1/50 MFIX Overview M. Syamlal, Fluent, Inc. Federal Energy Technology Center Morgantown, WV 26507-0880.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC)
Advertisements

Heat Transfer to Solids in a Flowing Fluid
Gas-Solid Reactor Models Quak Foo Lee Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering University of British Columbia.
Modeling Lime Kilns in Pulp and Paper Mills Process Simulations Ltd. #206, 2386 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada August 23, 2006.
Tingwen Li a,c, William Rogers a, Douglas McCarty b, Jenny Tennant a a: National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, WV b: Southern Company Services,
Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.
DIFFUSION MODELS OF A FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR Chr. Bojadjiev Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Chemical Engineering, “Acad. G.Bontchev” str.,
Lecture Objectives -Finish with modeling of PM -Discuss -Advance discretization -Specific class of problems -Discuss the CFD software.
Combusting and Gasification Using Discrete Phase Method Combustion Through a Chamber.
Behavior of Powders - Outline Interparticle Forces –Van der Waals Forces –Adsorbed Liquid Layers & Liquid bridges –Electrostatic –Solid Forces General.
Lecture 17 - Eulerian-Granular Model Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics Instructor: André Bakker © André Bakker (2002) © Fluent Inc. (2002)
Flow over an Obstruction MECH 523 Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics Presented by Srinivasan C Rasipuram.
Fluidized Bed Solids Management: How Knowledge of Fundamentals can Help Optimize Plant Operations.
PHY PHYSICS 231 Lecture 24: Ideal gases Remco Zegers Walk-in hour:Tue 4-5 pm Helproom.
Enclosure Fire Dynamics
Lecture 14 - Multiphase Flows Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics
Combustion AND Emissions Performance of syngas fuels derived from palm shell and POLYETHYLENE (PE) WASTE VIA CATALYTIC STEAM GASIFICATION Chaouki Ghenai.
In the analysis of a tilting pad thrust bearing, the following dimensions were measured: h1 = 10 mm, h2 = 5mm, L = 10 cm, B = 24 cm The shaft rotates.
Fixed bed and fluidized bed
Instructor: André Bakker
General Formulation - A Turbojet Engine
Convection Prepared by: Nimesh Gajjar. CONVECTIVE HEAT TRANSFER Convection heat transfer involves fluid motion heat conduction The fluid motion enhances.
Mechanisms of Fuel Combustion P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Basis for Development of Compact SG Systems……
Fixed and Fluidized Beds
Isothermal Reactor Design – Part 2
Winter Jordanian German Academy Feb Governing Equations for Combustion Processes Prepared By: Rasha Odetallah & Fatima Abbadi.
Chapter 13: Temperature and Ideal Gas
National Energy Technology Laboratory Driving Innovation ♦ Delivering Results Mehrdad Shahnam 1, Aytekin Gel 1,2, Arun K. Subramaniyan 3, Jordan Musser.
Two-fluid models for fluidized bed reactors: Latest trends and challenges Yassir Makkawi Chemical Engineering.
Numerical and Experimental Study on Bed-to-Wall Heat Transfer in Conical Fluidized Bed Reactor 17 th International Conference on Mechatronics, Electrical.
1 CREL meeting 2004 CFD Simulation of Fisher-Tropsch Synthesis in Slurry Bubble Column By Andrey Troshko Prepared by Peter Spicka Fluent Inc. 10 Cavendish.
Prediction of heat and mass transfer in canister filters Tony Smith S & C Thermofluids Limited PHOENICS User Conference Melbourne 2004 Co-authors - Martin.
Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions in Separation Components Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions.
Modeling and Simulation of Size Reduction of Fuels in Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustor by Considering Attrition and Fragmentation By Natthapong Ngampradit,
Fluid Bed Reactors Chapter (Not in book) CH EN 4393 Terry A. Ring.
Kemerovo State University(Russia) Mathematical Modeling of Large Forest Fires Valeriy A. Perminov
Coal combustion/gasification Carbon reactions: Synthetic gas Fuel gas Activated carbon Metallurgical processes Regeneration of coked catalysts Abundant.
1 Modeling and validation of coal combustion in a circulating fluidized bed using Eulerian-Lagrangian approach U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy.
A Status Report on Multiphase CFD for Gas-Particles Systems Dr. Thomas J. O’Brien National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) Morgantown, WV 2005 ANNUAL.
Design Analysis of Furnace Of A Steam Generator P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Perfection of Primary Cause for All that Continues…..
Mathematical Equations of CFD
Lecture Objectives Unsteady State Simulation Example Modeling of PM.
Convection: Internal Flow ( )
INTRODUCTION Many heat and mass transfer processes in column apparatuses may be described by the convection – diffusion equation with a volume reaction.
FLOW THROUGH GRANULAR BEDS AND PACKED COLUMN
Lecture Objectives -Finish Particle dynamics modeling -See some examples of particle tracking -Eulerian Modeling -Define deposition velocity -Fluid Dynamics.
INTRODUCTION TO CONVECTION
Muktar Bashir1 and Yassir Makkawi2
Thermo-chemical Conversion Technologies The Basics
FLUID FOW FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Gases AP Chemistry Mr. G. All matter follows the KMT: Kinetic Molecular Theory KMT- the tiny particles in all forms of matter are in constant motion.
Fluidization & Mapping of Flow Regimes
FLOW IN FLUIDIZED BEDS Fluidization refers to those gas-solids and liquid-solids system in which the solid phase is subjected to behave more or less like.
CFD ANALYSIS OF MULTIPHASE TRANSIENT FLOW IN A CFB RISER
Process simulation of switch grass gasification using Aspen Plus
Combined Cycles Using Coal & Other Solid Fuels
Lecture Objectives Unsteady State Ventilation Modeling of PM.
Lecture Objectives Learn about particle dynamics modeling
Conversion Process: Catalytic cracking Hydrocracking Thermal cracking
Combustor Model Simulation
Fluidization Reading Materials: Perry’s Handbook, Chapter 17
Heat Transfer Coefficient
Conversion Processes: Cracking
Lecture Objectives Ventilation Effectiveness, Thermal Comfort, and other CFD results representation Surface Radiation Models Particle modeling.
II. Theory for numerical analysis of multi-phase flow (Practice)
Conversion Processes: Cracking
Lecture 16 Multiphase flows Part 1.
Fixed and Fluidized Beds
9. FLUID FLOW: Working Problems
Conversion Processes: Cracking
Presentation transcript:

