1 Should regulators be policy makers? Peter Alexander Presentation to CLEAR conference Toronto September 12, 2003 The presenter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Law the system of rules of conduct established by the government of a society to maintain stability and justice Law provides a means of enforcing these.
Advertisements

2007 Annual Conference The Roles and Responsibilities of a Board Member Jan Robinson Registrar & CEO College of Physiotherapists of Ontario.
Proposed Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion Update on Agency Implementation Presentation for: Ontario Society of Nutrition Professionals.
1 Discipline, Capability and Grievance resolution: for those with responsibility for others Jessie Monck, PPD, Human Resources Division.
1 EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT /UNICEF SEMINAR ON JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN for Judiciary, Magistracy, Police and Social Workers in the Eastern Caribbean.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
Domestic Violence Fatality Review Team Presentation For Criminal Justice Advisory Group February 16, 2010.
Supporting and Protecting Adults From Harm Community Planning Board 10 th November 2011 Wendy Hinnie.
Overview of Open Government in Washington State: Open Public Records and Open Public Meetings ________________________________________ Prepared by Washington.
History of Law.  Enforceable rules of conduct in society  Reflect the culture and circumstances of the times  Created in this country by elected officials.
Multy-country Workshop on the fight against corruption Skopje April 2015 Duro Sessa Justice of Supreme Court of Republic of Croatia Vice-president.
Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services Suspension – with and without pay – where are we? OAPSB Conference November 20 th, 2014 International.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Purpose of the Standards
Trial Procedures & Courtroom Personnel
Aboriginal Justice Strategy Action Plan.
+ The Criminal Court System. + Today... Criminal courts are complex administrative organizations. They oversee the entire process of prosecuting criminal.
Test Yourself: An Introduction to the Sources of Law.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
Transitional Council of the College of Homeopaths of Ontario 1 Basil Ziv, Registrar May 2011 Road to the Regulation for Homeopaths in Ontario.
1 OVERVIEW PRESENTATION FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002.
Legislative Review Regulated Health Professions Act Manitoba Chiropractors’ Association AGM March 22, 2009 Dr. Dan Wilson.
Violetta Ilkiw, Vice President April 2010 Transitional Council of the College of Homeopaths of Ontario Countdown to Proclamation.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 7.
Office of Children’s Services Ombudsman May 17, 2006 Marilyn Jackson Legislative Policy Analyst.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Tim Timmons Vice President Compliance and Regulatory Services Health Future, LLC.
Chapter 18 Administrative Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
The Education Act 2002 & School Staffing Regulations 2009 (as amended 2012 and 2013) Responsibilities for Governors in respect of Staff.
Measures to prevent and tackle bullying, based on children's opinions and involvement. The role of ombudspersons. George Moschos, Children’s Ombudsman.
1 Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 A strategic view.
Quote for today “Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple” - ?? ????? “Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers.
Recommendation for Greater Transparency and Efficiency to Better Protect the Public Interest Professional Practices Institute Conference October 23 – 25.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Chapter 4 : Safe Schools Issues. Safe Schools Act and Bill 212/07 S.S.A. Introduced in 2000 Zero tolerance Teachers given authority to suspend Principals.
SEN and disability: a policy update VIEW Conference 15 March 2011 Philippa Stobbs Council for Disabled Children Special Educational Consortium Julie Jennings.
Outreach and Education Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Legal Framework.
Module 2 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 2 A The Independent Regulator.
A REPORT ON GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 1999 SUMMIT RESOLUTIONS : 26 TH MARCH 2003 A review and revision of legislation COMBATING CORRUPTION A review.
A Major Step In Developing A School Public Relations Program Is Collecting Information That Will Enable School Personnel To Know The Community In Which.
Business Law Chapter 1 Exam Review Chapter 1 -Knowing About the Law Business Law-Council Rock HS North Mr. Sherpinsky.
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE. PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE NCOP 11 SEPTEMBER 2013 CRIMINAL.
Accountability Board Member Training Robert A. Nebiker Director Virginia Department of Health Professions Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference.
Australian Health Ethics Committee Professor Colin Thomson address to International Dialogue on Ethics European Commission Bureau of European Policy Advisers.
Unit 1: Law, Justice, and You
Law, Justice, & You Unit 1.
TOURISM BILL “ THE CONTENTS ” Friday; 17 May 2013.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
Part 1 – Introduction to the Law Chapter 3 – Business Regulation Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 3-1.
The Paralegal Professional ESSENTIALS, 2/e By Cheeseman and Goldman PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ PA 101: Unit.
C HAPTER 2 - L AWMAKING. L EGISLATURES US Constitution divides the power to make laws between the federal government and the state governments Legislatures.
FERPA for the Financial Aid Office NCASFAA Fall Conference November 2012.
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Indiana Association of Cities and Towns Red Flag and Sunshine Workshop.
Zeynep Onen, Law Society of Upper Canada Freya Kristjanson, Cavalluzzo Shilton McIntyre Cornish LLP.
Paramedic Self-Regulation The New Brunswick Experience May 15, 2013 OBHG Annual Conference.
The Dream Criminal Justice Response to Family Violence: What Would It Look Like? ALLISON M. DOWNEY-DAMATO, LL.B. Assistant Chief Crown Prosecutor Alberta.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
Cje Karolina Kremens, LL.M., Ph.D. Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of.
Judicial Review The Supreme Court’s power to overturn any law that it decides is in conflict with the Constitution.
Claude JANIZZI Chairman of the Lanzarote Committee
IS THIS CONSIDERED A MEETING? April 18, 2017
Understanding the Policy-Making Bodies of the Texas Judicial Branch
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
National Framework Collaborative Police Action on Intimate
The Structure, Function, and Powers of the Judicial Branch
Successful Police Governance
Accountabilities of health and social care practitioners
Trial Procedures & Courtroom Personnel
Natural Justice and Registered Health Practitioners
Presentation transcript:

1 Should regulators be policy makers? Peter Alexander Presentation to CLEAR conference Toronto September 12, 2003 The presenter is a Policy Analyst for the Ontario College of Teachers. Opinions expressed are those of the presenter.

2 For and Against From the New York Times, Aug. 29, 2003 re greenhouse gas regulations “If Congress has not specifically addressed the question, a reviewing court must respect the agency’s construction of the statute as long as it is permissible.” -- Justice Sandra Day O’Connor “Where there is a major public policy issue, Congress needs to decide… The Supreme Court said where there is a major public policy decision to be made, an agency can’t just go out and use a broadly worded statute to deal with that.” -- Jeffrey R. Holmstead, Environmental Protection Agency

3 Rules are not enough “Discretion is a tool, indispensable for the individualisation of justice… Rules alone untempered by discretion, cannot cope with the complexities of modern government and of modern law… The seven instruments that are most useful in the structuring of discretionary powers are open plans, open statements, open rules, open reasons, open precedents and fair informal procedure. The reason for repeating the word ‘open’ is a powerful one; openness is the natural enemy of arbitrariness and a natural ally in the fight against injustice.” -- Kenneth Culp Davis, Discretionary Justice

4 Questions to consider ã How clear is the regulator’s mandate with respect to the policy at issue? ã Does a policy vacuum exist? Is this preferable to making good policy yourself to fill the vacuum? ã Which is the higher duty: to serve and protect the public interest, or to respect the parameters of delegated authority?

5 Case in point: Preventing sexual misconduct Background â In 1996, an Ontario teacher pleads guilty to 14 separate sexual offences, involving 13 victims over a period of 21 years. â The victims are all female, ranging in age from 10 to 18. All but one are students. â This grievous crime results in a public review, commissioned by the Attorney General of the province of Ontario in 1999.

6 A call for policy action â The “Robins report”, April 2000: Protecting Our Children: A review to identify and prevent sexual misconduct in Ontario schools. â Systemic failure in the public school system and related public services -36 recommendations addressed directly to the Ontario College of Teachers -Another 65 recommendations for school boards, faculties of education, provincial prosecutors, sentencing judges, federal justice department, provincial ministries of education, attorney general and community and social services

7 Regulator’s response â June 8, Executive Committee of the College directs staff to analyze Robins Report â February 8, College hosts working session with provincial education representatives and others with responsibility for the care of children. â March, Feature article on this matter in official publication of the College, Professionally Speaking â March 22, Council resolves to make recommendations to the Minister of Education based on the Robins Report

8 Government response â September Minister of Education introduces Student Protection Act –No other response from any other ministry or government body, provincial or federal –Dozens of recommendations ignored completely –Some evidence of ad hoc response by local school boards –Legislation uses language and professional context of Regulated Health Professions Act

9 Policy shortcomings â Sanctioning “sexual abuse” (cf. “sexual misconduct”) keeps emphasis on the victim, not the professional â Grooming behaviour of sexual predators addressed only partially âChildren’s vulnerability not fully addressed â The context of the educational environment is broader than doctor-patient context â A missed opportunity to do better

10 Regulator’s response â College develops its first Professional Advisory: “Professional Misconduct Related to Sexual Abuse and Sexual Misconduct” –based on Robins recommendations and consultations with stakeholders –conceptual approach supported by chiefs of police and children’s aid services

11 Regulator’s response (continued) â Advisory falls within College mandate as set out in statute (Ontario College of Teachers Act): –“establish and enforce professional and ethical standards” –“deal with discipline and fitness to practice issues” –“provide for the ongoing education of members of the College” –“communicate with the public on behalf of the members of the College”

12 Regulator’s response (continued) â Explain and define concepts not in legislation as subsets of statutory language â Provide examples and scenarios â Articulate considerations that may guide the deliberations of a discipline panel. â Offer members suggestions for ways to govern their own conduct â Emphasize duty to intervene and prevent

13 Regulator’s response (continued) â The advisory cites authority in regulation to discipline members for: –“failing to maintain the standards of the profession” –“an act or omission that (is)… disgraceful, dishonourable, or unprofessional” –“conduct unbecoming a member” â Province-wide public tour to 18 communities to promote the advisory

14 Stakeholder response â Mostly positive –Fair and balanced media coverage –Anecdotal evidence from practitioners in the field of the utility of the advisory –Requests made for presentation materials for use in staff training in schools –Increased appetite and confidence among College staff to communicate and conduct similar outreach on other issues

15 Should you make policy? In a word: Yes! â You were delegated authority for a reason: to exercise it. â Let your mandate be your guide. â In addition, structure your discretion with: –open plans and processes –open rationale and findings –open dialogue with oversight body –open rules, policy statements, guidelines, etc.

16 Questions?