Risk Assessments for Exposure of Deployed Military Personnel to Insecticides used for Personal Protection and Disease-Vector Management Robert K. D. Peterson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
Advertisements

Risk Management Introduction Risk Management Fundamentals
Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances 9:15 - 9:30 Introduction” Rick Becker (Session Chair and Panel Moderator) 9:30.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Risk Assessment.
Ten Reasons to Reduce Pesticide Use in Rental Housing April, 2009.
 Define terms associated with integrated pest management.  Differentiate between biological, cultural/physical control, and chemical pest management.
CONFERENCE ON “ FOOD ADDITIVES : SAFETY IN USE AND CONSUMER CONCERNS“ JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY NAIROBI, 24 JUNE 2014.
1 Update on Residential Pesticide Exposure Assessment Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) DoD Pest Management Workshop Naval Air Station, Jacksonville,
Methods for Incorporating Aquatic Plant Effects into Community Level Benchmarks EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
It Takes a Village to Raise a Child Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Section - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Sources of Uncertainty and Current Practice for Addressing Them: Toxicological Perspective David A. Bussard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The views.
Exposure Assessment Thanks to Marc Rigas, PhD for an earlier version of this lecture Much of the materials is drawn from Paustenbach, DJ. (2000) The practice.
John Leahy, EPA Pesticide Re-evaluation Division
What Do Toxicologists Do?
June 16-19, USEPA Cancer Guidelines: Mode of Carcinogenic Action 1 ICABR – Impacts of the Bioeconomy on Agricultural Sustainability, the Environment.
Alternatives to DDT Janice Jensen, USEPA LRTAP POPs Task Force March 1, 2004.
Lindane: A Toxicological Profile Source: US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2005):
Toxicity Evaluation of Chemicals with Limited Toxicity Data Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Division - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Environmental Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis of Contaminated Sites: Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment F. Quercia, ANPA Workshop ICS/UNIDO - Fundacion Mamonal Environmental.
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
Update on Duet™ and insecticide-treated surfaces Sandra A. Allan Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology ARS/ USDA Gainesville FL DoD.
TRAINING FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR
Community Health Risk Assessment An Assessment of Risk Related to the Oil and Gas Industry in Garfield County Teresa A. Coons, PhD Senior Scientist Saccomanno.
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
HERA at CED XXXI C.Lally 1 Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Christeine Lally Co-Chair.
INTRODUCTION TO TOXICOLOGY SIDNEY GREEN, PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACOLOGY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE HOWARD UNIVERISTY.
Production of Nitric Acid Environmental Impact Assessment Erik TolonenNick Poulin Environmental Engineering Environmental Planning and Decision Making.
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
A Review of Exposure and Toxicity. The Need for Gloves and Respirators A Brief Review of Exposure.
Reregistration of Consumer Pesticides: US Environmental Protection Agency December 13, 2005 US Environmental Protection Agency December 13, 2005 Mosquito.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
TCA in groundwater Anne Karvonen Juha Villman Mikko Pohjola.
Risk Assessment 1 Thanks to Paul R. Harp, Ph.D., NH Department of Health & Human Services, US EPA Air Quality Planning & Standards Division, and the DOE.
Risk Assessment.
Protecting Military Personnel by Controlling Host-Seeking Arthropods Brian Quinn USDA/ARS/CMAVE/MFRU Gainesville, Florida.
Personal Protection From Arthropods. Prevent Disease, Disability and Premature Death Objective هدف Explain how to use personal protective measures to.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
Air Toxics Risk Assessment: Traditional versus New Approaches Mark Saperstein BP Product Stewardship Group.
PESTICIDES AWARENESS TRAINING.
DoD Comments to NRC Committee on Improvements to EPA Risk Analysis Yvonne P. Walker, MS, MSE, CIH Director, Environmental Programs Navy Environmental Health.
George M. Woodall, PhD NCEA Toxicologist Leland Urban Air Toxics Research Center October 18, 2005 EPA Reference Values: Regulatory Context.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
NUATRC/TCEQ Air Toxics Workshop October Air Toxics Air Toxics: What We Know, What we Don’t Know, and What We Need to Know Human Health Effects –
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Health risk assessment – systemic effects (1) REMINDER OF INHALED DOSE PO intake is 7.2 mg/day 0.12 mg/kg bw/day for a 60-kg adult 2.
Environmental Risk Assessment and Risk Management Kevin L. Long ENVIRON International Corporation Academy Park High School May 12, 2010.
Key Concepts on Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
Abstract A step-wise or ‘tiered’ approach has been used as a rational procedure to conduct environmental risk assessments in many disciplines. The Technical.
Volker J. Soballa Evonik Degussa GmbH Essen, Germany
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
1 Risk Assessment for Air Toxics: The 4 Basic Steps NESCAUM Health Effects Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.
Use of Borates in Swimming Pools: Consideration of Health Effects
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
Risk Assessment Dec 7, 2009 Timbrell 3rd Edn pp 16-21
The Consortium for Environmental Risk Management, LLC
From Lab to Label: Innovations That Feed The World
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences
TOXICOLOGY.
VICH GL 54, Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: General approach to establish an Acute Reference Dose (ARfD)
Presentation transcript:

