ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) Country Consultation 2006 DRAFT ISPM: ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training
Advertisements

1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
The OIE’s approach to zones and compartments
Phytosanitary Capacity Evaluation (PCE) Tool
Implementation of science-based risk analysis for application of SPS measures in Australia.
Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training
Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment
Member consultation 2007 Draft ISPM: Sampling of Consignments Steward: David Porritt.
ISPM 6: Guidelines for Surveillance
AMENDMENTS TO ISPM No. 5 (GLOSSARY OF PHYTOSANTIARY TERMS) Steward: John Hedley.
The Role and Relationship of Scientific and Official Information Allan Hruska/Orlando Sosa & Dave Nowell/Jan Breithaupt IPPC Secretariat Rome Italy.
PHYTOSANITARY TREATMENTS FOR REGULATED PESTS Overview Steward: Narcy Klag.
DOMINICA COUNTRY REPORT
Supplement 1 of ISPM 5 Guidelines on the interpretation and application of the concepts of official control in relation to regulated pests and not widely.
The Role and Relationship of Scientific and Official Information IPPC Secretariat July 2011 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Considerations for Developing a Phytosanitary Capacity Building (PCB) Strategy for Developing Countries by IPPC Secretariat 1.Background 2.Lessons learnt.
The Role and Relationship of Scientific and Official Information Dave Nowell & Jan Breithaupt IPPC Secretariat Rome Italy.
AN INTRODUCTION TO RISK MANAGEMENT GRAEME EVANS. RISK ANALYSIS –Initiating the process –RISK ASSESSMENT –RISK MANAGEMENT –Risk communication.
Eradication, Containment and Contingency Planning
Draft ISPM: International movement of seeds ( )
Draft ISPM: INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT OF USED VEHICLES, MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT (Steward Ngatoko Ta Ngatoko) IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 30 November.
Draft ISPM: Amendments to ISPM 5 (Glossary of phytosanitary terms) ( ) IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 1 December 2013.
Plant Health in the Global Trading Environment – An Introduction GRAEME EVANS.
Introduction to Pest Risk Assessment. Presentation Overview  Purpose of Pest Risk Analysis (PRA)  Principles of Pest Risk Analysis  Components of Pest.
Integrated Pest Management By: Melody Carter-McCabe.
An Overview of Market Access And Maintenance requirements Related To Phytosanitary Measures Trade Awareness Workshop - Polokwane Mashudu Silimela DAFF:
SPS Committee: Second Review, Regionalization and Transparency Gretchen H. Stanton Senior Counsellor Agriculture and Commodities Division.
Surveying for Plant Pests: ISPM Terminology Graeme Evans & Teresa McMaugh.
Digitization at the National Archives and Records Administration Doris Hamburg Director, Preservation Programs James Hastings Director, Access Programs.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1 Strategic Plan for Digital Archives Programme DAP PROJECT SCOPE OVERVIEW STATUS.
General overview of South Africa’s commitment to global market access & maintenance based on requirements for phytosanitary measures by PATRICK TSHIKHUDO.
New plant health Regulation: main elements of the upcoming Commission proposal Yannis Karamitsios European Commission DG SANCO (E.2)
FAO/IAEA Food and Agriculture Programme INSECT PEST CONTROL SUBPROGRAMME.
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
Workshop on Accreditation of Bodies Certifying Medical Devices Kiev, November 2014.
The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) ISPMs adopted in 2008 and draft ISPMs proposed for adoption in 2009 Julie Aliaga, International Standards.
INFORMATION SESSION ON PHYTOSANITARY REGULATIONS IN GRAIN IMPORTS.
Oversight “The NPPO of the exporting country has the responsibility for ensuring that systems for exports meet the requirements …”
Systems Approach Concept and Application 24º Technical Consultation among ORPF, August 2012 Maria Inés Ares President of Directive Committee.
LMO RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER THE IPPC AND THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY Velia Arriagada Rios Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Chile.
ISO Session 3 Environmental Management and Ethics in Management.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsInternational Atomic Energy Agency The Role of Codex and the International Plant Protection Convention.
IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 1 December 2013
IPP Training, IAPSC & IPPC/FAO/FAORAF
DECIDUOUS COORDINATING MEETING 2007/08 EXPORT SEASON
North American Plant Protection Organization
The International Plant Protection Convention
Development Projects / Analysis Projects / On-site Service Projects
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
ISPM 8: Pest Status of on Area
COSAVE Activities Luis Rangel President
IPPC Consultation Period 1 July to 30 September 2016
International Standards on Phytosanitary Measures (ISPMs)
Trade and Pest Management
Area Wide Pest Management Programmes and Trade
Understanding what is the Phytosanitary Capacity Evaluation (PCE)
IPPC first consultation 1 July to 30 September 2018
Christina Devorshak, PhD NAPPO Acting Executive Director
IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 1 December 2013
QUALITY OF MANGOES EXPORTED FROM KENYA AND STRATEGIES FOR COMPLIANCE TO INTERNATIONAL MARKET REQUIREMENTS Augustus Kivi The 2nd International Phytosanitary.
The Role and Relationship of Scientific and Official Information
Role of Industry Self-regulation in Phytosanitary Compliance
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
Standard Method for Product Description
Module 5 Liaison and Managing Relationships with Stakeholders
ePhyto DRAFT APPENDIX 1 TO ISPM 12:2011
Integrated Pest Management
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )
Presentation transcript:

ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) Country Consultation 2006 DRAFT ISPM: ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) Steward: Magda González

OUTLINE of PRESENTATION SCOPE NEW TERMS AND DEFINITIONS General Requirements Determination of an FF-ALPP Maintenance of the FF-ALPP Specific Requirements Corrective action plans for fruit flies in an FF- ALPP (Annex 1) Examples of FTD values used as low pest prevalence for fruit flies ( Appendix 1)

SCOPE This standard provides guidelines for the establishment and maintenance of areas of low pest prevalence for fruit flies (including places and sites of production of low pest prevalence) for use as a risk mitigation measure to facilitate trade of fruits and vegetables. This standard applies to fruit flies (Tephritidae) of economic importance.

New term and definition Target fruit fly species : Fruit fly species identified by the NPPO for a commodity intended to be traded or moved from an area, place or site of production.

General Requirements The general requirements of an Area of Low pest prevalence for fruit flies (FF -ALPP ) include determination and establishment. Determination : The target fruit fly species and delimitation of the area are elements to be considered in this phase.

General Requirements (cont.) Establishment: It is necessary to determine a parameter to estimate the level of FF- prevalence, the most commonly used is the FTD value (flies per trap per day,) which is a population index to estimate the average number of flies captured by one trap. Also a surveillance system should be in place, as well as control measures to supress fruit fly populations.

General Requirements (cont.) Verification and declaration: the NPPO is responsible for the verification and official declaration of FF-ALPP status to trading partners. Maintenance: Once the FF-ALPP is declared, different phytosanitary actions such as surveillance, control measures and a corrective action plan, should be applied in order to maintain the status.

General Requirements (cont.) The conditions for Suspension, loss and reinstatement of FF-ALPP status are directly related to the low pest prevalence level of the target fruit fly determined in the area. The necessary documents and records of the different procedures implemented, must be kept to demonstrate the FF-pest status

Specific Requirements Two different categories of the FF-ALPP are described: A buffer zone for a pest free area, pest free place or site of production (permanent or in an eradication process) and, An area of LPP for export purposes, usually in conjunction with other risk mitigation measures as a component of a systems approach (e.g. post harvest treatment, less attractive hosts, tolerant varieties, physicals barriers)

Specific Requirements (cont.) Determination, establishment, maintenance and control measures, are required for the two FF-ALPP categories.

GUIDELINES ON CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS FOR FRUIT FLIES IN AN FF-ALPP (ANNEX 1) Annex 1 describes the procedures to be followed in the case of an outbreak of the target pest and the elements that should be considered when setting up the corrective action plan.

ANNEX 1 (cont.) Elements to be considered when implementing a corrective action plan include: criteria for the declaration of an outbreak time scales for the initial response and follow-up activities technical criteria for a delimiting survey suppression actions identification capability availability of sufficient operational resources effective communication within the NPPO and with the trading partner

ACTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED WHEN APPLYING THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Declaration of an outbreak and first actions Determination of the phytosanitary features of the outbreak Suspension and loss of FF-ALPP status Implementation of control measures in the affected area Criteria for lifting the suspension or reinstatement of FF-ALPP status* (footnote about the number of biological cycles of target pest to be considered when lifting suspension or for reinstatement) Notification of relevant agencies

Examples of FTD values used as low pest prevalence for fruit flies Examples of FTD values used as low pest prevalence for fruit flies ( Appendix 1) Appendix 1 illustrates some FTD (flies per trap per day) values used internationally for determining low pest prevalence levels for different fruit fly species in diverse scenarios.