IUFRO International Union of Forest Research Organizations Eero Mikkola Results of WP2 – Report Introduction to the work of WP2: Metadata, Keywords and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to the ALCTS FRBR Interest Group, ALA Annual, 24 June 2011
Advertisements

Ali Alshowaish. dc.coverage element articulates limitations in the scope of the resource, typically along the following lines: geographical, temporal,
Dublin Core for Digital Video: Overview of the ViDe Application Profile.
1 of 15 Information Access Internal Information © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Access Internal Information.
Open Access to Grey Resources Indexing Grey resources : considering the usual behavior of library users and the use of DC metadata using a database of.
DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Application Profiles: managing metadata.
Agents and Authority Linking Breakout sessions Oct 4 2-4, Oct 5 3-4:30 Goals: Explore issues in Agent discovery. Do we need an Agents working group? If.
OLAC Metadata Steven Bird University of Melbourne / University of Pennsylvania OLAC Workshop 10 December 2002.
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs
Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) Workshop Carol Perry Ernie Boyko April 2005 Kingston Ontario.
NEFIS (WP5) Evaluation Meeting, November 2004 Evaluation Data Rights Aljoscha Requardt, University of Hamburg Response Rate: 91% - 10 of 11 partners.
Work plan – Evaluation - General Aspects - NEFIS – mid-term, WP2 and WP3 Meeting, Vienna March 2004 University of Hamburg, Aljoscha Requardt WP 5:
Hamburg NEFIS WP5 GT & Tim R 1 NEFIS Evaluation Meeting WP3 Report Tim Richards (EFI) Moh Ibrahim (Greenwich University) University of Hamburg.
Andreas Schuck Metadata schema, keywords and guidelines NEFIS WP5 Meeting November, 2005 Hamburg, Germany.
METSÄNTUTKIMUSLAITOS SKOGSFORSKNINGSINSTITUTET FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE Expert evaluation Jarmo Saarikko (Metla team) NEFIS WP5 meeting.
2/22/2014 E U R O P E A N F O R E S T I N S T I T U T E The general objectives of NEFIS are maximising the value of existing data and databases by: coordinating.
Risto Päivinen NEFIS 15 November Project Timetable.
Network for a European Forest Information Service WP 4 Data preparation and data provision.
Technical System Options
Metadata workshop, June The Workshop Workshop Timetable introduction to the Go-Geo! project metadata overview Go-Geo! portal hands on session.
Metadata vocabularies and ontologies Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development
Risto Päivinen, Andreas Schuck and Tim Green NEFIS - Network for a European Forest Information Service QLK5-CT JRC Ispra - 29 June 2005.
NEFIS WP2 Mid-Term Meeting Vienna May 2004.
METSÄNTUTKIMUSLAITOS SKOGSFORSKNINGSINSTITUTET FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE Expert evaluation - details - Jarmo Saarikko (Metla team)
Intro The Evaluation of the NEFIS Project focused on: Metadata
IUFRO International Union of Forest Research Organizations Eero Mikkola Description of WP2 – NEFIS Metadata and Controlled Vocabularies Standards - work.
IUFRO International Union of Forest Research Organizations Eero Mikkola The Increasing Importance of Metadata in Forest Information Gathering NEFIS Symposium.
Metadata 8/7/2012 Katie Moss Digital Metadata Technician, Digital Library Services
FPS HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT 1 Joint Action on Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting Zuzana Matlonova Brussels – April 11th, 2013.
NEFIS Evaluation Meeting (WP5) Aljoscha Requardt, University of Hamburg NEFIS (WP5) Evaluation Meeting, November 2004  Metadata  VTK Workshop Topics.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
Design Plans CSCI102 - Systems ITCS905 - Systems MCS Systems.
Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – FGDC CSDGM National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center Please .
Introduction to Metadata: Overview and Guidelines Using the Dublin Core Metadata Schema Amelia Breytenbach Metadata Specialist
8/28/97Organization of Information in Collections Introduction to Description: Dublin Core and History University of California, Berkeley School of Information.
Metadata Considerations Implementing Administrative and Descriptive Metadata for your digital images 1.
Meta Tagging / Metadata Lindsay Berard Assisted by: Li Li.
Jan 9, 2004 Symposium on Best Practice LSA, Boston, MA 1 Metadata Helen Aristar Dry Eastern Michigan University LINGUIST List.
1 How to make the GEOSS Data CORE a reality Part 1 Max Craglia Presented on behalf of Max by: Alan Edwards, EC Stefano Nativi, CNR.
LIS654 lecture 5 DC metadata and omeka tables Thomas Krichel
Metadata and Documentation Iain Wallace Performing Arts Data Service.
Common Engineering Documents Inspection or trip reports Research, laboratory, and field reports Specifications Proposals Progress reports Instructions.
PACSCL Consortial Survey Initiative Group Training Session February 12, 2008 at The Historical Society of Pennsylvania.
1 Dublin Core & DCMI – an introduction Some slides are from DCMI Training Resources at:
SCORM Course Meta-data 3 major components: Content Aggregation Meta-data –context specific data describing the packaged course SCO Meta-data –context independent.
1 Understanding Cataloging with DLESE Metadata Karon Kelly Katy Ginger Holly Devaul
CSUN eCommons Submitting Learning Objects to CSUN eCommons: A Preliminary Guide February 7, 2008.
Basic Metadata Workshop Claire Hill Project Coordinator, AVEL An introduction to metadata and its application.
Working Group on the Registration of Music Archives Berkeley 2002 David Day, Chair.
NEFIS (WP5) Evaluation Meeting, November 2004 Evaluation Metadata Aljoscha Requardt, University of Hamburg Response rate: 93% (14 of 15 partners.
COMMON COMMUNICATION FORMAT (CCF). Dr.S. Surdarshan Rao Professor Dept. of Library & Information Science Osmania University Hyderbad
Project management and communication structure Nataša Urbančíková Faculty of Economics Technical University of Košice.
Application Profiles Application profiles -- are schemas which consist of data elements drawn from one or more namespaces, combined together by implementers,
Statistical Data and Metadata Exchange SDMX Metadata Common Vocabulary Status of project and issues ( ) Marco Pellegrino Eurostat
Data Citation Implementation Pilot Workshop
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
Metadata Schema Registries: background and context MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
® OGP/IPIECA Oil Spill Response Common Operating Picture Project RFI Clarification Telecon 30 September 2013.
Attributes and Values Describing Entities. Metadata At the most basic level, metadata is just another term for description, or information about an entity.
5th Session of the Task Team on WIGOS Metadata
Data Management: Documentation & Metadata
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
UFNPT Planning and Development Work Plan, Milestones and Timelines
Márton Németh – László Drótos How to catalogue a web archive?
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
Lab 2: Information Retrieval
Overview of The Bidder Response Form and Changes to the IT RFP Template March 8, 2019.
STEPS Site Report.
Interoperability of metadata systems: Follow-up actions
Presentation transcript:

IUFRO International Union of Forest Research Organizations Eero Mikkola Results of WP2 – Report Introduction to the work of WP2: Metadata, Keywords and Guidelines NEFIS WP5 Meeting November, 2005 Hamburg, Germany

Introduction to the work of WP2 This work package has addressed the development of two elements: metadata and controlled vocabularies The task of WP2, was to establish a NEFIS metadata standard based on DCs 16 elements and accompanying refinements and develop a controlled vocabulary to facilitate the cataloguing and accessing of NEFIS metadata records and underlying datasets.

Introduction to the work of WP2 IUFRO compiled responses from the 12 partners engaged in the WP2 regarding terminology used and needed and their thoughts on the preferred metadata schema. Instructions for submitting ideas on NEFIS metadata requirements (e.g. desired fields) were sent to WP2 partners.

Introduction to the work of WP An iterative process of information compilation, publication of draft vocabulary and metadata schema, open review through electronic media, and final refinements, has lead to the draft vocabulary and metadata schema It was discovered during the input process that partners had different needs, understandings, and interpretations of metadata.

Introduction to the work of WP2 Recommended additional fields A wide discussion took place regarding the addition of selected elements for the NEFIS metadata schema. In particular, participants expressed an interest in adding a field for quantifying the quality of the information product they would be posting to the NEFIS. Quality Report: The idea of including a field that allows data providers to indicate, and users to assess, the quality of a submitted information product has been carried over from the EFIS project.

Introduction to the work of WP2 Recommended additional fields Nominated Terms: In addition to testing a quality report metadata field it was determined that NEFIS data providers should have an avenue to submit terms not found in the NEFIS controlled vocabulary. A refinement under the element Subject was added to accommodate this possible need.

Introduction to the work of WP2 NEFIS Vocabulary The first step in developing the NEFIS vocabulary was to request input on draft themes from the 13 WP2 participating organizations. After deciding on the initial NEFIS themes, example hierarchical keyword lists were developed for selected themes for which partners would provide data sets The development was based on three existing recognized vocabularies (CABI thesaurus, AgroVoc, NAL).

Introduction to the work of WP2 NEFIS Vocabulary The presented tables provide an overview of approaches and an entry point to solutions. Keyword lists for five themes: Inventory, Silviculture, Forest products and trade flows, Forest maps and geo-referenced data and Field experiments Draft keyword lists for six themes: Health, Vegetation (or forest or land) types (inc. soil types), Non-wood goods and benefits,Operations Fire and Rural development

Introduction to the work of WP2 NEFIS Vocabulary Creating a complete controlled vocabulary (CV) of terms in the forestry domain within the timeframe of this project is not technically or economically feasible. The approach taken in WP2 illustrates the processes that need to be undertaken to construct a forestry CV (Thesaurus?) which is appropriate for NEFIS in the longer term.

Introduction to the work of WP2 NEFIS Metadata Guidelines Describe how to catalogue and describe resources for NEFIS. Describe the essential requirements of each element of the data entry interface and provides the structure into which data from converted catalogues must fit as well as the element specifications. The manual is organized by DC element.

Introduction to the work of WP2 NEFIS Metadata Guidelines Based on DC 16 NEFIS elements which are required to submit metadata into the NEFIS system. Ten mandatory elements: Title, Creator, Subject, Description, Publisher, Date, Type, Format, Language and Rights Optional (desirable) elements: Contributor, Identifier, Source, Relation, Coverage and Audience

Introduction to the work of WP2 NEFIS Metadata Guidelines Each NEFIS element is by its full name and label For each element there are guidelines to assist in creating metadata content, whether it is done from scratch or by converting an existing record in another format. In the NEFIS Metadata Guidelines the elements are listed in the order they were developed, but there are other useful ways to group them.

Introduction to the work of WP2 NEFIS Metadata Guidelines Title* Term Name: title Label: Title Refinements: Alternative Definition: A name given to the resource [by the Creator or Publisher]. Comment: Typically, a Title will be a name by which the resource is formally known. Guidelines for creation of content: If in doubt about what constitutes the title, repeat the Title element and include the variants in second and subsequent Title entries. If the item is in HTML,,,, Examples: title="A pilot's guide to aircraft insurance" title="The sound of music"

Self interest or money! Thank you for your attention! NEFIS WP5 Meeting November, 2005 Hamburg, Germany