Selection for Lifetime Production

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Where next for Terminal Sire Recording? Samuel Boon, Signet Manager and EBLEX Breeding Specialist.
Advertisements

Phenotypes for training and validation of genome wide selection methods K G DoddsAgResearch, Invermay B AuvrayAgResearch, Invermay P R AmerAbacusBio, Dunedin.
Chapter 9: Inbreeding and cross-breeding Effect of inbreeding on individual and population level Effect of cross-breeding Minimum inbreeding systems Population.
Breeds of Swine Created by: Tracey Hoffman Topic #3021
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Mongastric Production Swine Section Breeding and Selection of Swine.
PIC337 x Camb Crossbred Genetic Trends PIC337 x Camb 5 yr Genetic Trends Annual Trend Total No. Born / litter0.12 Stillborn (%TNB)-0.16 Pre-wean.
PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Economic Differentiation Through Lifetime Production Ken Stalder, Professor Department of Animal Science Iowa State.
“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.
PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Production management that delivers results Rafael Kummer, Phd. Master Company - Brazil.
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection Composite Populations Larry V. Cundiff ARS-USDA-U.S. Meat Animal Research Center 2008 Beef Cattle Production.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
Dr. John W. Mabry Iowa Pork Industry Center Iowa State University
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
Heterosis – The Forgotten Tool? Dr. Tom Field Colorado State University Dr. Andy Herring Texas A&M University Cattlemen’s College 2005 NCBA Meeting, San.
Matt Spangler Beef Genetics Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Chuanyu Sun Paul VanRaden National Association of Animal breeders, USA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USA Increasing long term response by selecting.
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
EBLEX Better Returns Programme Material produced for EBLEX Beef BRP by Signet Breeding Services Genetic Improvement of Beef Cattle in the UK.
 Selection & Culling Strategies Mario S. Mongeon; OMAFRA.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Chapters 13 & 14. Objectives Understanding of the concept of genetic variation Knowledge of quantitative vs. qualitative traits Appreciation for genetic.
Multi-breed Evaluation J. Keith Bertrand University of Georgia, Athens.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Heterosis-Ignored or Forgotten? (or did we ever believe in it to start with?) D. A. Daley California State University, Chico.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Improving Productivity Noel H Williams PIC North America.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Beef Cattle Production
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Nuts and Bolts of Genetic Improvement Genetic Model Predicting Genetic Levels Increase Commercial Profitability Lauren Hyde Jackie Atkins Wade Shafer Fall.
Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding April 27, 2010 Interpretation of genomic breeding values from a unified, one-step national evaluation Research project.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
NE WS2 SYSTEM Paul Lubout. CONTENT 1.Genetic inheritance similar to livestock 2.DNA not the magic solution. Can be used for: Identification Parentage.
Whole genome selection and the 2000 bull project at USMARC Larry Kuehn Research Geneticist.
Advanced Animal Breeding
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Genetic gain in selected herds of Khari goats over generations in Nepal Rupak Khadka European Master in Animal Breeding and Genetics Swedish University.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
Gene350 Animal Genetics Lecture September 2009.
David L. Thomas Department of Animal Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison Basics of Sheep Breeding for Commercial Flocks.
My vision for dairy genomics
Gene Editing Opportunity for Accelerating Gain
Beef Genomics and Data Programme
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Using EPDs in Selection
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
WP Leader: SRUC (Georgios Banos) INIA, AUTH, UNIVPM, CSIC, AHDB
Pedigrees.
Using EPDs in Selection
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
Percent of total breedings
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Unit 4: Genetic Selection & Mating
Presentation transcript:

Selection for Lifetime Production

Complexity of Lifetime Production

Process of Genetic Improvement Detailed and meaningful data capture Accurate prediction of genetic merit Meaningful selection objectives and targets

