1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Part 851 & Vacuum Systems W.R. Casey NSLS-II Project Brookhaven National Laboratory August 12, 2008 Office of Science Accelerator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmentally sound management of ship recycling- simple or complex? Roy Watkinson Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs UK Promoting Sustainable.
Advertisements

OFFICE OF SCIENCE Kurt W. Fisher Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy 1 Closeout Report.
“RULES FOR INSERVICE INSPECTION OF NUCLEAR PLANT COMPONENTS”
ICH Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria (RAAPAC) Overview and Update Robert H. King, Sr. Office of Pharmaceutical.
MODULE B - PROCESS B1.ASME Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment:
Safety Software QA at BNL’s Collider-Accelerator Department (C-AD) Accelerator Safety Workshop E. Lessard Collider-Accelerator Department August 12-14,
MODULE B - PROCESS B1. ASME Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity Assessment:
ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
Pressure Safety Requirement – Assist Visit 10CFR Part 851 Review February 12, 2015 Team Audrey Daly Dave Meekins Will Oren George Rawls Steve Smith.
Writing Proposals for Oak Ridge National Laboratory Women-Owned Small Business Day Sonny Rogers Contract Services Group Manager Oak Ridge, TN August 24,
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures.
1. The student will be able to describe: ◦ the history of ASME and the National Board ◦ the history of the National Board Inspection Code ◦ how the NBIC.
Dr. Jose Pires Structural, Geotechnical and Seismic Engineering Branch
Pipeline Personnel Qualification
Field Federal Safety & Health Councils (Insert FFSHC Name) (Insert Name & Title of Presenter) (Insert Date of Presentation)
Award for Achievement of Excellence in Fire Prevention 2009 Program Update.
Pressure Systems 10CFR851 - The Way to Go but, Some Tough Issues W. Oren Manager of Engineering and Technical Services Division Pressure Systems 10CFR851.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE Review of Critical Decision 1 for the Large Liquid Argon Detector for Neutron Physics (MicroBooNE) at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
ASME / NRC Management Meetings Kevin Ennis Director, Nuclear C&S Ryan Crane C&S Project Engineering Manager ASME 2 Park.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
RC14001 ® Update GPCA Responsible Care Committee September 23, 2013.
Revision of ISSAI 30 INTOSAI Code of Ethics
World Anti-Doping Code Process and Content Copenhagen, 13 November 2002.
Certificate in Pipeline Construction, Welding & Inspection LECA LEXTON ENERGY CORPORATE ACADEMY Copyright 2013 Lexton Energy Incorporated PCWI delivered.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC ANSI ASC C63 Subcommittee 7 Spectrum Etiquette Report to C63 H. Stephen Berger Chair, SC7 November 13, 2014.
QA Requirements for DOE Accelerator Safety System Software K. Mahoney Group Leader, Safety Systems TJNAF Presented at the 2008 DOE Accelerator Safety Workshop.
Fermilab requirements and recent FEA Analyses PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN 06/05/2015 Page 1 CERN, May 6th 2015.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures.
PA Department of Environmental Protection Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual, Revision 8)
Committee on Refinery Equipment November 2010 Update to the Refining Subcommittee Michael Lubcyik, Chevron Energy & Technology Company, Chair, CRE.
Public participation of EIA in R.O.C. Hsiao-Tien Wu, Wei-Chein Sun & Tung-Wang Chang Environmental Protection Administration Executive Yuan R.O.C.
Breakout Group 2: Software Quality Assurance Objectives and Goals 8/18/10 1.
11 FSO Assessment of Fermilab QA Program Status September 14 – 18, 2009.
Reducing the Probability of Incidents through Behavior-Based Safety – An Anomaly or Not? AIHCE Crossover Program 507 John A. Turek Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Y-12 Integration of Security and Safety Basis, Including Firearms Safety David Sheffey Safety Analysis, Compliance, and Oversight Manager B&W Technical.
Key Design Issues and Recent Reviews Tom Peterson, Fermilab DFBX PRR, October 23, 2002 US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley.
TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES A BRIEF SUMMARY.
1 Meeting on April 18, 2013 Washington DC Workshop on a Joint HDPE Roadmap for Current and Future Service.
DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Conference Knoxville, TN August 24-27, 2009 Colette Broussard, DOE-HQ Office of Quality Assurance Policy.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Presentation to PAC R. Casey NSLS-II ESH Program Status May 25, 2007.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Approvals and Permits Division Isreal Mallard Transportation Specialist,
AUL Guidance Revisions Draft AUL Guidance was made available for public review and comment December 2010 Available at
1 NDIA Earned Value Management Application Guide Status Report August 16-17, 2005 Wayne Abba Walt Berkey David Muzio David Treacy NDIA EVM Application.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 1: Techniques and Developments Zhong Chen SC1 Chair
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Director, Office of Science April 29, 2004 PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
Accelerator Safety Workshop SLAC Scott L. Davis Accelerator Safety Program Manager – SC Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy Summary and.
Accelerator Safety Workshop SLAC Scott L. Davis Accelerator Safety Program Manager – SC Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy DOE 420.2C Order.
Dave Passarello DOE Accelerator Safety Workshop August , 2009 Software QA Requirements Breakout Session – Key Points.
Accelerator Safety Order Revision Process Frank Kornegay, ORNL SNS Dennie Parzyck, DOE FSO.
Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,
Inspection and Quality Assurance Requirements for Metal Plate Connected Wood Trusses Educational Overview.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
Project Delivery Working Group FY2016 EFCOG Annual Meeting Robert P. Miklos Idaho National Laboratory Battelle Energy Alliance Working Group Chair June.
PIP-II Environment, Safety, Health & Quality Assurance Strategy John Anderson Jr. DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
Cryomodule Safety Approvals Jay Theilacker LCLS-II Production Cryomodule Final Design Review May 12-14, 2015.
Nuclear Codes and Standards Needs in Argentina International Working Groups April 2016 Buenos Aires, Argentina Ryan Crane Oliver Martinez.
Planning for Succession
Update on the Latest Developments in Government Auditing Standards
Industrial Hygiene/ Occupational Safety Special Interest Group
Accelerator Safety Workshop SLAC
EMERGENCY PLANNING GUIDANCE FOR RAIL MARSHALLING YARDS
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> January 2012
Report from the 7th Meeting of the IHO Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee (HSSC7) to NCWG April 2016, IHB, Monaco.
Regional Committee Meeting Chicago Section Report
Accelerator Safety Workshop SLAC
Citizens Advisory Committee EPA/CBP Program Update Jim Edward Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office February 20-21,2019 Williamsburg, VA.
Presentation transcript:

