Geneva, Switzerland, 11 June 2012 Future Networks standardization in ITU-T Takashi Egawa Q.21 Rapporteur of ITU-T SG13 NEC Corporation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

Enabling Customer Demand Management Kevin Evans President & CEO June 24, 2010.
1 UNIT I (Contd..) High-Speed LANs. 2 Introduction Fast Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet Fast Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet Fibre Channel Fibre Channel High-speed.
The 4 T’s of Test Automation:
Requirements Engineering Process
ITRS Roadmap Design + System Drivers Makuhari, December 2007 Worldwide Design ITWG Good morning. Here we present the work that the ITRS Design TWG has.
Service Oriented Architecture Reference Model
Smart Grid: an Ontario Perspective Brian Hewson, Senior Manager Regulatory Policy Hamilton May 8, 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission July 2009 Ari Ahtiainen, NokiaSlide 1 A Cooperation Mechanism for Coexistence between Secondary User Networks on.
IMT-Advanced Technical Requirements Summary of status after 22 nd Meeting of WP8F.
1 Virtual Resource Management (VRM) in Cloud Environment draft-Junsheng-Cloud-VRM-00 Friday 21 Jan 2011 B. Khasnabish, Chu JunSheng, Meng Yu.
SOA for EGovernment 1 Emergency Services Enterprise Framework: A Service-Oriented Approach Sukumar Dwarkanath COMCARE Michael Daconta Oberon Associates.
Scoping the Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Geert Van Hauwermeiren Workshop, Ljubljana, 13 Sept 2011.
ICT Infrastructures and Climate Change Chaesub Lee Chairman of ITU-T SG 13 (ETRI, Korea)
International Telecommunication Union Committed to connecting the world Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 3 April 2012 WTSA-12 Regional Preparatory Meeting Future.
Geneva, Switzerland, 11 June 2012 Environmental awareness - Recommendation ITU-T Y Toshihiko Kurita Fujitsu Ltd. Joint ITU-T.
Geneva, Switzerland, 17 October 2011 ITU Workshop on Service Delivery Platforms (SDP) for Telecommunication Ecosystems: from todays realities to requirements.
Vientiane, Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, July 2012 Standardization of Future Networks -- networks of and beyond -- Takashi Egawa, Rapporteur.
Geneva, Switzerland, 22 September 2012 FTTx in Japan: Past, Present, and Prospects for the Future Ken-Ichi Suzuki, NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories,
Enabling more sustainable societies How can Vodafone contribute?
Network Virtualization and Service Awareness Properties of FNs
Vientiane, Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, July 2012 Standardization for disasters Takashi Egawa, Vice chair of FG-disaster NEC Corporation
May ITU-T Workshop ICTs: Building the Green City of the Future Arthur Levin Chief, ITU-TSB ITU-T, ICTs and Climate Change United Nations Pavilion.
Summary and Conclusions (1) 1 Workshop on Software Defined Networking (SDN) Standardization Landscape Venue and date: Geneva, Switzerland, 4 June 2013.
Geneva, Switzerland, 11 June 2012 Standardization activities on Future Network in JTC 1/SC 6 Shin-Gak Kang Convenor, SC 6/WG 7 Joint.
Algiers, Algeria, 8 September 2013 SDN and its standardization Takashi Egawa NEC Corporation ITU-T Rapporteur, Q.14/13 ITU Workshop.
Synchronization architecture
Frameworks of Telecom and protect Environment Chaesub Lee Chairman of ITU-T SG13.
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Long Term Evolution LTE Long Term Evolution LTE Sanjeev Banzal Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Sanjeev Banzal Telecom Regulatory.
Shared Use of Radio Spectrum in the EU
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
Software change management
Chapter 5 – Enterprise Analysis
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Scaling Networks
Dr.-Ing. Halid Hrasnica Eurescom GmbH – AIM project coordinator Intermediary conference of the European thematic network.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 8: Subnetting IP Networks Network Fundamentals.
