Electronics Recycling Symposium 2009 E-Waste Developments in the U.S. by Jason Linnell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

CRT/Electronic Waste Committee OVERVIEW OF THE DRAFT IDAHO ELECTRONIC DEVICES RECYCLING ACT Drafted by Representative Trail Eastern Idaho Regional Solid.
AT Reuse Conference –9/15 Reuse and the New Laws by Jason Linnell.
Legislative and Regulatory Update: US Federal and State Initiatives IERI Electronics Recycling Education Program Jason Linnell Executive Director National.
Overview of Electronics Recycling Systems and Policies Jason Linnell Executive Director, NCER Waste Expo 2007.
New State E-Scrap Programs: A Business Opportunity Or A Business Bust For Processors? Jason Linnell E-SCRAP 2007.
Electronics Recycling Systems and Policies in the United States Jason Linnell Executive Director, NCER.
Waste Expo 2010 E-Waste Developments in the U.S. by Jason Linnell.
ISRI Convention & Exposition Electronics Recycling Summit ® State Issues & Challenges Thursday April
SERDC Green Prosperity Workshop 2009 E-Waste Developments in the U.S. by Jason Linnell.
Electronics Recycling Developments in WV and the USICEEP January 14, 2008 Jason Linnell Executive Director.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Millions of uninsured Source: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: United States Census Bureau,
Jason Linnell State Electronics Recycling Overview NRC Congress ▪ September 22, 2008 Jason Linnell, NCER.
Compliance Services Jason Linnell, NCER. Overview State laws: Dividing the states –Know the system types Manufacturer needs and possible services Other.
Overview of State E-Waste Laws Barbara Kyle Electronics TakeBack Coalition June 2, 2009.
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
Waste Expo 2009 – Monday, June 8 E-Waste: New Laws, New Programs by Jason Linnell.
Mobility Update as of February 15, WA OR CA NV ID MT ND SD WY UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX OK KS NE MN IA MO AR LA MS ALGA FL WI IL MI IN KY TN SC NC VA.
Iowa Recycling Association 2009 E-Waste Developments in the U.S. by Jason Linnell.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Step Therapy State Legislation Update AK HI CA AZ NV OR MT MN NE SD ND ID WY OK KS CO UT TX NM SC FL GAALMS LA AR MO IA VA NC TN IN KY IL MI.
State Electronics Recycling Trends Waste Expo 2008 May 5, 2008 Jason Linnell.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, FY.
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
Electronic Death Registration Systems, by Jurisdiction
House price index for AK
Washington State's Electronics Recycling Law: A Producer Responsibility System
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Percent Change in Average Nongroup Premium Following Implementation of a State Individual Mandate, 2019 WA –15.1% NH: –13.7% ME –10.7% MT –11.1% ND –15.4%
in a Regulatory Environment
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WA –16.9% NH: –18.8% ME –14.1% MT –23.7% ND –22.0% VT: –12.6% OR
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Reuse and the New Laws by Jason Linnell AT Reuse Conference –9/15.
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

Electronics Recycling Symposium 2009 E-Waste Developments in the U.S. by Jason Linnell

National Center for Electronics Recycling: Non-profit 501c3 Located in Parkersburg, WV Involved in Federal, State & Association Projects Conduct Research, Run Collection Programs Spearhead the National Electronics Recycling Infrastructure Clearinghouse Manage Oregon State Contractor Program Our Mission: Dedicated to the development and enhancement of a national infrastructure for the recycling of used electronics in the U.S. About Us

19 states (+NYC) with some type of e-waste law o CA, CT, IL, IN, HI, ME, MD, MI, MN, MO, NC, NJ, NYC, OK, OR, RI, TX, VA, WA, WV o Almost 164 million US residents or 53.9% of US population covered by a law o WI law on governor’s desk #20! Disposal bans no program o NH, MA, (AR) Current “State” of States

Overview of States With Laws NYC States With Producer Responsibility Laws States With ARF (Consumer Fees) Laws States With Landfill Disposal Fee States With Disposal Ban/No E-Waste Law WV MD CT ME VA NC IL OK TX MO MN MI CA OR WA AR RI NH VT MA NJ IN

True “Patchwork” of approaches to common challenge How is the program funded? –1 Advanced Fee, 5 Types of Manufacturer Financing Which products are covered? –10 different sets of product lists Who can use the recycling system? –8 sets of “covered entities” Definitions, interpretations vary as well Highlights

NYC RI ARF - Electronic Waste Recycling Fee, assessed on the sale of covered electronic products FEE - Manufacturer Annual Registration Fees (can be significantly reduced by establishing an approved take-back program) SHARE - Manufacturers must finance a program to collect & recycle their brand’s share of covered products, either collectively or independently ( LBS. SOLD Manufacturer pays registration fee and for collection and recycling of covered electronic devices based on their yearly sales to households RETURNS 1 - Manufacturers must develop and implement their own recycling programs for their own returned products (TX requires program to collect from consumers, NC requires program to collect from collectors). RETURNS 2 - Manufacturers pay for transportation and recycling of their own branded products collected by others plus a pro rata share of all orphan products Types of Financing ME CT NJ MD WV HI VA NC MI IL MO OK TX MN WA OR CA IN

