SWOTT Presentation April 8, 2011. our fanta STIC team  Technology Coordinating Team (TCT) – Jon Storslee  Direct Instructional Liaisons (DIL) – Patti.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Strategic Plan Prepared by Melissa Druckrey and Jama Lumumba Jackson State University Division of Library and Information Resources.
WELCOME COLBY SCHOOL DISTRICT Stakeholder Driven Strategic Planning January 8, 2014.
The Center for Personal Transformation 1 A Sample SWOT Analysis - Case I STRENGTHS Excellent regional reputation Excellent value for the money Student-centered.
NCETM AIM - to facilitate, enhance and provide leadership for all aspects of mathematics CPD for teachers in schools (primary and secondary) and colleges.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
Case Study Team 9. 2 Mission Statement The aim is to support teaching and researching of all students and faculty through the provision of relevant information,
Educom’98: Making the Connections An EDUCAUSE Conference on Information Technology in Higher Education.
Innovative Instruction Transformation Team Jeffrey Bartkovich, Monroe Community College Kim Scalzo, SUNY Center for Professional Development Carey Hatch,
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
The Necessity of Collaboration A State-Wide Plan Ray Walker CIO UVU.
Welcome to the Anthropocene. We are approaching a state-shift in Earth’s biosphere Where human activities will impact >50% of the physical & biological.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Technology Support on a University Campus Contingency Theory and Collaboration.
Challenges for Agricultural and Applied Economics Programs: Market Niches and Critical Success Factors Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics University.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Strengthening Information Literacy Instruction Through New Campus Partnerships Pamela Jackson, Information Literacy Librarian San Diego State University.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
Central Virginia Community College Where your future begins.
1 There are a number of organization designs, including many combinations or hybrids of models. Seven designs are shown below: Process Centered Front End.
Technology Access In Post-Secondary Education Ron Stewart Managing Consultant AltFormat Solutions LLC.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
Internet Technology and eLearning to Enhance the Quality of Higher Education Prof.Dr.Srisakdi Charmonman Chief Executive Officer College of Internet Distance.
STRATEGIC PLANS An Overview of Plans Within Maricopa.
Social Media Exploring Social Media to Enhance Interactive Communication and e-Learning for Students in Higher Education Billy Rector Texas Southern University.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Ontario Online Inter-ministerial Public Library Discussion Forum January 29, 2014 Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities Strategic Policy and.
Innovative Projects for Collaborating with Faculty Friday, September 26, 2014 Presented by: Todd Conaway, Instructional Designer Teaching & eLearning Support.
Board of Trustees Orientation September 23, 2014 Dr. George Railey Vice Chancellor of Educational Services and Institutional Effectiveness 1.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
A Collaborative Project to Build Capacity Through Quality Teacher Preparation.
Exemplary: Serving as a model; worthy of imitation; commendable.
Shared Leadership for a Stronger Montana Economy State Higher Education Executive Officers Workforce & Economic Development Committee July 20, 2005.
THE TEACHING & LEARNING CENTER- AN OVERVIEW MOHAMMED EL-AFFENDI AUGUST 2014.
What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.
Comprehensive Evaluation of Al-Quds Open University Kathleen Matheos, PhD Ramallah May 21, 2007.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Greenville Technical Charter High School Strategic Plan Developed October 2014.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Central Executive Restructuring: An Introduction to the Plans
Guidelines and Policies for an Effective Online Learning Program: Meriden Public Schools 10/3/2011 Stewart,JEL
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
State of the School 2015 Dr. Sam Hastings Library & Information Science.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
New Frameworks for Teaching and Learning Bertram C. Bruce Nicholas C. Burbules Scott D. Johnson James A. Levin.
Mickey Slimp, Executive Director, Northeast Texas Consortium of Colleges & Universities Rich Gross, Executive Vice President, the Clements Group Ronda.
Facilitated and compiled by UCSF School of Medicine Office of Educational Technology -Updated March 16, 2016 / Page 1 UCSF Student.
ORGANIZATION CAPACITY ASSESSMENT (2013) Produced in April 2013.
Technology Plan SMITA PIMPLAPURE Final Project Technology and Educational Restructuring December 11, 2003.
New Frameworks for Teaching and Learning Bertram C. Bruce Nicholas C. Burbules Scott D. Johnson James A. Levin.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Grant Writing 2012 Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium.
Quality Online Preparation: Qualities of Faculty, Courses, and Preparation Programs By Dr. Erin O’Brien Valencia College League of Innovation Conference,
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
Converting Roadblocks into Roadways: Reconstructing Developmental Math Courses Phoenix, AZ Paul Golisch, Mike Hamm Jennifer Henderson.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
STRATEGIC PLAN Emerging Ideas in Support of Five Initiatives
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Online Teaching Conference
Teaching and Engaging Students in
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
ECC Excels ECC’s Strategic Plan.
Human resource and Work flow of the Research Office, RUPP
Presentation transcript:

SWOTT Presentation April 8, 2011

our fanta STIC team  Technology Coordinating Team (TCT) – Jon Storslee  Direct Instructional Liaisons (DIL) – Patti Marsh  Online Learning Committee (OLC) – Jim Patterson  Center for Distance Learning (CDL) – Sheri Bakunowski  Web Advisory Committee (WAC) – Mary Lou Mosley and Paul Golisch

Mission and Role MISSION: The purpose of the Technology STIC is to develop and communicate a comprehensive SWOTT analysis summarizing environmental and organizational factors that impact the quality and direction of technology use, integration, innovation, collaboration, and support at PVCC. ROLE: The team will focus on internal and external trends through a comprehensive environmental scan. Internal factors will be monitored with effective and meaningful institutional data as well as feedback and input from stakeholders.

STRENGTHS – common themes  Competent, centralized IT staff  Outstanding support for faculty and students  Excellent collaboration and communication among faculty and IT staff (e.g. OHCS)  Technology enhanced environment (in and out of the classroom)  Solid processes in place from proposal => implementation => training => maintenance  Systematic planning and budgeting

STRENGTHS - others  Center for Teaching & Learning (CTL) has a talented team in a comprehensive new facility  Center for Distance Learning (CDL) supports distance learning Choices  Many online and hybrid courses are archived  Planned expansion of distance courses  Increasing support and training for faculty, including opportunities designed for adjunct faculty.

WEAKNESSES– common themes  Number of IT staff has not kept pace with the increasing number of students as well as expanded facilities and use of technology  Funding is limited for software, training, etc.  Minimal incentives for adjunct faculty to participate in training and integrate technology in their courses  Inconsistent communication with adjunct faculty regarding technology resources at PVCC

WEAKNESSES - others  Reliance on Bond funds  Student confusion Choices - what are they? Assistance – where can they get help? Skills - lack of student understanding of expectations  Distance Learning has limited support and role at PVCC  Student completion and attrition rates for distance learning courses are a challenge  Only a small number of qualified distance learning proposals have been submitted lately (see next slide)

Approved Online and Hybrid Course Proposals

OPPORTUNITIES – common themes  MCCCD Technology Plan – One Maricopa  Open Educational Resources (OER)  Grant money, partnerships  New technologies – virtual classrooms, mobile devices, virtualized applications, etc.  Increased articulation with universities  High school graduates more comfortable with technology (online classes, Google Docs, social media)  Increasing tuition at universities

OPPORTUNITIES - others  Learning Management System RFP  External contracts such as Navy Online  Expanding use of technology by faculty

THREATS – common themes  Reduced funding  Competition from other colleges and universities  Quality adjunct instructors are difficult to find and retain  Potential standardization across MCCCD

THREATS - others  Rapidly changing technologies have higher requirements -- bandwidth, expertise, etc  Blackboard issues  More opportunities for IT staff to leave the college as the economy improves

TRENDS  Mobile computing  Open Educational Resources  Virtual classrooms  Virtual applications (e.g. MySCC)  Increasing demand for online courses  Increasing familiarity with online courses  Reliance on technology to decrease the need for staff

FIVE WAYS TO SPEND $10 MILLION  Life without Bond  Fund faculty to develop and integrate technology into their instruction -- such as Open Educational Resources (OER), iPads, eBooks, mobile devices, etc.  Fund the development and support of enough online and hybrid courses to meet the demand  Provide financial rewards for innovations that are collaboratively developed and increase student success  Bonuses for Technology STIC members (just wondered if you were still reading this …)

QUESTIONS?? THANK YOU