Copyright ©2011 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, All Rights Reserved IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 Sustained Efficacy and Tolerability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Greatest Hits of 2012 Mark Wainberg McGill AIDS Centre Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Quebec.
Advertisements

Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Potent Antiretroviral Effect of MK-0518, a Novel HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor, in Patients with Triple-class Resistant Virus Potent Antiretroviral Effect.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 Sustained Efficacy and Tolerability of Raltegravir after 240 Weeks of Combination ART in Treatment- Naive HIV-1 Infected.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Poster # 388 CROI Feb Montreal, Canada Association of HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism with Immunologic and Virologic Parameters in HIV-1 infected,
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
IAC 2006 Abs# THLB0214 Potent Antiretroviral Effect of MK-0518, a Novel HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor, as part of Combination ART in Treatment -Naïve HIV-1.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Brett-Smith, ATAC, 2/24/02 Stavudine Extended Release (Zerit ® XR; d4T XR) Stavudine Prolonged Release Capsules ATAC Meeting 2/24/02.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Resistance to the HIV-Integrase Inhibitor Raltegravir: Analysis.
DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Superior Outcome for Tenofovir DF (TDF), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Efavirenz (EFV) Compared to Fixed Dose Zidovudine/Lamivudine (CBV) and EFV in Antiretroviral.
Weekly Alendronate Safe and Effective at Increasing Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Persons on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on: McComsey GA, Kendall.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Raltegravir.
FLAMINGO Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects SE/HIV/0023/14c January 2014.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Efavirenz Use Not Associated With Depressive Episodes, According to Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes Slideset on: Journot V, Chene G, De.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
Sustained Antiretroviral Efficacy of Raltegravir as part of Combination ART in Treatment-Naive HIV-1 infected patients: 96-week data M. Markowitz1, B.-Y.
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Switch to Etravirine from Efavirenz due to CNS Toxicity SSAT-029 STUDY
Intensification with INSTI
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Intensification with INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
Comparison of NRTI combinations
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

Copyright ©2011 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, All Rights Reserved IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 Sustained Efficacy and Tolerability of Raltegravir after 240 Weeks of Combination ART in Treatment-Naive HIV-1 Infected Patients: Final Analysis of Protocol 004 E. Gotuzzo 1, B.-Y. Nguyen 2, M. Markowitz 3, F. Mendo 4, W. Ratanasuwan 5, C. Lu 2, S. Bhanja 2, H. Teppler 2, and the Protocol 004 Part II Study Team 1 Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; 2 Merck Research Labs, North Wales, PA, United States; 3 Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York, NY, United States; 4 Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati, Lima, Peru; 5 Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

Copyright ©2011 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, All Rights Reserved IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 Percentage of Patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL (NC=F) Change from Baseline in CD4 Cell Counts (OF) Virologic and Immunologic Responses % 68.8% Week 240 (OF approach): RAL 89% EFV 77% Raltegravir

Copyright ©2011 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, All Rights Reserved IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 Safety Summary: Week 240 Overall adverse event (AE) profiles, all causality –Generally similar for RAL and EFV (other than neuropsychiatric AEs) –Similar frequencies reported at Weeks 192 and 240 Drug-related clinical AEs –Less common with RAL than EFV: 55% vs 76% (p=0.017) Neuropsychiatric symptoms* –Most occurred by Week 48 –At Week 240: 38% for RAL vs 63% for EFV Malignancies † –3.1% (5/160 pts) in RAL group, none considered drug-related –2.6% (1/38 pts) in EFV group, 1 event (GI carcinoma) possibly drug-related Grade 3 / 4 lab abnormalities uncommon –Similar frequencies reported at Weeks 192 and 240 Minimal effect of RAL on serum lipids *Abnormal dreams, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, depressed mood, depression, dizziness, insomnia, nightmare, psychotic disorder, somnolence, suicidal ideation, suicide attempt. † Cases included: in RAL group: 1 pt with B-cell lymphoma, 2 pts with Kaposi’s sarcoma, 1 pt with basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SC), and 1 pt with non-small cell lung carcinoma; in EFV group: 1 pt with gastrointestinal carcinoma (possibly drug-related) and SC.

Copyright ©2011 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, All Rights Reserved IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 Exploratory Analysis: Prognostic Factors Associated With CD4 Cell Count at Yearly Time Points Prognostic Factor P-value † Wk 48Wk 96Wk 144Wk 192Wk 240 Baseline CD4 cell count (cells/mm 3 ) < Week 8 HIV RNA decline (log 10 copies/mL) < Treatment Group † p-Value calculated from a linear regression model with CD4 cell count separately at each time point as the dependent variable adjusted for baseline CD4 cell count (c/mm 3 ), Week 8 HIV RNA decline (log 10 copies/mL) and treatment group. Significant predictors for CD4 cell count (at 0.05 critical value) at each time point were: (1) baseline CD4 count and (2) log HIV RNA decline at week 8.

Copyright ©2011 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, All Rights Reserved IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 CONCLUSIONS RAL + TDF/3TC demonstrated sustained antiretroviral efficacy through 5 years, similar to EFV + TDF/3TC: –HIV RNA <50 copies/mL in 69% of RAL patients vs 63% of EFV patients –CD4 counts continued to increase through 5 years in both groups RAL was generally well tolerated over 5 years: –Safety profile similar to Week 144 (3 years) and Week 192 (4 years) –Drug-related AEs less frequent with RAL than EFV –RAL has minimal effect on LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides In an exploratory analysis, statistically significant predictors for CD4 cell count at each yearly time point were baseline CD4 count and early (week 8) log HIV RNA decline.