Visuals in the Geosciences Earth Science References Tables, NYSED
Spatial Thinking & Geoscience Spatial Thinking is “the process of problem solving via the coordinated use of space, representation, and reasoning ” (NRC, 2006) 3
Spatial Thinking & Geoscience 4
Spatial Thinking is “the process of problem solving via the coordinated use of space, representation, and reasoning ” (NRC, 2006) Spatial Thinking & Geoscience 5
Spatial Thinking vs Spatial Ability (Lohman, 1993; McGrew, 2009) Uttal et al., 2012; Hegarty & Waller, Ability An aspect of “g” Domain-general Apprehending, encoding, and mentally manipulating three- dimensional forms Thinking / Skills Domain-specific Problem – solving with space, representation, and reasoning
Spatial Ability and STEM Education Shea et al., 2001; Wai et al., 2009 Spatial Ability STEM Careers 7
Research Question #1 Earth Science Achievement Spatial Ability
Research Question #2 Earth Science Achievement Visuals Spatial Ability
Earth Science Achievement 165,000 students annually 9 th Graders Publicly available June 2007 Earth Science Regents Exam, NYSED SAMPLE QUESTION WITH VISUAL New York State Earth Science Regents Exam
Three Types of Items 11 TEXT
Three Types of Items 12 NOVEL VISUALS
Three Types of Items 13 TRAINED VISUALS
Three Types of Items 14 TRAINED VISUALS
Population Public High Schools 1 rural / 1 suburban 74% white 144 Students (75 male) 9 th Grade (m=14.6 years) 15
Spatial Ability & Sex Linn & Petersen, 1985; Hamilton, 1998; Sorby & Baartmans, 2000 Sex Differences 16
Linn & Petersen, 1985; Halpern et al., 2007 Spatial Ability & Sex Sex Differences MALES 17
NYS Earth Science Regents Exam TEXT-ONLY QUESTIONS (T) NOVEL VISUAL QUESTIONS (V) TRAINED VISUAL QUESTIONS (RT) Study Variables 18
Categorizing Test Items 8 Categories Text Only Text w/ ESRT Stem Graphic Stem Graphic w/ESRT Answer Graphic Answer Graphic w/ ESRT Stem + Answer Graphic Stem + Answer Graphic w/ ESRT 3 Categories Text Only ESRT - TRAINED VISUALS Graphic – NOVEL VISUALS Two-way Effects Model with Absolute Agreement ICC =.844
NYS Earth Science Regents Exam TEXT-ONLY QUESTIONS (T) NOVEL VISUAL QUESTIONS (V) SPATIAL ABILITY READING COMPREHENSION SEX TRAINED VISUAL QUESTIONS (RT) Study Variables 20
NYS Earth Science Regents Exam TEXT-ONLY QUESTIONS (T) NOVEL VISUAL QUESTIONS (V) SPATIAL ABILITY READING COMPREHENSION SEX TRAINED VISUAL QUESTIONS (RT) Study Variables MOTIVATION PRIOR KNOWLEDGE 21
NYS Earth Science Regents Exam TEXT-ONLY QUESTIONS (T) NOVEL VISUAL QUESTIONS (V) SPATIAL ABILITY READING COMPREHENSION SEX TRAINED VISUAL QUESTIONS (RT) Study Variables MOTIVATION PRIOR KNOWLEDGE 22 NYS 8 th Grade English Language Arts Exam
NYS Earth Science Regents Exam TEXT-ONLY QUESTIONS (T) NOVEL VISUAL QUESTIONS (V) SPATIAL ABILITY READING COMPREHENSION SEX TRAINED VISUAL QUESTIONS (RT) Study Variables MOTIVATION PRIOR KNOWLEDGE 23 NYS 8 th Grade English Language Arts Exam NYS 8 th Grade Science Exam
NYS Earth Science Regents Exam TEXT-ONLY QUESTIONS (T) NOVEL VISUAL QUESTIONS (V) SPATIAL ABILITY READING COMPREHENSION SEX TRAINED VISUAL QUESTIONS (RT) Study Variables MOTIVATION PRIOR KNOWLEDGE 24 NYS 8 th Grade English Language Arts Exam NYS 8 th Grade Science Exam June 2012
NYS Earth Science Regents Exam TEXT-ONLY QUESTIONS (T) NOVEL VISUAL QUESTIONS (V) SPATIAL ABILITY READING COMPREHENSION SEX TRAINED VISUAL QUESTIONS (RT) Study Variables MOTIVATION PRIOR KNOWLEDGE 25 3 Spatial Tests Questionnaire 20 ES Regents Questions
NYS Earth Science Regents Exam TEXT-ONLY QUESTIONS (T) NOVEL VISUAL QUESTIONS (V) SPATIAL ABILITY READING COMPREHENSION SEX TRAINED VISUAL QUESTIONS (RT) Study Variables MOTIVATION PRIOR KNOWLEDGE 26 3 Spatial Tests Questionnaire 20 ES Regents Questions Collected Fall minute class period
Example Spatial Tests Paper Folding Ekstrom et al., 1976 Mental Rotation Vandenberg, et al. 1978; Object Perspective Hegarty & Waller, 2004
Spatial vs. Reading Spatial Composite Score Reading Comprehension
Spatial vs. Reading Spatial Composite Score Reading Comprehension Males outperformed Females on Spatial t(142) = 4.10, p<.001 Females outperformed Males on Reading t(142) = -2.66, p<.001
Correlations 1. Sex2. Reading3. Spatial4. Regents-All 1. Sex- 2. Reading.205*- 3. Spatial-.316**.205*- 4. Regents-.185*.562**.514**- 5. Text-Onlyns.545**.405**.801** 6. Trained Visualns.516**.392**.934** 7. Novel Visual-.226**.516**.564**.957** N=145; * p <.05; ** p <.01 (2-tailed)
Correlations 1. Sex2. Reading3. Spatial4. Regents-All 1. Sex- 2. Reading.205* - 3. Spatial-.316**.205*- 4. Regents-.185*.562**.514**- 5. Text-Onlyns.545**.405**.801** 6. Trained Visualns.516**.392**.934** 7. Novel Visual-.226**.516**.564**.957** N=145; * p <.05; ** p <.01 (2-tailed) Females display higher reading ability
Correlations 1. Sex2. Reading3. Spatial4. Regents-All 1. Sex- 2. Reading.205*- 3. Spatial -.316**.205*- 4. Regents-.185*.562**.514**- 5. Text-Onlyns.545**.405**.801** 6. Trained Visualns.516**.392**.934** 7. Novel Visual-.226**.516**.564**.957** N=145; * p <.05; ** p <.01 (2-tailed) Males display higher spatial ability
Correlations 1. Sex2. Reading3. Spatial4. Regents-All 1. Sex- 2. Reading.205*- 3. Spatial-.316**.205* - 4. Regents-.185*.562**.514**- 5. Text-Onlyns.545**.405**.801** 6. Trained Visualns.516**.392**.934** 7. Novel Visual-.226**.516**.564**.957** N=145; * p <.05; ** p <.01 (2-tailed) Spatial and Reading correlate
Correlations 1. Sex2. Reading3. Spatial4. Regents-All 1. Sex- 2. Reading.205*- 3. Spatial-.316**.205*- 4. Regents-.185*.562**.514** - 5. Text-Onlyns.545**.405**.801** 6. Trained Visualns.516**.392**.934** 7. Novel Visual-.226**.516**.564**.957** N=145; * p <.05; ** p <.01 (2-tailed)
Correlations 1. Sex2. Reading3. Spatial4. Regents-All 1. Sex- 2. Reading.205*- 3. Spatial-.316**.205*- 4. Regents-.185*.562**.514**- 5. Text-Onlyns.545**.405**.801** 6. Trained Visualns.516**.392**.934** 7. Novel Visual-.226**.516**.564**.957** N=145; * p <.05; ** p <.01 (2-tailed)
Correlations 1. Sex2. Reading3. Spatial4. Regents-All 1. Sex- 2. Reading.205*- 3. Spatial-.316**.205*- 4. Regents-.185*.562**.514**- 5. Text-Onlyns.545**.405**.801** 6. Trained Visualns.516**.392**.934** 7. Novel Visual-.226**.516**.564**.957** N=145; * p <.05; ** p <.01 (2-tailed)
Analysis 37 Overall Performance on the Regents Earth Science Exam Multiple Linear Regression BSE (B)βtp Sex Motivation Prior Science Knowledge <.001 Prior Earth Sci Knowledge Reading <.001 Spatial R 2 =.66, p <.001
