Design FRAME problem solving with the engineering design process F R A M E TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center © 2009 Texas Tech University T-STEM Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outcomes and Standards. Outcome Curricular statements describing how students will integrate knowledge, skills, and values into a complex role performance.
Advertisements

Training for Teachers and Specialists
Process and Product Quality Assurance (PPQA)
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Campus Improvement Plans
More CMM Part Two : Details.
NEES Project Management Workshop June 16 June 18 1 Segment 2.
Action Implementation and Evaluation Planning Whist the intervention plan describes how the population nutrition problem for a particular target group.
Course Technology Chapter 3: Project Integration Management.
Chapter 15 Evaluation.
The Software Product Life Cycle. Views of the Software Product Life Cycle  Management  Software engineering  Engineering design  Architectural design.
Purpose of the Standards
Don Cole Risk Assessment and Mitigation Project Management for ARA Engineers and Scientists.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 27 Slide 1 Quality Management 1.
University of Palestine software engineering department Testing of Software Systems Fundamentals of testing instructor: Tasneem Darwish.
Thinking about assessment…
Copyright Course Technology 1999
Manage Project Scope Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit Code BSBPMG502A.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Cybersecurity: Engineering a Secure Information Technology Organization, 1st Edition Chapter 7 Software Supporting Processes and Software Reuse.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Software System Engineering: A tutorial
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Requirements Engineering CSE-305 Requirements Engineering Process Tasks Lecture-5.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
BSBPMG405A Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Unit Guide C ertificate IV in Project Management
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Power Point Presentations for Each Chapter of SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach Carl D.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Project quality management. Introduction Project quality management includes the process required to ensure that the project satisfies the needs for which.
Cheryl Simonson, CESA 6 Jacob Hollnagel, DPI. Guiding Successful Implementation of Educator Effectiveness Understand successful educator effectiveness.
 Definition of a quality Audit  Types of audit  Qualifications of quality auditors  The audit process.
Chapter 27 The Engineering Design Process. Learning Objectives Describe the various factors that are changing the design process Discuss the steps in.
1 Commissioned by PAMSA and German Technical Co-Operation National Certificate in Paper & Pulp Manufacturing NQF Level 3 Apply quality procedures.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Understanding Policy Contexts CEP:ELM, 2011 Mombasa.
Guide to Options Comparison Revision of the SAFEGROUNDS Guidance James Penfold, Quintessa SAFESPUR, 4 October 2007.
BSBPMG501A Manage Application of Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification.
Day 3 in the pmProject Management Project Management (PM) ADJUST.
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Planning Evaluation Setting the Course Source: Thompson & McClintock (1998) Demonstrating your program’s worth. Atlanta: CDC/National Center for Injury.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Evaluation and Implementation 21 October 2015 PUBH 535.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
Language Studies and Academics Report Writing Types of Reports CM 2300.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
E VALUATION PLAN FOR COURSE DESIGN Embedding Literacy and Numeracy Module.
Stages of Research and Development
Project Management PTM721S
Project Quality Management
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
MOSH Adoption Team Training
CMMI – Staged Representation
Testing Procedures.
Software Engineering I
The Process for Final Approval: Ongoing Monitoring
Chapter 3: Project Integration Management
Managing Project Work, Scope, Schedules, and Cost
Software Reviews.
Testing Procedures Testing Procedures
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

design FRAME problem solving with the engineering design process F R A M E TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center © 2009 Texas Tech University T-STEM Center developed by John Chandler and Susan Talkmitt

F rame R esearch A nalyze M odel E xecute TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model

Outcomes of activities during each phase inform subsequent phases TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model

Actions Identify: problem specific attributes technical demands societal and human impacts Guiding Questions What are the needs and wants of stakeholders? Outcomes Documentation defining: the problem the requirements Phase 1. Examine the problem Frame the problem R esearch A nalyze M odel E xecute TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model

Guiding Questions What do we know and what do we need to find out? What are the possibilities, and how do we determine the best options? Actions Identify: existing knowledge and experience potential materials, processes, etc. Test: to compare to eliminate to verify Outcomes Documentation recording: research data procedures, observations, and conclusions Phase 2. Research to inform design decisions TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model

Phase 3. Employ analytic methods to make design decisions Guiding Questions How does the research data determine design decisions? Actions Analyze: data conclusions Outcomes Documentation describing: rational for analysis design decisions F rame Model E xecute R esearch Analyze the data TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model

Phase 4. Synthesize design elements into a model Guiding Questions How do we model and justify our design? How do we derive performance predictions? Do stakeholders have suggested revisions? Actions Illustrate / describe in detail: dimensions, materials, or other attributes production criteria Review design: peer review presentation to stakeholders / experts for feedback / approval Outcomes Model: graphics specifications Documentation establishing: justification of design performance predictions F rame Model the design E xecute R esearch A nalyze TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model

Phase 5. Produce the design as modeled and according to plan Outcomes Finished product: conforms to specifications meets requirements / expectations Documentation showing: team and individual activities summary of plan and production process proper use / maintenance of product Actions Develop and implement a plan to make and test the product: define timeline with personnel requirements and responsibilities establish inspection / feedback procedures follow safety procedures adhere to pertinent policies, codes, or laws Guiding Questions What is our plan for managing the resources to execute the design? F rame M odel Execute the design R esearch A nalyze TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model Assessment: measure of progress toward specific goals appraises change from a starting point applies pre-established criteria and methods for measuring Evaluation: determination of effectiveness of the process and its outcomes weighs assessments to inform overall determination formative evaluation – occurs at milestones during the design process summative evaluation – retrospective determination at end of process F R A M E Assessment and Evaluation are not separate parts of the process, but are continual and integral in the design process "Assessment is not something you do to someone; it is something you help them to do for themselves." National Research Council

Formative Evaluation: assessments of activities in each phase are used to determine: 1.extent of progress toward completion, and 2.if the current outcomes support moving to the next phase by satisfying the requirements answering the guiding questions being documented to inform next project phase Frame Research Analyze Model Execute TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model Formative Evaluation stakeholders reach consensus to move on, or to make adjustments to current process / plan

Summative Evaluation determination of effectiveness of the project in retrospect TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model Summative Evaluation: reflective determination of effectiveness of the process and finished product: 1. establishing whether stakeholder needs were met within the requirements, and performance of design was confirmed or problems identified, and 2. communicating and archiving lessons learned from the project

FR A M E TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY T-STEM Center engineering design FRAME model © 2009 Texas Tech University T-STEM Center developed by John Chandler and Susan Talkmitt