CONSShort: an hourly short term ensemble for ESTF Jerry Wiedenfeld, ITO MKX Jeff Craven, SOO MKX CRGMAT/VTF NWS Milwaukee/Sullivan WI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Experimental Aviation Grids at National Weather Service Marquette, Michigan Steven Fleegel NWS Marquette, MI Great Lakes Operational Meteorology Workshop.
JKL Aviation Grid Services Dusty Harbage – Aviation Program Leader Brian Schoettmer – Asst. Aviation Program Leader.
Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
Seth Linden and Jamie Wolff NCAR/RAL Evaluation of Selected Winter ’04/’05 Performance Results.
1 Mt. Mansfield, VT. Aka….New England Days 4-7 Forecast Test Paul A. Sisson NOAA/NWS, Weather Forecast Office, Burlington, Vermont (BTV) Joseph Dellicarpini.
Robert LaPlante Christopher Mello NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH Gregory Lang Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 9 April 2013.
Louisville, KY August 4, 2009 Flash Flood Frank Pereira NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Hydrometeorological Prediction Center.
Generating Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts for River Modeling
National Weather Service Protecting Lives and Property Precipitation Potential Placement ER Flash Flood Workshop Jeff Myers/Jim Noel NOAA/NWS/OHRFC
Rapid Refresh and RTMA. RUC: AKA-Rapid Refresh A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of off-time or continuous observations.
NOAA/NWS Change to WRF 13 June What’s Happening? WRF replaces the eta as the NAM –NAM is the North American Mesoscale “timeslot” or “Model Run”
Improving Excessive Rainfall Forecasts at HPC by using the “Neighborhood - Spatial Density“ Approach to High Res Models Michael Eckert, David Novak, and.
The Collaborative Effort Between Stony Brook University and the National Weather Service Part 3 – Integration of Mesoscale Models in Operational Weather.
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC Medium Range Grid Improvements Mike Schichtel, Chris Bailey, Keith Brill, and David Novak.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Hydrometeorlogical Prediction Center (HPC) Forecast Operations Branch Winter Weather Desk Dan Petersen.
Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington
HPC Winter Weather Desk Operations and 2011 and 2012 Winter Weather Experiments Dan Petersen Winter weather focal point with contributions from.
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
October 12, 2010Neural Networks Lecture 11: Setting Backpropagation Parameters 1 Exemplar Analysis When building a neural network application, we must.
Robert LaPlante NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH David Schwab Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 22 March 2011.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Weather Forecasting - II. Review The forecasting of weather by high-speed computers is known as numerical weather prediction. Mathematical models that.
GROUP # 5 UPDATED 02/20/07 Faye Barthold Michelle Benny Ting Sun.
Incorporation of TAMDAR into Real-time Local Modeling Tom Hultquist Science & Operations Officer NOAA/National Weather Service Marquette, MI.
Verification of a Blowing Snow Model and Applications for Blizzard Forecasting Jeff Makowski, Thomas Grafenauer, Dave Kellenbenz, Greg Gust National Weather.
Station Models How Meteorologist can look at a lot of cities’ data at once!
Smart Initialization Mike Romberg. Sept , 2002Smart Initialization2 Lecture Smart Init: what, why, how? Configurability Structure of Smart Init.
Verification Summit AMB verification: rapid feedback to guide model development decisions Patrick Hofmann, Bill Moninger, Steve Weygandt, Curtis Alexander,
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Analysis of Evaporation Basic Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009 LMRFC.
June 19, 2007 GRIDDED MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS –Essentially the same MOS that is in text bulletins –Number and.
By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist WFO Corpus Christi.
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
Filling the Gaps in Weather Data for the Transportation Industry A View from the Private Sector’s Perspective Jeff Johnson, CCM DTN Meteorlogix.
AMB Verification and Quality Control monitoring Efforts involving RAOB, Profiler, Mesonets, Aircraft Bill Moninger, Xue Wei, Susan Sahm, Brian Jamison.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
Meteorology of Winter Air Pollution In Fairbanks.
December 4, 2013 NCEP Product Suite Usage in the Private Sector Brian Kolts Energy Delivery – Environmental 2013 Production Review National Weather Service.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
The Similar Soundings Technique For Incorporating Pattern Recognition Into The Forecast Process at WFO BGM Mike Evans Ron Murphy.
Robert LaPlante NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH David Schwab Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 15 March 2012.
APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL MODELS IN THE FORECAST PROCESS - FROM NATIONAL CENTERS TO THE LOCAL WFO David W. Reynolds National Weather Service WFO San Francisco.
Characteristics of Fog/Low Stratus Clouds are composed mainly of liquid water with a low cloud base Cloud layers are highly spatially uniform in both temperature.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology Friday 2/8/2013 Quiz & Assignment 2 Results Finish Thermal Wind MOS decoding (Assignment) New England weather.
Briefing by: Roque Vinicio Céspedes Finally Here! The MOST awaited briefing ever! February 16, 2011.
Production of a multi-model, convective- scale superensemble over western Europe as part of the SESAR project EMS Annual Conference, Sept. 13 th, 2013.
The LAMP/HRRR MELD FOR AVIATION FORECASTING Bob Glahn, Judy Ghirardelli, Jung-Sun Im, Adam Schnapp, Gordana Rancic, and Chenjie Huang Meteorological Development.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2015 Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington.
MOS and Evolving NWP Models Developer’s Dilemma: Frequent changes to NWP models… Make need for reliable statistical guidance more critical Helps forecasters.
Assimilation of AIRS SFOV Profiles in the Rapid Refresh Rapid Refresh domain Haidao Lin Ming Hu Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Assimilation and Modeling.
MDL Requirements for RUA Judy Ghirardelli, David Myrick, and Bruce Veenhuis Contributions from: David Ruth and Matt Peroutka 1.
Instruments. In Situ In situ instruments measure what is occurring in their immediate proximity. E.g., a thermometer or a wind vane. Remote sensing uses.
Satellite Data Assimilation Activities at CIMSS for FY2003 Robert M. Aune Advanced Satellite Products Team NOAA/NESDIS/ORA/ARAD Cooperative Institute for.
2004 Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC Stan Benjamin Steve Weygandt NOAA / Forecast Systems Lab NY Courtesy:
Translating Advances in Numerical Weather Prediction into Official NWS Forecasts David P. Ruth Meteorological Development Laboratory Symposium on the 50.
ABC’s of weather forecasting NOAA/NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE WFO BALTIMORE / WASHINGTON OPEN HOUSE – APRIL 30-MAY 1, 2016 RAY MARTIN –– Lead Forecaster.
Encast Global forecasting.
Using RTMA Analysis to Substitute for Missing Airport Observations
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA)
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC
Relevant publications
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
Better Forecasting Bureau
Communicating Uncertainty via Probabilistic Forecasts for the January 2016 Blizzard in Southern New England Frank M Nocera, Stephanie L. Dunten & Kevin.
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC Rapid Refresh-RR High Resolution Rapid Refresh-HRRR RTMA.
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
New Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Presentation transcript:

CONSShort: an hourly short term ensemble for ESTF Jerry Wiedenfeld, ITO MKX Jeff Craven, SOO MKX CRGMAT/VTF NWS Milwaukee/Sullivan WI

Outline Background Information: Observations Models Blending of current obs into model consensus Nowcast feature PoP calibration differences versus CONSAll Hourly Weather, QPF, Snow, and Ice grids

Background: Composition of obs Five background fields, with observations matched via Tim Barker GFE “serp” program 20% LAPS (4 km) 20% RAP (13 km) {still RUC13 in AWIPS} 20% HRRR (3 km) 20% RTMA (5 km) 20% NAM12 (12km)

Model Info Each CONS Product is run every hour and produces hourly data out to 24 hours for the following elements T, Td, RH, Wind, WindGust, Sky, PoP, QPF, SnowAmt, Ice Accumulation, Wx 3, 6, and 12 hourly elements are computed for PoP, QPF, and SnowAmt

Composition of CONSShort Official Obs (advected by RAP mb mean wind: PoP, Sky, QPF, Snow) Persistence/obs (all others) adjusted by 7 day mean diurnal hourly variation HRRR (3km - weighted four times) RAP (RUC13 – weighted twice) GLAMP (2.5 km – weighted twice) Local wsWRF (4km – weighted twice) *this will vary if you don’t have wsWRF WRF ARW (4km) WRF NMM (4km) NAM12 NAMDNG5 (5km) ADJLAV (RAP adjusted by LAMP stations) (weighted four times) ADJMET (NAM12 adjusted by MET stations) ADJMAV (GFS40 adjusted by MAV stations) Observations dominate weightings in first 6 hours Bias Corrected Version as well: BCCONSShort

Composition of CONSShort (PoP, QPF, Sky, Snow) Model Weight Fhr Official 0.5% 1%2%3%4%4% Obs/persistence 90%75%60%40%20%10% HRRR 2% 5%8%12%16%17% RAP 1% 2% 4% 6% 8%9% GLAMP 1% 2% 4% 6% 8%9% Local wsWRF 1%* 2%* 4%* 6%* 8%* 9%* WRF ARW 0.5% 1% 2% 3% 4% 4% WRF NMM 0.5% 1% 2% 3% 4% 4% NAM12 0.5% 1% 2% 3% 4% 4% NAMDNG5 0.5% 1%2% 3% 4% 4% ADJLAV 2% 5% 8%12% 16% 17% ADJMET 0.5% 1%2% 3% 4% 4% ADJMAV 0.5% 1%2% 3% 4% 4%

