SPU Institute- Day 2 July 21, 2009. Session Overview Team Project Essential Conditions Thinking about implementation – Structures – Norms Formative Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
1 Welcome to Module 1 Principles of Mathematics Instruction.
Beginning With the End in Mind Planning Higher-Level Multiple Choice and Open Response Assessment Items Tom Stewart.
Welcome and Introductions  Name  Grade Level/Role.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Standards Based Assessment Systems Dana Anderson ESD 113
How to Integrate Students with Diverse Learning Needs in a General Education Classroom By: Tammie McElaney.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Students’ Interactions with One Another Chapter 6 Note---shift of focus from the teacher to the students…….
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Common Core Summer Institute Fourth Grade July 31-August 2, 2012.
Curriculum & Staff Development Center
Literature Circles.
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
1 District PLC/Curriculum Team  To provide a liaison between the PLC teams and the Admin SIPPLC team  Revise and align K-12 curriculum to.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Student-Centered Coaching Instructional Design and Assessment Presented by Diane Sweeney Author of: Student-Centered Coaching (Corwin, 2010), Student-
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Collaborative Data Teams
Cooperative Learning Students work together in small groups and learn through interaction with each other while the teacher coaches the process.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Implementing Mathematics Common Core Module 1-2: Helping Students Orient to the Thinking of Others Janda Lannigan, Traci Loftin, Sarah Roggensack, Denise.
Standards-based grading What does it look like?.
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
Presented by Instructional Coach Angela Harriston, M.Ed. Data Systems The Dream Team: Inspiring Students to Dream Big!
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Engaging Students in Productive Challenge December 9, 2013 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204.
Robert Kaplinsky Melissa Canham
COSIA 2010 Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences WEEK 12: Assessments & Reflections.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
Effective Questioning: Gap Closing Grade 9 Student Success Summer Program 2011 Mathematics 7-12.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Necessary Conditions. Washington Education Association Educational Service Districts Association of Washington School Principals Washington Association.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Planning for Equity Laura Maly Astrid Fossum Lee Ann Pruske Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Math Teacher Leader Training January 2011.
Putting It All Together Diane Gross USD 261 8/11/06.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Professional Learning Communities Session 2 Tenino High School December 15, 2009.
Working with PLCs Seattle Pacific University July 20-23, 2009 Dana Anderson ESD 113 (Olympia)
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
Effective Grading Strategies Alison Morrison-Shetlar Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning Adapted from the book Effective Grading by Barbara Walvoord.
START BY TURNING IN YOUR ESSAY – THEN SCORE YOUR DEJ for TODAY (10 minutes) Homework Due Monday (previous) -Final Draft of GOSM (students have been working.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Professional Learning Communities Session 1 Rainier Elementary November 10, 2009.
Daily Math Review Kindergarten – 2nd February 6, :30 – 3:45pm.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Daily Math Review 2 nd Grade February 6, :30 – 3:45pm.
Teacher Refresher Course Professional Learning Program Program 1 Learning Leaders: Jill Flack Maureen O’Rourke.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Indiana Room Math Leadership Teams December 8, 2014.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
1 Chapter 2 Grading Design Instruction and Evaluation Systems.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
W R I T I N G M A T T E R S A workshop of the Hoosier Writing Project a site of the National Writing Project at IUPUI Herb Budden, Co-director.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan For Associate’s Degree in Library Skills (Donna Roy)
Implementation Training
Team Teaching Section 8: Conclusion to Models of Team Teaching.
The Year of Core Instruction
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
© 2017 Script. All Rights Reserved
Presentation transcript:

SPU Institute- Day 2 July 21, 2009

Session Overview Team Project Essential Conditions Thinking about implementation – Structures – Norms Formative Assessment Team Project

Connecting to Prior Learning Turn to a neighbor and share one thing you recall from our last session…

Concerns from last time… Reluctant staff Finding time/resources Role of leadership Topics for PLC

Stages of concern Awareness - I am not concerned. Management - I’m spending all my time preparing. Information Seeking - I’d like to know more. Personal - How will using it affect me? Consequence - Is this making a difference? Collaboration - How are others doing this? Refocusing - I have ideas to make this better. Adapted from National Staff Development Council - “Tools For Schools” February/March 2003

Norms for the Day Review Team Norms: 6 1.Review team norms worksheet 2.Discuss norms within your group 3.Identify 3-5 norms you agree on for today

Team Projects 1.Who are you? 2.What is your school/school system’s “really big deal”? 3.How do PLCs fit in? 4.What actions steps are you suggesting? 5.How do you represent your understanding? 6.How did this course influence your thinking/planning?

Time to Explore:

Are you Ready for a PLC? 1,2,3, Shoot

Reflective Dialogue Faculty/staff members talk with each other about their situations and the specific challenges they face. Not at allSomewhat50%To a large degree To a great extent Discussion:

1, 2, 3, Shoot De-Privatization of Practice Teachers share, observe, and discuss each others’ teaching methods and philosophies. Not at allSomewhat50%To a large degree To a great extent Discussion:

Finish “Shooting” Minutes PLC Survey

What barriers exist in your school? Based upon your discussion or your experience… – What barriers exist for PLCs in your school? – What are your highest priority concerns? – How will you engage others in this conversation?