Risk Assessments for Exposure of Deployed Military Personnel to Insecticides used for Personal Protection and Disease-Vector Management Robert K. D. Peterson Montana State University Bozeman, Montana

Problem Because of the lack of vaccines and therapeutic drugs, vector management, including the use of personal protective measures, is the best tool that deployed military personnel have against most vector-borne pathogens that cause disease In preparation for military operations and force-health protection, the health risks from vector-borne pathogens that cause disease and vector management tactics need to be understood

Problem Due to long-standing perceptions of risk from pesticides, the use of insecticides may raise concerns about their potential adverse health effects on military personnel The uncertainties about exposure of the troops to pesticides led the DOD to investigate the use and management of pesticides during the Gulf War and to raise concerns about the potential health effects of pesticide exposures to service members in general

Objective To use risk assessment methodologies to evaluate health risks to deployed U.S. military personnel from insect-vector management tactics © 2004 RKD Peterson

Risk Assessment Risk assessment is a formalized basis for the objective evaluation of risk in which assumptions and uncertainties are clearly considered and presented.

Hazard Identification Dose-Response Relationships Exposure Assessment Risk Characterization Risk Assessment Paradigm Problem Formulation

Risk Assessment Extremely conservative assumptions to screen out negligible risks Reasonable worst-case scenarios Tier I Tier II Tier III Tier IV Most refined assessment

Methodology Acute Exposure: Single-day exposures after a single application or use of the chemicalSingle-day exposures after a single application or use of the chemical Subchronic Exposure: The exposure per day over 180 days with multiple spray eventsThe exposure per day over 180 days with multiple spray events Chronic Exposure: The exposure per day over 250 days per year for 10 yearsThe exposure per day over 250 days per year for 10 years

Methodology Hazard Identification: permethrin, resmethrin, sumithrin Outdoor Space Sprays BDU, Bednet Synergist piperonyl butoxide cyfluthrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, alpha-cypermethrin, sumithrin permethrin, deltamethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, alpha-cypermethrin, cyfluthrin Indoor/Outdoor Residual

Insecticide-Impregnated BDU’s Worn 18 hr/day Permethrin Only Dermal Exposure Only Briefs and undershirt Arms, hands, and legs No wash-off or degradation

Insecticide-Impregnated Bednet 8 hr/night permethrin, deltamethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, alpha- cypermethrin, cyfluthrin Inhalation Exposure Dermal Exposure 50% of head, trunk, arms, legs, hands, feet No wash-off or degradation

Surface Residual and Indoor Space Applications Surface residuals: cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, cyhalothrin Indoor space spray: sumithrin Dermal Exposure Only 50% of head, trunk, arms, and hands Subchronic = 6 apps/180 days Chronic = 9 apps/yr AFPMB Image Database

Outdoor ULV Exposure Inhalation: moderate activity Dermal: no clothing 1-hr peak aerial concentration

Subchronic/Chronic Outdoor ULV Exposure Inhalation: moderate activity Dermal: no clothing Inhalation from re-suspended soil particles Dermal exposures from contact with soil Dermal exposures from contact with outdoor surfaces 30 spray events in 250 days