Composition of CONSShort (T, Td, wind, wind gust, RH) Model Weight Fhr Official 2%4%4% 5% 5% 5% Obs/persistence 50%25%10% HRRR 10%14%17% 20% 20%20% RAP 5% 7% 9% 10% 10% 10% GLAMP 5% 7% 9% 10% 10%10% Local wsWRF 5%* 7%* 9%* 10%* 10%* 10%* WRF ARW 2% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% WRF NMM 2% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% NAM12 2% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% NAMDNG5 2% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% ADJLAV 10% 14% 17% 20% 20% 20% ADJMET 2% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% ADJMAV 2% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5%

Composition of CONSShort Model Approximate Weight in 7-24 hour period Official 5% 7% 8% Obs/Persistence 0% 0% 0% HRRR 19%NANA RAP 10%13% NA GLAMP 10%13% 15% Local wsWRF 10%*NANA WRF ARW 5% 7% 8% WRF NMM 5% 7% 8% NAM12 5% 7% 8% NAMDNG5 5% 7% 8% ADJLAV19% 27%31% ADJMET 5% 7% 8% ADJMAV 5% 7% 8%

Resolution and Refresh rate Model Resolution Length Refresh frequency Official 1 hr 24+ hr ~3 hr Obs/Persistence HRRR RAP GLAMP Local wsWRF 1 15* 3* WRF ARW WRF NMM NAM NAMDNG ADJLAV ADJMET ADJMAV

Bias Correction BOIVerify does a 30 day bias correction every 3 hours BCCONSShort harnesses the 3 hour bias corrected grids, and then does weighted time interpolation to get hourly values Since BOIVerify starts 12 hours into the future, BOIShort was created to handle 0-12 hour hourly grid verification. It runs every 3 hours out 12 hours BOIShort is not included in CONSShort Tech Note (due to database size issues)

Temperature and Dew Point Hourly temperatures are used if available For those inputs that are 3 hour temporal resolution, a weighted time interpolation is used to compute additional hours The observation contribution for the next 3 hours is adjusted based on the 7 day running average diurnal change. That way, a 15z observed Temp would be adjusted up, e.g. 3 degrees to be used as a 16z input

Example hourly temperature

Wind Wind is treated like T and Td Bias Correction of the wind is only on the speed, not the direction The weighted time interpolation for 3 hourly inputs works like T and Td, but does account for both direction and speed The wind observations are adjusted for 7 day running means, so it should have some diurnal effects as well

Wind Gust Similar to wind Smart Inits are used to create Wind Gust for models that don’t specifically generate it The transport wind magnitude is compared to the Gust Factor looking at the 10 meter wind speed. If the transport wind is within 1.3 to 1.8 range, the transport wind magnitude is used for wind gust. If not, it is capped with lower bound of 1.3 and upper bound of 1.8 times the 10 meter wind In all other cases, Wind Gust = 1.5 x 10m wind The Wind Gust QC ensures that Gust > wind

Relative Humidity The model RH is used for 2 meter level Possible changes: taking the consensus T and Td, and computing a consensus RH to save computing time in the future

Sky This field needs work, since we still use sky cover from RH Smart Init. This will improve if we replace these Smart Inits with actual cloud cover generated from model cloud The MOS components do help out here For observations, the average of “obs”, LAPS, and RTMA is used. “Obs” include METARs. This is advected into the future each hour by the mean RAP wind in 850/700/500mb layer

Examples hourly Sky

PoP Weighted Observed grid is used hours %, 90%, 75%, 60%, 40%, 20%, 10% The Obs grid is advected using an average of the forecasted RAP winds at 850, 700, and 500 mb Since many models do not have hourly PoP, QPF was used to generate an hourly “PoP” Took QPF over its period and fragmented the grid to hourly QPF If QPF >.01” PoP=100%, otherwise 0% (not same as CONSALL method which is tied more to QPF amount) Run a smoother over the final CONSField Produces 1, 3, 6, and 12 hour PoP, which are consistent

Examples hourly PoP 0 hour 2 hour 4 hour

QPF Observed grid is created by taking highest value of LAPS, MPE, RTMA. If those are all missing, then the HRRR QPF is used as a starting point. (Great need for better Hourly Precip Analysis) Weighted Observed grid is used hours %, 90%, 75%, 60%, 40%, 20%, 10% The Ob grid is advected using an average of the forecasted RAP winds at 850, 700, and 500 mb Since many models do not have hourly QPF, Took QPF over its period and fragmented the grid to hourly QPF Produces 1, 3, and 6 hour QPF, which are consistent