Initial Thoughts Time for Learning & Collaboration Removing Barriers Establishing Group Procedures Working as a team/Teacher Isolation Resources Facilitation Physical Proximity

Entry Points

1.Identify your priority areas of concern 2.Select guiding questions that best match your priority concerns: – Select Facilitator, timekeeper and scribe – Discuss and record responses to questions – Summarize your action plans

Ah…Grades…That’s what he’s talking about… Why do we do what we do?

A Brief History of Time… Prior to mid 1700’s students did not get grades, they received written narrative feedback Yale University quantified feedback on a 4 point scale (4.0 system) Harvard created “Divisions” – Division 1: 90 to 100 – Division 2: 75 to 90 – Division 3: 60 to 74 – Division 4: 50 to 59 – Division 5: 40 to 49 – Division 6: below 40

Why Change the Current Grading System? 1.We Consider Factors Other Than Academic Achievement when Assigning Grades 2.We Weight Assessments Differently 3.We Misrepresent Single Scores on Classroom Assessments 4.We compare students against each other instead of what they need to learn (standards) (Source: Transforming Classroom Grading by Robert Marzano)

Student 1 Same Teacher Student 2 Same Course Same Homework Scores Same Tests Scores Same Quiz Scores Same Project Scores Same Presentation Scores Factors Other Than Academic Achievement Grade “A”Grade “B-”

Percentage of Teachers Reporting Use of Effort, Behavior, Cooperation, and Attendance in Determining Grades Grade LevelEffortBehaviorCooperationAttendance K31%7%4%8% 1-329%8%4%8% 4-630%8% 10% 7-036%10%8%18% %14%9%24% Factors Other Than Academic Achievement

Teachers Weight Assessments Differently Teacher 1 Teacher 2 Team Teaching Same Class Same Students Same Homework Scores Same Quiz Scores Same Test Scores Grading Based on Achievement Factors (No effort, behavior, etc) Exactly the same Assessment Information to Construct Grades Agreement 57.7% of the Time

Misrepresentation of Single Scores Student 1Student 2Student 3 All 3 students do the same class assignment Assignment has two parts Part I – Multiplication Part II – Deductive Reasoning, Problem solving, Communicating Mathematically Each part is worth 10 points

Part 1 Directions: Fill in the answer for each multiplication problem. 1.7 x 6 = x 11 = 3.9 x 7 = 4. 7 x 32 = 5.6 x 6 = x 5 = 7.42 x 7 = 8. 5 x 5 = x 3 = x 9 = Part II Directions: Write your answer and show all your work on a separate piece of paper. Treena won a seven-day scholarship worth $1,000 to the Pro Shot Basketball Camp. Round-trip travel expenses to the camp are $335 by air or $125 by train. At the camp she must choose between a week of individual instruction at $60 per day or a week of group instruction at $40 per day. Treena’s food and other expenses are fixed at $45 per day. If she does not plan to spend any money other than the scholarship, what are all the choices of travel and instruction plans that she could afford to make? Explain your reasoning. Mathematics Assignment

Misinterpretation of Single Scores Student 1Student 2Student 3 All 3 students do the same class assignment All 3 students receive the same percent score All 3 students receive the same grade All 3 students have demonstrated different understandings

Misrepresentation of Single Score – Single Score represents a wide array of Skills and Abilities StudentsComputationProblem SolvingScore Karen10414 Mike41014 Sue7714

Think Time What do you think about the four problems with grading? Are there other issues related to grading practices that concern you?

You can’t rely on the 100-point scale.

C. Item 15–16 Two items that asks for application in novel situations that go beyond what was explicitly taught Total for section = A. Items 1–10 Ten items that require recall of important but simpler content that was explicitly taught B. Items 11–14 Four items that ask for application of complex content that was explicitly taught AND in situations similar to what was taught. Total /100

Total for section= /40 /20 /40 A. Items 1 – 10 Ten items that require recall of important but simpler content that was explicitly taught B. Items 11 – 14 Four items that ask for application of complex content that was explicitly taught AND in situations similar to what was taught. C. Item 15–16 Two items that asks for application in novel situations that go beyond what was explicitly taught

+ + Total for section = All correct Two correct None correct A. Items 1 – 10 Ten items that require recall of important but simpler content that was explicitly taught B. Items 11 – 14 Four items that ask for application of complex content that was explicitly taught AND in situations similar to what was taught. C. Item 15–16 Two items that asks for application in novel situations that go beyond what was explicitly taught Total /100 /40 /20 /40

Total + + Total for section = 40/40 20/40 0/20 All correct Two correct None correct A. Items 1–10 Ten items that require recall of important but simpler content that was explicitly taught B. Items 11–14 Four items that ask for application of complex content that was explicitly taught AND in situations similar to what was taught. C. Item 15–16 Two items that asks for application in novel situations that go beyond what was explicitly taught

Another Jigsaw Formative Assessment Article Use the “Save the last word for me” protocol What are the big ideas in formative assessment? How do they apply to your school setting?

Preparing for Next Steps (Exit Task) Please complete the Exit Task sheet What did you take away from today’s session? What support do you feel you need? What questions are still rolling around in your head?

Team Time Prepare for Wednesday’s Presentation--- Who are you? What is your really big deal? How do PLCs fit in? What are your next steps? How do you represent your understanding?