Vladimir Livshits Maricopa Association of Governments May, 2009

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP4 – 4.1 and 4.2 Preparatory activities for the creation of the WATERMODE permanent network 1 Technical Committee Meeting Venice, June 24-25, 2010 VENETO.
Advertisements

Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE - FACULTY OF GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION (ITC) Human Sensor Web project h2.0 Inform and Empower Initiative Human.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Resetting the measurement table CTR Board Meeting March 28, 2014 WSDOT Staff Evaluating a New CTR Program.
Gabe Rousseau Federal Highway Administration Office of Human Environment.
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
6th MSDI Working Group Meeting
MAG New Generation Freight Model SHRP2 C20 IAP Project Vladimir Livshits, Ph.D AMPO Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA October 23, 2014 Freight Session.
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division Oregon Transportation Plan 2005 Modeling Alternative Policy Choices Becky Knudson,
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
Transportation Planning Analysis UnitPNREC 2006 Transportation Modeling in Oregon: Overview of ODOT Statewide Integrated Model Pacific Northwest Regional.
The European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans 25 th September 2014 Casablanca, Morocco Christof Marx Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.
Lecture IntentLecture Intent  Position my scholarship within ideas and streams introduced in seminar to this point  Provide initial introduction to.
Justice Information Network Strategic Plan Development Justice Information Network Board March 18, 2008 Mo West, JIN Program Manager.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Transportation Planning Applications Committee (ADB50) presented by Sarah Sun Federal Highway Administration.
Regulatory Transparency and Interaction with the Government Dr. Konstantin Petrov Head of Section, Policy and Regulation.
NYMTC Strategic Data Management Kuo-Ann Chiao Technical Group Director.
Gzim Ocakoglu European Commission, DG MOVE World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), 24/06/2010.
Strategic and operational plan. Planning it is a technical function that enables HSO to deal with present and anticipate the future. It involve deciding.
Development and Transfer of Technologies UNFCCC Expert Workshop On Technology Information Technology Transfer Network and Matchmaking Systems: a LA & C.
Creating a Shared Vision Model. What is a Shared Vision Model? A “Shared Vision” model is a collective view of a water resources system developed by managers.
Factors of success of International tourism destinations Lecture 9.
Oregon Modeling Improvement Program Oregon Modeling Improvement Program An Innovative Approach to Support Public Policy & Decision-Making Prepared for.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
1 Improving Statistics for Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development – Action Plan for Africa THE RESEARCH COMPONENT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION.
Dr. David Mowat June 22, 2005 Federal, Provincial & Local Roles Surveillance of Risk Factors and Determinants of Chronic Diseases.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
BUSINESS DRIVEN TECHNOLOGY
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
August 29, 2007 Metropolitan Travel Forecasting TRB Special Report 288 Mn/DOT Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee August 29, 2007.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Handbook for Developing a Transportation Management Center Operations Manual Sponsored by the TMC Pooled-Fund Study Single.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Weather Information for Surface Transportation: AASHTO Activities June 13, 2006 WIST Workshop Presented by Leland D. Smithson AASHTO SICOP Coordinator.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Competing For Advantage Chapter 4 – The Internal Organization: Resources, Capabilities, and Core Competencies.
HDM-4 Institutionalization. 2 HDM is for decision-support tool; not decision- making Institutionalization process should ensure that outcome is:  sustainable,
Creating a Statewide Modeling System in Virginia Presentation for the 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 7, 2007.
Shaping a Health Statistics Vision for the 21 st Century 2002 NCHS Data Users Conference 16 July 2002 Daniel J. Friedman, PhD Massachusetts Department.
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit, Transportation Development Division TRB Innovations in Travel Modeling Conference The Path to a Staged Implementation.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
Transportation Planning: An Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Copyright  2007 McGraw-Hill Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Marketing Research 2e by Lukas, Hair, Bush and Ortinau Slides prepared by Judy Rex 19-1 Chapter Nineteen.
Analysis of the External Environment and Competition
Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)
Theme : Information, monitoring & research NWRS Workshops October - December
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Strategic and operational plan
Project Overview – Phase 1
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
Florida’s Multimodal Mobility Performance Measures Program
HDM-4 Future Directions
CHAPTER 7: The Manager as a Planner and Strategist
SHRP2 C20: Freight Demand Modeling and Data Improvement Strategic Plan
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
Planning for automated travel
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Vladimir Livshits Maricopa Association of Governments May, 2009 Technical Innovations in the Regional Planning Processes: SWOT Analysis from a Practitioner's Perspective Vladimir Livshits Maricopa Association of Governments May, 2009

