Opportunities and Challenges with Sexed Semen Joseph C. Dalton, PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arab Chieftains - Stole semen to breed mares  Ivanov (Russia) Developed methods as we know today - Most work was with horses but did some.
Advertisements

Can You Breed a “Good Breeder” Kristi M. Cammack Department of Animal Science University of Wyoming.
Sexed Semen and Beef Cattle UW Extension Livestock Team Spring 2010.
2006 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic.
B114 Embryo Transfers.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
Precision Agriculture In The Beef Cattle Industry Thomas Hyde SOIL 4213.
1.8 Management Heat Stress 1.9 Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows 1.10 Guide to Good Dairy Farming Practice By: Mohammed Sabah 2014 Ch.1 Dairy cows.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
Jenna Parnell Agricultural Leadership ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATI ON A.I.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
AI Promotion Breeding Future Profits. Breeding Workshop for Stakeholders. March 2006.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
 87 of the top 100 active proven TPI sires are descendants of Planet, O Man, Shottle and Goldwyn.  58 descendants of O Man  32 descendants of Shottle.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows with Particular Reference to Organic Systems Michael G Diskin & Frank Kelly Animal Production Research Centre,
Leaving Certificate Agricultural Science
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
December 2014 Proof Changes
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
Sperm are sorted. “X” sperm are saved “Y” sperm and “undetermined” sperm are discarded.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
ABS Real World Data ® Bull Fertility November 2012.
 Selection & Culling Strategies Mario S. Mongeon; OMAFRA.
Artificial Insemination GCSE Module 14 Biotechnology Lesson Ouch!
For the Instructor ●Students will: o Have a basic understanding of what Embryo Transfer is and understand its components o Be able to summarize the processes.
Enhancing Quality Of Dystocia Data By Integration Into A National Dairy Cattle Production Database C. P. Van Tassell 1,2 and G. R. Wiggans 1 Animal Improvement.
 Breeding Heifers Mark Carson Reproductive Specialist, EastGen.
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
Collecting and Handling Semen
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA San Antonio.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,
Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Peter Sutovsky, PhD, Dr.h.c..  Fertilization  Male infertility in humans  Male fertility in livestock species  Assisted Reproductive Technologies/Therapy.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
H.D. Norman* and J.L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
2002 George R. Wiggans and Curt P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
2006 GEORGE R. WIGGANS Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, Maryland ,
C.P. Van Tassell 1, * G.R. Wiggans 1, J.C. Philpot 1, and I. Misztal Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
Successful experience of introduction of the Brown Swiss in the northwest of Vietnam Serge Lacaze Biotechnologies Manager AURIVA
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Assisted Reproductive Technology
IHFA Cork Club 27th Jan 2014.
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
Genetics – Applications to Agriculture
EQUATION OF REPRODUCTION
Artificial Insemination
Artificial Insemination
Value of Sexed Semen Victor E. Cabrera
EQUATION OF REPRODUCTION
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
Data Holstein breedings from 2006 through 2008 Total breedings
Extent of sexed-semen usage
Presentation transcript:

Opportunities and Challenges with Sexed Semen Joseph C. Dalton, PhD

 Sperm contain an X or a Y chromosome.  Ova contain only an X chromosome.  When fertilization occurs: X-sperm + X-ova = XX female Y-sperm + X-ova = XY male Introduction

 1980’s: Technology to separate X and Y sperm via flow cytometry was developed.  1996: XY, Inc. became the exclusive worldwide licensee of sperm separation in non-human mammals.

How are sperm separated?  The X chromosome is larger and contains approximately 3.8% more DNA than the Y chromosome.

Semen collection Evaluation, initial extension, staining, and incubation Initiation of separation How are sperm separated?

(Mo-Flo diagram courtesy of XY Inc.)

How are sperm separated?  ~ 35,000 sperm pass the laser per second  ~ 5,000 X sperm are sorted per second  X sperm are collected  Y sperm and unknown and dead sperm are discarded

Sexed semen processing  After sorting, the semen is: Packaged into 1/4 mL straws Frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen

Opportunities with Sexed Semen

Opportunities  Flow cytometry is the only reliable sexed semen technology available today.  Breed heifers with X sperm to decrease calving difficulty.  Eliminate biosecurity risks with closed herd expansion.  On average 9 out of 10 calves will be of the desired sex.

Heifers (no.) expected in 100 calvings – conventional semen (ABS Global)

Heifers (no.) expected in 100 calvings – sexed semen (ABS Global)

Recommendations for use of sexed semen  Use only in well-managed virgin heifers.  Inseminate 12 h after heat is observed.  Thaw using warm water at 95 to 98 degrees F for a minimum of 30 seconds.  Time, temperature, hygiene, and skill.

Average daily gain1.8 lb/d Weight at first service800 lb Age at first calving22 to 24 mo Weight at first calving1350 to 1400 lb Weight after first calving1250 lb BCS at first calving3.25 to 3.5 Goals for Holstein heifers (Adapted from Vandehaar, 2001, and Hoffman, 1997)

First service strategy  Use sexed semen at first service only.  Use conventional semen at second and later services.  Results: decreased average age at calving for heifers inseminated with sexed semen as compared with those inseminated with conventional semen. (Weigel, 2004; DeJarnette et al., 2007)

What results can you expect?  Conception rate: Holstein heifers: 41% to 57% Greater than 70% of herds achieved a heifer CR > 70% of first service CR obtained using conventional semen (XY, Inc./Weigel, 2004; Cerchiaro et al., 2007; DeJarnette et al., 2007) In well-managed virgin heifers, the conception rate will be ~70% to 85% of conventional semen.