States With E-Waste Bills In 2009 Legislature AZ IA IN* NE KY NV** NY MA PA SC VT WI *Passed ** Passed Study Bill CO** UT** GA**

Pending & Enacted Legislation Map AZ IA IN NE KY NV NY MA PA SC VT WI NYC WV MD RI CT ME VA NC IL OK TX MO MN MI CA OR WA Enacted (Bills Passed) Pending (Bills Introduced) HI NJ CO UT GA

StateIn Effect?Date CAYes1/1/2005 MEYes1/18/2006 MDYes1/1/2006 MNYes7/1/2007 MONo7/1/2009 OKYes1/1/2009 ORYes1/1/2009 RIYes2/1/2009 TXYes9/1/2008 VAYes7/1/2009 WAYes1/1/2009 WVYes1/1/ In Effect Above, 7 Pending Below CTNo*7/1/2009 – likely early 2010 HINo1/1/2010 ILNo1/1/2010 INNo4/1/2010 NCNo7/1/2010 NJNo1/1/2010 NYCNo??– delayed plan date

Pounds Per Capita Collected Across State Programs Minnesota N/A6.34 Maryland Maine California Lbs/Capita 2007 Lbs/Capita 2008 State NCER 2008 Per Capita Collection Index = 7%. Absolute per capita average 3.7 in 2006 to 4.2 in 2007 to 4.5 in 2008!

Current Metrics Most Recent Per Capita Rates

Multiple ways to participate, some with winners/losers Get on state list, then start collecting or Get contract with manufacturer/group of manufacturers/“program” before collecting Limited number of customers? Pressure to limit collection volumes or incentive to collect? Producer responsibility and recyclers

Two ways to participate –Get on state list, then start collecting or –Get contract with manufacturer/group of manufacturers/“program” before collecting Not guaranteed! Or at the price you want.. –Some states allow all, others see recyclers competing for your business –Local businesses can be left out What does it mean for collectors?

Definition! Just plug-in or disassembly allowed? Still a challenge – particularly w/ manufacturer financing Reuse sometimes prohibited – every covered device collected must be sent to recycler –Manufacturer could limit as well More recent laws – extra “credit” pounds given to manufacturer for reuse –IL, IN If allowed, how to document appropriate due diligence What does it mean for reuse?

Other Issues Collector issues –What if you collect too much? –Limit non-covered products and non-covered entities? –Haulers – curbside pickups covered/funded? System Leakage –Prices may be better on the “open market” Payment issues –Recyclers compete for contracts, but markets may change Qualification/Certification/Export –Handled differently at state level

The Good News … and Bad News on Certification Certification is on its way! –Weed out bad actors, finally an answer to “who should I work with?” But, 2 separate certifications to choose from: –Responsible Recycling Practices (“R2”) –Basel Action Network’s “E-Stewards” No one certified yet! –Expect to see certified recyclers from both in 2010 (possibly R2 recyclers before that)

State Law Standards State laws also have guidelines: –Maine ESM Guidelines –Oregon Environmental Management Practices –Washington ESM and P standards, plus voluntary “Preferred” level –Connecticut’s pending regulations But, not “certifications systems” –Third party audit doesn’t = certification What will happen when R2 and E-Stewards available?

What Should Collectors/Programs Do? Waiting game – nothing available yet But, ask your recycler which certification program they are pursuing –If not, why not? No need to choose at this point between programs –Will know more about uptake by recyclers by end of 2010

Thank You! Jason Linnell, NCER Phone: (304) Visit us on the web: and

Backup Slides

Desktops, Laptops (over 4 inch), TVs (over 4 inch), Monitors (over 4 inch) Laptops, TVs (over 9 inch), Monitors (over 9 inch) Desktops, Laptops, TVs (over 4 inch), Monitors (over 4 inch) TVs with exclusions (over 4 inch), Monitors (over 4 inch), Laptops (over 4 inch) TVs (over 4 inch), Monitors (over 4 inch), Laptops (over 4 inch) Desktops, laptops, computer monitors, printers, and TVs Desktops, laptops, computer monitors, printers, keyboards, mice, digital music players, and TVs Desktops, monitors, laptops TVs, Desktops, monitors, laptops, keyboard, mice, and other peripheral equipment (excluding printers) *Product scope for MD and MN includes products triggering a manufacturer obligation to participate in the program. NYC Rhode Island Desktops, laptops, computer monitors over 9 inch and TVs over 9 inch Hawaii Product Scope By State

Adding Covered Entities Our Patchwork Quilt -Households -Small Business -Non-Profits -Any Entity w/ Fewer Than 7 Devices -Households -Small Gov’t -Small Business -School Districts -Charities Households Only Consumers Only (Who Use Computer Equipment for Home or Home Business Use) Any Entity Households & Schools Households Small Business with fewer than 7 employees -Households -Small Businesses -Public Schools