Doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 1 Multimedia Challenges for IEEE802.11 Notice: This document has been prepared to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission July 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenario – A Pair of Unlicensed Wireless Networks Notice:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0029r0 Submission July 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenario – A Pair of Unlicensed Wireless Networks, one.
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission April 2012 Review of j Traffic Models IEEE P802.22b Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0907r0 Submission September 2005 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 dot1AM management plane Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0181r0 Submission September 2009 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide 1 Extended Network Topologies Author: Notice: This document has.
Doc.: IEEE /0322r0 Submission March 2006 Royce Fernald - Intel CorporationSlide 1 Video Use Cases Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission May 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Discussion on mode of management service Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /0003r0 Submission January 2006 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Multiple Access and Effects of Aggregation Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0667r0 Submission July 2005 Mike Moreton, STMicroelectronicsSlide 1 Multiple Networks Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission January 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Definitions and Terminology Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1528r0 Submission 22 September 2006 Naveen Kakani, Nokia, IncSlide 1 TGn PSMP adhoc Group September Closing Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0460r1 Submission March 2006 Fujio Watanabe, DoCoMo USA LabsSlide 1 Japanese Emergency Call Regulation Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
TGn Sync Atlanta Presentation on Confirmation
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
3GPP Extended Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
November Opening Report
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2008
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
for video transmission, Status
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 1 Multimedia Challenges for IEEE Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 2 Abstract A brief summary of the features required for a useable wireless network carrying audio-visual content in either the home or production environment, comparing these against the features available in the present IEEE802.11a/b/g core standards, the IEEE802.11e QoS extensions, and the proposed IEEE802.11n standard.

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 3 Multimedia Challenges for IEEE What are the requirements? In the home In the TV studio On location How does WiFi shape up? ChannelsDelay and jitter Throughput Quality of Service Error CorrectionUnicast vs Multicast Conclusions Where is more work needed?

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 4 What are the requirements? ●Potential uses ●Number of channels ●Delay/jitter ●Throughput ●Reliability

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 5 Uses around the home over WLAN Bedroom 1 Bedroom 2 Home CinemaKitchenFamily Room DSL Media Centre DVD player

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 6 Uses in a TV studio Up to twelve cameras ●One HD stream from each ●One HD stream to each ●1 or 2 SD/HD streams to all ●Camera control Other wireless uses ●Picture monitors ●Sound system ●Lighting ●Intercom ●Script/production network

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 7 Requirements for TV production Studio ●Six to twelve cameras ●Controlled environment ●Often a metal box ●Lots of multi-path ●Good for MIMO On location ●One to thirty cameras ●Public environment ●Laptops, mobile phones, … ●Long distances Production costs more than £10,000 per hour Loss of “one-off events” totally unacceptable ∴ E xclusive-use (licensed) frequencies are a necessity

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 8 Channels needed: flats ●Concrete flooring reduces transmission between floors ●3 to 5 other homes affected ●6 channels needed ●Assuming one per flat…..but the “building across the street” problem may double the number of channels required 7m

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 9 Channels needed: houses ●WiFi doesn’t stop at the garden fence… …if you reach all parts of your property, you also reach your neighbours ●5 to 7 homes affected ●8 channels needed ●Assuming one per house… 12m 36m 48m

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 10 Channels needed: TV production ●One per camera ●Two for “broadcast video” ●One for sound and lights ●One for “production team” Up to 20 channels in a studio Up to 40 channels on location… …but we (broadcasters) are used to paying for licensed channels!

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 11 Delay and synchronisation in the home over WLAN Bedroom 1 Bedroom 2 Home CinemaKitchenFamily Room DSL Media Centre DVD player

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 12 Lip-sync – Audio and Video Synchronisation over WLAN Bedroom 1 Bedroom 2 Home CinemaKitchenFamily Room DSL Media Centre DVD player

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 13 Delays in the TV Studio Delay is very disconcerting …to performers …to directors …to camera operators …to teleprompt operators We know that one frame (~30ms) of delay is too much

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 14 Summary of Requirements Similarities and Differences At home ●Multiple receivers ●Maybe multiple sources too ●Neighbouring properties ●Privacy ●Subscription sharing ●Moderate data rates ●“Last hop” ●Some delay tolerable ●100ms max ●Synchronisation important ●Good QoS TV production ●Multiple receivers and sources ●Each camera is a source ●Sometimes isolated ●Studios are metal boxes ●Golf courses aren’t! ●Very high data rates ●Cascaded codecs ●Very low delay tolerance ●1 frame (~30ms) is too much ●Synchronisation vital ●Excellent QoS

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 15 How does WiFi shape up? Frequency allocations Throughput Delay Error correction Quality of Service Unicast vs Multicast

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 16 2·4GHz band Frequency allocations: 2·4GHz Band n Most of Europe France Spain USA Japan

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 17 Frequency allocations: 5GHz Band ●Typically twelve channels (depending on country and mode) ●Fewer users Better than 2·4GHz band …at the moment… So how many channels do we need?

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 18 Throughput ~600 Mbit/s 54 Mbit/s 11 Mbit/s 5 Mbit/s 6 Mbit/s b ~55% useable g ~45% useable n ~25% useable 450 Mbit/s overhead 150 Mbit/s useable 30 Mbit/s 24 Mbit/s

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 19 Re-try based error correction Delivered capacity Delay Desired capacity

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 20 Best Effort Video Audio Telephony Quality of Service High Low High “Priority” Data rate

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 21 Unicast vs Multicast Unicast ●Explicit acknowledgement ●Lost packets are re-sent ●Jitter and delay introduced ●Modulation rate optimised ●There is a “feedback path” ●Beamforming possible ●MIMO also works Multicast ●Blind transmission ●Lost packets are really lost ●Delay predictable ●Modulation assumes the worst ●11Mbit/s when 54Mbit/s would work ●Omni-directional transmission ●MIMO still works

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 22 Conclusions ●PHY layer ●More channels ●Licensed frequencies ●MAC layer ●More flexible Quality of Service ●Better handling of multicast ●Lower overhead and delay ●Application layer – with IEEE802.1as ●AV stream synchronisation ●Better delay management

doc.: IEEE /0892r1 Submission July 2006 Mike Ellis, BBCSlide 23 References ● wng-multicast-over-wlan ● wng high-data-rate-multimedia-transmission ● k-qos-metrics ● wng-video-over ● t-overview-video-use-cases ● wng-update-on-hd-video-over-wlan ● wng-proposed-multi-purpose mac-extensions ● wng-mulitichanneldlp ● wng-mac-performance-improvement-using-random-aifsn ● wng-hd-video-and-multimedia-over update