+ Transforming Units STEMstitute – June 23, 2014 Presented by the Clermont County Gifted Program Fay Wagner, Gifted Intervention Specialist Bethel-Tate,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Designing Instruction Objectives, Indirect Instruction, and Differentiation Adapted from required text: Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Problem Based Lessons. Training Objectives 1. Develop a clear understanding of problem-based learning and clarify vocabulary issues, such as problem vs.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Common Core Elementary Symposium Transitioning to the Common Core
Formulating objectives, general and specific
STEMstitute – June 11, 2015 Presenter: Fay Wagner, Gifted Intervention Specialist STEM PROJECTS.
Principles of Assessment
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Goals and Objectives.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Common Core Math Professional Development
Welcome to Common Core Math Night Grades K - 6. Fortune 500 Survey On Needed Workforce Skills  Critical Thinking/Problem Solving  Oral and Written Communication.
Everett Public Schools DOK to Unit Planning LMS Department August 28, 2014.
Online Resources for STEM STEMstitute – June 26, 2013 Presented by the Clermont County Gifted Program Fay Wagner, Gifted Intervention Specialist Bethel-Tate.
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
Central concepts:  Assessment can measure habits of mind or habits of recall.  Tests have their limits.  It is important to know the purpose the test.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
40 Multiple Choice Items TIMED! 35 Minutes Data Representation (38%) Research Summaries (45%) Conflicting Viewpoints (17%) Content Includes: Biology,
Goals for Learning: I can describe what rigor looks like in my classroom. I can examine student work products for rigor. I can incorporate rigor into my.
Meeting the Needs of High- ability Students in the Classroom: Mindset and Rigor Presented by Sharolyn Wilkin 2013.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
Teaching with Depth… using Questions Partially Adapted from Polk County, Florida Professional Development Presentation.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Where Great Teaching Begins Rachel Beech CI 843 Spring 2012.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
ASLI Plenary Session Rigor. Welcome to ASLI What does Rigor mean? Rigor is more than what you teach and what standards you cover; it's how you teach.
Page 1 Teaching with Depth: An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge by Karen Taylor
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
STEM Center Math and Technology STEMstitute – June 26, 2013 Presented by the Clermont County Gifted Program Fay Wagner, Gifted Intervention Specialist.
IST_Seminar II CHAPTER 12 Instructional Methods. Objectives: Students will: Explain the role of all teachers in the development of critical thinking skills.
Standards-Based Instruction Implementation: Badge 4-Analyzing Standards.
Time for The Big Think David V. Loertscher & Carol Koechlin.
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
SBAC Overview. SBAC Data SBAC Data Using ATLAS Protocol Step 1- GETTING STARTED 0 The educator providing the student work gives a very brief statement.
Instruction in a Literacy Workshop Summer Academy~2013 Tera Ellison.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
Elizabeth Stevenson Teaching, Learning and Leading In the 21 st Century EDU-650 Dr. Allison Rief May 30, 2014 Elizabeth Stevenson Teaching, Learning and.
STEMstitute – June 26, 2013 Presented by the Clermont County Gifted Program Fay Wagner, Gifted Intervention Specialist Bethel-Tate and Williamsburg Local.
What is RIGOR in the Math Classroom?. Presenter Introduction: Stephanie Darley East Valley RttT Math Coach Curriculum Coach at DHHS Been with TLG for.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
Workshop 2014 Cam Xuyen, October 14, 2014 Testing/ assessment/ evaluation BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.
Bison School District Welcome to Common Core Trainings! Michele L. Davis
What do we know (page 1)? Define the word "Taxonomy." (Knowledge) Define the word "Convergent." (Knowledge) Define the word "Divergent." (Knowledge) What.
Constructivism is a theory based on observation and scientific study about how people learn. It is a teaching philosophy based on the concept that learning.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content.   Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.
Wayne Curriculum Conversations
Presentation transcript:

+ Transforming Units STEMstitute – June 23, 2014 Presented by the Clermont County Gifted Program Fay Wagner, Gifted Intervention Specialist Bethel-Tate, CNE, and Williamsburg Local School Districts in Partnership with the Clermont Co. ESC

+ Our Mission To develop a program that challenges students toward rigorous learning by blending virtual learning with face-to- face lessons

+ What are “higher-order” thinking skills (HOTS)?

+ “Defining thinking skills, reasoning, critical thought and problem solving is troublesome to both social scientists and practitioners. Troublesome is a polite word; the area is a conceptual swamp.” -Cuban, 1984

+ A Working Definition of HOTS: Higher Order Thinking takes thinking to higher levels than just restating the facts. HOTS require that we do something with the facts. We must understand them, connect them to each other, categorize them, manipulate them, put them together in new or novel ways, and apply them as we seek new solutions to new problems. -Thomas and Thorne, Center for Development and Learning (2008)

+ The research says… YES!

+ A Sample Unit…

+ The Mystery of Felix Navidad GEMS “Mystery Festival” curriculum

+ Dan Meyer:

+ Keeping up with Cognitive Demand… We must pay attention to the kind and level of thinking our students are being asked to do. We have to allow for a great deal of interaction with content.