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Committed to connecting the world Overview of ITU-T Study Group 5 “Environment and Climate Change” Ahmed ZEDDAM France Telecom Orange Chairman, ITU-T Study.
SDN standardization Landscape from ITU-T Study Group 13 Takashi Egawa Rapporteur, Question 14, Study Group 13 Copyright (C) 2013 NEC Corporation. All rights.
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013Standards for Shared ICT Standard harmonization toward FN including NGN Chae Sub LEE, TTA Document No: GSC17-GTSC10-05 Source: TTA.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All GTSC-9 Summary Glenn Parsons, GTSC-9 Chair, ISACC Document No: GSC16-CL-04 Source: GTSC-9 Contact:
Doc.: IEEE tvws Submission September 2009 Stanislav Filin et al, NICTSlide 1 Comments to WS coexistence draft PAR Notice: This document.
Processes Management.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialBCMSN BCMSN Module 1 Lesson 1 Network Requirements.
1 Chapter 11: Data Centre Administration Objectives Data Centre Structure Data Centre Structure Data Centre Administration Data Centre Administration Data.
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013Standards for Shared ICT Developments of future networks CHAESUB LEE, Chairman of ITU-T SG13 Document No: GSC17-GTSC10-06 Source:
Advanced 5G Network Infrastructure for the Future Internet From IoT to U-HDTV, ubiquity Restless Pressure on bandwidth, spectrum crunch Complex traffic.
FIA Budapest 18 th May 2011 Management and Future Networks Filling in the Standardisation Gap!!! FIA Budapest 18 th May 2011 Alex Galis University College.
DOCUMENT #:GSC15-GTSC-05 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:ITU-T AGENDA ITEM:4.1 NGN, Testing specification and Beyond Chaesub.
COnvergence of fixed and Mobile BrOadband access/aggregation networks Work programme topic: ICT Future Networks Type of project: Large scale integrating.
FirstEnergy / Jersey Central Power & Light Integrated Distributed Energy Resources (IDER) Joseph Waligorski FirstEnergy Grid-InterOp 2009 Denver, CO November.
IEEE SCC41 PARs Dr. Rashid A. Saeed. 2 SCC41 Standards Project Acceptance Criteria 1. Broad market application  Each SCC41 (P1900 series) standard shall.
Geneva, Switzerland, 11 June 2012 Socio-Economic Aware Design of Future Network Technology (Y.FNsocioeconomic) Martin Waldburger, University of Zurich,
1 Recommendations Now that 40 GbE has been adopted as part of the 802.3ba Task Force, there is a need to consider inter-switch links applications at 40.
Doc.: IEEE 11-04/0319r0 Submission March 2004 W. Steven Conner, Intel Corporation Slide 1 Architectural Considerations and Requirements for ESS.
1 Relationships among NGN, SUN, FN and IoT Beijing, China 11~13 July 2011 Chaesub Lee*, Jeongyun Kim
Internet of Things. IoT Novel paradigm – Rapidly gaining ground in the wireless scenario Basic idea – Pervasive presence around us a variety of things.
Internet Protocol Storage Area Networks (IP SAN)
CJK 7 th Plenary: NGN-WG (IPv6 based NGN) IPv6 based NGN (NGNv6)
Towards more flexible networks -- backyard of IMT Takashi Egawa NEC Corporation Rapporteur, Q.14, SG13 1.
Tunis, Tunisia, 28 April 2014 Requirements of network virtualization for Future Networks Nozomu Nishinaga New Generation Network Laboratory Network Research.
Atsushi Iwata, Takashi Egawa System Platforms Research Laboratories
Framework of Network Virtualization for Future Networks
Future Networks: Design Goals and Promising Technologies
FG-FN results and future steps
IP and NGN Projects in ITU-T Jean-Yves Cochennec France Telecom SG13 Vice Chair Workshop on Satellites in IP and Multimedia - Geneva, 9-11 December 2002.
Global Collaboration on Future Network Standardization
Global Collaboration on Future Network Standardization
Presentation transcript:

Geneva, Switzerland, 11 June 2012 Future Networks standardization in ITU-T Takashi Egawa Q.21 Rapporteur of ITU-T SG13 NEC Corporation Joint ITU-T SG 13 and ISO/JTC1/SC 6 Workshop on Future Networks Standardization (Geneva, Switzerland, 11 June 2012)

2 Backcast/forecast in standardization Historically, standardization target already existed in the market (backcast) Modern standardization is done to develop market (forecast) Future Networks: long-term forecast History of standardization is filled with unused standards, in particular in ICT area…?! time Market size Future Networks Modern Traditional

3 Aims of standardization Prune options (future possibilities) Restrict the freedom of innovation Non-IP packet format is almost extinct Optimal for particular purpose, but non-standardized (ie, customized) product cannot become majority if standardization works well Define the area of competition, making it severer (=benefit for consumers) Simplify our life Makes some part of our life decided We concentrate on remaining part Expand the market By making average users easier to understand/use

4 Questions for FN standardization Do we have enough options? Are they mature enough to prune, or to freeze innovation? Which part is mature, which is not? Is the emerging market clear enough? Can we expect enough participation from industries? ITU-T is contribution driven (no progress without contribution). Do industries ready to compromise to expand the market? If we specify standards, do market respect our specifications? FNs was in their early stage, so it was not appropriate to define overall architecture It is now changing.

5 ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks (FG-FN) approach Collection of project descriptions Network virtualization (Y.3011) Consolidated vision (Y.3001) Identification (Y.FNid) Energy savings of networks (Y.3021) Collection of project descriptions Collection of project descriptions Collection of project descriptions Collection of project descriptions Collection of project descriptions Collection of project descriptions Collection of project descriptions Collection of project descriptions Vision Technology description on each areas Future Network related activity information Termi- nology Top-down: develops vision as mature part Bottom-up: develops specifications on particular areas considering research activities as mature building blocks

6 Future Networks in ITU-T SG13 (Future Networks including NGN and mobile) leads this activity Approved/agreed on three specifications Future Networks (FNs) study is now expanding in SG13 Started in Focus Group on Future Networks (FG-FN) and Q.21/13 FG-FN: temporary, Q.21: standing Smart Ubiquitous Network (SUN), the bridge between NGN and FN is currently studied in several Qs in SG13

7 ITU-T FN activity timeline FG-FN Q.21 start Vision (Y.3001) Net. virtualization (Y.3011) energy saving (Y.3021) identifier (Y.3031) socio-economic autonomic-mngt Concept Proposal SUN overview Other SUN docs Future Networks (long-term future) Concept discussion SUN (short- term bridge) SDN Data-aware net

Future Networks (long-term future) 8

9 Definition of FN: A network able to provide services, capabilities, and facilities difficult to provide using existing network technologies. A Future Network is either: Target Date: roughly a)A new component network or an enhanced version of an existing one, or b)A heterogeneous collection of new component networks or of new and existing component networks that is operated as a single network. Vision of Future Networks (Y.3001) 4 objectives and 12 design goals Service awareness Data awareness Social and economic awareness Environmental awareness Energy Consumption Optimization Service Universalization Economic Incentives Service Diversity Functional Flexibility Virtualization of Resources Network Management Mobility Reliability and Security Data Access Identification

10 Network Virtualization for FNs (Y.3011) Definition of network virtualization": A technology that enables the creation of logically isolated network partitions over shared physical networks so that heterogeneous collection of multiple virtual networks can simultaneously coexist over the shared networks. This includes the aggregation of multiple resources in a provider and appearing as a single resource. Motivation Key technology for Service Awareness of FNs Diverse services Heterogeneous network architectures Problem spaces & design goals Coexistence of multiple networks Simplified access to resources Flexibility in provisioning Evolvability Design goals Isolation, network abstraction, topology awareness and quick reconfigurability, performance, programmability, management, mobility, wireless

11 Energy saving for FNs (Y.3021) Energy Control & Measurement Function Status Information Base [e.g., power consumption, traffic] Equipment level [e.g., node sleep] Network level [e.g., routing path] Device level [e.g., device clock] Operation Data Energy Management Function Operating Sub-function Optimisation Sub-function DataCollecting Sub-function Access Definition of "Energy saving of networks": Network capabilities and their operations where the total energy for network equipment is systematically used in an efficient manner Approaches Reduction of required network capacity Improvement of efficiency Possible functions Energy Control & Measurement Function Three levels of technologies Energy Management Function Function to calculate the optimum case of operation Status Information Base Database of energy-related information Data

Motivation Essential to recognize potential identifiers pertinent to networks envisioned in ITU-T Recommendation Y.3001 So, specify an identification framework that includes node IDs, data IDs, user IDs, service IDs and location IDs in its scope Identification Framework Logically connects communication objects to physical networks Includes four components: ID Discovery Service ID Spaces ID Mapping Registries and ID Mapping Service Detail specifications of these components would be provided by future Recommendations. Identification Framework for FNs (Y.3031)

Y.FNsocioeconomic Lists and describes methods to assess socio- economic effect of the technology Analyze potential tussles among parties Helps design/select appropriate technology for Future Networks 13 Is this technology good for society? Economically reasonable? Some interfaces/mechanisms are too integrated, and difficult to improve because too many parties are involved When a technology is given, Y.FNsocioeconomic

14 FN related documents StatusShort title Y.3001Approved(05.11)Future networks: Objectives and design goals Y.3011Approved(10.11)Network virtualization Y.3021Approved(10.11)Energy saving Y.3031Approved(05.12)Identifiers Y.FNid-configTarget: ID configuration Y.FNsocioeconomic Target: 2013Tech evaluation method Y.amnsaTarget: Autonomic network management Y.FNDANTarget: 2013Data-aware networking Y.FNsdnTarget: 2013Telecom SDN framework Y.FNsdn-fmTarget: 2013SDN Formal Lang. Rqrts Y.FnvirtreqTarget: 2013NW virtualization Rqrts

Environmental consideration clause Security is important, and we have security consideration clause in every standards ---why not for environment? Environmental consideration clause is now in every FN related ITU-T Recommendations Describes environmental assessment of the recommended technology Describes the facts. No evaluation Development guideline will be necessary in the future For security consideration, we have RFC 3552, Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations. What should be for environment? 15

Environment consideration in Y.3011 (network virtualization) Network virtualization technology changes the resource (metal, fiber, etc.) consumption and energy consumption of networks by changing the overall architecture of networks. This technology enables operators to develop multiple logical networks on a single physical network. This reduces necessary physical resources for constructing networks, e.g., optical fibre or copper cable, which generally reduces energy consumption. This technology regroups a set of mechanisms allowing more than one service to operate on the same piece of physical resource, thus improving the hardware utilization. This opens possibility to lower energy consumption because a single machine under high load generally consumes less energy than several lightly loaded ones. Also, network virtualization can support resource consolidation which regroups underutilized devices to reduce the energy consumption. A possible drawback is that the structure of each node, in particular the routers and switches become more complicated, which may increase energy consumption. 16

Smart Ubiquitous Networks (Short-term bridge) 17

18 SUN, bridge between NGN & FN SUN 4/11 docs completed Started current Long term future & beyond Started /4 docs completed

19 Definition of SUN Smart = context aware Current focus: context aware, content aware, smart resource managements, programmability, autonomic network management, ubiquity Smart ubiquitous networks are IP-based packet networks that can provide transport and delivery a wide range of existing and emerging services to people and things. The services provided by the networks can cover aspects such as control, processing and storage. The networks are smart in the sense that they are knowledgeable, context- aware, adaptable, autonomous, programmable and can effect services effectively and securely. The networks are ubiquitous in the sense that they allow access anytime anywhere through varied access technologies, access devices including end user devices, and human-machine interfaces.

20 SUN related documents StatusShort title Y.SUNoverviewTarget: Overview Y.SUN-contentTarget: Content awareness Y.SUN-contextTarget: Context awareness Y.SUN-trcmfTarget: Traffic Resource Ctrl. & Mngt. Functions

Backup slides 21

22 History of FN related activities ~: a Question (Q.21/13) and a Focus Group (FG-FN) started their activities : FG-FN closure : discussion on Smart Ubiquitous Network (SUN), the bridge between FN and NGN started : Y.3001 (FNs: objectives and design goals), 1 st Recommendation approved : Y.3011 (network virtualization for FN), Y.3021 (energy savings of FN) was consented Study on Four SUN documents started