School & district accountability reporting Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 Report Cards How to prepare and distribute 2013 district and school report cards.
Advertisements

Superintendent Melinda J. Boone Alumni Auditorium, North High School October 21, 2013 Worcester Public Schools State of the Schools Address.
ESEA Flexibility C hanges to School & District Accountability and Assistance April 2012.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Why PARCC in 2015? Key Training and Decision Dates Field Test vs. Operational Test Holding Districts “Harmless” 2015 PARCC MCAS CHOICE.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2008.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
REVIEW OF 2014 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY AND ACHIEVEMENT DATA, GOAL SETTING, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR 2014/2015 SAUGUS PUBLIC SCHOOLS CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Report Cards How to prepare and distribute 2014 district and school report cards.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 17 &
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.
Merrymount Elementary School PTO Assessment Presentation December 4, 2014.
Accountability Report Dedham Public Schools October 3,
No Child Left Behind Education Week
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2012 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Back to Table of Contents DART for English Language LearnersAnnual SnapshotDART for English Language LearnersAnnual Snapshot DART for English Language.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
2015 State PARCC Results A webinar for school and district leaders Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator Wally McKenzie Edwin Analytics.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2015 Accountability Reporting Presentation to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary & Secondary Education December 15, 2015 Update on Overall District.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview
2012 Accountability Determinations
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
2016 Accountability Reporting
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
New Statewide Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Presentation to the Board of Elementary & Secondary Education
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Presentation transcript:

School & district accountability reporting Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013

What will we cover today?  Massachusetts’ accountability measures  Goal  Progress & Performance Index (PPI)  School percentiles  Framework for accountability & assistance  Sample reports  Accountability system resources  Requirements 2 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What were the major changes for 2012? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 3 1.New goal of reducing proficiency gaps by half by Accountability & assistance levels for schools and districts (Levels 1-5) 3.New performance measure (Progress & Performance Index - PPI) that includes student growth, science, & other indicators 4.School percentiles reported, representing performance relative to other schools of the same school type 5.“High needs” subgroup data reported Low income students, students with disabilities, current and former English language learners

What is the new goal? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 4 1.Subtract 2011 Composite Performance Index (CPI) from Divide by 2 3.Divide by 6 to calculate annual targets

What are some key PPI concepts? 6  PPI is a measure of progress toward a group’s gap narrowing goals  Annual PPI shows progress over two years  Cumulative PPI represents trend over time  PPI runs from 0-100: 75 considered to be On Target  Core indicators (up to 7)  ELA, math, & science proficiency gap narrowing (CPI)  ELA & math growth (SGP)  Annual dropout rate  Cohort graduation rate (4- and 5-year)  Extra credit for reducing percentage of students scoring Warning/Failing or increasing percentage of students scoring Advanced Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Annual PPI = total points / # core indicators Cumulative PPI = (2009* * * *4) / 10 Core indicatorsUp to 700 points awarded 1. ELA proficiency gap narrowing0, 25, 50, 75, or Math proficiency gap narrowing0, 25, 50, 75, or Science proficiency gap narrowing 0, 25, 50, 75, or ELA growth0, 25, 50, 75, or Math growth0, 25, 50, 75, or Annual dropout rate0, 25, 50, 75, or Cohort graduation rate0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 Extra credit indicatorsUp to 150 additional points awarded ELA, math, science W/F reduction ELA, math, science ADV increase Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 7

What are some key level concepts?  Schools and districts are classified into a level based on a four-year trend  Cumulative PPI for all students and high needs students is used to classify schools into Levels 1 & 2  School percentiles (1-99) represent performance relative to other schools of the school type, and are used to determine Level 3 schools (lowest-performing 20 percent per state law)  Progress and Performance Index (PPI) and school percentiles are used to determine Level designations for schools  Districts are classified based on the level of the lowest- performing school, or as a result of Board action 8 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

The PPI and the school percentile Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 9  PPI is a criterion-referenced measure of progress  Percentiles are relative, and help the state and districts focus supports on low-achieving students in low performing schools  Massachusetts uses school types (ES, ESMS, MS, MSHS, HS) to fairly compare the performance of schools serving the same or similar grades  Every school’s percentile and PPI tells a different story  Schools with lower percentiles but higher PPIs for all student groups are showing improvement over time  Schools with higher percentiles but lower PPIs are high performing, but have more work to do to support student success

Sample reports

Level 1 school (first layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 12

Level 1 school (second layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 13

Third layer of report Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 14

Level 2 school (first layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 15

Level 3 school (first layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 16

Accountability system resources

Videos, lists, explanatory materials, & tools  Accountability videos  Lists of schools and districts by accountability & assistance level  School Leaders’ Guide to the 2013 Accountability Determinations  Includes required actions by school and district level  PPI and CPI calculators for planning and goal setting Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 18

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 19

Requirements

Planning  District improvement plan  Three-year plan  Supplemented annually with a District Action Plan  District Standards and Indicators as resource  School improvement plan  One-year plan  Conditions for School Effectiveness (CSE) Self-Assessment as resource for development and/or revision  Title I schoolwide program plan  Alignment between CSEs and federal Title I schoolwide program plan requirements  If all CSEs are addressed, school improvement plan may also serve as the schoolwide program plan 21 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Grant reservations Any district with one or more Title I schools classified in Level 2-5 must reserve a portion of its Title I, Part A grant funds on a sliding scale for interventions and supports to address the needs of low-achieving students in low- performing schools  reservation is based on the district’s 2012 accountability and assistance level  0 to 25 percent of Title I allocation  For Level 2 districts, reservation percentage determined by percent of students not yet proficient on MCAS  See FY14 Title I grant application website for more details: Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Notifications Three types – all can be combined in one notice 1.Accountability notification to inform families of relevant accountability data, including an explanation of the improvement activities in place a.Accountability and Assistance Level b.School percentile (1-99) c.Progress and Performance Index (PPI) 2.Right-to-know notification to inform families of their right to request certain information about the qualifications of their child’s teacher(s) a.Whether the teacher is licensed in the grade levels and subject areas they teach b.Whether the teacher is teaching under an emergency license or waiver c.The college degree and major of the teacher d.Whether the child is provided services by paraprofessionals and, if so, their qualifications 23 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Notifications 3.School/district report card to provide families federally required information a.Educator qualifications b.Student achievement (MCAS and NAEP) c.Accountability ESE has created a 2-page school report card overview for that districts can distribute to families of all enrolled students More information on the school report card overview, including distribution requirements, will be coming later this fall. 24 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Notifications ESE has created a template for a single letter that satisfies all federal notification requirements  Can serve as a cover letter to the school report card or overview  Customizable  Available in 10 languages 25 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education