Earning Your Best Possible Rating. The observation cycle has been designed to incorporate the elements of the NEAT process into the post-observation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Teacher Evaluation Update
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation Training KICKOFF PRESENTATION March 8, 2013 Presented by: Joy Forrest (FLC) Jennifer Donnelly (PAE) Rich Pepe (FIS)
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Volusia System For Empowering Teachers (VSET)
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
“Begin with the End in Mind”
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Deliberate Practice PGP
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Self-Advocacy in the Observation Cycle
Leadership for Standards-Based Education
Common Core State Standards
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

Earning Your Best Possible Rating

The observation cycle has been designed to incorporate the elements of the NEAT process into the post-observation conference and reflection process. In the event that a principal determines that a teacher is performing at an “Unsatisfactory” or “Developing/Needs Improvement” level, the procedures outlined in Article VII, Section H-6 shall be implemented to the extent they are not included or already covered by the formal observation cycle. Teachers are entitled to union representation in meetings scheduled outside of the formal evaluation/observation cycle to discuss the teacher’s performance.

Self-advocacy is NOT: *A defensive, knee-jerk reaction *A knock-down, drag-out argument *An attack on the administrator’s professional assessment Self-Advocacy IS: *Speaking confidently of your classroom practices *Showing the administrator what they may not have seen *Shining a light on the positive while demonstrating an awareness of growth opportunities Self-advocacy refers to an individual’s ability to effectively communicate, convey, negotiate or assert his or her own interests, desires, needs, and rights.

New Electronic Observation Platform DP (narrowed focus) Now includes Domain 3 in additive points Still required to create the DP Plan Two observations One formal in Fall, One informal in Spring Scored individually, then averaged Domain1 finished before May Domains 2-4 will be monitored throughout the year Collect artifacts as you go Take advantage of mid-year feedback; identify elements that may be underrated and supplement evidence

*Narrowed to 8 target elements: #1 – Providing Rigorous Learning Goals & Performance Scales #6 – Identifying Critical Content #11 – Helping Students Elaborate on New Content #12 – Helping Students Record and Represent Knowledge #17 – Helping Students Examine Similarities & Differences #18 – Helping Students Examine Their Reasoning #20 – Helping Students Revise Knowledge #22 – Engaging Students in Cognitively Complex Tasks Involving Hypothesis Generation and Testing Choose your deliberate practice element with your resources and administrator in mind Focus on growth opportunity Remember that you can ask for an additional observation to be conducted at a SPECIFIC time if the administrator is unable to score your DP in the two observations

Fall Pre-conference is optional One week window for observation Full lesson observed Feedback within 10 days Post-conference required

Establish rapport Make admin aware of behavioral challenges Clarify where DP and PLC work will be most noticeable Steer admin toward the day and class that will be the most likely place that they will see evidence of deeper content learning

According to the district, your pre-conference discussion is an opportunity to provide a general overview. Focus on describing routine events, classroom management, and common strategies that you use to monitor progress toward goals.

Lesson plans Incorporate documentation that addresses Domain 2 elements Strategic implementation of Target Elements Know and use the interview questions your students could be asked so they won’t be stumped

Make notes about the lesson that was observed Focus on DQ5, DQ7, DQ8, & DQ9 Any particular relevant student behaviors Any moments that you thought went very well Any difficulties and how you addressed them If not collected in advance, revisit and revise the lesson plan to ensure it addresses Domain 2 elements Review observation feedback and gather artifacts tied to scored elements Consider student work samples Take pictures of classroom

Within 10 days, but as close to observation as possible, you should have feedback on the observation Request by if 5 days without feedback Complete the post-conference form online Bring Evidence & Artifacts Be prepared to speak confidently about the learning strategies used during the lesson

Spring Completely Unannounced Full lesson observed Feedback within 10 days Post-conference recommended

Be Proactive! Encourage your administrator to drop in during particularly interesting lessons Don’t forget to “use your pass” if you sense it won’t go well…invoke the “dead dog” clause

Start early and make a regular habit of adding evidence to the electronic observation platform throughout the year Look for the mid-year Domains 2-4 feedback at the beginning of Semester II; ask for a conversation to help clarify what your administrator might be looking for in these Domains DON’T QUIT! This is a year-long observation, so be mindful August - June

Daily & Unit Lesson Plans ESOL & ESE Accommodations Communications w/ resource staff Samples modified work ESOL Strategy Sheets Data tracking for sub-groups (PLC) PLC Assessment Reflection Forms Canvas or other online communication options Assessments

DP in MyPGS Self-assessment Plan Reflections PD Transcript (screenshot) Post-Conference Reflection Forms Assessment Reflection Tools Reflection on “Why” using the problem solving cycle

Evidence of collaborative planning communication samples Online presence, website Parent/student contact log Mentor logs SDS records PLC communications Duty roster Esembler Student anecdotals Calendar of additional/volunteer contributions Open House District & Schools Committees Lunch ‘n’ Learns

For Domain 1 (60% of Status Score): A.“Highly Effective” – All requirements for Effective and at least 15% of scorable elements in Domain One at Level 4 (Innovating) in , and 25% in B.“Effective” – At least 60% of scorable elements at Level 3 (Applying) or higher. C.“Developing/Needs Improvement” – Less than 60% of scorable elements at Level 3 (Applying) or higher and less than 50% of scorable elements at Levels 0 and/or 1 (Beginning and/or Not Using). D.“Unsatisfactory” – At least 50% of scorable elements at Levels 0 and/or 1 (Beginning and/or Not Using). For Domain 2 (30% of Status Score) and Domain 4 (10% of Status Score): A.“Highly Effective” – At least 65% of scorable elements at Level 3 (Applying) and no scorable elements at Levels 0 and/or 1 (Not Using and/or Beginning). B.“Effective” – At least 60% of scorable elements at Level 3 (Applying) or higher. C.“Developing/Needs Improvement” – Less than 60% of scorable elements at Level 3 (Applying) or higher and less than 50% of scorable elements at Levels 0 and/or 1 (Beginning and/or Not Using). D.“Unsatisfactory” – At least 50% of scorable elements at Levels 0 and/or 1 (Beginning and/or Not Using).

Domain 1 Average: 2.5 x.60= 1.5 Semester I Observation: Effective (3.0) Semester II Observation: Needs Improvement (2.0) Domain 2: 4.0 x.30= 1.2 Domain 4: 3.0 x.10=.3 Status Score= 3.0

Deliberate Practice: Domain 3— Element 50: 3 Element 51: 3 Element 52: 4 Element 53: 4 Element 54: 4 Deliberate Practice Goal— x.15=.53 Instructional Practices Score = = 3.53