What is SWOT? Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats Internal Strength that facilitates planning goals Internal Weakness that impedes planning goals External Opportunity that facilitates planning goals External Threat that impedes planning goals

What is the purpose of this presentation? Take a systemic look at the innovations in terms of their interplay and overall effect on the common practice in planning processes. Generate a discussion leading to better allocation of resources and cooperation in implementing most appealing innovations Offer some ideas for innovations evaluation and planning

What is a technical innovation in transportation planning? We will talk about new technical tools in transportation planning (new model, new program, new interface, new hardware, etc.) We will not talk about new planning ideas (new facility type, new land use policy, etc.) GPS data collection Reliability Analysis Multiyear Master Transportation Networks Geo Databases Photo visualization Geo Analysis Activity-based Travel Forecasting Models Mobile GIS Modeling of Dynamic Traffic Phenomena 3d rendering Smart board interactive overlay Cellular data collection Uncertainty Analysis

Main Causality of Technical Innovations in Regional Planning Planning Needs (necessary but not sufficient) New Planning Processes Political stratum New Planning Tools Evaluation stratum Discussion framework Modeling stratum Technological Advancements (sufficient, but not necessary) Data stratum

Climate Change and Environmental Protection Needs Sustainability Needs Needs to account for Economic Volatility and for Plan Sensitivity Needs to Account for Uncertainty Needs to Evaluate New Travel Modes and Transportation Technologies Needs to Evaluate New Policies and Regulations Needs to Reflect New Travel Behavior Are emerging planning needs threats or opportunities in achieving planning goals/regional visions? Example analysis of planning needs in relation to planning goals

Can Technological Advances help to address new challenges /threats in achieving planning goals? Dramatic Increase in Computing Power: multiple processors, distributed computing, cloud computing Dramatic Decrease in Computational and Storage Costs New Web Technologies New GIS technologies New GPS technologies New Technological Expectations Lack of New Technological Expertise Competitiveness on the HR market Example technological opportunities and implications.

Future Staff Requirements and Availability of Technical Expertise Life Cycle of existing technologies, maintenance and support cost and availability Stakeholders and general public expectations Applicability to foreseeable tasks Efficiency in execution of typical technical tasks What are weaknesses and strengths of proposed innovations in terms of advancing regional planning agenda? Resulting implications of developing new planning tools

Department of Economic Security MPO Planning Process Environmental Protection Agency Federal Guidelines and Requirements MPO Planning Process Statewide Planning Interstate Corridor Planning Federal Guidelines and Requirements MPO Planning Process Community Participation Freight Planning Federal Guidelines and Requirements MPO Planning Process Federal Guidelines and Requirements MPO Planning Process Environmental Justice Department of Environmental Quality Federal Guidelines and Requirements MPO Planning Process Socio-Economic Forecasting Environmental Planning FHWA Guidelines and Requirements Multi-jurisdictional Coordination Multimodal Planning Land Use Planning FTA Guidelines and Requirements Multi-jurisdictional Coordination Multimodal Planning Land Use Planning FTA Guidelines and Requirements MPO Planning Process Economic Vitality Sustainable Development Federal Guidelines and Requirements MPO Planning Process Congestion Management Process Public-Private partnerships Federal Guidelines and Requirements MPO Planning Process Safety Financial Planning Federal Guidelines and Requirements MPO Planning Process Federal Guidelines and Requirements Complexity of the planning process – makes analysis and decisions difficult – need to establish some structure to facilitate innovation decisions