Details of the nowcast feature From hours 7-24 of the forecast, the consensus of the available guidance is weighted just about equally with exception of HRRR and ADJLAV From hours 1-6, there is a heavy weight toward the current observations, which decreases each hour until it is gone at hour 7 For parameters like T, Td, wind, wind gust, the current observations are tweaked in the next 3 hours based on a 7 day running average of the diurnal hour to hour change (for example, you would not want to use a 15z T for 16z, because it would normally go up about 3 degrees)

Examples hourly QPF 0 hour 2 hour 4 hour

Details of the nowcast feature For parameters like Sky, PoP, QPF, and Snow: The observed Sky, QPF, and Snow are “advected” by the mean hourly RAP wind averaged from 850 mb, 700 mb, and 500 mb The PoP is derived from the QPF, which is a combination of the advected QPE and the model forecast QPF. This starts heavily weighted towards continuity, but then becomes more model driven as you approach 6 hour mark Snow is created from QPF, surface temperature, and the Caribou/Cobb derived Snow Ratio using the latest RAP during hours 1-18 then NAM12/GFS40 there after

SnowAmt Used CONS QPF and Temperature as well as RAP/GFS40/NAM12 consensus SnowRatio (Caribou/Cobb) to compute SnowAmt Weighted time interpolation is used for GFS40/NAM12 snow ratios First compute raw snow amounts by multiplying QPF by SnowRatio Post process based on temperature If T > 32, ((36-T)^2/16) x SnowAmt If T > 36 set to 0 Otherwise set to originally computed SnowAmt

02z KMSN 0.01” 0.2” 0.4” 18z run Obs Fcst KMSN 30F 1 -SN KMKE 33F 2 ½ -SN 0.02” 0.2” 0.1”

The relationship between 1, 3, 6, and 12 hour grids in CONSShort The 1, 3, 6, and 12 hour grids are consistent Thus, adding up 6 hourly QPF grids will yield the same value as the QPF6 grid Adding up the 6 hourly SnowAmt grids will yield the same value as the SnowAmt6 grid

Ice Accumulation If there is hourly QPF but the hourly Snow Amount is zero, then locations with temperatures of 32F or colder will have that QPF assigned as ice accumulation This field is later used to determine Wx grids that include Freezing Rain

Weather Harnessed a variety of information: Snow Ratio (RAP/NAM12/GFS40) Snow amounts (CONSShort) Ice Accumulation (CONSShort) Surface Temperature (CONSShort) 850 mb Temperature (RAP/NAM12/GFS40) QPF (CONSShort) PoP (CONSShort) SBCAPE (RAP/NAM12/GFS40)

Example hourly Ice Accumulation

Weather If snow amount calculated, then precip type snow If no snow and temp 32F or less, then freezing rain with ice accumulation from QPF Several simple mixed algorithms that look at snow ratio, CONSShort surface temperature, and 850 mb temperature from RAP/NAM12/GFS40 to determine snow, sleet, freezing rain, and rain mixes If no snow or ice & temp above 33F, then rain when QPF >.01” Looks at consensus model SBCAPE to determine stratiform, showers, and thunder No fog or blowing snow (yet)

Examples hourly Wx 7 hour 10 hour 13 hour

Weather Matrix WXSnow or ice amt? Snow RatioSurface Temp850 mb Temp SNSnow> 8:1<33F<0C RN/SN033-36F<0C PL/SN<8:1<32F0-1C PL0<32F0-1C FZRA/PL0<32F1-2C FZRA/PL/S N Ice0<32F0-0.5C FZRA/PLIce0<32F0.5-2C FZRAIce0<32F>2C RA/PL<8:132-35F<1C FZRA/RA<8:132-33F1-2C RA0>33F>2C

Coming Features (AWIPS2) Aviation: Ceiling and Visibility Grids Improved Sky Cover Analysis from CIMSS Adding Fog, blowing snow, and freezing spray to Weather Adding Weather to CONSAll Adding Snow Ratio, Snow, and Ice to CONSAll BOIShort: Space an issue

BOIShort

Best Verifying Models at MKX per BOIShort Temp and Td: ADJLAV, CONSShort and BCCONSShort depending on time of day Wind and Wind Gust: BCCONShort very dominant. CONSShort often 2nd Sky: ADJLAV best. CONSShort often worst. Official has 15% high bias (Less confidence in Sky verification due to analysis quality)

Known Issues Lag/delay between HRRR running and being available in GFE is roughly 4-5 hours and causes spinup issues in precip/QPF The advection of features using 850/700/500 mb wind can cause poor results (e.g. Lake effect snow showers and orographic features) Non-diurnal events, especially in first 3 hours (e.g. frontal passage)

Summary CONSShort creates realistic hourly grids Detailed features are subject to usual model error and can be off a county or so and a few hours Observed hourly precip fields like LAPS, RTMA, MPE, RFCQPE could use additional work. These are critical for spinning up the PoP/QPF/Snow Lots of detail in time and space for QPF, PoP, Snow, Wx. Hard for some forecasters to embrace