Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

The Governors Grants Office Presents: Smart Issues for Effective Grants Management Governors Grants Office Higher Education Conference May 22, 2012 Martin.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
1 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Guidance -- History & New Structure Steve Bradley, Director.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
What’s New in Government Internal Control Standards?
Standards for Internal Control in the Government Going Green Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government 1.
Implementing the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
New Responsibilities of Pass Through Entities Under the Uniform Grant Guidance Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
U.S. Department of Education The Uniform Guidance Audit Requirements – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Complying With The Federal Information Security Act (FISMA)
Uniform Grant Guidance Laura Hirst Office of the Auditor General.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Procurement Policies under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Standards for Internal Control in the Government Going Green Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government 1.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
1. The Perkins Act – bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s250enr.tx t.pdf Your OMB Circulars
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the Office of Management and Budget’s Circular A-133 Presented to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
OMB’s Management Watch List (MWL) & High Risk Projects List How to More Effectively Track, Analyze and Evaluate Your Agency IT Investments October 9, 2007.
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
Safeguarding Federal Funds OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Implementing the Uniform Guidance Alabama Department of Education.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
How To Ensure Your Agency Has A Strong Subrecipient Monitoring System Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
Session 11 & 12. Auditing standard of I.A. & A.D. Prescribes: Auditor should report about weakness in Internal Control of management (Para 7.1.) Weakness.
OMB’s “Super Circular”: What Community Development Professionals Need to Know National Community Development Association Presented by Bob Lloyd January.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
The New Super Circular Inaugural Tribal Accounting Conference November 16, 2015 Morgan Aronson National Single Audit Coordinator
Jaimie Lewis Omnitrans San Bernardino, California SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Performance Accountability Review Risk-Based Management Kathryn Hornsby Technical College System of Georgia NACTEI May 14, 2009.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
F&A Rates 101 Basics of F&A rates for Proposals, Grants, & Contracts Dr. Mindy S. Connolly, CPCM Sr. Sponsored Research Officer Office of Sponsored Projects.
Maryland State Department of Education Brief Update on Select Fiscal Matters Related to Grant Issuance and Management Title I Spring Meeting 2016 Kim Stewart,
Billy Swindell Shelley Fleming, CPA State of Oklahoma Single Audit 1.
Subgrantee Monitoring and Risk Assessment Principles
Subrecipient Monitoring
Welcome State directors & your staff members
UNIFORM GUIDANCE: RESULTS AND BEST PRACTICES
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Understanding the Uniform Guidance Effective Dates
Uniform Guidance Discussion
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
CoC Subrecipient Management
Understanding a Subrecipient Agreement
Presentation transcript:

Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education

2 Purpose and Use of this Presentation The Department of Education is providing this presentation to help its grantees understand the contents of the Uniform Guidance and should be viewed after or alongside of the regulations. It is not a substitute for reading the regulations. To get the most out of this presentation, view this as a notes page. The notes section of each slide provides information to supplement the points on the slide. To change to notes page: Go to View and click on Notes Page.

3 Learning Outcomes  Understand concepts of risk and risk-based monitoring;  Understand the risk requirements in 2 CFR Part 200;  Be able to find the relevant regulations in 2 CFR Part 200; and  Apply this knowledge in your job.

4 Uniform Guidance Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200 (2 CFR Part 200) Accepted by the Department of Education in 2 CFR Part 3474

5 “This guidance does not change or modify any existing statute or guidance otherwise based on any existing statute.” Authorities to consider when using 2 CFR Part 200

6 When does 2 CFR Part 200 start? Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) applies to:  New and Continuation grants awarded on or after December 26, 2014 Former regulations (EDGAR Part 74 or 80 and OMB circulars) apply to:  Grants awarded prior to December 26, 2014

7 Relationships and Key Terms Subaward or Contract? The relationship, rather than the document title, is the basis for determining which requirements are applicable. Know the Difference.

8 Definitions: Pass-through entities A non-Federal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a Federal program (§200.74). At ED:  State-Administered Formula Grants: SEAs, other grantees which make subawards  Discretionary Grants: under EDGAR or authorizing statute, some discretionary grantees may make subawards. These are not the same as partnerships.

