Understanding Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Joey Kleiner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluate Spawning of Fall Chinook and Chum Salmon Just Below the Four Lowermost Columbia River Mainstem Dams Project PNNL.
Advertisements

Assessing effects of Columbia River Basin anadromous fish flow management on the aquatic ecology of the Henrys Fork watershed A Proposal By The Henrys.
Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
Status of Instream Flow Science in the Southeastern US Mary M. Davis, Ph.D., Technical Advisor Southern Instream Flow Network.
Middle Fork Project AQ 6 – Fish Passage Technical Study February 3, 2009.
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
Watershed Watch Protocols Level I. Goals for this module Understand how biomonitoring is used to evaluate the health of a stream Understand how biomonitoring.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
The adequacy of the existing reserve system for the protection of freshwater ecosystems Janet Stein Fenner School of Environment and Society.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
HOOD RIVER TRIBUTARIES DRAFT AREA WEIGHTED SUITABILITY Presented by: Thomas Gast, Normandeau Associates Presented to: Hood River Water Planning Group Instream.
River Studies. Outline of Events During your river field work you will be visiting two different sites in the lower course of the river. At each site.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
GIS Information Project!
Instream flow assessment in New Zealand. Flow assessment framework Morphology Evaluate for changes in flow Water quality Methods and parameters DO Temperature.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Restoration Site Prioritization Analysis Pilot Coarse Filters: Glen Ellen to Sonoma Creek headwaters SSA sub-watersheds Areas of observed salmonid presence.
Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology December 11, 2013.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – February 2004 Part 3 – Hydrologic Assessment.
Lindsay Carr, Joey Kleiner, Kinsey Hoffman
INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW ANALYSIS Thomas R. Payne Certified Fisheries Professional Normandeau Associates, Inc.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Mapping River Habitat at Different Flows in the Big Bend Reach of the Rio Grande A Project in Support.
Lower Saluda River Instream Flow Study TWC Study Team Workshop December 11, 2007.
Abstract Background Conclusion Stream Bed Morphology and Discharge Rates of Deckers Creek Data was collected at 5 different points along a 100 meter transect.
SFCC Walkover Habitat Survey Training Course July 2015.
Troy Brandt and Pete Gruendike River Design Group, Inc. Corvallis, Oregon Jarvis Caldwell HDR Engineering, Inc. Sacramento, California CONTRACT NO. W9127N-12-D
North Fork Shenandoah River Results Application For the State Drought Assessment Plan Jennifer L. Krstolic and Donald C. Hayes.
Ecoregion typing Ecological classification or typing will allow the grouping of rivers according to similarities based on a top-down nested hierarchical.
Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Thomas R. Payne & Associates Update on Flood Storage Fish Study Presented by Paul Schlenger, Bob Montgomery, Jim Shannon June 15, 2011.
2012 Instream Flow Study Agency Meeting on 2012 Draft Study Descriptions January 24,
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 - Attachment A California Red-legged Frog Site Assessment March 10, 2008.
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Research in the Shenandoah Valley Presented to the Shenandoah Valley Natural.
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
DEQ Water Supply Planning Integrating Monitoring, Modeling, and Scientific Study with Adaptive Management and Planning.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invertebrate Communities as Tools for Establishing Minimum Flows and Levels in Florida Streams.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
Elevation (m) Figure 1: The left panel shows the entire modeled reach which extends from RM 63.4 to RM 65.9, with arrows indicate locations of the rapids.
Modes of Sustainability Definition  In text  In aquifer-storage terms  In water-budget terms  In physical changes at the river (natural side)
Baird Claytor Hydroelectric Project Sedimentation Study.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
M ODESTO I RRIGATION D ISTRICT | T URLOCK I RRIGATION D ISTRICT FERC PROJECT N O Don Pedro Project Relicensing.
Ecomorphological Comparison of the Two Cyprinid Fishes Varicorhinus barbatulus and Candidia barbatus in Hapen Creek of the Northern Taiwan Ling-Chuan Chuang.
Former Channel Habitats of the Sacramento River: Physical and Ecological Processes and Restoration Potential Presented by Ingrid C. Morken By G. M. Kondolf,
Hydropeaking and minimum flow : the French approach. P. Baran CIS ECOSTAT - HYDROMORPHOLGY WORKSHOP 12th and 13th June Brussels Pôle Ecohydraulique.
Estimating the Volume of Fine-Grained Sediments Behind Four Low-Head Dams, Kalamazoo River, Michigan. In cooperation with the Michigan Department of Environmental.
PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.
Impacts of Landuse Management and Climate Change on Landslides Susceptibility over the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State Muhammad Barik and Jennifer.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.
PHABSIM: A TOOL FOR EVALUATING FLOW REQUIREMENTS IN FLORIDA STREAMS?
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology November 13, 2015.
ESTIMATING WEIGHT Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257 RG712.
Development of a High-Resolution Flood Inundation Model of Charles City, Iowa Nathan Young Associate Research Engineer Larry Weber.
Dr. Thomas Hardy Chief Science Officer River Systems Institute Texas State University.
Habitat suitability and availability for rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in the Canyon Reservoir tailrace Greg Cummings.
FISHERIES POSTER SESSION
Computer Aided Simulation Model for Instream Flow and Riparia
“Low Flow” “Water is taken out of the stream for a variety of uses, such as irrigated agriculture, municipal and industrial. Low flow means that amount.
Jim Pacheco, instream flow biologist Water Resources, Dept. of Ecology
TERMINOLOGY Macrohabitat – water quality and hydrology
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
A Comparison of Riparian Vegetation Structures
IBI’s: How It’s Done.
Spatterdock and Lake Allen Patuxent Research Refuge
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Joey Kleiner

IFIM: Instream Flow Incremental Methodology The goal of an IFIM study is to show the relationship between stream flows and available aquatic habitat This Flow:Habitat relationship is necessary for assessing potential downstream impacts on habitat resulting from upstream flow alterations A main product of an IFIM study is the Weighted Usable Area (WUA) table- an index showing habitat suitability for a given species over a range of flows

Steps in the IFIM Process 1)Habitat identification 2)Transect selection 3)Species selection, habitat suitability criteria (HSC) compilation 4)Collection of field hydraulic and habitat data 5)Physical Habitat Simulation System (PHABSIM) model 6)PHABSIM output of “Weighted Usable Area” (WUA)

The Formation of Fish Habitat Fish habitat is dependent on: Depth Velocity River bottom conditions (substrate/cover) Depth and velocity conditions change with increasing flow Example: Riffles, runs, pools

The Mapping of Fish Habitat The first step in an IFIM study is the identification of aquatic habitats within the study area The stream is divided into “study reaches” at points where significant changes in channel morphology or flow occur The primary types of mesohabitats within these reaches need to be identified to facilitate transect site selection

The Mapping of Fish Habitat (cont.) Habitat mapping is achieved through the use of existing institutional knowledge, aerial photographs, GIS, GPS, and site-specific data obtained through “float trips”

Transect Locations Once the river reaches and habitat types are identified and mapped, transect locations for the collection of field hydraulic data are determined Transects are located in areas representative of the hydraulic/habitat conditions observed in that reach

Field Data Collection Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM) software is used to simulate the relationship between streamflow and habitat for various species and life stages of fish Data collected in the field at each transect location is used to calibrate PHABSIM for the study reach of interest Data is collected at sampling stations/cells equally spaced along each transect Data collected at each cell include: Water surface elevation (WSE) Water velocity Substrate/cover

Field Data Collection (Cont.) WSE and velocity data are typically collected at each transect under 3 different “target flows” (low flow, medium flow, high flow) The target flows observed at the transects are achieved by altering dam releases upstream Example of target flows: 50, 150, and 300 cfs (measured by a USGS gage within the study reach) By entering the measurements taken at 3 flows, PHABSIM is able to interpolate WSE and velocity values for flows other than the 3 observed in the field

Field Data Collection (Cont.) Cover/substrate measurements are taken during the lowest target flow Codes for cover/substrate are assigned to each cell along a transect

Species Selection and HSC A set of fish species needs to be selected for Flow:Habitat analysis The species selected must be present within the study reach The species chosen are usually the ones most affected by changes in flow Each species has corresponding Habitat Suitability Criteria (HSC) that can be gathered from existing sources HSC quantify habitat quality for each species/life stage based on flow velocity, depth of the water column and substrate/cover HSC utilize a preference index ranging from 0 (least preferred) to 1 (most preferred)

PHABSIM Development A hydraulic model within PHABSIM is created for each study transect The hydraulic model consists of a water surface model and a velocity model The water surface and velocity models are developed and calibrated using the 3 data sets obtained in the field (1 data set from each of the 3 target flows) The calibrated hydraulic model is able to simulate WSE and velocity values at each cell along the transect for any flow value The hydraulic model at each transect is combined with the HSC to produce a WUA table showing the Flow:Habitat relationship at that transect

PHABSIM Development (Cont.) HSC for water depths, water velocities and substrate/cover are used to rank the suitability of each model cell in a transect This uses a multiplicative approach where suitability indexes (on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0) for a single cell in a transect are multiplied together (depth*velocity*substrate) to produce a composite suitability score for that cell (0.0 to 1.0) The suitability score of a cell is used to weight the area of that cell to produce a “Weighted usable area” (WUA) value for that cell The weighted values for all cells in a transect are summed to produce a total WUA for that transect WUA = suitability-weighted samples of area WUA is an index to the microhabitat availability

WUA Development within PHABSIM By repeating this process for multiple species/lifestages over an entire range of flows, a WUA table can be produced for each transect displaying the flow:habitat relationship for each species/lifestage of interest The WUA tables from each transect in a reach can be averaged together using weighting factors to produce a single WUA table representative of the entire reach WUA tables from each transect are weighted so that each transect's contribution to the reach-WUA is indicative of the amount of each habitat type (% area) present in the reach Area weighting factors are determined during the development of the habitat maps

WUA Development within PHABSIM (Cont.) Weighting transect-WUAs to produce a single reach-WUA table: % of each habitat type present in a single reach Weighting factors for each transect in the reach

WUA Example

Sources: Appomattox River Instream Flow (IFIM) Study: George F. Brasfield Dam to Harvell Dam, Final Report. Hunt Valley, MD: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., Averett et. al. Stream Habitat Modeling to Support Water Management Decisions for the North Fork Shenandoah River, Virginia, Final Report. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech Dept. of Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences, Bovee, K. D. et al. Stream Habitat Analysis Using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Geological Survey, Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Studies on the North Anna and Pamunkey Rivers, Virginia, Final Report. Sparks, MD: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., Krstolic, J.L., and Ramey, R.C. South Fork Shenandoah River habitat-flow modeling to determine ecological and recreational characteristics during low-flow periods: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5081, 64 p Payne, T. et. al. Appalachian Power Company Claytor Hydroelectric Project No , Instream Flow Needs Study, Final Report. Arcata, California: Thomas R. Payne & Associates, pdf 08.pdf Schreiner et. al. Habitat Assessment of the Potomac River From Little Falls to Seneca Pool, Final Report. Columbia, MD: Versar, Inc., Stalnaker, C. et al. The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology, A Primer for IFIM. U.S. Dept. of the Interior Report 29,