BSE in the US APHIS Investigation and Response FDA TSE Advisory Committee February 12, 2004 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA, APHIS,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDINFO EXPO 2006 Westin Crown Center, Kansas City, MO. National Animal Identification System Cattle Industry Work Group Report John Adams Gary Wilson Members.
Advertisements

Trace concepts & EMRS Fred Bourgeois EMRS National Coordinator Mark Schoenbaum Regional EPI.
Bovine Tuberculosis Dr. Rick Smith Assistant State Veterinarian over Ruminant Programs Bovine TB Program Coordinator MDARD.
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in Canada Pedro Piccardo, MD Division of Emerging and Transfusion-Transmitted Diseases Office of Blood Research.
1 BSE and the Alberta Beef Industry Presentation to Canada/US Transportation Border Working Group Calgary, Alberta October 20, 2004 Nithi Govindasamy,
Keys to Transparent Communication Module #3 – 5 Tips for Clearer Sentences.
Update on PEDV Lisa Becton, DVM, MS National Pork Board.
Proposed SRM Disposal Permitting Process Natalie Bragg, D.V.M., M.Sc., Animal Health and Production Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of New Regulations and Policies to Further Enhance Safeguards Against Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)
Analysis to Inform Decisions: Evaluating BSE Joshua Cohen and George Gray Harvard Center for Risk Analysis Harvard School of Public Health.
Age Verification for Japan: What is involved and is it right for me? Prepared by: John D. Lawrence Iowa State University Western Center for Risk Management.
Dr. Patrick Webb Pre-Harvest Traceability in the Pork Industry.
Scrapie Program Update Troy Bigelow, DVM U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary Services National Institute.
Continuity of Business Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Continuity of Business (2013)
21 January, 2011 Washington D.C. Aaron Scott, DVM PhD DACVPM Center Director, NSU USDA/APHIS/VS Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health 1 Safeguarding.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Proposed Activities to Address Antibiotic Resistance Secretary’s Advisory Council on Animal Health April 29, 2015 L.M. Granger,
BVD on the modern Dairy: The present state of confusion? Tom Shelton MS, DVM Bruce W. Hoffman, DVM.
Michael VanderKlok DVM Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Animal Industry Division BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS IN MICHIGAN CATTLE.
Harvard Center for Risk Analysis Evaluation of the Potential for BSE in the United States Joshua T. Cohen Keith Duggar George M. Gray Silvia Kreindel Harvard.
Canadian and U.S. BSE Risk Steven Anderson, Ph.D, MPP Office of Biostatistics & Epidemiology Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research U.S. Food & Drug.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 Proposed BSE Comprehensive Rule: A New Approach to BSE Rulemaking Dr. Christopher Robinson Assistant Director, NCIE BSE Comprehensive.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
North Dakota Department of Health TB Symposium North Dakota Tuberculosis Update.
SURVEILLANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT DURING THE LATTER STAGES OF ERADICATION AUSTRALIA BRIAN RADUNZ.
The Dairy Industry. Dairy Industry Provides milk and other dairy foods to consumers in North America and many foreign markets.
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
April 11, 2008 “Who’s Minding the Store? The Current State of Food Safety and How It Can Be Improved” Conference sponsored by Marler Clark and Stoel Rives.
1 Harvard Risk Assessment of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Joshua T. Cohen, Ph.D. The Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk Institute for.
Teaching Workshop Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Surveillance for Bovine Tuberculosis in U.S. Livestock Tuberculosis.
Quarantine and Movement Control Authorities Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Surveillance Part 1: The Surveillance Plan Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
Canada’s BSE Story Presentation to the Ontario Association of Bovine Practitioners November 6, 2003.
Bovine-derived Products Used in the Manufacture and Formulation of Vaccines and Allergenic Products: Minimizing TSE Risks William M. Egan, Ph.D. Acting.
Quarantine and Movement Control Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
Response to an Animal Disease Emergency. HSEMD, IDALS, CFSPH Animal Disease Emergency Local Response Preparedness, 2008 Steps in a Response Detection.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
BSE/TSE measures – state of play and future work Plenary of the Advisory Group on the Food Chain, Animal and Plant Health 19 December 2008.
BSE: World Situation and USDA Response FDA TSE Advisory Committee Silver Spring, MD October 14, 2004 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA,
Bovine Tuberculosis Molecular Epidemiology “Where are our new cases of bovine TB coming from?” Suelee Robbe-Austerman, DVM, PhD Mycobacteria Brucella Section.
A Stochastic Model of Paratuberculosis Infection In Scottish Dairy Cattle I.J.McKendrick 1, J.C.Wood 1, M.R.Hutchings 2, A.Greig 2 1. Biomathematics &
Recent Epidemiologic Situations of TB in Myanmar -Preliminary Review of Data from routine TB surveillance focusing on Case Finding- 9 May 2014, Nay Pyi.
Surveillance During Animal Disease Emergencies Overview.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Canada – British Columbia Agreement Establishing the Facilitation of the Disposal of Specified Risk Materials (SRM) Program.
ENZOOTIC BOVINE LEUKOSIS
NATIONAL ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (NAIS) 1.Why is identification important? 2.Why is speed and accuracy crucial? 3.What is current status? 4.What is.
BSE: World update FDA TSE Advisory Committee Gaithersburg, MD September 18, 2006 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA, APHIS, Veterinary.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Epidemiology Part 2: Epidemiology in an FAD Outbreak Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance,
David M. Asher, MD Division of Emerging & Transfusion-Transmitted Diseases Office of Blood Research & Review Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Uday Dessai, MS, Ph.D., M.P.H. Director, Microbiology Division Office of Public.
1 A Simulation Model to Quantify the Spread of BSE in the United States Joshua Cohen and George Gray Harvard Center for Risk Analysis Harvard School of.
Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development
August 2008 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Billy Moss Area Livestock Teacher North Region Agricultural Education February 2004.
New developments Regulation on official controls TAIEX Workshop AGR Belgrade, February DVM Hentriikka Kontio Ministry of Agriculture and.
Official investigation on a case of BSE on the example of a EU member state I Ivan Ambrožič, DVM, MSc Kiev 4. – 5- April 2011.
Legal framework of TSE surveillance Workshop on Prevention, Control and Eradication of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSE) Serbian Ministry.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Personnel and Premises Designations Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and.
Brought to you through a Cooperative Agreement with USDA/APHIS Goat Producers are the Key To Eradicating Scrapie in the U.S. Scrapie is a fatal, degenerative.
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
Foot and Mouth Disease Ministry Of Agriculture, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Kimberley Pilbara Cattlemen’s Association annual conference
Implementation of OIE Standards into national legislations
Scientific and Technical Department OIE
Frequently Asked Questions About BSE
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing
A PROCESS MODELLING APPROACH TO ESTIMATE FMD DIAGNOSTIC CAPACITY FOR OUTBREAK MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING. Kylee Walker1*, Rudolfo Bueno2, Richard.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Presentation transcript:

BSE in the US APHIS Investigation and Response FDA TSE Advisory Committee February 12, 2004 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA, APHIS, Veterinary Services

BSE Timeline 12/9/03 – index cow arrives at WA slaughter plant, sampled as a non-ambulatory (downer) animal 12/9/03 – index cow arrives at WA slaughter plant, sampled as a non-ambulatory (downer) animal 12/23/03 – presumptive positive BSE test results reported from NVSL 12/23/03 – presumptive positive BSE test results reported from NVSL 12/23/03 – Epidemiologic investigation begins 12/23/03 – Epidemiologic investigation begins 12/25/03 - Confirmation of BSE positive diagnosis 12/25/03 - Confirmation of BSE positive diagnosis 12/30/03 – USDA Secretary Veneman announces additional safeguards to be initiated by APHIS and FSIS. 12/30/03 – USDA Secretary Veneman announces additional safeguards to be initiated by APHIS and FSIS. 1/12/04 – USDA Secretary makes declaration of extraordinary emergency providing additional authorities and funding for response (effective on 1/6/04) 1/12/04 – USDA Secretary makes declaration of extraordinary emergency providing additional authorities and funding for response (effective on 1/6/04) 2/9/04 – Active field investigation closed out 2/9/04 – Active field investigation closed out

BSE Index Case - Diagnosis Presumptive positive diagnosis at NVSL was based on Presumptive positive diagnosis at NVSL was based on immunohistochemistry immunohistochemistry histopathologic examination histopathologic examination The positive diagnosis was confirmed at the BSE reference laboratory in Weybridge, England. Samples from the index cow were hand carried to this laboratory where the BSE diagnosis was confirmed on 12/25/03. The positive diagnosis was confirmed at the BSE reference laboratory in Weybridge, England. Samples from the index cow were hand carried to this laboratory where the BSE diagnosis was confirmed on 12/25/03.

BSE Index Case Holstein dairy cow, 6 ½ years at slaughter Holstein dairy cow, 6 ½ years at slaughter Sent to slaughter due to calving complications Sent to slaughter due to calving complications Tested at slaughter because of non-ambulatory status, no CNS signs observed Tested at slaughter because of non-ambulatory status, no CNS signs observed Trace back investigation determined cow was born into a herd in Alberta, Canada Trace back investigation determined cow was born into a herd in Alberta, Canada Moved into U.S. as part of dispersal sale in 2001 Moved into U.S. as part of dispersal sale in 2001 Initially went to Mattawa, WA dairy finishing herd (9/01) Initially went to Mattawa, WA dairy finishing herd (9/01) Resided in Mabton, WA dairy herd since 10/01 Resided in Mabton, WA dairy herd since 10/01

BSE Index Case (continued) The index cow has had four offspring over her lifetime, three calves since entering the U.S. The index cow has had four offspring over her lifetime, three calves since entering the U.S. A heifer calf born in Canada A heifer calf born in Canada A stillborn calf born in 2001 A stillborn calf born in 2001 A heifer calf in born in 2002 (was in the index herd) A heifer calf in born in 2002 (was in the index herd) A bull calf born in 2003 – moved to a bull calf raiser in Sunnyside, WA A bull calf born in 2003 – moved to a bull calf raiser in Sunnyside, WA

“At Risk” Animals Located “At risk” animals = 81 animals from herd in Canada “At risk” animals = 81 animals from herd in Canada One of the 81 is the positive cow One of the 81 is the positive cow 9 – index herd, Mabton, WA (131 euthanized) 9 – index herd, Mabton, WA (131 euthanized) 3 - Tenino, WA (4 euthanized) 3 - Tenino, WA (4 euthanized) 6 - Connell, WA (15 euthanized) 6 - Connell, WA (15 euthanized) 1 - Quincy, WA (18 euthanized) 1 - Quincy, WA (18 euthanized) 3 - Mattawa, WA (39 euthanized) 3 - Mattawa, WA (39 euthanized) 1 – Moxee, WA (15 euthanized) 1 – Moxee, WA (15 euthanized) 3 – Burley, ID (7 euthanized) 3 – Burley, ID (7 euthanized) 1 – Othello, WA (3 euthanized) 1 – Othello, WA (3 euthanized) 1 – Mabton, WA (3 euthanized) 1 – Mabton, WA (3 euthanized) February 9, 2004

BSE investigation Of the shipment of 81 animals from the Canadian birth herd: Of the shipment of 81 animals from the Canadian birth herd: 29 accounted for (including index cow) 29 accounted for (including index cow) Normal culling practices – estimate between 17 to 36 of the 81 might still be alive Normal culling practices – estimate between 17 to 36 of the 81 might still be alive OIE guidelines – animals born within one year (before or after) of a BSE affected animal considered higher risk OIE guidelines – animals born within one year (before or after) of a BSE affected animal considered higher risk 25 of the shipment of 81 were in this category 25 of the shipment of 81 were in this category 14 accounted for (including index cow) 14 accounted for (including index cow) Normal culling practices – estimate that 11 of the 25 might still be alive Normal culling practices – estimate that 11 of the 25 might still be alive

BSE investigation Total of 704 animals depopulated Total of 704 animals depopulated 449 – bull calf premises 449 – bull calf premises 255 – animals of interest 255 – animals of interest 28 were part of the original were part of the original could have been part of the original could have been part of the original 81 7 were part of additional group of 17 heifers from Canadian herd of origin 7 were part of additional group of 17 heifers from Canadian herd of origin

Other parts of investigation FSIS - Class II voluntary recall of meat initiated on 12/24/03 FSIS - Class II voluntary recall of meat initiated on 12/24/03 Includes 10,410 pounds Includes 10,410 pounds Includes all 20 animals slaughtered on the same day as index cow Includes all 20 animals slaughtered on the same day as index cow FDA – investigation of rendered product/feed FDA – investigation of rendered product/feed Over 2,000 tons of rendered protein disposed of Over 2,000 tons of rendered protein disposed of Facilities in compliance with feed regulations Facilities in compliance with feed regulations

International Review Subcommittee Delivered to Secretary’s Advisory Committee for Foreign Animal and Poultry Diseases – February 4, 2004 Delivered to Secretary’s Advisory Committee for Foreign Animal and Poultry Diseases – February 4, 2004 Commended the US on the open and transparent manner in which the investigation was conducted Commended the US on the open and transparent manner in which the investigation was conducted North American “indigenous BSE” North American “indigenous BSE”

International Review Subcommittee Investigation recommendations: Investigation recommendations: Comprehensive epi investigation, conforms to international standards Comprehensive epi investigation, conforms to international standards suggested all relevant information had been obtained and recommended concluding investigation suggested all relevant information had been obtained and recommended concluding investigation Tracing and recall of MBM effective and appropriate Tracing and recall of MBM effective and appropriate Tracing and recall of meat consistent with WHO recommendation Tracing and recall of meat consistent with WHO recommendation

International Review Subcommittee Policy recommendations Policy recommendations Specified risk materials Specified risk materials remove from human and animal feed remove from human and animal feed Recognized that FSIS interim rule (from cattle >30 months) removes highest risk tissues Recognized that FSIS interim rule (from cattle >30 months) removes highest risk tissues Recommend extending definition, cattle > 12 months of age Recommend extending definition, cattle > 12 months of age Non-ambulatory cattle Non-ambulatory cattle Maintain access for surveillance samples Maintain access for surveillance samples

International Review Subcommittee Surveillance Surveillance Test all cattle > 30 months in targeted high risk population (CNS signs, fallen stock, non-ambulatory animals, emergency slaughter, etc..) for one-year period Test all cattle > 30 months in targeted high risk population (CNS signs, fallen stock, non-ambulatory animals, emergency slaughter, etc..) for one-year period Testing of all cattle slaughtered for human consumption unjustified Testing of all cattle slaughtered for human consumption unjustified Random sample of slaughter cattle >30 months could be considered to encourage reporting at the farm level Random sample of slaughter cattle >30 months could be considered to encourage reporting at the farm level Adopt rapid screening tests, decentralize laboratory facilities Adopt rapid screening tests, decentralize laboratory facilities

International Review Subcommittee Feed restrictions Feed restrictions Recommend all SRM excluded from all animal feed Recommend all SRM excluded from all animal feed Recommend all mammalian and poultry protein be excluded from ruminant feed Recommend all mammalian and poultry protein be excluded from ruminant feed Traceability Traceability Animal identification system Animal identification system Education Education

BSE – Targeted Surveillance Non-ambulatory animals Dead stock Field CNS Cases and on-farm suspects Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory data Public health laboratories CNS condemns at slaughter and other antemortem condemns in certain categories

Surveillance goals Surveillance at a level sufficient to find 1 case per 1 million adult cattle, 95% confidence Surveillance at a level sufficient to find 1 case per 1 million adult cattle, 95% confidence Based on estimates of targeted high risk population Based on estimates of targeted high risk population Non-ambulatory – 195,000 Non-ambulatory – 195,000 Broader estimate, including deads and other condemns – 600,000 Broader estimate, including deads and other condemns – 600,000 Adult cattle population – 45 million Adult cattle population – 45 million

Surveillance goals FY 02 and FY 03 – goal was 12,500 FY 02 and FY 03 – goal was 12,500 Based on estimate of non-ambulatory animals as targeted population (195,000) Based on estimate of non-ambulatory animals as targeted population (195,000) FY 04 – goal is at least 40,000 FY 04 – goal is at least 40,000 Based on broader estimate of targeted population (600,000) Based on broader estimate of targeted population (600,000) Statistical calculation is 38,462 samples necessary, rounded up to 40,000 Statistical calculation is 38,462 samples necessary, rounded up to 40,000

BSE Surveillance – May 1990 – FY2004 ( thru 12/31/2003) 20,543 19, ,

Surveillance: US Regions NW C SW SC SE NC NE E

US Regional Goals BSE Surveillance (through 12/31/03) FY01 Goal FY01 FY02 Goal FY02 FY03 Goal FY03FY04GoalFY04 NW ,2052,2241, SW ,9762,7531,9763, C ,5902,3561,5902, SC ,5091,8101,5091, NC ,5613,7802,5615, NE ,1402,1902,1402, E , SE ,0053,1561,0052,

Surveillance: NVSL Bovine Brain Submissions FY (through 12/31/03)

Future policy changes Evaluating International Review Subcommittee recommendations Evaluating International Review Subcommittee recommendations Considering range of options on surveillance Considering range of options on surveillance In the interim, still committed to maintaining FY04 goal as stated, until further decisions are made In the interim, still committed to maintaining FY04 goal as stated, until further decisions are made Working with states, industry, and others to maintain access to targeted population Working with states, industry, and others to maintain access to targeted population