Sexation data N = % (ABS Global, 2008)

Conception rate by service number Service Sexed semen, % (n) Conventional semen, % (n) Sexed semen relative to conventional,% First47.0 (26,465)56.4 (21,864)83.3 Second43.1 (6,375)53.8 (13,389)80.1 Third38.1 (2,567)45.4 (11,772)83.9 (DeJarnette et al., 2008)

Challenges with Sexed Semen

Challenges  With good management, conception rates will average 70 – 85% of conventional semen.  The lower concentration of sperm (2.1 million per dose) can affect the fertility of the semen.  Potential damage due to cold shock is greater in the 1/4 mL straw.

Why not increase the number of sperm per dose?  Processing is slow (3,000 to 6,000 sperm per second) = 1 hour to produce 1 straw with 20 million sperm.  Research has focused on maximizing fertility of low concentration of sperm in heifers.

Total number of sperm (millions) Fertility (%) Bull A Bull B Bull C Bull B threshold value for optimal results Optimum fertility of the population (Salisbury and VanDemark, 1961)

Concepcion rate, (%) Concentration of sperm per dose, (millions) (DeJarnette et al., 2008) Why not increase the concentration of sperm per dose?

Why not increase the number of sperm per dose?  Overall, there was no effect of sperm dosage on conception rates in heifers.  Bull “A”: Increase in sperm dosage resulted in an increased conception rate.  Conception rates averaged 47% (range: 33-68%). (DeJarnette et al., 2008)

Why isn’t sexed semen available from all bulls?  Not all bulls are suitable for sorting Demand Genetics Semen quality Poor motility Poor morphology Inadequate concentration

Why isn’t sexed semen available from all bulls?  Reduction in total sperm available for freezing and distribution ~20% of total sperm are able to be used 80% of sperm are discarded Y-chromosome bearing sperm Abnormal or dead cells Sperm cells not recognized by the laser

What results can you expect with sexed semen in cows?  Conception rate: Holstein cows: 15% to 41% Possible effect of: Parity Days in milk Insemination at heat vs. timed AI (Andersson et al., 2006; Schenk and Everett, 2007; DeJarnette et al., 2008) In cows, conception rates are ~ 45% to 66% of conventional semen.

“The key to the value of sexed semen…lies in the opportunity to have better heifers.” (Fetrow et al., 2007)

Economics including the value of increased genetics  Heifer value = US$1,800 Inseminate the top 30% of heifers with sexed semen. Inseminate the remaining 70% of heifers with conventional semen. Results: $22 profit per animal for all animals in the breeding pool (Fetrow et al., 2007)

Which economic factors should be considered?  Value of heifers relative to bulls  Cost of sexed semen relative to conventional semen  Genetic merit of the heifer to be inseminated  Value of a heifer relative to the cost to raise a heifer (Fetrow et al., 2007)

NAAB scoring system for calving ease Degree of difficultyCalving ease score No problem1 Slight problem2 Needed assistance3 Considerable force4 Extreme difficulty5 (Scores recorded by producers, then submitted to DHIA or AI Stud; Adapted from K. Weigel)

Frequency of difficult calvings Calving ease scoreLactation 1, % (Meyer, 2001; Adapted from K. Weigel)

Economics of decreased dystocia  Herd-level benefit of decreased dystocia will likely be low; the value of this decrease is ~$1.00/calving. Therefore, decreased dystocia will probably not be the principle driver of sexed semen use. (Fetrow et al., 2007; Photo courtesy of M. Drost)

Stillbirths  Definition: Calves born dead or that die within 48 h of birth (The majority are usually born dead).

What is the incidence of stillbirths following use of conventional semen? Meyer et al † Lombard et al ‡ Lactation 111.1%12% Lactation 2+5.7%6.2% Overall7.1%8.2% ( † 666,341 calvings over 12 years; ‡ 7,380 calvings on 3 dairies over 13 mo., 24-h)

Calf sex FemaleMaleTotal Semen typeLiveDeadLiveDeadLiveDead Sexed, % Conventional, % What is the incidence of stillbirths following use of sexed semen? (DeJarnette et al., 2008) Average incidence ~ 20%, nevertheless, males represent only 10% of total births Total incidence of stillbirths is not influenced by sexed semen

Further research is needed to improve sexed semen  Increase sorting efficiency $400,000/sorter  Increase market share TAI protocol in heifers? Targeted use in lactating cows?  Is the male stillbirth data real?

Final thoughts  Use only in well-managed virgin heifers.  Consider genetic merit of heifers.  Inseminate 12 h after heat is observed. Do not use timed AI.  Recognize the inevitable decrease in conception rate.

Final thoughts  What is the conception rate in your heifers with conventional semen?  What management factors contribute to high or low conception rates (with conventional semen or sexed semen?)

Acknowledgements  Neil Michael  Kylene Anderson  John Schenk  ABS Global Technical Services Team

Thank you. Gracias. Obrigado. Questions?