FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
A National Perspective On Demand Response Ahmad Faruqui, Ph.D. March 3, 2008 California Energy Commission Sacramento, California.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
1 Measuring What Matters – Looking ahead, what data must we have to succeed? NEET Workgroup #1 Report Co-Chairs: Massoud Jourabch and Mary Smith Executive.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure
1 Demand Response Implementing Demand Response and AMR / AMI Systems used by the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
SPP.org 1. SPP: Demand Response and Advanced Metering in Arkansas.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Key Issues and Challenges in the Deepening Penetration of Demand Response Resources 报 告 人 : Prof. George Gross 报告时间 : 2014 年 11 月 24 日上午 10:00 报告地点 : 清华大学西主楼.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
FCC Field Hearing on Energy and the Environment Monday November 30, 2009 MIT Stratton Student Center, Twenty Chimneys Peter Brandien, Vice President System.
Advanced Metering Implementation Team Update Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas October 2008.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Role Of The Market Monitor: ISO New England Dr. Hung-po Chao Director, Market Monitoring FERC Open Meeting Washington,
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
EEI Energy Efficiency Initiative Eric Ackerman ( Senior Manager, Regulatory Policy April 23, 2007.
2008 Demand Response and Advanced Metering Report and Survey David Kathan FERC NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative February 17, 2008.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
FERC Perspective on Demand Response David Kathan FERC Midwest Demand Response Initiative Chicago, IL February 9, 2007 The author’s views do not necessarily.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Measurement & Verification at the Wholesale Market Level David Kathan FERC NAESB DSM/EE Business Practices Washington, DC April 11, 2007 The author’s views.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
WFEC and Its Rural Electric Cooperative Members Solar Power October 16, 2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
Product-Pricing Strawman David Sun Ali Ipakchi 26 October.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
NAESB Conference Call October 10, 2008 DSM EE RETAIL GROUP.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
Overview of Energy Policy Act of 2005 A Review of Implementation issues in New Hampshire.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development for Demand Side Management / Energy Efficiency September 14, 2009 Eric Winkler, Ph.D. Project.
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Regional Transmission Organizations
Transmission: the Critical Link
The Future of Demand Response in New England
The Need for Compensatory Standby Rates
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
Vice President, Markets Development
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry NyquistJohn Kelly Manager of Planning & RatesDirector, Economics and Research SMMPAAPPA Rochester, MNWashington, DC

FERC Assessment Parameters Section 1252(e)(3) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 required the FERC to prepare a report by appropriate region to assess electric demand response resources, including those available to all customer classes. To aid in preparing the report, FERC staff developed and implemented a national survey of electric demand response and advanced metering. The survey included 3,365 organizations in all 50 states representing every aspect of the electric delivery industry. The survey had a response rate of approximately 55%. Page 1

FERC Survey Parameters The following items were identified and reviewed as a result of the FERC survey: Saturation and penetration rate of advanced meters and communication technologies, devices and systems; Existing demand response and time-based rate programs; The annual resource contribution of demand resources; The potential for demand response as a quantifiable, reliable resource for regional planning purposes; Page 2

Steps taken to insure that, in regional transmission planning and operations, demand resources are provided equitable treatment as a quantifiable, reliable resource relative to the resource obligations of any load-serving entity, transmission provider, or transmitting party; and Regulatory barriers to improved customer participation in demand response, peak reduction and critical period pricing programs. FERC Survey Parameters (continued) Page 3

Advanced Metering Advanced metering is defined as a metering system that records customer consumption [and possibly other parameters] hourly or more frequently and that provides for daily or more frequent transmittal of measurements over a communication network to a central collection point. Page 4

FERC Survey indicates that advanced metering currently has a penetration rate of about six percent of total installed electric meters in the United States. The estimate of market penetration of advanced metering is highest among rural electric cooperatives at about 13 percent. Investor-owned utilities have the next highest penetration rate at close to six percent. Advanced Metering (continued) Page 5

Advanced Metering (continued) Page 6

Advanced Metering (continued) Page 7

Advanced Metering (continued) Page 8

Advanced Metering (continued) Page 9

Existing Demand Response Programs and Time- Based Rates Demand Response is defined as changes in electric usage by end-use customers from their normal consumption patterns in response to changes in the price of electricity over time, or to incentive payments designed to induce lower electricity use at times of high wholesale market prices or when system reliability is jeopardized. Demand response under this definition can be categorized into two groups: 1. incentive-based demand response; and 2. time-based rates. Page 10

Existing Demand Response Programs and Time-Based Rates (continued) FERC staff found that use of demand response is not widespread. Only approximately five percent of customers are on some form of time-based rates or incentive-based program. Nationally, the total potential demand response resource contribution from existing programs is estimated to be about 37,500 MW. The vast majority of this resource potential is associated with incentive-based demand response. Page 11

Existing Demand Response Programs and Time-Based Rates (continued) Page 12

Existing Demand Response Programs and Time-Based Rates (continued) Page 13

Demand Response is not treated in transmission planning uniformly across regions, and demand response is typically not directly assessed during transmission planning. The eligibility of demand response resources to provide operating reserves has been limited in most regions and is typically limited to providing supplemental (non-spinning) and slower reserves. Demand Response in Regional Transmission Planning and Operations Page 14

FERC staff has identified the following actions and steps that could be taken to enable greater use of demand resources: Assure that regions that schedule resources to meet either energy or reserve needs properly recognize the capabilities and characteristics of demand resources. Assure that requirements are specified in terms of functional needs rather than in terms of the technology that is expected to fill the need. Accommodate the inherent characteristics of demand response resources. Demand Response in Regional Transmission Planning and Operations (continued) Page 15

Allow appropriately designed response resources to provide all ancillary services including spinning reserve, regulation, and frequency response reserves. Allow for the consideration of demand response alternatives for all transmission enhancement proposals at both the state and ISO/RTO level. When appropriate, treat demand response as a permanent solution, similar to transmission enhancements. Develop better demand response forecasting tools for system operators, to increase the usefulness and acceptability of demand response. Demand Response in Regional Transmission Planning and Operations (continued) Page 16

FERC staff identified the following regulatory barriers to improved customer participation in demand response, peak reduction and critical peak pricing programs: Disconnect between retail pricing and wholesale markets. Utility disincentives associated with offering demand response. Cost recovery and incentives for enabling technologies. The need for additional research on cost-effectiveness and measurement of reductions. Regulatory Barriers Page 17

The existence of specific state-level barriers to greater demand response. Specific retail and wholesale rules that limit demand response. Barriers to providing demand response services by third parties. Insufficient market transparency and access to data. Better coordination of federal-state jurisdiction affecting demand response. Regulatory Barriers (continued) Page 18

The potential immediate reduction in peak electric demand that could be achieved from existing demand response resources is between three and seven percent of peak electric demand in most regions. Conclusions Page 19

FERC staff recommends the following action be taken: 1. Explore how to better accommodate demand response in wholesale markets; 2. Explore how to coordinate with utilities, state commissions and other interested parties on demand response in wholesale and retail markets; and 3. Consider specific proposals for compatible regulatory approaches, including how to eliminate regulatory barriers to improved participation in demand response, peak reduction, and critical peak pricing programs. Conclusions (continued) Page 20