Surface-Residual Spray (cyfluthrin, alpha- cypermethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin) Indoor Space Spray (d-phenothrin) Outdoor ULV Space Spray (permethrin, resmethrin, d- phenothrin, piperonyl butoxide) Insecticide- Impregnated Battle Dress Uniforms (BDUs) (permethrin) Insecticide- Impregnated Bednets (permethrin, cyfluthrin, lambda- cyhalothrin, deltamethrin, alpha- cypermethrin) Dermal contact with sprayed surface Inhalation from spray particles Dermal contact with spray particles Inhalation exposures from re- suspended outdoor soil particles Dermal exposures from contact with soil Dermal exposures from contact with outdoor surfaces Dermal contact with BDU Dermal contact with bednet Inhalation from bednet Application Type Exposure Pathways, Routes, and Durations (acute, subchronic, chronic) (subchronic, chronic)

Methodology Toxicity Endpoints: Chosen based on EPA regulatory endpoints Inhalation and dermal toxicity endpoints used for respective exposure route and duration No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) compared to estimated exposures

Methodology Toxicity Endpoints: Permethrin Example: Inhalation NOAEL = 11 mg/kg body weight (BW) Dermal NOAEL = 500 mg/kg BW

Risk Characterization Integration of toxicity and exposure Margin of Exposure Method (MOE) NOAELExposure If MOE > 100, then it is typically below level of concern (LOC) MOE =

Results Surface Residual and Indoor Space ChemicalApplication rate SubgroupAcuteSubchronicChronic MOE Cyfluthrin215.8 mg/m 2 Adult male1394,1731,434,203 Adult female1474,4201,519,148 Lambda- cyhalothrin mg/m 2 Adult male ,416 Adult female ,255 Alpha-cypermethrin125.9 mg/m 2 Adult male2,02130,30812,291,542 Adult female2,14032,10313,019,541 Sumithrin2.15 mg/m 2 Adult male295,7968,873,87521,293,191 Adult female313,3159,399,45322,554,336

Results Outdoor ULV Space Spray ChemicalApplication rate SubgroupAcuteSubchronicChronicCancer MOE Risk PBO kg/haAdult male2,198,386116,94641,328,113N/A Adult female1,837,09297,72734,572,845N/A Permethrin kg/haAdult male4,30715,33721, X Adult female4,40715,71422, X Resmethrin kg/haAdult male42,690123,2751,839, X Adult female35,674125,6301,886, X Sumithrin0.004 kg/haAdult male1,357,058495,9617,456N/A Adult female1,134,032504,4597,618N/A

Results BDU’s and Bednetting ChemicalTarget doseSubgroupAcuteSubchronicChronicCancer MOE Risk Permethrin (BDUs) mg/cm 2 Adult male7,587 11, X Adult female7,594 11, X Permethrin (bednets) 500 mg/m 2 Adult male2,8308,49712, X Adult female2,8788,64212, X Permethrin (bednets) mg/m 2 Adult male23,20870,422102, X Adult female23,55071,621104, X Deltamethrin (bednets) 25 mg/m 2 Adult male88,601328,495479,602N/A Adult female86,052331,671484,239N/A Lambda- cyhalothrin (bednets) 20 mg/m 2 Adult male6772,1133,085N/A Adult female6832,1463,134N/A Alpha- cypermethrin (bednets) 40 mg/m 2 Adult male27,58742,41874,292N/A Adult female27,90543,12475,525N/A Cyfluthrin (bednets) 50 mg/m 2 Adult male2,6648,01811,906N/A Adult female2,7078,15412,107N/A

Discussion Our risk assessments were sufficiently conservative and indicate that health risks to military personnel from exposures to vector- control insecticides and personal protective measures would be lowOur risk assessments were sufficiently conservative and indicate that health risks to military personnel from exposures to vector- control insecticides and personal protective measures would be low

Discussion Our results most likely do not warrant significant refinements for regulatory decision- making, but data on actual use patterns, timing and areas treated, and data on actual air concentrations and deposition rates would better characterize risksOur results most likely do not warrant significant refinements for regulatory decision- making, but data on actual use patterns, timing and areas treated, and data on actual air concentrations and deposition rates would better characterize risks

Discussion Approach allows for the comparison of risks between vector-borne diseases and vector management strategies

Acknowledgments U.S. Armed Forces Pest Management Board's Deployed War Fighter Protection Research Program Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, MSU

Thank You