Effects of exotic interactions in Neutrino Oscillations in matter Mario Campanelli Université de Genève Andrea Romanino Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 3+2 Neutrino Phenomenology and Studies at MiniBooNE PHENO 2007 Symposium May 7-9, 2007 U. Wisconsin, Madison Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University.
Advertisements

Precision Neutrino Oscillation Measurements & the Neutrino Factory Scoping Study for a Future Accelerator Neutrino Complex – Discussion Meeting Steve Geer,
Neutrinoless double beta decay and Lepton Flavor Violation Or, in other words, how the study of LFV can help us to decide what mechanism is responsible.
Neutrino Mass Seesaw at the Weak Scale, the Baryon Asymmetry, and the LHC Z. Chacko University of Maryland, College Park S. Blanchet, R.N. Mohapatra.
Chuan-Hung Chen Department of Physics, National Cheng-Kung U., Tainan, Taiwan Introduction & Motivation Higgs-mediated LFV Implications.
Higgs Quadruplet for Type III Seesaw and Implications for → e and −e Conversion Ren Bo Coauther : Koji Tsumura, Xiao - Gang He arXiv:
Status of Neutrino Science Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003.
1 Neutrino Phenomenology Boris Kayser Scottish Summer School August 9,
Neutrino oscillations and non- standard neutrino-matter interactions (NSI) Cecilia Lunardini INT & UW department of Physics, Seattle A.Friedland, C.L.
Slepton Discovery in Cascade Decays Jonathan Eckel, Jessie Otradovec, Michael Ramsey-Musolf, WS, Shufang Su WCLHC Meeting UCSB April
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
P461 - particles VII1 Glashow-Weinberg-Salam Model EM and weak forces mix…or just EW force. Before mixing Bosons are massless: Group Boson Coupling Quantum.
Doubly charged Higgs bosons at Hadron Colliders and neutrino mass hierarchy Mayumi Aoki (KEK) A.G.Akeroyd and M.A. PRD72, (2005) (hep-ph/ )
November 19, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Physics of Atmospheric Neutrinos: Perspectives for the Future Topical Workshop on Physics at Henderson DUSEL Fort.
1 V cb : experimental and theoretical highlights Marina Artuso Syracuse University.
LFV and LUV at CLEO Lepton-Flavor Violation: –Probe non-SM physics and/or SM extensions –Here, report on Upsilon(1S)   Complements other studies MEG.
S K The Many Uses of Upward- going Muons in Super-K Muons traveling up into Super-K from high-energy  reactions in the rock below provide a high-energy.
8/5/2002Ulrich Heintz - Quarknet neutrino puzzles Ulrich Heintz Boston University
Paris 22/4 UED Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Identifying Universal Extra Dimensions at CLIC  Minimal UED model  CLIC experimentation  UED signals & Measurements.
A New Theory of Neutrino Oscillations Netta Engelhardt
P461 - particles VIII1 Neutrino Physics Three “active” neutrino flavors (from Z width measurements). Mass limit from beta decay Probably have non-zero.
A. Blondel, M.Campanelli, M.Fechner Energy measurement in quasi-elastics Unfolding detector and physics effects Alain Blondel Mario Campanelli Maximilien.
Model building: “The simplest neutrino mass matrix” see Harrison and Scott: Phys. Lett. B594, 324 (2004), hep-ph/ , Phys. Lett. B557, 76 (2003).
Experimental Review on Lepton Flavor Violating Tau decays 2008/4 K.Inami Nagoya university International workshop e + e - collisions from phi to psi PHIPSI08.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
Study of hadron properties in cold nuclear matter with HADES Pavel Tlustý, Nuclear Physics Institute, Řež, Czech Republic for the HADES Collaboration ,
Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University Model independent analysis of New Physics interactions and implications for long baseline experiments INTERNATIONAL.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Sterile Neutrino Oscillations and CP-Violation Implications for MiniBooNE NuFact’07 Okayama, Japan Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University August 10, 2007.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Weighing neutrinos with Cosmology Fogli, Lisi, Marrone, Melchiorri, Palazzo, Serra, Silk hep-ph , PRD 71, , (2005) Paolo Serra Physics Department.
Matter Effect on Neutrino Oscillation from Universality Violation in Neutral Current Interactions Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) and Minako Honda (Ochanomizu.
Neutrino oscillation physics Alberto Gago PUCP CTEQ-FERMILAB School 2012 Lima, Perú - PUCP.
Tests of non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI) Cecilia Lunardini Institute for Nuclear Theory University of Washington, Seattle.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
PHY418 Particle Astrophysics
NSI versus NU at the Neutrino Factory Euronu meeting Strasbourg June 2-4, 2010 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg TexPoint fonts used in EMF: AAAAA A A.
Optimization of a neutrino factory for non-standard neutrino interactions IDS plenary meeting RAL, United Kingdom January 16-17, 2008 Walter Winter Universität.
CEBAF - Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility.
1 Luca Stanco, INFN-Padova (for the OPERA collaboration) Search for sterile neutrinos at Long-BL The present scenario and the “sterile” issue at 1 eV mass.
March 7, 2005Benasque Neutrinos Theory Neutrinos Theory Carlos Pena Garay IAS, Princeton ~
Sterile neutrinos at the Neutrino Factory IDS-NF plenary meeting October 19-21, 2011 Arlington, VA, USA Walter Winter Universität Würzburg TexPoint fonts.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider DAPNIA/SPP (Saclay) V.Ruhlmann-KleiderPhysics at LHC, Praha Review of Higgs boson searches at LEP Introduction The SM Higgs.
Neutrino states in oscillation experiments – are they pure or mixd? Pheno 07, May, 07-09, 2007, Madison, Wisconsin Marek Zralek, Univ. of Silesia.
Precise calculation of the relic neutrino density Sergio Pastor (IFIC) ν JIGSAW 2007 TIFR Mumbai, February 2007 In collaboration with T. Pinto, G, Mangano,
Search for Lepton Flavor Violation (LFV) in e+e– interaction (review of experimental results) M.N. Achasov International Workshop on e+e– collisions from.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau decays at B-factory 2006/2/27-3/2 K.Inami Nagoya university, Belle - Introduction - Experimental results - Future.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Z’ Signals from KK Dark Matter Sabine Riemann (DESY) LCWS, Stanford, March 18-22, 2005 Outline  Universal extra dimensions (UED)  KK dark matter?  Sensitivity.
Review of experimental results on atmospheric neutrinos Introduction Super-Kamiokande MACRO Soudan 2 Summary Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory.
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS AND LEPTOGENESIS Alicia Broncano Berrocal MPI.
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis International workshop on double beta decay searches Oct SNU Sin Kyu Kang (Seoul National University of.
KT McDonald NuFact’13 (IHEP) August 21, Two Questions from an Inquiring “Student:” Do Neutrino Oscillations Conserve Energy? Could Decoherence Blur.
Pontecorvo’s idea An introductory course on neutrino physics (IV)
Neutrino Oscillations and T2K
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Non-Standard Interactions and Neutrino Oscillations in Core-Collapse Supernovae Brandon Shapiro.
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Neutrino diffraction : finite-size correction to Fermi’s golden rule k
Neutrino oscillation physics
Future neutrino experiments
Determination of Neutrino Mass Hierarchy at an Intermediate Baseline
Will T2KK see new physics?
Presentation transcript:

Effects of exotic interactions in Neutrino Oscillations in matter Mario Campanelli Université de Genève Andrea Romanino Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa

Introduction As we know, the SM describes neutrino production and interaction, and the mixing with charged leptons and masses can be accounted for by non- renormalizable interactions h ij (L i H)(L j H)/Λ No surprise if the ultra-violet completion of the SM (either SUSY or extra-dimension) would give observable low-energy effects.

Effects of new physics New physics can arise in: Neutrino production Neutrino interactions Neutrino propagation in matter I will describe in detail the latter case, since it is the most relevant to long-baseline neutrino experiments. The first two cases are normally better studied in a short-baseline experiment, due to the higher flux; for the latter, the effect is of course more visible at longer distances, and the particular energy-dependent growth makes higher energies particularly appealing.

Theoretical background Standard MSW effect gives rise to a diagonal contribution to the mixing matrix, proportional to neutrino energy. The most natural way to express a flavor-changing interactions in matter propagation would be to consider non-diagonal terms in the effective matrix:

Present limits on ε αβ A model-independent limit from atmospheric neutrinos yields ε μτ <0.05 Assuming that NP operators conserve SU(2) W, stringent bounds can be extracted: Since SU(2) W is broken (e.g. by a multiplet of bosons with SU(2) W breaking masses), the above limits can be relaxed up to a factor 7, and still be compatible with the EW data. In a more general framework, non-diagonal terms can only be inferred from neutrino experiments, yielding weaker bounds, like

Θ 13 and new physics To better understand the practical implications of the ε parameters on the oscillations, we write the effective mass matrix in the simplified form it takes when we assume Δm 2 12 =0, θ 23 =π/4, cos 2θ 13 =1, s 13  sinθ 13 e iδ :

Θ 13 and new physics The term (E/E res ) enhances the effect of the ε at high energy. For ε τe =0.1 (not excluded), at E=50 GeV the NP term corresponds to maximal Θ 13. ε τe corresponds to sinθ 13  7ε(E/50 GeV) In other words, NP terms overtake oscillations for For example, at E μ =50 GeV, it becomes |ε|>0.14|s 13 | (|s 13 |=0.05 corresponds to sin 2 2θ 13 =10 -2 )

High-energy behavior Oscillation probabilities in matter in the limit E>>E res : Standard MSW: Δm 2 31  2 EV; sin 2 2  13  (E res /E) 2 New Physics: s 13  (E/E res ) s 13 + c 23 ε τe +s 23 ε μe Goes to 4|ε| 2 sin 2 LV/2 at high energy!

Oscillation probabilities The very stringent bounds on |ε eμ | make new physics effects very hard to detect in direct e   oscillations. On the other hand, taking |ε eτ | close to the boundaries produces dramatic effects: e   e  τ

Neutrino Factory The peculiar increase of the oscillation with energy well matches the growth of the Neutrino Factory flux. From the experimental point of view a direct τ search is certainly challenging; however, it is possible to highlight the presence of new physics from  decays (18% of BR). Muon energy spectrum shows clear variation and shift towards larger momenta L=3000 km M=40 kt Sin 2 2θ 13 =0.01 ε eμ =

Dependence on θ 13 A very interesting property is that new physics effects are much more visible for small values of θ 13, since oscillation probability stays constant, while it drops for standard MSW. For instance, this is how the muon spectrum becomes for sin 2 2 θ 13 = A comparison with the previous case (done for sin 2 2 θ 13 =10 -2 ) clearly shows that standard oscillations are suppressed, while non-standard interactions change very little

Discriminating new physics and standard oscillations A very important point is: if new physics show up, will we be able to recognize it, or will we just measure a wrong value of sin 2 2 θ 13 ? Traditionally, new physics effects are considered as possible source of confusion for the measurement of the standard oscillation parameters (for instance, Huber et al. in hep-ph/ and hep-ph/022048)

Distcriminating new physics and standard oscillations We believe that a detector with muon momentum resolutions similar to those assumed for the neutrino factory could be able to disentangle the two effects using the energy spectrum of wrong-sign muons from  decays. Use of a likelihood based on Poisson probabilities between the two wrong-sign muon spectra Can go to very low values of θ 13, since we would still see “oscillations”, but with a completely wrong spectrum preliminary!

Conclusions (preliminary) Neutrino oscillations are an obvious place for new interactions to show up at low energy. Short-baseline experiments already have stringent limits on flavor- changing neutrino production and interactions, and the front-end of a neutrino factory will push much further these limits Flavor-changing in matter interactions are not so much constrained since they require intense long-baseline beams, and would be mistaken as oscillations However, the energy dependence of minimal non-standard interactions would be very different to that of neutrino oscillations, in particular we would not observe the classical probability drop with energy, therefore it would exploit the energy rise of the neutrino factory spectrum Even an experiment looking at only wrong-sign muons would be able to distinguish them from standard oscillations comparing the spectral shape.