1/50 MFIX Overview M. Syamlal, Fluent, Inc. Federal Energy Technology Center Morgantown, WV

2/50 Outline Multiphase Theory Validation Studies –Bubbling Fluidized Bed –Circulating Fluidized Bed –Turbulent Gas-solids Jet –Carbonizer Gasifier Application

3/50 Multiphase Theory

4/50 Multiphase Formulation Two Phases Three phases Fluid Solids Solids - 1 Solids - 2 Fluid Coal Char

5/50 Multiphase Formulation Details of flow field and particle interaction have been averaged out. Account for the information lost due to averaging - constitutive equations Constitutive equations specify how the phases interact with themselves and with each other 1 1. Drew and Lahey (1993)

6/50 Continuity Equation

7/50 Momentum Equation Interaction within the phase - stresses –collisions, sliding or rolling friction –electrostatic, van der Waals, capillary

8/50 Momentum Equation Interaction between phases - interphase forces

9/50 Momentum Equation Interactions with rest of the universe - body forces

10/50 Drag -- MFIX C d from a Richardson and Zaki correlation MFIX manual p.10

11/50 Buoyancy Model A – full description of buoyancy –1-D model has imaginary characteristics; leads to ill-posed initial value problem 1 Model B –describes only Archimedean buoyancy;e.g., doesn’t describe buoyancy in rotating flow –1-D model leads to well-posed problem 2 1. Gidaspow (1994 p. 191); 2. p.134; Also see Enwald et al. (1996)

12/50 Granular Flow Regimes Elastic RegimePlastic RegimeViscous Regime StagnantSlow flowRapid flow Stress is strainStrain rateStrain rate dependentindependentdependent ElasticitySoil mechanicsKinetic theory

13/50 Energy Balance originates from a work term for  changes

14/50 Energy Balance Viscous dissipation

15/50 Energy Balance Energy sources; e.g..., radiation

16/50 Energy Balance heat conduction

17/50 Energy Balance Interphase heat transfer

18/50 Energy Balance Energy transfer with mass transfer

19/50 Fluid-Particle Heat Transfer - The interphase heat transfer coefficient is given by where the Nusselt number is given by 1 1. Gunn (1978)

20/50 Species Mass Balance Multiphase chemical reactions are described by tracking chemical species in each of the phases

21/50 Fluid Catalytic Cracking C G PlPl AlAl C Al PhPh NhNh AhAh C Ah NlNl Ten-lump model 1 Aromatic Side chains Naphthenes paraffins Aromatic Carbon Gasoline Coke 1. Mobil/Sundaresan

22/50 Validation Studies

23/50 Fluidized Bed with Jet Gidaspow (1994) & 800  m sand (2610 kg/m 3 ) Jet velocities: 3.5, 5.77, 9.88 m/s 2D bed with a central jet 0.39 m width x 0.58 m height 124 x 108 cells 1. Sec.7.8.1; Syamlal (1997)