9 Definitions: Subrecipient and Contractor A pass-through entity must determine the relationship and the applicable requirements:  Subrecipient means a non-Federal entity that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a Federal program (§200.93).  Contractor means an entity that receives a contract as defined in Contract (§200.23).  § explains the roles of subrecipients and contractors

10 Understanding Risk

11 What is Risk? (GAO – The Green Book) Risk is the possibility that an event will occur and adversely affect the achievement of objectives.

12 What is Risk Management? (GAO) Risk management can be described as the continuous process of assessing risks, reducing the potential that an adverse event will occur, and putting steps in place to deal with any event that does occur.

13 Risk Management Risk AssessmentRisk Mitigation Risk-Based Monitoring

14 Risk and Monitoring Key Concepts and Changes in the Uniform Guidance Indicates a new requirement or change to existing requirement for pass-through entities.

15 Parallels: ED and Pass-through entities Whether an ED program office or pass-through entity, the following concepts are the same. The practices and tools, however, may differ.  Risk Assessment,  Risk Mitigation, and  Risk-based Monitoring.

16 Overview (2 CFR ) Grantees, as pass-through entities, must:  Assess risk of subrecipients. (§ (b))  Monitor to ensure the subaward is used appropriately and in compliance with the award and all associated regulations. The monitoring plan should be based on the results of the risk assessment. (§ (d)) The risk assessment and monitoring should address both financial and programmatic considerations.

17 Where are the Requirements? TopicPass-through entities Award Notification§ (a) Risk Assessment§ (b) Specific Conditions§ * High-Risk Designation§ Monitoring§ (d)-(e) Subpart F* Non-Compliance§ * *Section references these sections for requirements.

18 Pass-Through Risk Review (§ (b)) Items that may be part of the Pass-through entity’s review:  Prior experience with same or similar subawards  Results of previous audits  Whether new or substantially changed personnel or systems  Extent and results of Federal awarding agency moni toring

19 Risk Rubric Risk Rubric highlights  Risk indicators  Risk categories  Scoring mechanism  Risk designation levels

20 Specific Conditions (§ ) If deemed appropriate based on the risk assessment, specific conditions (e.g., increased reporting, reimbursement plan) may be placed on:  A subaward from a pass-through entity (§ (c) refers to (§ )) In addition, a high-risk designation can be added to a subaward, as per §

21 Pass-Through Monitoring Procedures  When monitoring subrecipients, the pass-through entity must (§ (d)):  Review reports required by the pass-through entity  Ensure subrecipient takes appropriate action on deficiencies identified through audits, on-site reviews, and other means  Issue a management decision for single-audit findings pertaining to Federal award  Verify audits of subawards (§ (f))  Threshold for required audits increased to $750,000

22 Pass-Through Entity Monitoring Tools  The following tools may be useful, depending upon the risk assessment (§ (e))  Providing subrecipient training and technical assistance  Performing on-site reviews  Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements under § , Audit services [in Cost Principles] The pass-through entity determines which tools to use based upon its assessment of risk

23 Risk-Based Monitoring Plan Monitoring Plan highlights  Assessment methodology  Last Fiscal Year (FY) assessment & monitoring activities  Current FY assessment & monitoring strategies  Resource constraints

24 Audit Requirements Single Audit (2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F) Alternatives to Single Audits  Program specific audit  Agreed-Upon-Procedures Additional Audits, as requested by Congress or the Federal Government  GAO Audits  OIG General Audits

25 Other Pass-through Requirements The pass-through entity must provide specific information in the subaward ( § (a)), including but not limited to:  Federal award identification, e.g., DUNS number  Indirect cost rate  Requirements imposed by the pass-through entity  Requirement to provide access to records for audit

26 Continuous Improvement Standard Evaluate annually the risk management process to identify its strengths and weaknesses and refine ability to reduce risk throughout the grant process

27 Responsibilities

28 Compliance: Grantees Responsibility for subawards:  Strong Internal Controls for managing subawards  Communication with ED Staff and with subrecipients  Documentation of all activities  Monitoring subawards  Verifying subgrantees are audited, if required