Www.internetsociety.org Operators and the IETF – the survey Standardizing the future, together Jan Žorž and Chris Grundemann, ISOC mailto:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Points in Writing Case Studies
Advertisements

World IPv6 Day: June Why We Care and You Should Too! Phil Roberts –author- Christian OFlaherty –messenger-
Best Current Operational Practices – Efforts from the Internet Society Deploy360 – Internet Society.
Effective Meetings.
Mayfield Intermediate
Analyzing Student Work
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Module 2: Creating Quality IEPs for Students with ASD
EUROPEAN STUDENTS’ FORUM HOW TO MAKE A WORKSHOP ON... EVERY EU RELATED TOPIC Y VOTE 2014.
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
Russ Housley IETF Chair 23 July 2012 Introduction to the IETF Standards Process.
Stephanie M. Glyptis April 5, 2014 Let’s Meet: The Essentials of Great Meetings.
Methodology Conducted from March 16 – 22, 2006
Internet Etiquette or Netiquette. Ten Rules Of Netiquette There are Ten rules of Netiquette that everyone who goes online should follow. You should remember.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Self Determination in the IEP
Community Level 7. Hey Everybody My name is Tek. I ’ m going to be your guide today! I ’ m a part of i-SAFE, and we are concerned with helping you to.
Historical Research.
By Paula Jacobsen Chapter 12
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Class Directors and Committee Chairs Spring Zone Rally Training Workshop.
Transition Assessments Matrix Great Prairie AEA Transition Coordinators  Transition Assessment  Living, Learning and Working.
Change Management. Why change management  For many change practitioners, there is no doubt that change management must be used on projects that impact.
How to Write a Literature Review
The Power of Community A Roundtable Session facilitated by Christie Huck, City Garden Montessori School, St. Louis, Missouri Better Together: Community.
Psychological Methods Original Content Copyright by HOLT McDougal. Additions and changes to the original content are the responsibility of the instructor.
Module 5 Week 11 Supplement 12. SPEAKING TRUTH EFFECTIVELY How to provide insightful and effective peer reviews.
Delta-Schoolcraft Parent Coalition Sounding Board Process.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
Internet Addressing and the RIR system (part 2) 12 February 2004 Phnom Penh, Cambodia Paul Wilson, APNIC.
2013 RI CONVENTION STRENGTHENING ROTARY Jennifer Jones Paul Hydzik 25 June 2013.
Best Practices in Partnering Julia King Tamang
Styles of Leadership LET II. Introduction Leadership styles are the pattern of behaviors that one uses to influence others. You can influence others in.
Class Directors and Committee Chairs. Both Class Directors and Committee Chairs are “Leaders of Leaders.” Committee chairs and class directors spend their.
What is a case?  A written description of a business situation or problem  Provides factual information about a company’s background ○ organizational.
Revised 03/08 Transition for Students Planning for Your Future.
Class Directors and Committee Chairs Key Club Kick Off Conference Training Workshop.
Best Current Operational Practices – Efforts from the Internet Society Deploy360 – Internet Society.
In your business. DATING!!! Take a few minutes and write down one of the best dates you have ever been on. Then we will have a few of you share your exciting.
Facilitate Group Learning
© 2007 Open Grid Forum Enterprise Best (Community) Practices Workshop OGF 22 - Cambridge Nick Werstiuk February 25, 2007.
Lecture 10 More Innovation SE3821 Software Requirements and Specification Dr. Rob Hasker (based on slides by Dr. Brad Dennis)
1.2 What Can We Work Together? Pg. 6 Creating a Quilt Using Symmetry and Investigations.
Public Relations and the Net Moving into the World of Cyberspace.
Polling and Voting Adrian Farrel Routing Area Director Maastricht, July 2010.
PARENT NIGHT Working Together To Achieve What’s Best For Your Child.
ENGLISH 101 WEEK 2 Tuesday. Review and Announcements A Couple of Important Things to Note: On your schedule there might be a couple of places I accidently.
Some Common Interview Questions Exposed Lynn D’Angelo-Bello The Center for Career & Professional Development.
Family Matters: The Effects of Adolescents’ Exposure to Political Discussion in the Home David E. Campbell University of Notre Dame.
IPSP Outcomes Reporting Framework What you need to know and what you need to do.
Boston Public Schools: Professional Development Teacher Leadership and Education Policy Teachers and Education Policy--Challenges and Opportunities.
A Template for Stakeholder Dialogue. Purpose To move its students to greater success with college and career readiness and in other state priorities the.
SCHOOL NEWSPAPER CAMPAIGN Challenge: Student Participation By: Yu Qiong He & Tenzin Choeyang.
Example Commentary Report Research results Big Data Analytics - the extent of deployment and the accuracy of the insight 1.
Unit 8.1 – Using New Technology Author: Tim Musgrave Student ID: A H808 ECA Core Evidence.
Young Adult Engagement: Process, Peer Development and Product Farjad Agha & Rachel Cooper.
The Research Paper English 12. Argumentative Research Papers  Present a strong claim to a possibly resistant audience  You will gather evidence by looking.
NASP 2009 Annual Conference Management Potpourri Caryn Siebert Carl Warren & Company Chris McPadden Travelers.
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
Sweet Adelines International
Supply Chain Best Practices Executive Seminar
Math Facts: 10s You will have 3 seconds to complete each problem.
Creating a Community of Inquiry
Math Facts: 6s You will have 3 seconds to complete each problem.
Math Facts: 5s You will have 3 seconds to complete each problem.
Math Facts: 10s You will have 3 seconds to complete each problem.
Math Facts: 3s You will have 3 seconds to complete each problem.
Math Facts: 9s You will have 3 seconds to complete each problem.
Math Facts: 2s You will have 3 seconds to complete each problem.
Math Facts: 8s You will have 3 seconds to complete each problem.
Presentation transcript:

Operators and the IETF – the survey Standardizing the future, together Jan Žorž and Chris Grundemann, ISOC mailto:

The Internet Society Primal reason: The Dream In a perfect world… The IETF creates standard protocols with operator input and they work great Deployment and operationalization concerns are consistently addressed The level of operator engagement makes sense when compared to vendor and academic involvement Operators always know when their input is needed Operators always provide their input when it’s needed

The Internet Society Primal reason: The Reality Operators aren’t that much engaged enough… The significant portion of operators (at least mid/small size) don’t join IETF mailing lists nor do they show up to IETF meetings Current IETF attendees, including many stakeholders, make vital decisions without this operator input The operators expected to deploy these technologies often don’t even know that they are being developed Critical new technologies are being developed with little to no direct operator input Standards deemed ready by recent IETF attendees sometimes turn out to be problematic in operational networks

The Internet Society Our role This topic was discussed for many years now and we decided it’s time to gather some real data from the operators ISOC’s Chris Grundemann created a massive online survey with many questions Our team within ISOC is working to facilitate communications between operators and the IETF to help ensure operational realities help inform standards development. Part of that is to understand what the issues are from the operators’ perspective so that we can address the concerns and ultimately help make better standards..

The Internet Society The survey Survey started at the beginning of 2014 and ended on 1 st of July people answered the survey Many questions and also opportunity for people to describe with their own words “why” in different categories Opportunity for operators to openly express their frustrations, concerns and their various reasons

The Internet Society The survey Main categories: Who are you (technical, management, operational, etc…) Level of IETF participation (not at all, just ML, meetings, participating in full, etc…) If not participating – why not? If participating – why do you think other opers are not participating that much? What would *you* do to increase operators participation in the IETF?

The Internet Society Sample of results (just for those that indicated that they are not participating)…

The Internet Society Sample of results (just for those that indicated that they are not participating)…

The Internet Society Sample of results – are you tech?

The Internet Society Sample of results – are you participating?

The Internet Society Sample of results – do you know IETF?

The Internet Society Sample of results – why?

The Internet Society Sample of results – Mailing lists?

The Internet Society Sample of results – Mailing lists?

The Internet Society Sample of results – IETF Meetings participation?

The Internet Society Sample of results – IETF Meetings participation?

The Internet Society In short: Majority of survey participants were Operators/Engineers/Architects Not many developers Half of them claim to have a managerial role (remember this one) More than 90% were primarily technical About half of them do not participate in the IETF in any form ~30% participate just on mailing lists

The Internet Society In short: They heard of IETF, know what IETF does but still half of them don’t know how to participate Majority of survey participants who do not participate believe that IETF documents ARE relevant to their job More than half think that their operator input is welcomed and disagree that they rely on vendors 64% say they do NOT rely on vendors to represent them More than half had heard of IETF mailing lists but think that they don’t know what happens on the lists Strong majority of survey participants claim that they are interested in IETF mailing lists, find the content relevant, thinks it’s their job but don’t have enough time for them

The Internet Society In short: Half of the survey participants don’t know what happens at IETF meetings nor how to participate, but at the same time they claim that they are interested and that the content seems appropriate. More than half of the survey participants that do not participate in IETF claim that time is an issue and 82% say that they don’t have travel budget for IETF meetings, despite the fact that over 50% of them have a managerial role.

The Internet Society There’s lots of more data in the survey We got some suggestions, descriptions in their own words, frustrations and also indications where the issues might lie We’ll write an I-D with our findings and also some potential suggestions to draw more operators towards the IETF Stay tuned for IETF91 in Hawaii ;)

The Internet Society Q&A? Questions? Suggestions?