Preparing students as effective assessors Enabling learning beyond graduation David Nicol Professor of Higher Education Centre for Academic Practice and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Dr David Nicol Project Director Centre for Academic Practice University of Strathclyde Re-engineering Assessment Practices in Scottish.

Advertisements

Dr Catherine Bovill Academic Development Unit University of Glasgow Dr Kate Morss and Dr Cathy Bulley, Queen Margaret University.

Completing the cycle: an investigation of structured reflection as a tool to encourage student engagement with feedback Jackie Pates Lancaster Environment.

A Strategy to Enhance Assessment and Feedback Sheila Oliver Director of Assessment School of Dentistry.

Assessment for learning: the benefits of generating feedback David Nicol Professor of Higher Education Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement.

QAA-HEA Education for Sustainable Development Guidance Document Consultation 5 November 2013, Birmingham Professor James Longhurst Assistant Vice Chancellor.

Principles of Assessment and Feedback for Learning Ulster Principles of Assessment and Feedback for Learning School Board Briefing [School/Dept name] [Facilitator.

5th International CDIO Conference Singapore, June , The Role of Peers in the Assessment of Students’ CDIO Skills Ivan D’haese Johan D’heer.

Professor Alyson Tobin Professor of Biology University of St Andrews.

Enhancing Assessment and Feedback Principles and Practice David Nicol Professor of Higher Education Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement.

Assisting Peers to Provide W orthwhile Feedback UC Merced SATAL Program.

Cambridge International Examinations

Principled Teaching for Deep Progress - Improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials An NCETM research study module.

Integrating writing into (even large) economics classes All handouts available at Jennifer Imazeki San Diego State University jenniferimazeki.com.

Providing Constructive Feedback

Aim to provide key guidance on assessment practice and translate this into writing assignments.

Facilitators: Janet Lange and Bob Munn

Assessment of Group Work University of Warwick 27/28 March 2003 Cordelia Bryan Project Director

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING Helen Barefoot Learning and Teaching Institute.

ACCESS TO SKILLS ASC TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 1. WELCOME TO A UNIQUE LEARNING OPPORTUNITY... You have been invited by the Pharmacy Guild SA to participate.

Learning Development and Innovation Overview and Updates Steve Wyn Williams March 2013.

Authentic Assessment Principles & Methods

Marion Webb January  By the end of the session, participants will be able to:  Discuss the role of assessment for learning  Describe key assessment.

Report on Ideas to Action (i2a) March 1, 2010 Patricia R. Payette, Ph.D. Executive Director, Ideas to Action Associate Director, Delphi Center for Teaching.

Principles of good assessment: theory and practice David Nicol, Project Director, Re-Engineering Assessment Practices, University of Strathclyde, Scotland.

 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.

Academic Essays & Report Writing

Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.

Re-Engineering Assessment Practices in Scottish Higher Education Dr David Nicol, Project Director Ms Catherine Owen, Project Manager Centre.

Centre for Academic Practice University of Strathclyde

Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.

Evaluating the Benefits of the Principal’s Teaching Award Scheme Daphne Loads IAD.

A review of peer assessment tools. The benefits of peer assessment Peer assessment is a powerful teaching technique that provides benefits to learners,

Leading Innovation 2011: Sanding the Edges - Tuning a Lesson STRUCTURED LESSON REVIEW BEGIN.

Assessment and the First Year Experience Dr David Nicol, Project Director, REAP Head of Research & Development in E-learning.

The selection of appropriate assessment methods in a course is influenced by many factors: the intended learning outcomes, the discipline and related professional.

22 April 2004Eddy Lee Design and Implementation of Portfolio for Learning and Assessment Lee Yeung Chun Eddy (Raimondi College)

Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.

Re-engineering Assessment Practices in Scottish Higher Education [REAP] Dr David Nicol, Project Director Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement.

Identifying Assessments

Taking Learning Development outside of the university Catherine McConnell, University of Brighton.

ASSESSMENT DO THIS, NOT THAT! UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO ASSESSMENT DAY

PBL Instructional Design. PBL Instructional Design Name: Name of PBL: Grade Level: Content Area:

Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.

AS TEACHING STRATEGIES. (COOPERATION)  Small group work  Large group work  Critical outcomes (principles of OBE) Focus on the outcome.

GROUP WORK & COOPERATIVE LEARNING AS TEACHING STRATEGIES.

Tracy Panther Associate Dean, Student Experience Lindsay Williams Principal Lecturer, Student Experience ACP CONFERENCE 2012 THE STUDENT EXPERIENCE IN.

Tips for Academic Quality Assurance Hugh Starkey Tempus DO IT 2 nd Consortium Meeting Landau 13 March 2013.

Assessment for Learning Centre for Academic Practice Enhancement, Middlesex University.

Assessment and Feedback Developing Graduate Attributes Professor David Nicol Facilitator: QAA Scotland: Assessment and Feedback Deputy Director Centre.

1 The academic discourse - a challenge for both students and teachers Leif Karlsson, Kristianstad University, Learning Resource Centre Bodil Lennvig, Kristianstad.

Footer to be inserted here 1 ASSESSMENT of REFLECTION in Participation Units Theresa Winchester-Seeto & Marina Harvey with Debra Coulson & Jacqueline Mackaway.

Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.

Design Question 4 – Element 22

Good teaching for diverse learners

Supporting student partnerships

Course Director’s Strategy Day

Understanding Standards: Higher Course Event

Assessment and Feedback – Module 1

SLICCs Student-Led, Individually-Created Courses DR SIMON RILEY

Looking at assessment dilemmas

The Highland Council Learning and Teaching Reflection Framework

Backwards Design A Super Short Overview

Enhancing Effective Assessment and Feedback

TEACHNG AWARDS 2019 BRIEFING SESSION

Assessment for learning: the benefits of generating feedback

Providing feedback to learners

Diverse use of the web-based peer assessment tool, Aropä, across the University of Glasgow. Elaine Huston, Mary McVey, Susan Deeley, Chris Finlay, John.

Giving Effective Feedback and Feedforward

Presentation transcript:

Preparing students as effective assessors Enabling learning beyond graduation David Nicol Professor of Higher Education Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement (CAPLE] Director, Peer project ( Project Facilitator, QAA Enhancement Themes: Assessment University of Strathclyde Enhancement Themes Conference: March 2 nd 2011

Feedback in higher education Mainly thought of from teacher perspective Students [NSS] – timeliness, detail and clarity Teachers: workload, student engagement Peer feedback innovations - more feedback, timely, no extra workload with software support, mimics feedback receipt in employment settings But thinking about delivery still locks us into seeing feedback as transmission

Students as feedback constructors Constructivist perspective – the benefits Producing is cognitively more demanding than receiving: you cannot be passive Students process/reprocess criteria from multiple perspective See how others tackle work and learn that quality can be produced in different ways Develop disciplinary thinking – constructing explanations Enables students to better assess own work: same skills Develop judgement – necessary for employment and life beyond university. All graduate attribute development requires that student learn to make evaluative judgements

Examination of module and course approval documents Rare to find a learning outcome of the following type: At the end of this module: …you will be able to evaluate critically the quality and/or impact of your own work …you will be able to evaluate critically the quality and impact of the work produced by others see 10.pdf

Example of peer feedback Psychology class Students write an essay on one topic from three related to child development Each student provides feedback on three essays in another topic anonymously using a set of questions and ratings provided by the teacher. The rubric: write a short summary of the essay, comment on and rate (four point scale) the structure, arguments, evidence, writing, and suggest ways of improving the essay. Students receive peer reviews of their own essays They then review, comment on and rate their own essay using the same or similar rubric. Students given marks for participating in the task, for their essay and for their own review of it. Finally, students provided with 3 reviews from other students and asked to rate them and comment on how useful they thought this would be to an author. All activities supported by peer review software (e.g. Aropa)

Principles of effective peer feedback TASK If you were asked to compile a list of principles to guide academics implementing peer feedback what would be on that list? To clarify the principle you might wish to provide an example of its implementation.

How might you apply these peer review ideas in your own context? Discussion What might you do to implement these ideas? What issues do you anticipate?

Peer Review in Education Evaluation [PEER] Peer project is funded by JISC (till July and led by the University of Strathclyde. The aims are to: Review evidence base for peer review Develop educational designs for peer review (and self-review) Identify software support for peer review Pilot implementations of peer review with large student numbers Produce guidelines for HE/FE – why do it, how to do it, pitfalls and solutions and software possibilities. see