your Time”

Page 2 LXI Evolution Describe the latest changes to the specification Revision 1.2 to Revision 1.3 voting has now successfully completed Where LXI goes to from here

Page 3 The drivers for change Adoption of To improve timing performance in the presence of LAN traffic Follow the path being taken by network infrastructure providers Does not impact Class C products Addition of mDNS To improve Discovery Conversion of 1.2 Future Rules to Rules During creation another primary driver emerged Re-organisation of specification Make it easier to read Make preparation for any future evolution

Page 4 Specification Re-organization Sections renumbered Rules and text grouped together by features to improve readability Rule numbers have changed! References to roadmap items have been removed Intention is to handle in a different way No future rules Intention is to handle in a different way Deal with a problem identified by LXI vendors Deprecated clauses have been removed Improve readability and flow of the specification Simplified reorganizing the numbering specification

Page 5 Migration to IEEE Standard simply refers to IEEE1588 Interpret as the latest version IEEE (1588V2) Creation of LXI IEEE1588 Profile Separate stand alone specification Defines the parameter ranges and detail of the IEEE1588 aspects Separating provides easier maintenance of IEEE1588 aspects

Page 6 IEEE1558 Web Page Changes Changes to what appears on web pages Web page examples in Appendix updated These are simply guideline examples They do reflect the minimum content required for devices supporting IEEE1588

Page 7 What impact does 1588 change have? It improves the timing accuracy in the presence of network delays It accounts for the delays through infrastructure devices with high traffic loads Measures the incoming and outgoing control message timing It can coexist with using separated domains White paper on the issue will be available from the LXI Consortium

Page 8 Adoption of mDNS Discovery Discovery improvements Standard used for discovery of devices like printers Also known as Apple Bonjour, Rendezvous in earlier descriptions Provides much faster Discovery Easier programmatic integration There is a limited time waiver on mDNS for some implementations

Page 9 Section 2 LXI Unit Deletion LXI Unit was an effort at defining half rack width dimensions and mechanical interface References to LXI Unit removed The standard has no physical restrictions on mechanical sizes or definitions Still has guidance on other issues and rules governing indicators and interconnect locations

Page 10 Changes to C Extended Features Features that can be added to Class C that are usually part of Class B or Class A In version1.2 WTB and LAN messaging identified as extended features In 1.3 additional features are identified (Section 1.9) 5 features – (LXI) 1588, WTB, LAN Messaging, Event Log, Time Stamping Compliance requirements of features are positively identified Helps organize the standard

Page 11 Changes Class C Extended Features Class model does NOT change Class A,B,C are the class declarations that will be made It will continue to be the focus of LXI The 5 additional features are precisely defined to have a meaning in the standard Use the protection of “LXI” in their description Market forces will define how much take up there will be Implementing all 5 features takes a Class C product to Class A

Page 12 Why the Extended features? It allows vendors to pick a smaller added feature set in support of specific markets Saves investment in a full feature set Particularly useful for Devices with low cost controller systems It ensures these features have been third party tested for interoperability Protects the feature description Protects the LXI brand The Device remains as Class C

Page 13 Updated Conformance Sections Simply reflect current rather past practice Expect this to be moved to a separate document on a future revision

Page 14 NVS and PVE Dates NVS (New Version Start) Consortium tests to 1.3 from October 2008 Continues to test to 1.2 PVE (Previous Version End) November 2009 is the last time we test new products to 1.2 mDNS Waiver For products otherwise compliant to 1.3 waiver scheme in place Vendor must be compliant by PVE date

Page 15 Where does the standard go from here? (1) Class C is unlikely to change from Version 1.3 It will be the baseline for future versions Change will only occur due to enforced change caused by technology migration

Page 16 Where does the standard go from here? (2) Focus moves to System level issues Resource management Arbitrate between different test processes demanding access to the same resources Improved Web support for triggering Aid to Debugging system level problems with trigger events between devices LAN Triggers WTB Event Log Make it easy to grab log data from multiple devices and combine the data in a meaningful way

Page 17 Where does the standard go from here? (3) The Consortium will continue to follow technology changes that could have an impact IPV6 PoE None of these will have a short or medium term impact The IT legacy of Ethernet will ensure continued support

Page 18 Compliance Evolution Great deal of ongoing work on compliance issues Developing IEEE1588 procedures Preparing for a date when self certification might be permitted At present it is not, and that will not change for at least a year It is likely to only apply to experienced members

Page 19 System Level Analysis Analyse the other system level issues that may need attention Might include other features State Management Script management Peer to Peer Communications Any other issues found to influence adoption rates Intent is still to use 1.3 as the baseline specification for Class C

Page 20 When is the next Version? Maybe two years away But new features will be published in the interim Vendors may chose to implement them New features will be subject to testing before claiming as an LXI feature Backward compatibility will be maintained The LXI Consortium will continue to support an active and thriving specification evolution