Market Effects of Wood Promotion Jan Hagstedt Senior Advisor
1 Raw material 2 Product Know how Interest/Good examples - Arguments - Tools
What is wood promotion? From a supplier – generic? Hardwood – softwood? Spec products – general wood? Commercial – PR – Information?
Possibilities: Interesting market Sustainability & Environment Positive attitudes Raw material abundant Marginal promotional efforts so far Practical problems can be solved In Short: Favourable!
Limitations: Wood is “not present” Know how & education Fragmented branch “Cut the cake” – attitude Confidence/ reliability from end users Does the wood sector believe in itself?
The wood resource Products Checking: The market
The wood resource, Europe Net increment in 10 years 2 billion m3 (under bark) or 1,1billion m3 sawlogs or 550 million m3 sawn products Source: European Forestry institute Present growth: Corresponds to around + 65 million m3 sawn timber Can this happen? To what effect? Where is the market?
Europe: 50 % TF million m3 total 105 millions Theoretically m m3 remains Market? Wood culture? Wood: leading mtrl By ? The market
Our working environment Clients General public Specifiers Media Opinion formers Wood product Manuf. Forest PR - agent Building contractors developers Politicians Local actors Products, systems
Success stories: 1 Germany: Profilbretter 2 Japan: Nordic softwood 3 Southern USA – SYP + 2,2 million m3 interiors + 1,5 - ” - housing + 4,5 - ” - decking
Assess the market possibilities- the strategy, the plan and act! Firm resolution to go ahead! “Bake a bigger cake” Involve the best possible “brain power” Network!
The Nordic Timber Council case: 1993 – % Consumption Europe Production - ” Sweden+Finland, prod Export Prices (index) %
Advertisement Promotion & ‘Fulfilment’ OpinionBehaviourConsumption Main Campaign Activity Key Impact Parameters -Time - Timber – Wood.For good UK - A promotion approach
Timber 2000/ Wfg UK June 2000 – June 2002 Wood windows (BWF)+ 18 % (projection till % Deckings (TDA) % 1995: £ 5 m Now: £ 100 m Target: 0,25 m3/capita by Results : m3 or 1/3 of target Evaluation by Jaakko Pöyry Consulting, London