Path Analysis 38 Regents
Path Analysis 39 Text Trained Novel
Results ReadingSpatialText Trained Visual Novel Visual Overall Regents Sex ✔✔ XX ✔✔ Reading -- ✔✔✔✔ Spatial -- ✔*✔* X ✔✔ * p <.05, all others p <.01 Significant Direct Effects for Path Analysis 40
Results ReadingSpatialText Trained Visual Novel Visual Overall Regents Sex ✔✔ XX ✔✔ Reading -- ✔✔✔✔ Spatial -- ✔*✔* X ✔✔ Significant Direct Effects for Path Analysis * p <.05, all others p <.01 41
Conclusion Research Question #1: Is spatial ability associated with earth science achievement?
Conclusion Research Question #1: Is spatial ability associated with earth science achievement? YES
Conclusion Research Question #1: Is spatial ability associated with earth science achievement? Research Question #2: Is there a relationship between visual representations, spatial ability, and earth science achievement? YES
Conclusion Research Question #1: Is spatial ability associated with earth science achievement? Research Question #2: Is there a relationship between visual representations, spatial ability, and earth science achievement? YES YES: Spatial ability is related to novel visuals, but not trained visuals.
Training Spatial Skills N=67 Experts Novices N=67 Undergrad, Grad, Prof Spatial Ability Knowledge Field Mapping Task Hambrick, Libarkin, Petcovic, Baker, Elkins, Callahan, Turner, Rench & LaDue, 2012, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Training Spatial Skills Expert chemists Analytical strategies Novice chemistry students Spatial strategies Low spatial chemistry students Analytical Strategies Stieff, 2007; Stieff & Raje, 2010; Stieff, Ryu, Dixon, Hegarty, 2012
Next Steps Strategy Studies - Analytical vs Spatial strategies Training Studies - Interventions to improve spatial reasoning 48
Acknowledgements Geocognition Research Lab Julie Libarkin, Advisor D. Zach Hambrick Steve Kluge, Ret. New York Teacher Participating Teachers, Students, and Administrators Funding The Graduate School Graduate Student Research Grant
Contact Me Nicole D. LaDue, PhD Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences Center for Secondary Science and Mathematics Education Northern Illinois University DeKalb, Illinois (815)
Instruments Assessment/SurveyCitation Spatial Ability: Paper-folding Mental Rotation Perspective-taking Ekstrom et al., 1976, Vandenberg, et al. 1978; Hegarty & Waller, 2004 Reading Comprehension: 8th Grade ELA NYS examNYSED, 2012 Motivation: Science Motivation Questionnaire (modified) Glynn & Koballa, 2005 Prior Science Knowledge: 8 th Grade Science NYS exam 20 question ES Regents Test NYSED, 2012 NYSED 2011
Example Spatial Tests Paper Folding Test (Ekstrom et al., 1976)
Example Spatial Tests Paper Folding Test (Ekstrom et al., 1976)
Example Spatial Tests Ekstrom et al., 1976, Vandenberg, et al. 1978; Hegarty & Waller, 2004
Example Spatial Tests Ekstrom et al., 1976, Vandenberg, et al. 1978; Hegarty & Waller, 2004
Example Spatial Tests Ekstrom et al., 1976, Vandenberg, et al. 1978; Hegarty & Waller, 2004
Example Spatial Tests Ekstrom et al., 1976, Vandenberg, et al. 1978; Hegarty & Waller, 2004