Plasma Homocysteine and Coronary Heart Disease David S. Rosenblatt, MD Department of Human Genetics McGill University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Funding to Oxford University for MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Medical Research Council$14M British Heart Foundation$2M Merck $8M Roche Vitamins$8M Designed,
Advertisements

The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP)
SHARP trial Study of Heart and Renal Protection : a randomised placebo-controlled trial The e ff ects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus.
Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) Colin Baigent, Martin Landray on behalf of the SHARP Investigators Disclosure: SHARP was.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events Purpose To assess the relative efficacy of the antiplatelet drugs clopidogrel.
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) 5804 patients aged 70–82.
Economic evaluation of MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group University of Oxford UK.
Vitamins - what is the evidence? Rohan Subasinghe.
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
1 Therapies Not Indicated Andrew P. DeFilippis, Ty J. Gluckman, James Mudd, Catherine Campbell, Gregg Fonarow & Roger S. Blumenthal.
Who should have statins 18 th March Nonfatal MI CHD death Any major coronary event CABG PTCA Unspecified Any coronary revascularisation.
Lipid Lowering Substudy Trial of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288: ALLHAT- LLT.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
The concept of Diabetes & CV risk: A lifetime risk challenge The Clinical Significance of LDL-Cholesterol: No Longer a Hypothesis? John J.P. Kastelein,
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
LIPID: Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease Purpose To determine whether pravastatin will reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
B-1 Pravastatin-Aspirin Combination René Belder, M.D. Executive Director Clinical Design and Evaluation, Metabolics Pharmaceutical Research Institute Bristol-Myers.
The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) 2 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2006; available at: End pointActive therapy PlaceboRelative.
C-1 Efficacy of the Combination: Meta-Analyses Donald A. Berry, Ph.D. Frank T. McGraw Memorial Chair of Cancer Research University of Texas M.D. Anderson.
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Lancet 2010;epub 9 Nov.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
? What more will it take to turn the tide of treatment for angina patients from a PCI-first to an optimal medical therapy– first approach? 1.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
Baseline characteristics and eligibility criteria of participating trials Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2005;366:
Can Folic Acid Prevent AMD? Rick Trevino, OD Evansville VA Clinic
Date of download: 6/10/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effects of Homocysteine-Lowering With Folic Acid.
Over Time Additional Risk Factors Can Progress: Effect of Cholesterol and BP on CHD Risk in MRFIT Trial
The FAVORIT Study (Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction in Transplantation) Source Bostom AG, Carpenter MA, Kusek JW, et al. Homocysteine-lowering.
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior cerebrovascular disease.
Statins The AURORA Trial Reference Fellstrom BC. Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360. A.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from participants in 26 randomised trials Lancet 2010;
Volume 376, Issue 9753, Pages (November 2010)
US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
ASCEND Randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin 100 mg daily in 15,480 patients with diabetes and no baseline cardiovascular disease Jane Armitage.
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
These slides highlight a presentation from a Special Session of the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials sessions during the American College of Cardiology 2005.
Volume 376, Issue 9753, Pages (November 2010)
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
Cause of death Treatment-arm events, % (n=45 054)
The Heart Rhythm Society Meeting Presented by Dr. Johan De Sutter
Effects on 11-year mortality and morbidity of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin for about 5 years in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised.
The results of the SHARP trial
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the American College of Cardiology 2004, Scientific Sessions, in New Orleans, Louisiana on.
Presentation transcript:

Plasma Homocysteine and Coronary Heart Disease David S. Rosenblatt, MD Department of Human Genetics McGill University

OBJECTIVES 1)To describe the evidence for a role for homocysteine in coronary artery and vascular disease 2)To present evidence from recent prospective trials

Homocysteine and Heart Disease Evidence from Inborn Errors of Metabolism

In 1969, Kilmer McCully proposed the homocysteine hypothesis of vascular disease based on autopsy findings of extensive atherosclerosis and arterial thrombosis in two children-one with classical homocystinuria and one with an inborn error of vitamin B 12 metabolism.

