International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, 19-20 December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Dr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact of JUSFTA on affordability and availability of medicines from perspective of local generic manufacturers Towards equitable and affordable medicine.
Advertisements

(C) Leslie Wagner. LW-IP Consulting. All rights reserved.1 Introduction to IP and Licensing Leslie F. Wagner Intellectual Property and Licensing.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS © ETSI All rights reserved ETSI Seminar 2012.
Freescale Semiconductor Confidential and Proprietary Information. Freescale and the Freescale logo are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All.
Licensing Issues Research In Motion Limited ETSI IPRR#01 meeting January 2006.
SOS Interoperability III: Standards, Open standards and Interoperability ETSI, Sophia Antipolis 20 February 2006 How OSS can/will/should impact standardization?
Differential Pricing: Reconciling R&D, IP and Access Patricia M. Danzon PhD The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania.
QMUL Cloud Legal Project Cloud Legal Project: Began in Oct 2009 as 3 year project - funded by Microsoft. Focus? To address legal and regulatory issues.
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Arun.
Standards-Setting, IPR Policies, and Open Standards Steve Mutkoski Regional Director, Interoperability & Innovation Microsoft Corporation
WHY?WHAT?HOW?WHERE? Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.19/02/2007 Patents in the Electronic (and IT) Industries Olivier Sacroug European Patent Attorney Katzarov.
Negotiating Technology License Agreements Tamara Nanayakkara.
From Invention to Patent -Patents as Tool for Economic Success- WIPO – INSME International Training Program IP and Management of Innovation in SMEs May.
1 Patrice MICONI Frank BAILLEUL GLOBAL ENGINEERING TELECOM Le Tertia II Pôle dActivités dAix les Milles BP AIX-EN-PROVENCE Cedex 3 France.
WIPO - TCCIA WORKSHOP ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOR BUSINESS FOR SMEs Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania, May 10 and 11, 2005 Keeping Confidence: Trade Secrets in.
Theme 7 Intellectual Property and Economic Development
Slide title minimum 48 pt Slide subtitle minimum 30 pt LICENSING AND TECH TRANSFER MAKING THE MOST OUT OF YOUR PATENT Gustav Brismark Vice President, Patent.
“This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded under Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) as implemented by the U.S. Department.
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Dr.
Global Markets and International Marketing
A Framework for Analyzing Strategies of Internet Service Providers (ISP) By: Erik Wierstra, Gabriele Kulenkampff, Hans Schaffers Presented by: Ron Johnson.
WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NEGOTIATING TECHNOLOGY LICENSING AGREEMENTS organized by The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in cooperation with.
IP LAW AND ADMINISTRATION IN TANZANIA Presented by: Leonila Kishebuka Deputy Registrar, Business Registrations and Licensing Agency [BRELA],
1 The Lockheed Martin India Innovation Growth Program
“Commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights” - Skopje, April 2009 UNECE ‘Recommendation M’ on the Use of Market Surveillance.
Value of chain Analysis Creating valuable product or service
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
Kevin J. McNeely McNeely IP Law Washington, DC SANDARDS & PATENTS.
Trends in Retail Competition: Private Labels, Brands and Competition Policy A Symposium on the Role of Private Labels in Competition between Retailers.
World Intellectual Property Organization DCPPS 1 presented by Mr. Vladimir Yossifov WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT.
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Utsab.
26/28/04/2014 – IP for Innovation HG Dynamic Use of Industrial Property for Innovation Growth, Competitiveness and Market Access Heinz Goddar Boehmert.
Geneva, Oct 8, 2012 Latest developments in the field of IPR since GSC-16 Antoine DORE Senior Legal Officer, ITU Document No: GSC16bis-IPR-10 Source: ITU.
1 WIPO-KIPO-KIPA IP Panorama Business School, October 6 to 10, 2008 IP Strategies in Standards Setting Tomoko Miyamoto Senior Counsellor, Patent Law Section.
China IP’s Challenge Since joining the World Trade Organization (2001), China has strengthened its legal framework and amended its IPR laws and regulations.
Intellectual Property Basics: What Rules Apply to Faculty, Staff, and Student Work Product? Dave Broome Vice Chancellor and General Counsel October 15,
1 AIPPI Forum 2011 Hyderabad, India, 15 October AIPPI Forum 2011 Hyderabad, India, 15 October 2011 Standardisation and Software Protection Strategies.
UNECE April 2009 Commercialization of IPR A Business Perspective Jason Bucha, Compliance Counsel April 2, 2009.
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Dr.
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Brad.
View from the U.S. The Swing of the Pendulum in the Antitrust Focus to IPR Licensing in the SDO Context Lauren S. Albert AXINN, VELTROP & HARKRIDER LLP.
ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) issues IPR in ICT standards View ’ s of the European Commission Anne Lehouck New Delhi,
Recent Japanese Cases Regarding Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing Declaration AIPLA-IPHC Meeting April 11, 2013 Shinji ODA Judge, Intellectual.
The Training Strategy of Egyptian Patent Office Presented by: Magdy Hassan Madbooly Senior Information Specialist Egyptian Patent Office.
Economic Vitality and Intellectual Property Rights Discussion at Hanyang University May 26, 2005.
PRESENTATION attached to the application for participation in the Competitive Selection dated_____________________ Innovation Project: […] Entity: […]
Patents and Standards WIPO SCP 13, March 23, 2009 KEI Briefing on Patents and Standard Dr. Baisheng An Research Fellow South Centre.
Stephen S. Korniczky Anti-Suit Injunctions – Leveling the Playing Field When Seeking a FRAND License to Standard-Essential.
TRADE SECRETS workshop I © 2009 Prof. Charles Gielen EU-China Workshop on the Protection of Trade Secrets Shanghai June 2009.
“COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE” USING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFORMATION
Competition Law and Cellphone Patents
Patent Office Responsibilities in Technology Transfer
A balanced framework for the licensing of Standard Essential Patents
Intellectual Property Protection and Access to Medicines
Standards and Intellectual Property Rights in ITU
TTC Activities on IPR in Standards
International Regulatory:
GSM Association Presentation to ETSI SOS Interop
Intellectual Property Rights: Practice and Process
Arbitration – Telecoms Industry
Christian W. Appelt German and European Patent and Trademark Attorney
Community protection of geographical indications :
Jakob Wested and Helen Yu and Timo Minssen
ETSI Conference Standards, Interoperability & Licensing
Summary of GSC-16bis IPR WG Meeting
Intel’s Views on IPR in Standards
Giles S. Rich Inn of Court September 26, 2018
Knowledge Transfer Office
Standards and Patents in the CEN and CENELEC system
Legal Considerations IPR in ETSI
Presentation transcript:

International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Dr. Ir. Serge RAES, Intellectual Property & Standards Manager France Telecom Orange Patent Pool: a possible means to reduce aggregated royalties

International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 Internal Organization IP & Licensing R&D Research & Strategy Legal IP ProcurementOrange Labs & Network Carriers Standardization & Ecosystems Dev. IP & Standardization Co-Ordination

International Telecommunication Union Generalised model for rapid licensing PRODUCTS / SERVICES Ready made tools for fast technology transfer: - « shop window of the technology » - Collective Licensing Agreement IPR Policy : Fair, Reasonable and Non- Discriminatory (FRAND or RAND) Technical standards making Standards bodies (ITU, ETSI, ANSI, ARIB, GISFI ? ) Industry clubs (TM Forum, IPTV Forum, IEEE, IETF) Missing Link ? Existing Structure 3G LTE Patent Pools

International Telecommunication Union Quantification of RAND LICENSING ADMINISTRATION PATENT EVALUATION MECHANISM IPR POLICY OF STANDARDS BODIES (SDO) STANDARDS BODIES (ITU, ETSI, ANSI, ARIB, GISFI ? ) Licensing scheme: Maximum Aggregated Royalty Evaluates Patent Essentiality Basic IPR Policy Standards making « added value » PATENT POOL

International Telecommunication Union 3G LTE situation : Acquiring Essential Patent licenses each Company must negotiate best deal 1 : 1 3G LTE Patent Pools MAR x % >> Essential Patents Owners >562 patent families declared (756 for GSM and 1605 for UMTS) Total IPR Cost ?? x % ? x % + ? MAR = Maximum Aggregated Royalties

International Telecommunication Union License scope and Royalty base: patent rights exhaustion 30 Essential Patents 60 Essential Patents Manufacturer 1 Manufacturer 2 Service + Application Provider 1 FINISHED MANUFACTURED PRODUCT WITH A SALES PRICE RANGE OF SELLABLE SERVICES Manufacturer 3 Final Manufacturer Operator 1 9 Essential Patents 1 Essential Patent Supply Chain Added Value within Supply Chain MANUFACTURING CHAIN SERVICE PROVISION CHAIN CONSUMER Licenses obtained by Final Manufacturer protect all Operators, Service Providers and Consumers

International Telecommunication Union Patent Pool Suppliers Benefits Eliminates existing licensing negotiation deficiencies (e.g. unfair, discriminatory, complicated, time consuming, expensive) Catalyses market growth through easier access to technology Reduces exposure to patent infringement litigation though global license coverage Minimises Essential Patent cost as a real competitive cost element Reduces substantially the internal licensing and negotiation costs Knowledge of which patents are essential and their holders No competition issue associated with classical Patent Pools Retains total control over your own IPR

International Telecommunication Union Patent Pool Operators Benefits Reduce investment cost for the acquisition of the infrastructure Creates a more favorable business case, arising from more affordable technology cost, which will stimulate market launch and growth Removes uncertainty concerning patent infringement litigation which could impact on the service provision Defines a more certain and deterministic Essential Patents environment for the planning of new commercial services Increases the choice among competitive suppliers globally Creates a more favorable stock market view for the standard Removes the hassle of Essential Patent portfolio management Retains total control over your own IPR

International Telecommunication Union Collective Licensing: Conclusions Patent Pool is not a panacea ! Bilateral licensing negotiation will continue Large patent holders will likely stay outside Not a remedy against Non-Practicing Entity Collective Licensing Agreements may still improve : new features exploring other business strategies (e.g. defensive Patent Pools) in 2012, 3G LTE Patent Pools defined

International Telecommunication Union Thank you Serge RAES Intellectual Property & Standards Senior Manager c/o France Telecom - Orange Office IB 313T rue du Général Leclerc F Issy Les Moulineaux France Tel: Fax: