1 Analytical Spectra of RGWs and CMB Yang Zhang Astrophysics Center University of Science and Technology of China (USTC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational constraints on primordial perturbations Antony Lewis CITA, Toronto
Advertisements

Observational constraints and cosmological parameters
Primordial perturbations and precision cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background Antony Lewis CITA, University of Toronto
CMB Constraints on Cosmology Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Constraining Inflation Histories with the CMB & Large Scale Structure Dynamical & Resolution Trajectories for Inflation then & now Dick Bond.
Light Waves and Polarization Xavier Fernando Ryerson Communications Lab
Eloisa Menegoni ICRA and INFN, University of Rome “La Sapienza” Cosmological constraints on variations of fundamental constants Miami2010, Fort Lauderdale,
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
CMB lensing and cosmic acceleration Viviana Acquaviva SISSA, Trieste.
Phenomenological Classification of Inflationary Potentials Katie Mack (Princeton University) with George Efstathiou (Cambridge University) Efstathiou &
Distinguishing Primordial B Modes from Lensing Section 5: F. Finelli, A. Lewis, M. Bucher, A. Balbi, V. Aquaviva, J. Diego, F. Stivoli Abstract:” If the.
The Physics of the cosmic microwave background Bonn, August 31, 2005 Ruth Durrer Départment de physique théorique, Université de Genève.
Álvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz Theoretical Physics Department Complutense University of Madrid in collaboration with Antonio L. Maroto & Antonio Dobado Different.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark Energy Perturbations 李明哲 南京大学物理学院 中国科技大学交叉学科理论研究中心 合肥.
Cosmic Microwave Radiation Anisotropies in brane worlds K. Koyama astro-ph/ K. Koyama PRD (2002) Kazuya Koyama Tokyo University.
CMB as a physics laboratory
1 On the road to discovery of relic gravitational waves: From cosmic microwave background radiation Wen Zhao Department of Astronomy University of Science.
COMING HOME Michael S. Turner Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics The University of Chicago.
The Implication of BICEP2 : Alternative Interpretations on its results Seokcheon Lee SNU Seminar Apr. 10 th
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
THE LARGE SCALE CMB CUT-OFF AND THE TENSOR-TO-SCALAR RATIO Gavin Nicholson Imperial College London with Carlo Contaldi Imperial College London (astro-ph/ )
1 Circular Polarization of Gravitational Waves in String Cosmology MIAMI, 200 7 Jiro Soda Kyoto University work with Masaki Satoh & Sugumi Kanno.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Relic Neutrinos, thermal axions and cosmology in early 2014 Elena Giusarma arXiv: Based on work in collaboration with: E. Di Valentino, M. Lattanzi,
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Lloyd KnoxUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 The Science Potential of Planck Lloyd Knox (UC Davis)
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us.
27 th May 2009, School of Astrophysics, Bertinoro Daniela Paoletti University and INFN of Ferrara INAF/IASF-Bologna Work in collaboration with Fabio Finelli.
Constraints on the neutrino mass by future precise CMB polarization and 21cm line observations Yoshihiko Oyama The Graduate University for Advanced Studies.
Wei-Tou Ni Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University [1] W.-T. Ni, (MPLA 25 [2010]
The CMB TE Cross Correlation and Primordial Gravitational Waves Nathan Miller CASS Journal Club 11/6/07.
Constraining the Inflationary Gravitational Wave Background: CMB and Direct Detection Nathan Miller Keating Cosmology Lab CASS Journal Club 3/13/07.
Tunneling cosmological state and origin of SM Higgs inflation A.O.Barvinsky Theory Department, Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow based on works with A.Yu.Kamenshchik.
Cosmological Perturbations in the brane worlds Kazuya Koyama Tokyo University JSPS PD fellow.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
CMB as a dark energy probe Carlo Baccigalupi. Outline  Fighting against a cosmological constant  Parametrizing cosmic acceleration  The CMB role in.
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Results from Three- Year WMAP Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) TeV II Particle Astrophysics August 29, 2006.
PHY th century cosmology 1920s – 1990s (from Friedmann to Freedman)  theoretical technology available, but no data  20 th century: birth of observational.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
L2: The Cosmic Microwave Background & the Fluctuation History of the Universe & the Basic Cosmological Parameters Dick Bond.
The Planck Satellite Hannu Kurki-Suonio University of Helsinki Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Cosmology, Helsinki
Testing the slow roll inflation paradigm with the Big Bang Observer
JPL, 12 April 2007 Discovering Relic Gravitational Waves in Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation L. P. Grishchuk Cardiff University and Moscow State University.
Observational constraints on inflationary models Zong-Kuan Guo (ITP, CAS) CosPA2011 (Peking Uni) October 31, 2011.
1 Circular Polarization of Gravitational Waves in String Cosmology KITPC, 200 7 Jiro Soda Kyoto University work with Masaki Satoh & Sugumi Kanno.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
The Cosmic Microwave Background
Quantum Noises and the Large Scale Structure Wo-Lung Lee Physics Department, National Taiwan Normal University Physics Department, National Taiwan Normal.
Inflation coupled to the GB correction Zong-Kuan Guo Hangzhou workshop on gravitation and cosmology Sep 4, 2014.
Basics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) Lecture at Max Planck Institute August 14, 2007.
Gravitational Waves from primordial density perturbations Kishore N. Ananda University of Cape Town In collaboration with Chris Clarkson and David Wands.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
Investigating dark energy with CMB lensing Viviana Acquaviva, SISSA, Trieste Lensing collaborators in SISSA: C. Baccigalupi, S. Leach, F. Perrotta, F.
BICEP2 Results & Its Implication on inflation models and Cosmology Seokcheon Lee 48 th Workshop on Gravitation & NR May. 16 th
Understanding the CMB Neutrino Isocurvature modes S. MUYA KASANDA School of Mathematical Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal Supervisor: Dr K. Moodley.
PLANCK TEAM of the DISCOVERY Center. The most mysterious problems.
Mike Cruise University of Birmingham Searches for very high frequency gravitational waves.
Smoke This! The CMB, the Big Bang, Inflation, and WMAP's latest results Spergel et al, 2006, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year results:
Observational Constraints on the Running Vacuum Model
Stochastic Background
12th Marcel Grossman Meeting,
The Cosmic Microwave Background and the WMAP satellite results
Inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet coupling
Introduction: A fundamental Issue of physics left for nearly one century: Gravitational Wave (引力波) 如果引力波力波存在,可以解釋諸多天文觀測現象。
暗能量、残余引力波、CMB极化 Dark energy, relic GW and CMB polarization 张杨 (Yang Zhang) 中国科学技术大学 (USTC) 天体物理中心(CFA) 2018/12/3.
Standard ΛCDM Model Parameters
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
“B-mode from space” workshop,
Presentation transcript:

1 Analytical Spectra of RGWs and CMB Yang Zhang Astrophysics Center University of Science and Technology of China (USTC)

2 Topics 1.Relic Gravitational Waves ( RGWs ) 2.C l XX of CMB generated by RGWS and re-ionized 3.C l XX generated by scalar perturbations in synchronous gauge

3 1. RGWs Robertson-Walker metric ds 2 =a 2 (t) [ -dt 2 + (δ ij +h ij ) ] perturbations h ij = hδ ij /3+h ij || (scalar) +h ij ┴ (vector) +h ij T (TT: RGWs) after generated by inflation, existing all the time, existing everywhere, broad distribution over (10 - 18 - ) Hz,

4 medium frequencies cavity: ν = 10 4 Hz MAGO, EXPLORER laser interferometer: ground, ν = 10 2 - 10 3 Hz LIGO, VIRGO, etc space, ν = - 10 0 Hz LISA , ASTROD, etc high frequencies Gaussian laser beam ν = 10 9 - Hz waveguide ν = 10 8 Hz (Cruise & Ingley) low frequencies CMB ν = ( - ) Hz WMAP, Planck, CMBPol, etc pulsar timing ν = Hz PPTA, etc

5 Analytic calculations equation : solution :

6 Initial condition: A, β, α T : behavior during expansion : Wavelengths > horizon , |h ij | = constant ; Wavelengths < horizon , |h ij | = h/a(t); → lower |h ij | at short wavelength λ

7 Other modification processes : ν free-streaming ; uud→p, QCD phase transition ; e + e - →2γ, annihilation ; accelerating expansion (dark energy Ω Λ ) ;

8 h(ν) and Ω g (ν) depend on inflation index β : Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 3783 ( 2006 )

9 h(ν) and Ω g (ν) depend on running index α T : Phys.Rev.D ( 2009 )

10 neutrino free-streaming; Phys.Rev.D75, (2007 )

11 Phys.Rev.D77, (2008) QCD phase transition, e - e + annihilation,

12 Dark energy reduces h(v) by a factor: Ω m /Ω Λ Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 3405 ( 2005 )

13 LIGO, Adv LIGO, LISA, DECIGO Phys.Rev.D80 (2009)

14 PPTA

15 BBN constraints:

16 MAGO, EXPLORER: Still short by ~7 orders of magnitudes in sensitivity; PRD80, (2009) Gaussian beam: Still short by ~5 orders in sensitivity; PRD 78, (2008);

17 RGWs might be directly detected via CMB Scalar : C TT, C EE, C TE RGWs: C TT, C EE, C TE, C BB WMAP5

18 2 、 Analytic C l TT, C l TE, C l EE, C l BB generated by RGWs, and re-ionized

19 anisotropies polarization Boltzmann eq for CMB photons : Equivalent to : with

20 The formal integrations : where the visibility function for the decoupling process fitted by two half Gaussian functions: Carrying out time integration, one has

21 Approximate, analytical solution : where with c ~ 0.6, b ~ 0.8

22 Analytical CMB spectra :

23 analytical, and numerical(CAMB) Phys.Rev.D74 (2006) ; Phys.Rev. D78 ( 2008 )

24 improvements : 1.effective range : l < 300  l < 600, covering the first 3 peaks; 2. errors only ~ 3%; 3. C TT l and C TE l are also obtained ;

25 ν- free-streaming has small modifications:

26 ν- free-streaming : 1. amplitude reduced by 20 ~ 35 % for l > 100; 2. C l XX are shifted slightly to larger l with Δl ∝ l. Δl =(1~5) ; (for the first two peaks)

27 Zero multipole method: to examine the value l ~ 50,where C TE l crosses 0. Our results: Δl by NFS is the same order of magnitude as those caused by inflation index β inf and Ω b. More works are needed before a conclusion can be made.

28 inflation index β :

29 WMAP5 constraint on C BB l : Phys.Rev.D78, (2008)

30 Reionized case possibly by first generation of luminous stellar objects likely occurred z = (6~ 20), uncertain yet; WMAP5 : ( sudden re-ionization ) z = 11 (95%CL) a major process secondary only to the decoupling V(t) consists of two parts : around z~1100 and around z~11

31

32 three models of reionization: Sudden : η-linear : Z-linear :

33

34

35

36 Approximate, analytical solution : with the coefficients

37 a 1 -- the probability of a polarized photon last scattered during decoupling, a 2 -- the probability of a polarized photon last scattered during reionization, both depending upon the optical depth κr : PRD79, (2009)

38 Where h k (η) and dot h k (η) at decoupling and reionization

39 Re-ionized CMB spectra

40 Phys.Rev.D79, (2009)

41 profile of C XX l determined by RGWs.

42 Re-ionization bump location is sensitive to time η r. height is sensitive to duration Δη r.

43 κ r - A degeneracy Phys.Rev.D79, (2009)

44 κ r - β degeneracy broken from the 2nd peak

45 Re-ionization also shifts l 0 around l=50 Therefore, Re-ionization has to be well studied before one can determine major cosmological parameters from CMB observational data.

46 Contribution of baryon isocurvature is minor

47 3 、 Analytic C l TT, C l TE, C l EE generated by scalar perturbations (in synchronous gauge)

48 scalar perturbations of metric (synchronous gauge) :

49 Boltzmann eq.: formal sol. :

50 several technique treatments : 1 。 Time integration 2 。 Removing gauge modes 3 。 Joining at R=M 4 。 Initial condition

51 We get : where

52 Analytic result: (valid for l>400)

53 Contributions by each term

54 C l XX depend on inflation scalar index n S

55 C l XX depend on baryon Ω b

56 conclusion: Still need to fully understand CMB, The “precision cosmology” is yet to be reached. Thank you!