Coupled modelling - snow Patrick Samuelsson Rossby Centre, SMHI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EURO4M Météo-France motivations and contributions.
Advertisements

2010 update of GCOS IP in support of UNFCCC Paul Mason and Stephan Bojinski GCOS Steering Committee September 2010.
Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline
Snow, forest and lake aspects in the HIRLAM surface scheme Stefan Gollvik, SMHI, Patrick Samuelsson, RC, SMHI.
Land Surface Evaporation 1. Key research issues 2. What we learnt from OASIS 3. Land surface evaporation using remote sensing 4. Data requirements Helen.
Joint GABLS-GLASS/LoCo workshop, September 2004, De Bilt, Netherlands Interactions of the land-surface with the atmospheric boundary layer: Single.
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
Implementation of lakes in the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM): towards CRCM 5 Andrey Martynov, Rene Laprise, Laxmi Sushama University of Quebec.
03/06/2015 Modelling of regional CO2 balance Tiina Markkanen with Tuula Aalto, Tea Thum, Jouni Susiluoto and Niina Puttonen.
Alpine3D: an alpine surface processes model Mathias Bavay WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland.
SMOS – The Science Perspective Matthias Drusch Hamburg, Germany 30/10/2009.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Snow hydrology ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
Are the results of PILPS or GSWP affected by the lack of land surface- atmosphere feedback? Is the use of offline land surface models in LDAS making optimal.
4. Models of the climate system. Earth’s Climate System Sun IceOceanLand Sub-surface Earth Atmosphere Climate model components.
Land Surface Models & Surface Water Hydrology Cédric DAVID.
1 Comparison of forest-snow process models (SnowMIP2): uncertainty in estimates of snow water equivalent under forest canopies Nick Rutter and Richard.
THE EFFECT OF THE SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS ON THE DICE RESULTS SEEN BY THE MESONH MODEL M. A. Jiménez, P. Le Moigne and J. Cuxart DICE workshop, October.
The Louvain-la-Neuve sea ice model : current status and ongoing developments T. Fichefet, Y. Aksenov, S. Bouillon, A. de Montety, L. Girard, H. Goosse,
Land Use and Climate Change Stephanie J Houser Earth Climate Systems
Slide 1 PA Surface I of IV - traning course 2006 Slide 1 Parameterization of land-surface processes in NWP Gianpaolo Balsamo Room: 315 Extension: 2246.
Distinct properties of snow
CryosPheric responses to Anthropogenic PRessures in the HIndu Kush-Himalaya regions: impacts on water resources and society adaptation in Nepal DHM Centre.
SMHI in the Arctic Lars Axell Oceanographic Research Unit Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute.
EGU General Assembly C. Cassardo 1, M. Galli 1, N. Vela 1 and S. K. Park 2,3 1 Department of General Physics, University of Torino, Italy 2 Department.
Verification and Case Studies for Urban Effects in HIRLAM Numerical Weather Forecasting A. Baklanov, A. Mahura, C. Petersen, N.W. Nielsen, B. Amstrup Danish.
Winter Processes in WEPS Fred Fox Wind Erosion Research Unit Manhattan, KS.
Coupling of the Common Land Model (CLM) to RegCM in a Simulation over East Asia Allison Steiner, Bill Chameides, Bob Dickinson Georgia Institute of Technology.
Status report from the Lead Centre for Surface Processes and Assimilation E. Rodríguez-Camino (INM) and S. Gollvik (SMHI)
Land Surface Analysis SAF: Contributions to NWP Isabel F. Trigo.
Inquiry into the appropriateness of a TILE/MOSAIC approach for the representation of surface inhomogeneities B. Ritter and J. Helmert.
TERRA TERRA Soil Vegetation Atmosphere Transfer across Models and Scales.
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Introduction 2) The methodology of the inter-comparison 3) Phase 1 : cases study Inter-comparison of numerical models.
Future Climate Projections. Lewis Richardson ( ) In the 1920s, he proposed solving the weather prediction equations using numerical methods. Worked.
TURBULENT FLUX VARIABILITIES OVER THE ARA WATERSHED Moussa Doukouré, Sandrine Anquetin, Jean-Martial Cohard Laboratoire d’étude des Transferts en Hydrologie.
The White Arctic: A Snow Impacts Synthesis for the Terrestrial Arctic Matthew Sturm 1 Glen E. Liston 2 Donald K. Perovich 1 Christopher A. Hiemstra 2 1.
The Atmosphere: Part 8: Climate Change: Sensitivity and Feedbacks Composition / Structure Radiative transfer Vertical and latitudinal heat transport Atmospheric.
Aihui Wang, Kaiyuan Li, and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington Integration of the VIC model.
LMWG progress towards CLM4 –Soil hydrology CLM3.5 major improvement over CLM3 (partitioning of ET into transpiration, soil evap, canopy evap; seasonal.
An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.
Vegetation Phenology and the Hydrological Cycle of Monsoons
Features and performance of the NCAR Community Land Model (CLM): Permafrost, snow, and hydrology David Lawrence NCAR / CGD Boulder, CO.
Implementation and preliminary test of the unified Noah LSM in WRF F. Chen, M. Tewari, W. Wang, J. Dudhia, NCAR K. Mitchell, M. Ek, NCEP G. Gayno, J. Wegiel,
GLASS/GABLS De Bilt Sept Boundary layer land surface as a coupled system Alan Betts (Atmospheric Research) and Anton Beljaars (ECMWF) How to build.
Autonomous Polar Atmospheric Observations John J. Cassano University of Colorado.
Snow processes in ORCHIDEE Tao Wang, C. Ottlé, P. Ciais, etc..
Contribution of MPI to CLIMARES Erich Roeckner, Dirk Notz Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg.
COSMO General Meeting, Rome, Italy, 5-9 September 2011 Status of the implementation of the multi-layer snow scheme into the COSMO model COLOBOC meeting.
Evaluating a tiled land-surface model with multi-site energy flux observations A. Nordbo 1, A. Manrique-Sunen 2, G. Balsamo 2,
MM5 studies at Wageningen University (NL) Title Jordi Vilà (Group 4) NL North sea Radar MM5 NL North sea.
Diagnosis of Performance of the Noah LSM Snow Model *Ben Livneh, *D.P. Lettenmaier, and K. E. Mitchell *Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Washington.
Initial Results from the Diurnal Land/Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (DICE) Weizhong Zheng, Michael Ek, Ruiyu Sun, Jongil Han, Jiarui Dong and Helin Wei.
An advanced snow parameterization for the models of atmospheric circulation Ekaterina E. Machul’skaya¹, Vasily N. Lykosov ¹Hydrometeorological Centre of.
Comparison of snow microstructure models Richard Essery Anna Kontu, Samuel Morin, Martin Proksch, Mel Sandells MicroSnow2 Workshop, Columbia MD, 13 – 15.
Representing Effects of Complex Terrain on Mountain Meteorology and Hydrology Steve Ghan, Ruby Leung, Teklu Tesfa, PNNL Steve Goldhaber, NCAR.
Chapter 3 Modelling the climate system Climate system dynamics and modelling Hugues Goosse.
Hirlam1D; Statusreport Esbjörn Olsson SMHI/Sundsvall Presented at: Cost 722 Larnaca meeting may 2005.
Data services: Archiving of UERRA data in MARS and dissemination Richard Mládek, Manuel Fuentes, Shahram Najm, Sebastien Villaume, Enrico Fucile (ECMWF)
Pedro M A Miranda Centro de Geofísica da Universidade de Lisboa Instituto Dom Luiz Modelação Atmosférica e Climática no IDL Emanuel Dutra, João Martins,
PA Surface II of III – Training course 2016 Slide 1 Land Surface(2) Cold processes: Snow/soil Emanuel Dutra
Towards development of a Regional Arctic Climate System Model ---
European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2015
Description of the climate system and of its components
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
Implementation of multi-energy balance (MEB) into SURFEX Patrick Samuelsson Stefan Gollvik SMHI Aaron Boone Christophe Canac Meteo.
Introduction to Land Information System (LIS)
Cathy Hohenegger 1,2 Linda Schlemmer 1,2 Bjorn Stevens 1
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
Soil hydrology soil moisture variability problem; interim solution
Soil and Permafrost studies
Presentation transcript:

Coupled modelling - snow Patrick Samuelsson Rossby Centre, SMHI

Aspects of snow in NWP/climate models Give realistic lower boundary conditions for the atmosphere in the terms of surface fluxes (sensible/latent heat and momentum fluxes) NWPNWP CLIMATEMODELCLIMATEMODEL IMPORTANT LESS IMPORTANT The complexity should not violate assimilation and numerical stability Represent a storage of water as hydrological memory for runoff Internal snow structure in terms of size and character of snow crystals Insulation of the soil and its impact on soil thermal evolution Snow drift by wind

Important characteristics of snow Very high albedo and very variable with age, typical range 50-90% Variable areal extent (snow cover fraction), 0-100% Very low density and quite variable with age, typical range kg/m 3 Low heat capacity, typically 2-7 ·10 5 J/m 3 K (soil 14 ·10 5 J/m 3 K) Low heat conductivity, typically W/m K (soil 0.3 W/m K) Smooth surface, roughness in order of m (open land m) Can hold liquid water, typically 3-6%

Modelling issues of snow in this talk Number of layers in the snow Albedo parameterisation Snow fraction parameterisation Snow density parameterisation Snow heat conductivity parameterisation Snow and vegetation interaction

Number of layers in the snow Boone and Etchevers (2001) divided snow models into three main categories: -Simple force-restore with composite snow-soil (e.g. SURFEX 1-layer ISBA) or single explicit snow layer (e.g. ECMWF) -Detailed internal-snow-process schemes with multiple layers of fine vertical resolution. Intended for e.g. snow avalanche modelling (e.g. SNOWPACK, Crocus, SNTHERM) -Intermediate-complexity schemes with physics from the detailed schemes but with a limited amount of layers. Intended for NWP/Climate models. (e.g. SURFEX 3-layer) Boone, A. and Etchevers, P., 2001: An intercomparison of three snow schemes of varying complexity coupled to the same land surface model: Local-scale evaluation at an alpine site. J. Hydrometeorol, 2,

Snow albedo Pirazzini (2009) reports that The positive snow albedo-temperature feedback is an important factor in the high-latitude amplification of the global warming. The model representation of snow and ice albedo is one of the most serious oversimplifications, causing large errors, in NWP and climate models. Most albedo parameterisations can be divided into: Dutra, E., Balsamo, G., Viterbo, P., Miranda, P. M. A., Beljaars, A., Schär, C. and Elder, K. 2010: An improved snow scheme for the ECMWF land surface model: description and offline validation. In press. Pirazzini, R Challenges in Snow and Ice Albedo Parameterisations. Geophysica Roeckner, E., et al The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-5: model description. Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology Report No. 349, Hamburg, Germany, 140pp. ECMWF, old HTESSEL (Dutra et al., 2010) α min =0.5, α max =0.85 For snowfall>1mm/h: α sn t+1 =α max prognostic temperature dependent α min =0.3 T=0 α = linear change α max =0.8 T<-5 ECHAM5 (Roeckner et al., 2003)

Snow albedo Pedersen and Winther (2005) concluded: Although, prognostic snow albedo formulations are considered to be superior to purely temperature dependent snow albedo formulations they are sensitive for the threshold value of snowfall used to reset the albedo to a high fresh-snow albedo at a snowfall event. The threshold is often set too high which means that the albedo tends to remain at too low values. Also, the decrease of albedo with time may be overestimated in typical prognostic albedo parameterisations (for low temperatures). Indeed, in a new version of the Rossby Centre regional climate model (RCA) it has been shown that a modification of the prognostic snow albedo considering both the threshold and temperature factors significantly reduces a warm bias over Arctic regions. Pedersen, C. A. and Winther, J.-G Intercomparison and validation of snow albedo parameterization schemes in climate models. Climate Dynamics. 25, 351–362. doi: /s

Temperature Accumulated snowfall Snow water eq. old HTESSEL new HTESSEL RCA ECHAM5 Different parameterisations of snow albedo

Snow cover fraction Simpler parameterizations of snow cover fraction (SCF) usually relates SCF to the snow water equivalent (SWE) or the snow depth (Hsn) along with some critical value. Two examples are ECMWF / Old HTESSEL S crit =15 mm ARPEGE-Climate Version 5.1

Snow cover fraction However, the relationship between SCF and Hsn shows a clear seasonality dependence (a hysteresis effect); the increase of SCF with Hsn in autumn is more rapid than the decrease of SCF with Hsn during the spring melting period. Douville, H., J.-F. Royer, J.-F. Mahfouf, A new snow parameterization for the Météo-France climate model, Clim. Dyn., 12, 21–35. Niu G.-Y and Z.-L. Yang, An observation-based formulation of snow cover fraction and its evaluation over large North American river basins, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D21101, doi: /2007JD NCAR CLM Niu and Yang (2007) z 0g =0.01 m, ρ new =100 kg m -3, m~1.6 ECMWF / New HTESSEL Dutra et al. (2010) SCF=S n /(S n + ρ sn *5*z 0veg ) SURFEX/ISBA Douville et al. (1995)

Different parameterisations of snow fraction old HTESSEL New HTESSEL

Snow density ECMWF / Old HTESSEL Dutra et al. (2010) ρ snmax =300 kg/m3, ρ snmin =100 kg/m3 τ f =0.24, τ 1 =86400 s Based on Douville et al. (1995) and Verseghy (1991). Douville, H., Royer, J.F. and Mahfouf, J.F., 1995: A New Snow Parameterization for the Meteo-France Climate Model.1. Validation in Stand-Alone Experiments. Climate Dyn., 12, Verseghy, D.L., 1991: Class-a Canadian Land Surface Scheme for Gcms.1. Soil Model. Int. J. Climatol., 11, However, Dutra et al. (2010) concluded that this type of parameterization underestimates the snow thermal insulation and overestimate soil freezing. Many prognostic parameterisations of density has a simple exponential increase of density with time along with some restoring function due to new fresh low- density snow, like:

Snow density overburden thermal metamorphism compaction related to melt water retained in the snowpack (Anderson 1976; Boone and Etchevers 2001) Lynch- Stieglitz (1994) σ sn is pressure of the overlaying snow (Pa) η sn is snow viscosity (Pa s) A more physically parameterisation taking into account overburden of snow, thermal metamorphism and compaction related to liquid water in the snow is used in SURFEX 3-layer snow scheme and is recently introduced in ECMWF New HTESSEL: Anderson, E.A., 1976: A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover. NOAA Tech. Rep., NWQ 19, 150 pp. Lynch-Stieglitz, M., 1994: The Development and Validation of a Simple Snow Model for the Giss Gcm. J. Climate, 7,

Temperature Accumulated snowfall Snow water eq. old HTESSEL New HTESSEL Different parameterisations of snow density

Snow heat conductivity Cook, B.I., Bonan, G.B., Levis, S. and Epstein, H.E., 2008: The thermoinsulation effect of snow cover within a climate model. Climate Dyn., 31, Cook et al. (2008) used a GCM to test the sensitivity of land surface and climate processes to snow thermal conductivity. Over Sibera and Northern Canada they report changes in soil temperature up to 20 K, and in the air temperature up to 6 K, during winter, just by prescribing snow thermal conductivity to its observed upper and lower limits (0.1 – 0.5 W/mK). High values drove increased heat flux into the ground during the summer, with resulting air temperature anomalies of -1 to -2 K. Gives a for the Northern Hemisphere

Implications of snow heat conductivity Imagine a grid box partly covered by snow but where the soil is not tiled Autumn heat release The whole soil column cools via snow-free soil Spring warming The whole soil column warms via snow-free soil Underestimated heat transport to snow Overestimated heat transport to snow

Implications of snow heat conductivity Imagine a grid box partly covered by snow and where the soil is tiled Autumn heat release Cooling of soil beneath snow via snow-free soil is reduced Spring warming Warming of soil beneath snow via snow-free soil is reduced

Interaction of snow and vegetation Depth of snow Fraction of snow Introduction of double-energy balance in combination with snow in SURFEX T veg T ground / snow Vegetation can be everything between grass and forest! Enable studies (and forecasts) including complex interactions of snow/vegetation w.r.t. turbulent fluxes, radiation, blowing snow,… Low sun elevation at high latitudes

Conclusions Also from a recent snow Workshop in Kuopio, Finland Snow albedo = f( ageing, temperature ) is more realistic than f( one of the factors ) Modelling of snow fraction should include the hysteresis effect of snow growth/melt. Orography should be accounted for since snow melt is more patchy in mountainous terrain. New formulation of snow density leads to more realistic snow thermal insulation and consequently more realistic soil temperatures. Use separate soil columns beneath snow and for bare soil/vegetation part of a grid box. Otherwise, e.g. during spring time we can have melting of snow from below when the bare soil part is heated. Double-energy balance in combination with snow gives e.g. more realistic energy partitioning in high-latitude forest areas. Other aspects not considered: horizontal redistribution of snow due to wind, interception of snow, black carbon on snow reducing albedo…

20 THANKS!

Snow liquid water ECMWF / New HTESSEL Dutra et al. (2010) following Anderson (1976) r l,min =0.03, r l,max =0.1, ρ sn,l =200 kg/m3 Anderson, E.A., 1976: A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover. NOAA Tech. Rep., NWQ 19, 150 pp.