24/50 Bubble Size and Shape Gidaspow (1994) Fig. 7.10

25/50 Bubble Size and Shape Gidaspow (1994) Fig. 7.11

26/50 Voidage Contours time average 3.55 m/s 5.77 m/s Data - Gidaspow, Lin, and Seo (1983)

27/50 Centerline Voidage time average Data -- Gidaspow and Ettehadieh (1983)

28/50 Bubble Rise Velocity Rowe and Partridge (1962), Davidson and Harrison (1963), Syamlal and O’Brien (1989)

29/50 Jetting Fluidized Bed Yang and Keairns (1980) 0.28 cm Polyethylene (901 kg/m 3 ) Jet velocity 62 m/s, grid velocity 0.96 m/s 0.28 m dia x 2.1 m height 20x77 cells Boyle and Sams (1997)

30/50 Jet Velocity Profile Boyle and Sams (1997)

31/50 Uniform Fluidization Halow and Nicoletti (1992) 700  m plastic (1460 kg/m 3 ) Uniform flow 1.04 U mf -air 3D cylindrical bed 0.15 m diameter x 0.25 m height 30 x 100 x 16 cells

32/50 Bubble Properties Average of 9 bubbles Data -- Halow and Nicoletti (1992)

33/50 Bubble Rise Velocity Data -- Halow and Nicoletti (1992)

34/50 Circulating Fluidized Bed Bader, Findlay, and Knowlton (1988) 76  m FCC catalyst (1714 kg/m 3 ) Solids flux: 98 and 147 kg/m 2  s V g0 : m/s m dia x m height 2-D, cyl., 12 x 240 cells Gas Solids Gas + solids O’Brien and Syamlal (1993)

35/50 Pressure Drop Across CFB Data -- Bader et al. (1988)

36/50 Solids Distribution in Riser Data -- Bader et al. (1988)

37/50 Turbulent Gas-Solids Jet Tsuji et al. (1988) 2D Axisymmetric cylindrical 500  m polystyrene (1020 kg/m 3 ) - air 24 m/s gas-solids jet 20 mm nozzle in 0.3 m dia chamber 49 x 259 cells

38/50 Gas and Solids Velocities Centerline Data -- Tsuji et al. (1988)

39/50 Carbonizer Model Froehlich et al. (1994) 550  m coal and sorbent particles 1207 K, 1034 kPa axisymmetric cylindrical coordinates Flows (kg/s): coal ; sorb- 0.01; air - 0.1; N ; Steam max dia x m height 16 x 132 cells Coal, sorbent, air and steam Product gas Syamlal et al. (1996)

40/50 Carbonizer Chemistry Ash Moisture Volatile Matter Fixed Carbon CaO CaCO 3 CaMg(CO 3 ) 2 MgO CO 2 + H 2 O + CO + CH 4 + H 2 +Tar CO 2 + H 2 O + CO + CH 4 + H 2 + Fixed Carbon CO 2 + H 2 O O2O2 O2O2 coal sorbent H2OH2O CO + H 2 O W CO 2 + H 2 CO 2 O2O2 CO H2OH2OH 2 + CO H2H2 CH 4

41/50 Temperature Distribution Syamlal et al. (1996)

42/50 SynGas Composition Syamlal et al. (1996)

43/50 Gasifier Application

44/50 PyGAS J Gasifier Novel gasifier 1 ;1200 K, 4130 kPa 2120  m coal and sorbent axisymmetric cylindrical coordinates Flows (kg/s): coal+sorb- 1.8; air: pyro - 2.6, top - 0.9, grate max dia x 8.2 m height 39 x 165 cells 1. Sadowski (1992) air + Steam air+ coal air fuel gas ash

45/50 Gas Temperature Scale: Red - Blue K Upper Zone Flame (~1800 K) Stable flame at the riser bottom (~1600 K)

46/50 Coal Mass Fraction Scale: Red - Blue g/cc Coal conversion to char completes in the pyrolyzer

47/50 CO Mass Fraction Scale: Red - Blue CO and CH 4 concentrations are low in hot regions Nonuniform CO distribution in the packed bed

48/50 Tar Mass Fraction Scale: Red - Blue Coal devolatilization is completed 20 ft above the inlet Tar cracking is completed in the pyrolyzer

49/50 Other Results Information on gas and solids flow patterns Cannot maintain a tall coflow bed No regions where coal agglomerate Sticky coal particle ( o C) Char particles

50/50 It is far better to foresee even without certainty than not to foresee at all. - Henri Poincare

51/50