Homocysteine and Heart Disease CYSTATHIONINE SYNTHASE DEFICIENCY CLASSIC HOMOCYSTINURIA

Glycine

Homocysteine and Heart Disease COMBINED HOMOCYSTINURIA AND METHYLMALONIC ACIDURIA cblC

Homocysteine and Heart Disease Evidence from Observational Studies

Homocysteine and Heart Disease H Y P E

Homocysteine and CAD

Homocysteine and Heart Disease Evidence from Prospective Trials

S E A R C H Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (Circulation 118: 2310, 2008)

Homocysteine and Heart Disease SEARCH results slides provided by Dr. Jacques Genest, McGill University

SEARCH: 2 separate randomised treatment comparisons in 12,064 post-MI patients Homocysteine-lowering comparison Folic acid 2mg + Vitamin B 12 1mg daily vs Placebo Mean (SD) duration: 6.7 (1.5) years

SEARCH: Reduction in HOMOCYSTEINE with allocation to FOLATE/B 12 versus placebo Reduction µmol/lpercent Month % Year % Year % AVERAGE3.828% Mean (SD) baseline: 13.5 (5) µmol/l

Folate allocationRisk ratio & 95% CI EventPlaceboActiveActive betterPlacebo better (n=6031)(n=6033) Non-fatal MI431(7.1%)429(7.1%) Coronary revascularisation590(9.8%)591(9.8%) CHD death463(7.7%)422(7.0%) Major coronary events1229(20.4%)1185(19.6%)4.7% SE 4.2 increase Fatal stroke59(1.0%)65(1.1%) Non-fatal stroke218(3.6%)222(3.7%) Total stroke269(4.5%)265(4.4%)1.8% SE 8.7 increase Non-coronary revascularisation178(3.0%)153(2.5%)16.9% SE 11.9 increase MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS1537(25.5%)1493(24.8%)4.0% SE 3.7 increase SEARCH: FOLATE/B 12 on MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS

Folate allocationRisk ratio & 95% CI Year of follow-upPlaceboActiveActive betterPlacebo better 1265/6033(4.4%)228/6031(3.8%) 2220/5751(3.8%)236/5783(4.1%) 3232/5483(4.2%)197/5511(3.6%) 4192/5202(3.7%)194/5257(3.7%) 5221/4958(4.5%)192/5010(3.8%) 6192/4680(4.1%)209/4749(4.4%) 7+215/4400(4.9%)237/4467(5.3%) /5751(22.1%)1265/5783(21.9%)1.8% SE 4.0 increase ALL FOLLOW-UP1537/6033(25.5%)1493/6031(24.8%)4.0% SE 3.7 increase SEARCH: FOLATE/B 12 on MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS by year of follow-up

Folate allocationRisk ratio & 95% CI PlaceboActiveActive betterPlacebo better Homocysteine (µmol/L) <11363/1735(20.9%)377/1736(21.7%) ≥11 <14563/2255(25.0%)521/2315(22.5%) ≥14611/2043(29.9%)595/1980(30.1%) ALL PATIENTS1537/6033(25.5%)1493/6031(24.8%)4.0% SE 3.7 increase SEARCH: FOLATE/B 12 on MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS by baseline HOMOCYSTEINE

Folate allocationRisk ratio & 95% CI Cause of deathPlaceboActiveActive betterPlacebo better (n=6031)(n=6033) CHD463(7.7%)422(7.0%) Stroke59(1.0%)65(1.1%) Other vascular51(0.8%)58(1.0%) All vascular573(9.5%)545(9.0%)5.5% SE 6.1 increase Neoplastic260(4.3%)251(4.2%) Respiratory67(1.1%)65(1.1%) Other medical67(1.1%)78(1.3%) Non-medical16(0.3%)11(0.2%) All non-vascular410(6.8%)405(6.7%)1.6% SE 7.0 increase All causes983(16.3%)950(15.8%)3.8% SE 4.6 increase SEARCH: Effects of Folate/B 12 on Mortality

Summary of SEARCH findings in context of meta-analyses of previous trials Lowering homocysteine with folic acid supplementation is safe, but does not reduce the risk of vascular events

B V T T B-Vitamin Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration

Homocysteine and Heart Disease BVVT unpublished meta-analysis results provided by Dr. Robert Clarke, University of Oxford

BVTT meta-analysis: Effects of FOLATE on MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS by trial % CI 95% CI 99% CI 95% CI Events (%) TreatmentControl (n=11,658)(n=11,707)Risk ratio (CI) Treatment better Control better Trial CHAOS-2111(11.8)95(10.1) 1.21 ( ) WENBIT327(21.2)313(20.2) 1.06 ( ) VISP300(16.4)300(16.2) 1.01 ( ) NORVIT978(52.2)1011(53.9) 0.96 ( ) WAFACS376(13.8)366(13.5) 1.02 ( ) HOPE-2790(28.7)796(28.8) 1.01 ( ) SEARCH1537(25.5)1493(24.8) 1.04 ( ) Total4419(25.0)4374(24.7) 1.02 ( ) (n=17,691)

Effects of BVTT of B-vitamins on coronary events, in published trials

Effects of BVTT of B-vitamins on stroke events, in published trials

BVTT meta-analysis: Effects of FOLATE on CANCER by year of follow-up % CI 95% CI 99% CI 95% CI Events (%) TreatmentControl (n=16,751)(n=16,796)HR (CI) Treatment better Control better Year of follow-up Year 1 286(1.7)309(1.8) 0.93 ( ) Year 2 323(2.0)279(1.7) 1.16 ( ) Year 3 244(1.7)219(1.5) 1.12 ( ) Year 4 212(1.7)193(1.5) 1.11 ( ) Year (1.9) 193 (1.8) 1.02 ( ) Years (3.0)257(3.0) 1.02 ( ) Total1521(9.1)1450(8.6) 1.05 ( ) Test for trend :  1 2  0.04; p=0.9

Effects of BVTT of B-vitamins on cancer events, in published trials

BVTT meta-analysis: Effects of FOLATE on CANCER SUBTYPES % CI 95% CI 99% CI 95% CI Events (%) TreatmentControl HR (CI) Treatment better Control better Cancer Subtypes Colorectal175(1.0)160(1.0) 1.10 ( ) Other gastrointestinal 129(0.8)123(0.7) 1.05 ( ) Prostate265(1.6)233(1.4) 1.14 ( ) Other genitourinary 178(1.1)173(1.0) 1.02 ( ) Lung 206(1.2)186(1.1) 1.11 ( ) Breast111(0.7)132(0.8) 0.83 ( ) Melanoma44(0.3)46(0.3) 0.96 ( ) Haematological 93 (0.6) 95 (0.6) 0.98 ( ) Other320(1.9)302(1.8) 1.07 ( ) ALL1521(9.1)1450(8.6) 1.05 ( ) (n=16,751)(n=16,796)

Effects of BVTT of B-vitamins on mortality, in published trials

Summary of BVVT Meta-Analysis and overall CONCLUSIONS Lowering homocysteine with folic acid supplementation is safe, but does not reduce the risk of vascular events

So don’t fear the hype just yet….

Lama Yamani Isabelle Racine- Miousse Junhui Liu Our lab David Watkins David Rosenblatt Natascia Anastasio

Summary of SEARCH findings in context of meta-analyses of previous trials More versus less LDL-lowering comparison: SEARCH results are consistent with previous trials of statin vs control and of more vs less statin Larger reductions in LDL cholesterol with statin therapy produces larger reductions in major vascular events