Data Sources SIRE LINE DAM LINE MULTIPLICATION CBVs EBVs and selection decisions MULTIPLICATION COMMERCIAL Breeding stock GN COMMERCIAL CROSS BRED SLAUGHTER PIGS SIRE LINE DAM LINE GN Progeny Performance Data PICTraq Database Commercial Sow Performance Data Objective is to select within pure lines for commercial crossbred performance Sire line & Dam line Sire Line Piglet Performance: Mortality Pre-weaning Nursery Grow/finish Production traits Carcass traits Dam Line Sow performance Sow mortality Reproduction Contemporary crossbred information used in BLUP to increase the accuracy of selection for commercial crossbred improvement objectives subject to G x E interaction (e.g., growth)difficult or impossible to measure sufficiently in pure line selection candidates (e.g., reproduction, mortality, congenital defects, meat quality) Commercial Progeny Performance Data

Dam Line Programs April 2011

Purebred and Crossbred Sows Contributing to Genetic Evaluation

GNX FIRE Test Implemented in May 2010 Enhanced Differentiation Pedigreed commmercial pigs Terminal Maternal Heavy slaughter weights Approximately 290 lbs. Low energy, pelleted diets

Prediction of Genetic Merit Basic principle… Resemblance between relatives Meaningful data Accurate pedigree Historically, we have utilized data flows combined with pedigree and small amounts of genomic information for prediction of genetic merit (i.e. EBV’s, index values, etc.)

Initial Implementation of New Era of Genetic Technologies Genomic Selection Initial Implementation of New Era of Genetic Technologies Scrotal Hernia Finisher Mortality Total Born

What’s Next? Single Step Genomic Evaluation Information extracted from the DNA can be used mainly in two ways: Genetic markers: estimate the effect of each SNP on each trait. Genomic relationships: estimate the actual fraction of genes identical by descendent

How many identical genes 2 pigs share? Resemblance Between Relatives EBV Based on pedigree, we assume it’s 50% between ALL full-siblings

How many identical genes 2 pigs share? Resemblance Between Relatives EBV Based on pedigree, we assume it’s 50% between ALL full-siblings Genomic Information shows it is between 40 and 60%

Single Step Genomic Evaluation Where’s the Benefit? Instead of assuming relationships based only pedigrees we define relationship on pedigree + DNA, Therefore for every animal and every trait our genetic evaluation is improved… Constantly linking newest phenotypic data with Pedigree information augmented by DNA Delivering a significant cumulative gain in accuracy of selection.

Single Step Genomic Evaluation Increasing Rate of Genetic Gain TRAIT ACC EBV ACC GEBV increase Total Number Born 0.36 0.40 11% Stillborn % 0.28 0.33 18% Litter weaning weight 0.16 0.20 25% Interval weaning - mate 0.11 0.14 27% Survival birth - weaning 0.29 0.34 17%

Genetic Differentiation = Profitability Enhancement If selection objectives and intensity are aligned and focused, PIC differentiation in the sow farm should be delivered via delivery of high quality weaned pigs at the lowest possible cost… Maximum efficiency per litter Maximum efficiency of inventory Maximum efficiency in utilization of inputs

PIC Commercial Female Performance

PIC Commercial Female Performance

PIC Commercial Female Performance

Data currently captured in PIC genetic improvement program Lifetime Production and Efficiency Targeting and Delivering the Key Drivers Data currently captured in PIC genetic improvement program

Camborough Potential

Example of Lifetime Performance GP 1070 sow in 6th parity with 26 NBA and 25 of those were weaned with help from foster sows

53.3 pigs TB/sow/yr 51.1 pigs BA/sow/yr Parity 1 114 days gestation P1 18TB 16BA 140 Days to Parity 2 19TB 19BA 143 Days to Parity 3 22TB 20BA 139 Days to Parity 4 18TB 18BA 140 days to Parity 5 17TB 17BA 144 days to Parity 6 26TB 26BA…25 weaned Lifetime Performance (so far) 820 days of herd life 120 pigs Born 116 Pigs Born Alive 0.146 pigs TB per day in farm 0.141 pigs BA per day in farm 53.3 pigs TB/sow/yr 51.1 pigs BA/sow/yr