Regional Planning Business Process Real planning business process: numerous data types/sources, agents/departments/agencies

Technical Innovations Strata in the Regional Planning Process Data Evaluation Models Decisions Core technical process strata: Observed data for analysis and modeling Models for predictions, explanations and descriptions Project evaluations and programming/planning Strata for innovations selection and analysis – reflects technical information flows

Data Stratum: Innovative Planning Tools Web-based GUI data access Visualization: GIS, Google Data Integration (different types of data, historic data, jurisdictional data) Enterprise Application Integration (e.g. integration with modeling applications - automated model validation tools, with data collection applications - QA/QC, automated data upload) Built-in data analysis tools Example evaluation of innovations on the data stratum

Why it was important and urgent

Data Collection and Management Innovation Decision Matrix Threats Opportunities Strengths Urgent Not Important e.g. innovative capitalization on another ongoing project where the need can be addressed with traditional tools as well Not Urgent e.g. opportunity to improve data disposal Weaknesses Important e.g. innovative approach to address unmet data needs from a major project or stakeholder Best Time to introduce innovations data collection data acquisition data analysis data storage data security data retrieval data access and dissemination data archiving data disposal Arrows indicate results of example project level decisions on data management innovations Key slide on innovations evaluation approach. Internal weakness in combination with external opportunity lead to best time for innovation introduction.

Modeling Stratum: Strengths and Weaknesses Modeling assumptions are inadequate for future planning needs but are in-line with existing planning processes Models are not integrated with each other and other parts of the planning process Data Evaluation Models Decisions

Innovations in Transportation Modeling = Relaxed Modeling Assumptions + Capitalization on Computing Technology Uncertainty & Sensitivity Four Step Trip Based Paradigm Activity / Tour Based Paradigm Long Term Choices: Residence Location Work Location School Location Car Ownership TG Purpose/ User Class Prism Activity/ Person/ Household Prism Assumptions TD Assumptions Assumptions MS Assumptions Short Term Choices: Activity Choice Time of Day Choice Mode Choice Route Choice TA Assumptions Assumptions

Example innovations/trends in modeling field related to modeling software. Can be evaluated in SWOT/Urgent/Important framework for vendors/innovation choice.

Transportation Modeling Innovation Decision Matrix Paradigm Shift and disaggregation – Data Mining and Knowledge Management - Database Approach, ABM Enterprise Application Integration and Automation - PMDS, Geo Database, Master Network Data Accessibility and Visualization - Web-based GIS technologies, 3D Arrows indicate results of example project level decisions on data management innovations Threats Opportunities Strengths Urgent Not Important e.g. innovative capitalization on another ongoing project where the need can be addressed with traditional tools as well Not Urgent e.g. an improvement in the traditional four step based procedure that is not crucial for model applications or future development Weaknesses Important e.g. innovative approach to address unmet data needs from a major project or stakeholder Best Time to introduce innovations Key slide on innovations evaluation approach. Internal weakness in combination with external opportunity lead to best time for innovation introduction.

Evaluation Stratum: Strengths and Weaknesses Disconnect between evaluation, data analysis and modeling, necessity for complex manual effort Insufficient accessibility of project data, ability to easily visualize and query project information Robust manual procedures and established guidelines Data Evaluation Models Decisions

Evaluation Stratum and Process Integration Innovations New dimensions introduced by both political and technical nature of the process Process Integration Issues with other strata Visualization and Accessibility-web based Outsourcing and Cooperation – vendors Evaluation stratum – goes beyond technical domain

Conclusions and Recommendations Agency level systemic analysis is crucial for technical innovations’ introduction Innovations should be planned and considered in the overall planning business process and not in isolation Introduction of technical innovations affect different strata of the planning process. It should and can capitalize on the synergy of cooperative efforts between departments and agencies and efficient outsourcing to third party vendors