+ Blooms… The Old The New

+ Depth of Knowledge (Webb)

+ Depth of Knowledge – Levels of Complexity

+ Caution #1: The Verb Trap It’s not about what verb you use! It is about what follows the verb! Example: Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks. Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks. Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle.

+ Caution #2: The Difficulty Trap A difficult task does not necessarily involve HOTS! We must focus on the outcome. Example: What is the definition of exaggerate? What is the definition of prescient?

+ Let’s try it!

+ Transforming The Mystery of Felix Navidad… What needed to change?

+ Student Designed Investigations…

Data Analysis and Graphing…

Claims and Evidence in an Online Writing Assignment…

+ Blended Learning Component…

+ Advice from the trenches: Watch me do this! (teacher modeling) Let’s do this together! (guided learning) Now do this on your own! (student-led)

+ A note about student engagement… 21 st Century Skills (The 4 Cs) – Communication, Collaboration, Critical thinking, Creativity Mark Edwards (author of Every Child, Every Day) – Drivers of Student Engagement: instruction must be relevant, collaborative, personalized, and connected. Beers & Probst (authors of Notice and Note) – “…rigor does not reside in the barbell, but in the act of lifting it.” Students should be engaged, observant, responsive, questioning, and analytical. Carol Dweck (author of The New Psychology of Success) - Growth Mindset vs. Fixed Mindset Jim Stigler – Struggle for Smarts

+ Take a step back… Wows? Wonders?

+ Assessing HOTS… Credits to: Susan M. Brookhart

+ Assessment always involves: Specifying what you want to assess. (Be clear and exact!) Designing tasks or questions that require students to demonstrate knowledge or skill. Deciding what you will accept as evidence that students have shown the knowledge or skill.

+ Special Considerations for Assessment of HOTS #1: Use introductory material for tasks. This will give students something about which to think! Example: Stacey and her friends have noticed a problem in their neighborhood. The garbage cans in the public park are overflowing. Name at least two things Stacey and her friends could do on their own to help solve this problem. Which one would you recommend they try first? Explain why.

+ Special Considerations for Assessment of HOTS #2: Use novel material. The formats should not be consistently interchangeable. Example A: A chef opened a jar of olives. He used them to make 45 identical plates. There were 2 olives on each plate. Write an equation, that when solved, will tell how many olives were in the jar. Example B: During the canned food drive, each student collected 10 cans of food. The students collected 80 cans in all. Randy says the following equation can express this: s x 10 = 80. Brian thinks the equation should be written as 80 x 10 = s. Compose a text message to the boys explaining who is correct and why.

+ Special Considerations for Assessment of HOTS #3: Manage difficulty and cognitive complexity separately. Difficulty and the level of thinking are two different qualities. EasyDifficult Recall Name three examples of animals that are mammals. What is the taxonomy for a bottle-nosed dolphin? Higher-Order A scientist just discovered a new animal in the Amazon rain forest. Design a flow- chart she could use to determine if the animal should be classified as a mammal. What do you think Carolus Linnaeus would think of our modern system of biological classification? Provide specific examples to support your conclusion. Example: High Level of Difficulty ≠ Higher-Order Thinking!

+ Using Multiple Choice Questions… Low Level: In order for precipitation to fall as snow instead of rain, the temperature must be below: a. 0˚ F c. 32˚ F b. 20˚ F d. 35˚ F Higher Level: In which city did snow most likely fall at some time during the day? a. City 1 c. City 3 b. City 2 d. City 4 The “thinking” is encoded in the choosing. If the questions are to reflect the level of thinking, the questions must be designed so that HOTS are really required to get the correct answer. City 1City 2City 3City 4 High Temp. 65˚ F80˚ F48˚ F25˚ F Low Temp. 56˚ F66˚ F38˚ F10˚ F Preci- pitation 2 in.0 in.1 in.

+ Using Rubrics… The quality of thinking demonstrated in the work should be included in at least one of the trait scales. Use rubrics that describe qualities rather than quantities. It is helpful if the same general scheme can be applied to different assignments. This will encourage students to see their thinking as a learning goal, rather than just content. A caution: Be sure that your rubric doesn’t squash the HOTS you’re trying to encourage.

+ Student Self-Assessments: Definitely involves HOTS! Often takes the form of checklists or rubrics. Use for: self-assessing drafts of students’ own work. analyzing the quality of provided work samples. student discussion groups. establishing points of discussion for student-teacher conferences.

+ Assessing HOTS… Wows? Wonders?

+ Technology Resources that Encourage HOTS…

Blended Learning…

+ Computer Coding Scratch: Introduction to Computer Science: Code Academy:

+ Other Resources?

+ Transforming Our Units… What are the next steps?

+ “Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.” - George Bernard Shaw

+ Thank you for your time! Contact Information: Fay Wagner, Gifted Intervention Specialist: Contact Information for Administrators or Professional Development Requests: Amy Bain, Clermont County Gifted Coordinator: