REMSAD Simulation of the BRAVO Tracer Experiment Michael G. Barna Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University Fort Collins,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NPS/CIRA Group Data Analysis and Receptor Modeling Receptor Modeling Meeting with Carol McCoy, ARD Division Chief CIRA, Fort Collins, CO 16 June 2011.
Advertisements

Atmospheric inversion of CO 2 sources and sinks Northern Hemisphere sink Jay S. Gregg.
WATER I NNOVATE Pascal Harper Product Manager. 2 Application Areas for Greenfield Sites –Incorporate odour emissions into process selection. Process Upgrades.
An Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) Study Marc Pitchford, Ph.D National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
An Assessment of CMAQ with TEOM Measurements over the Eastern US Michael Ku, Chris Hogrefe, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla PM Model Performance Workshop,
Distribution of NO 2 concentrations over shooting (400 µg/m 3 per 1 hour) calculated with POLAIR dispersion model using (2004) NO 2 concentrations from.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Influence functions for the WLEF tower (z=400m) for the June, July, August and September 2000 Simulation: RAMS v4.3 with two nested grids (Δx=100km and.
Monthly Composites of Sea Surface Temperature and Ocean Chlorophyll Concentrations These maps were created by Jennifer Bosch by averaging all the data.
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
Tianfeng Chai 1,2, Alice Crawford 1,2, Barbara Stunder 1, Roland Draxler 1, Michael J. Pavolonis 3, Ariel Stein 1 1.NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College.
Air Quality Challenges In South Central Texas Issues and Demand to Infrastructure in the Eagle Ford Region Eagle Ford Consortium Peter Bella, Natural Resources.
Air Quality Issues: Non-Attainment Challenges in South Texas Energy, Air & Water: A Comprehensive Study of the Issues of Today Peter Bella, Natural Resources.
Evaluation of REMSAD- BRAVO Simulations Using Tracer Data and Synthesized Modeling Michael Barna Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado.
1 Asheville Air Quality Megan Stone. 2 Clean Smokestacks Act Passed in 2002 by the General Assembly of North Carolina Passed in 2002 by the General Assembly.
Preparatory work on the use of remote sensing techniques for the detection and monitoring of GHG emissions from the Scottish land use sector P.S. Monks.
CMAS Conference, October 16 – 18, 2006 The work presented here was performed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with partial.
Assessing the diurnal cycle of precipitation in the CSU MMF (T42) Michael S. Pritchard Richard C. J. Somerville John O. Roads Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
BRAVO Back-Trajectory Analyses Why Consider ATAD? History of use at Big Bend - How Good is our past? History of comparison to other wind fields. ATAD vs.
Tracer Simulation and Analysis of Transport Conditions Leading to Tracer Impacts at Big Bend Bret A. Schichtel ( NPS/CIRA.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
A Decline in the Northern Hemisphere CO 2 Sink from John Miller 1, Pieter Tans 1, Jim White 2, Ken Masarie 1, Tom Conway 1, Bruce Vaughn 2,
BRAVO Results of CMAQ-MADRID Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto 10 October 2002.
Hurricane lecture for KMA Ed Szoke 1 October 20, 2004 Overview of 2004 Atlantic Hurricane Season Ed Szoke* NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory Forecast Research.
Stephan F.J. De Wekker S. Aulenbach, B. Sacks, D. Schimel, B. Stephens, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder CO; T. Vukicevic,
Presents:/slides/greg/PSAT_ ppt Effects of Sectional PM Distribution on PM Modeling in the Western US Ralph Morris and Bonyoung Koo ENVIRON International.
Modeling Overview For Barrio Logan Community Health Neighborhood Assessment Program Andrew Ranzieri Vlad Isakov Tony Servin Shuming Du October 10, 2001.
Chemical transport modeling in support of NPS-CIRA activities Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bret Schichtel 1 Bill Malm 1 Jenny Hand 2.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Response of the San Jacinto fault zone to static stress changes from the 1992 Landers earthquake M. Nic Bhloscaidh and J. McCloskey School of Environmental.
A comparison of PM 2.5 simulations over the Eastern United States using CB-IV and RADM2 chemical mechanisms Michael Ku, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla.
Airmass History Analysis During High and Low Sulfate Days Bret A. Schichtel NPS/CIRA Fort Collins, CO BRAVO Study Data Analysis Meeting San Antonio, TX.
MODEL ERROR ESTIMATION IN ENSEMBLE DATA ASSIMILATION FRAMEWORK Dusanka Zupanski Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair Telling the OTAG Ozone Story with Data.
Goal: “What are the sources and physical mechanisms that contribute to high ozone concentrations aloft that have been observed in Central and Southern.
Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study:  Understand the long-range, trans-boundary transport of visibility-reducing.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
Modeling Regional Haze in Big Bend National Park with CMAQ Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto CMAQ.
1 Engineering Analysis of Properties Designated within the City of Bonita Springs as “Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource” (DR/GR) Land Use Category.
Contributing to the Prediction Coastal Flooding:
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
Seasonal Airmass Transport to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri Submitted.
September 20 th 2014 Case Study. Observed increases seen in Ozone (MTMET; Sept 20 th ) and PM 2.5 (Hawthorne; Sept 19-21) measurements, wildfire related?
Brief evaluation of REMAD and CMAQ for east Texas tracers Mark Green, DRI Model results from Christian Seigneur and Betty Pun- AER (CMAQ and REMSAD), and.
BRAVO Results of REMSAD Shiang-Yuh Wu, Betty Pun & Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon 10 October 2002.
Our World in Hemispheres SS TEKS 3.5C, 3.16E; LA TEKS 3.20A, B, C, D Communities (Grade 3), Scott Foresman, 2003 pp
Template Application of SCICHEM-2012 for 1-Hour NO 2 Concentration Assessments Prakash Karamchandani, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood, Bart Brashers, S.-Y.
Mark Lenz Senior Service Hydrologist National Weather Service Austin/San Antonio Current Drought Status 2011 Texas Emergency Management Conference Henry.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Triggered Earthquakes at Koyna, India
Contents 1. Overview on work done 2. Individual site discussions
CSU, ARDEC Fort Collins, CO July 11-15, 2005
60x30: Educated Population Goal and Interactive Map
A very brief introduction
CSU Sodium Lidar Program: Temperature and winds in the Mesopause Region of the Atmosphere Joe She and David Krueger, Physics Steve.
OZONE Monitoring Network

Hydraulics of Wetlands: Monitoring and Modeling Emily Spargo
A very brief introduction
February 2007 Note: Source:.
Predictability of Tropical Cyclone Genesis in the IPRC Regional Model
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Synthesized CMAQ A BRAVO community Product
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

REMSAD Simulation of the BRAVO Tracer Experiment Michael G. Barna Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 10 October 2002

The Modeling Process…. Primer on BRAVO Modeling:

Tracer Release Rates – Phase 1 (July 5 – September 16):

Tracer Release Rates – Phase 2 (Sept. 17 – October 30):

Tracer Release Sites and 6 hr Receptors:

PDCH tracer from Eagle Pass BBNP PDCH tracer from Eagle Pass BBNP Dispersion is a Lagrangian Process:

And a Three-Dimensional One:

Contour Maps of the Four Tracers:

Eagle Pass 12 Hour Timing Tracer at Marathon (PTCH):

Eagle Pass 24 Hour Timing Tracer at Monahans (PDCB):

Eagle Pass 24 Hour Timing Tracer at Big Bend (PDCB):

Eagle Pass Continuous Tracer at Persimmon Gap (PDCH):

Eagle Pass Continuous Tracer at Big Bend (PDCH):

San Antonio Tracer at Fort Stockton (PDCB):

Predicted and Observed Average Tracer Concentrations:

Correlation Coefficient:

Observed and Predicted PDCH – All monitors: y = x R = 0.25

Conclusions: Some skill in replicating timing (but often not magnitude) of the 12 hr and 24 hr Eagle Pass timing tracers Measured and predicted tracer concentration from Big Brown (PPCH) low (< 1 ppqV) Model tends to over-predict average concentrations at southern monitors Correlation coefficients: 0.05 – 0.65