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Part 851 & Vacuum Systems W.R. Casey NSLS-II Project Brookhaven National Laboratory August 12, 2008 Office of Science Accelerator Safety Workshop

2 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Vacuum System Design Issue Part 851 defines a vacuum system as a pressure system because of the potential for back-pressurization which invokes ASME Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII Discussed at length at SC sponsored Accelerator Safety Workshop held 8/07 Uncertainty was expressed regarding interpretation and implementation of requirement Potential impact to design of NSLS-II and other new accelerators was noted

3 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Approach to Addressing Pressure System Requirements for Vacuum Systems Developed during break-out session at Accelerator Safety Workshop ORNL, BNL, ANL, LANL, TJNL, and others Prevent pressure differential greater than 15 psig through use of pressure relief devices (prevent over-pressurization if accidentally backfilled) Develop guidance that defines the design, fabrication, inspection, & test requirements for a vacuum vessel.

4 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Approach to Addressing Pressure System Requirements for Vacuum Systems (cont.) Form a working group to further develop this guidance. Issue guidance as an Office of Science document, most likely as an attachment to the Implementing Guidance for the DOE Accelerator Safety Order 420.2B.

5 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Status of Effort Working Group was formed Jan Technical issues were discussed during 6 conference calls from January to April. Six drafts of consensus standard were reviewed Final draft issued 6/17/08 Edited version issued 7/17/2008

6 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Members of Working Group Argonne National Laboratory Jeffrey T Collins William F Toter Brookhaven National Laboratory Robert Casey (Chair) Edwin Haas Dick Hseuh Steven Kane Edward Lessard Sushil Sharma Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Daniel R Olis David R Pushka Oak Ridge National Laboratory Peter Ladd Stanford Accelerator Center R. Keith Jobe

7 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary of Standard Key features of standard Defines design requirements for all vacuum vessels Requires ASME code compliance for vacuum vessels subject to over pressurization > 15 psig Defines requirements for equivalent level of safety when ASME code does not apply (because of pressure range, vessel geometry, use of special materials, etc) Provides exemption for vacuum vessels with energy less than 100,000 joules or vessels with small dimensions (cross-sectional area less than 28.5 in 2 )

8 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary of Standard (cont.) Defines Authority having jurisdiction Engineering evaluation Independent design professional Pressure Safety Committee Responsible vacuum system design engineer Vacuum systems –Category I –Category II –Category III

9 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary of Standard (cont.) Defines responsibilities and qualification requirements for the responsible design engineer, independent reviewer, authority having jurisdiction, and Pressure Safety Committee Establishes requirements for Design Design review Fabrication –Welding –Inspection –Testing Pressure Relief Records

10 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary of Standard (cont.) Two Appendices Appendix A defines “ Engineering Evaluations ” Appendix B defines independent review requirements for Category III vacuum vessels

11 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Current Status The working group is very satisfied with its product – there was a true consensus. Definitions and requirements are being incorporated into BNL Pressure Safety requirements (other Labs are doing the same) However – we need for this standard to be recognized by the Office of Science and incorporated into the Accelerator Safety Order (or other appropriate documents)

12 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Next Step Review standard at break-out session Incorporate any additions, deletions, modifications to standard Identify responsibility and process for moving the document into the Office of Science Establish time line for official recognition of standard