Mateusz Berlik Office of Electronic Communications, Poland

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Advertisements

AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Fill in missing numbers or operations
Direction générale de lAviation civile Ministère de l'Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement Direction des Services de la Navigation.
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2003 Andy Gowans (UK RA) UK Ultra Wide Band (UWB) Compatibility Study Andy Gowans & Bharat Dudhia UK.
AS. 02/03 Finding fractions of a quantity AS. 02/03.
An Introduction to the ITU
WMO Workshop on Radio-Frequency for meteorology20-21 March Ultra Wide Band (UWB) technologies Philippe TRISTANT Frequency.
WMO Radio Spectrum Workshop- Radiosonde Spectrum Issues Presented By: David Franc Office of Radio Frequency Management March 2006.
Regional Workshop on planning of digital terrestrial broadcasting in relation to RRC-06 for CEE, CIS and Baltic States (Moscow, 21 –24 September 2004)
International Telecommunication Union Accra, Ghana, June 2009 Conformance and Interoperability Testing: (WTSA-08) Resolution 76 Joshua Peprah Director,
World Radiocommunication Seminar – Geneva 2010 GE84 Agreement VHF-FM Sound Broadcasting Bangaly Fod é Traor é and Jean-Marc Paquet Radiocommunication Bureau.
ITU-R Working Party 8B Thomas Ewers RegTP Germany Chairman WP8B.
1 Ground Based Meteorological Radars Presented By: David Franc NOAAs National Weather Service September 2005.
BR/TSD Москва 2004 Workshop for CEE, CIS and Baltic States BCD Compatibility Analysis Сентябрь 2004 Москва David Botha.
Wiktor Sęga, Office of Electronic Communications, Poland
Wiktor Sęga, Office of Electronic Communications, Poland
AERONAUTICAL COMMUNICATIONS PANEL (ACP) TWENTY THIRD MEETING OF WORKING GROUP F WACAF/ESAF BRIEF REPORT BY OMODELE AROWOLO Cairo, Egypt 21 – 27 September.
Paris Mar 2011 Preparations for WRC-12 WRC -12 AGENDA ITEM 1.3 ON UAS Presented by John Taylor EUR RPS for WRC-12 preparation.
International Telecommunication Union September 2010 WRC-12 PREPARATIONS MID Regional Planning Seminar 19/20 September 2010 W. Frank Radiocommunication.
CITEL Preparation World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-12) Fortaleza Brazil August, 2010.
FIXED SATELLITE SERVICE and UAS (22 September 2010)
Direction générale de lAviation civile Ministère de l'Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement Direction des Services de la Navigation.
ICAO was created in 1944 to promote the safe and orderly development of civil aviation in the world. A specialized agency of the United Nations, it sets.
WRC-11 Agendas for Radar & Amateur Issues 6-8 March, 2008 Joo-Hwan Lee Radio Resource Team, ETRI Republic of Korea.
0 - 0.
ZMQS ZMQS
WRC–12 Industry Debrief 23 April 2012 Agenda item 1.5 – Electronic News Gathering Presenter: Andrew King on behalf of Roger Bunch.
Wireless WANs Chapter 16.
The basics for simulations
The need to harmonize spectrum for mobile
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
Earth Stations on Mobile Platforms (ESOMPs)
TRANSITION TO THE DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION BROADCASTING IN TURKEY 05 NOVEMBER 2012, BUDAPEST Information and Communication Technologies Authority.
Charging at 120 and 240 Volts 120-Volt Portable Vehicle Charge Cord 240-Volt Home Charge Unit.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All GRSC-9 Summary Report Cindy Cook, GRSC-9 Chair, ISACC Document No: GSC16-CL-03 Source: GRSC-9 Contact:
National Weather Service 1 Results of Operational Compatibility Studies between ASR, Meteorological Radars and IMT Systems Operating in the –
3.7) On-going activities within CEPT/ECC Thomas Weilacher Vice Chairman of CEPT/ECC Working Group FM (Frequency Management)
WRC-07 Workshop Select Critical Issues with a Commercial Sector Focus Jennifer A. Manner Mobile Satellite Ventures USITUA WRC Seminar September 19, 2007.
Before Between After.
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Pham Nhu Hai Head, Broadcasting Services Radiocommunication Bureau
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
The most important decisions of WRC-12 and their impact on the development of mobile services (Agenda Item 1.17) Péter Vári Director for Frequency and.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
WRC–12 Industry Debrief 23 April 2012 Agenda item 1.16 – Meteorological aids – below 20 kHz Presenter: Paul Hettrick.
WRC–12 Industry Debrief 23 April 2012 Agenda item 1.21 – Radiolocation service 15.4–15.7 GHz Presenter: Darrell Ninham.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
ATN/GNSS Seminar Varadero, Cuba 6 to 9 May 2002 GNSS spectrum and signal vulnerability issues Presentation 5.2 by V. Iatsouk, GNSS Panel Secretary ANB/ICAO.
WRC 2007 Results October 22 ~ November 16, 2007 Geneva, Switzerland Masatoshi OHISHI RAFCAP meeting 2008.
1 Compatibility of Digital Broadcasting and Mobile Services Regional Seminar on Digital TV Broadcasting Algiers, 4-5 December 2007 Presented by Jan Doeven.
Meteorological Spectrum Issues- Outcome of the 2003 World Radiocommunication Conference Presented By: David Franc National Weather Service December 2,
WRC–12 Industry Debrief 23 April 2012 Agenda item 1.15 – Oceanographic radars 3–50 MHz Presenter: Paul Hettrick.
National Preparatory Working Group meeting for World Radio-communications Conference 2015 Aeronautical Agenda Item 1.7 Presented by Takalani Tshikalaha.
Agenda item Allocation to the Fixed- Satellite Service in the 7 ‑ 8 GHz range Presenter: Carol Wilson (Coordinator: Kevin Knights)
Agenda Item: 1.8 Title: to review the provisions relating to earth stations located on board vessels (ESVs), based on studies conducted in accordance with.
WRC-15 Agenda item 1.18 “to consider a primary allocation to the radiolocation service for automotive applications in the GHz frequency band…”
CEPT position on WRC-12 AI’s 1.3, 1.4, 1.7, 1.12 and 1.25
ITU-R activities on WRC-19 AI 1.12
IMT-2020 Process Presentation to the IEEE 5G group (24 June 2016)
PRELIMINARY POSITION OF THE RCC CAs ON THE AGENDA ITEMS OF THE WORLD RADIOCOMMUNICATION CONFERENCE 2012.
Status On Current DFS CEPT/ECC Civil/Military Meeting, November 2016, Prague Thomas Weber, ECO, Spectrum Management
Panel Session 4 WRC-15 Agenda items 1. 2 and 1. 3 (incl
WRC-12 A.I. 1.3 Eric ALLAIX DGAC-DSNA.
IMT-2020 Process Presentation to the IEEE 5G group (24 June 2016)
Regional Seminar on Digital TV Broadcasting
INMARSAT > CTO> RMA
Preliminary GSC positions on WRC-19 agenda items 1.13 IMT
Presentation transcript:

Empirical compatibility assessment in Poland LTE causes interference to ARNS Mateusz Berlik Office of Electronic Communications, Poland Department of Frequency Resources Management ITU Regional Seminar for Europe and CIS Countries Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 Agenda Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Aims and conditions of the measurements Radio systems under tests Measurements action Summary Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 Agenda Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Aims and conditions of the measurements Radio systems under tests Measurements action Summary Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem MOBILE added by WRC-07 Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem WRC-12 AI 1.17 - to consider results of sharing studies between the mobile service and other services in the band 790-862 MHz in Regions 1 and 3, in accordance with Resolution 749 (WRC-07), to ensure the adequate protection of services to which this frequency band is allocated, and take appropriate action. MOBILE FIXED BROADCASTING ARNS Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Two approaches proposed by CPM-12: coordination distances: 125 – 515 km (depending on ARNS system and scenario) coordination field strength triggers aggregate values – eg. 13 dBµV/m @ 10m in 6 MHz RBW for RLS1 radar; single values – eg. -24.24 dBµV/m @ 10m for ARNS terrestrial station Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 Agenda Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Aims and conditions of the measurements Radio systems under tests Measurements action Summary Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Aims of the measurements: to analyse an impact of the LTE system on the radar system; to determine/assess the maximum level of the interfering signal. Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 What did we have? 4 ARSN systems operating in Poland; agreement of the army on measurements (with some restrictions); LTE test terminals (provided by the operator); LTE signal generator (provided by Nokia Siemens Networks Poland); ARNS’s system operators/service staff. Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 What did we NOT have? detailed knowledge about the ARNS systems; documentation of the ARNS systems; specialists in old ARNS systems; compatibility criteria(!). Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 Agenda Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Aims and conditions of the measurements Radio systems under tests Measurements action Summary Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 Scenario LTE terminal/signal generator ARNS ground station Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Object of the measurements RSP-10 MN-1 radar system: primary (RLS1) / secondary (RLS2) radar; only RLS1 module currently in use; radiolocator for traffic controllers; less than 100 km operational radius; is going to be replaced by modern systems. Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

RSP-10 Radar system (RLS1) Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

RSP-10 Radar system (RLS1) Zdjęcia jako ciekawostki Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

RSP-10 Radar system (RLS1) Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

RSP-10 Radar system (RLS1) Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 Agenda Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Aims and conditions of the measurements Radio systems under tests Measurements action Summary Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 Military airfield 17-18.02.2011 Pomiary odbywały się: 15-16 lutego w bazie w Toruniu – radar w konserwacji, 17-18 lutego na lotnisku w Malborku – działający radar. Z powodu nieplanowanych lotów w Malborku, konieczne było powtórzenie pomiarów na działającym radarze w Toruniu, 30 marca. Military base 15-16.02.2011 30.03.2011 Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Measurement I (Toruń, 15-16.02.2011) The radar under maintenance works; Direct connection to the radar receiver. W Toruniu badany radar był w końcowym etapie konserwacji/remonu – został przygotowany do pracy, więc był sprawny. Możliwe było bezpośrednie podłączenie na wejście odbiornika, oraz wykorzystanie procedur testowych opisanych przez producenta. Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Measurement I (Toruń, 15-16.02.2011) Układ pomiarowy. Sztucznie generowane impulsy nadawane i odbierane były sumowane z sygnałem LTE z generatora i podawana na wejście odbiornika radaru. Ponieważ nie było możliwe wykonanie w pełni obiektywnego pomiaru, przyjęto dwa pośrednie kryteria oceny zakłóceń: opinia obsługi radaru; obserwacja poziomu sygnału z wyjścia radaru na oscyloskopie Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Measurement I (Toruń, 15-16.02.2011) Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Measurement I (Toruń, 15-16.02.2011) LTE parameters:   Bandwidth [MHz] 5 10 20 Modulation QPSK 16-QAM G4-76A generator settings: „Reflected” signal [dBm] - 92.3 -82.3 -72.3 LTE generator „critical” power: LTE Power [dBm] - 89.1 -87.1 Wyniki pomiarów w Toruniu. Widać, że szerokość kanały LTE i modulacja nie wpływają na dopuszczalny poziom zakłóceń. Co dziwne, poziom dopuszczalnych zakłóceń nie zmienia się w zależności od mocy sygnału odbitego odebranego przez radar Pol H: E = 24.6 dBμV/m Pol V: E = 48.6 dBμV/m Sensitivity: -92.3 dBm Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Measurement II (Malbork, 17-18.02.2011) Operating radar used by military airfield in Malbork Pomiary w Malborku miały na celu sprawdzenie koegzystencji LTE i RSP-10 w warunkach rzeczywistych. Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Measurement II (Malbork, 17-18.02.2011) The radar in „receive-only” mode: very optimistic results (allowable interference > 50 dBµV/m); Received interference’s level dramatically higher when it works in regular „send-and-receive” mode; there was no ability to repeat the measurements. Tutaj napisałbym, że nie udało nam się zrealizować planu pomiarów, ale zauważyliśmy ważną rzecz: Pomiary wykonywane były na czynnym lotnisku. Niestety, z powodu nieplanowanych wcześniej lotów odbywających się na lotnisku, nie udało się zrealizować planu pomiarów. Po stwierdzeniu, że radar jest dużo bardziej czuły jeśli pracuje w trybie nadawanie-odbiór, nie udało się przeprowadzić właściwych pomiarów. Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Measurement III (Toruń, 30.03.2011) Operating radar (after maintenance works); Measurements similar to ones performed in Malbork; LTE terminals as interfering transmitters. Niedokończone pomiary z Malborka postanowiono przeprowadzić w Toruniu. Użyto tego samego, radaru, który był serwisowany w lutym – tym razem jednak radar był ulokowany na terenie bazy i normalnie pracował. Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

RSP-10 Radar system (RLS1) Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Measurement III (Toruń, 30.03.2011) Antenę terminala LTE zamontowano na dachu samochodu, który poruszał się w okolicy bazy w Toruniu. Szukane były pozycje terminala, dla których zakłócenia na wskaźniku radaru przestają być widoczne. W okolicy radaru znajdował się samochód pomiarowy, przy pomocy którego dokonywano pomiaru mocy w punkcie odbioru. Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Measurement III (Toruń, 30.03.2011) Measure No. Received power [dBm] Field strength at receiving point [dBμV/m] Distance [m] Frequencies 1 -95,2 35,5 706 RSP-10: 835 MHz LTE: 834.75 MHz 2 -96,5 34,2 1 488 3 -96,3 34,4 1 504 4 -80,3 50,4 128 LTE: 839.5 MHz 5 -69,7 61,0 LTE: 840.5 MHz Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 Agenda Introduction to the LTE vs. ARNS problem Aims and conditions of the measurements Radio systems under tests Measurements action Summary Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012

Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012 Summary Because of the lack of the technical compatibility criteria, it was difficult to use the results as a point in discussion. General conclusions: LTE terminal does really interfere RSP-10 radar; allowable interference field strength is probably higher than protection level from the CPM-12 Report. The results were useful for our administration. Mateusz Berlik, UKE :: Warsaw, 7 - 9 May 2012