SETI Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence FYOS Lecture 8

History Guglielmo Marconi ( ) Guglielmo Marconi ( ) o 1 st cross-Atlantic radio communication Nikola Tesla ( ) Nikola Tesla ( ) o inventor of AC current They both claimed to hear a radio signal from alien worlds. In fact, they both heard atmospheric “whistlers” In 1924, when the Mars was close to Earth, a large campaign to hear a signal from Mars…  Destined to fail. Why?

Ionosphere acts as a mirror for radio waves… Ionosphere acts as a mirror for radio waves…

Whistler Hearing distant lightnings! Hearing distant lightnings!

Modern Approach Cocconi and Morrision at Cornell calculated in 1959 that it is possible to send radio signals b/w stars even with the technology of 50s… Cocconi and Morrision at Cornell calculated in 1959 that it is possible to send radio signals b/w stars even with the technology of 50s… Galaxy is quite old  must be more advanced civilizations than us in the Galaxy  they may send “hailing signals” to other stars very easily! Galaxy is quite old  must be more advanced civilizations than us in the Galaxy  they may send “hailing signals” to other stars very easily! ? which radio frequency ?

Choice of Frequency Neutral Hydrogen gas produces a 1420 MHz (21cm) wave  natural static radio noise… Neutral Hydrogen gas produces a 1420 MHz (21cm) wave  natural static radio noise… Uniqueness of this frequency : Hydrogen is the most common element in the Universe, hence any astronomers in advanced civilizations would use this frequency to study Galaxy! Uniqueness of this frequency : Hydrogen is the most common element in the Universe, hence any astronomers in advanced civilizations would use this frequency to study Galaxy!

Modern SETI Cocconi and Morrison persuaded fellow radio astronomers but no positive response. Cocconi and Morrison persuaded fellow radio astronomers but no positive response. In 1960, Frank Drake independently arrived at a similar conclusion and performed a week-long search for alien signals at two stars (ε Eri and τ Ceti)  caught the attention of the astronomy community. In 1960, Frank Drake independently arrived at a similar conclusion and performed a week-long search for alien signals at two stars (ε Eri and τ Ceti)  caught the attention of the astronomy community. NASA started a dedicated program which finally started its operation in In 1993, the program got canceled by the U.S. Congress. NASA started a dedicated program which finally started its operation in In 1993, the program got canceled by the U.S. Congress.

Categories of Signals In Frank Drake’s 1960 experiment: searched for an “intentional” signal sent to us: an interstellar hailing signal. In Frank Drake’s 1960 experiment: searched for an “intentional” signal sent to us: an interstellar hailing signal. Three possible types of alien signals 1.intentional signal beacons. 2.aliens’ local communication. e.g., our own radio and TV signals 3.alien world’s inter-planetary or interstellar communication. our communication signals with interplanetary spacecrafts (e.g., Voyager)

Can aliens detect our leaked signals? Our signal has no intended direction Our signal has no intended direction  to reach out to many homes… Because of the inverse square law, the signal gets weaker very quickly… Because of the inverse square law, the signal gets weaker very quickly… With the technology similar to ours, our leaked signal can be detected only about one light-year away from Earth! With the technology similar to ours, our leaked signal can be detected only about one light-year away from Earth! The nearest star is 4 light-years away… The nearest star is 4 light-years away…  This means that we can’t detect alien’s local communication signals (unless they use much stronger signal) We can detect only an intended signal from aliens at this point.

Format of Signal Intended messages should be easy to decipher… Intended messages should be easy to decipher…  what communication protocol? In the movie, “Contact”, Carl Sagan suggested that aliens may use our leaked TV broadcast as a clue embedded in their message… But, our signal reaches only 50 light-years… In the movie, “Contact”, Carl Sagan suggested that aliens may use our leaked TV broadcast as a clue embedded in their message… But, our signal reaches only 50 light-years… We sent out a radio signal using the world’s largest antenna (Arecibo) in 1974 toward M13!

Arecibo 1974 signal 1,679 bits in a 3-minute message  1,679 = a multiple of two prime numbers (23, 73).  alien needs to know that the message was a 23x73 image…  single transmission

Even if we detect an alien signal, we may never decode it!

How to decipher?!? Arecibo message deciphered as 73x23 image… Arecibo message deciphered as 73x23 image…

Difficulties with Radio SETI Two challenges Two challenges 1.No dedicated search telescope  all SETI programs so far had to compete for telescope times against other traditional astronomy research projects… 2.terrestrial interferences o TV broadcasts o Radio stations o Radars o etc.  exactly the types SETI look for! Build a telescope on the far-side of the Moon!?

Current Radio SETI SETI institute  m radio telescopes near Berkeley… SETI institute  m radio telescopes near Berkeley… 450 million channels 450 million channels 70 megawatts from 100 lightyears away. 70 megawatts from 100 lightyears away.

Current Radio SETI UC Berkeley UC Berkeley SERENDIP – “piggyback” SERENDIP – “piggyback” 168 million channels 168 million channels 1 megawatt (2-3% of data)

Current Radio SETI Southern SERENDIP Southern SERENDIP Parkes 64m telescope in Australia Parkes 64m telescope in Australia 58 million channels, 1 megawatt 58 million channels, 1 megawatt

Current Radio SETI SETI Italia SETI Italia 32m Medicina telescope 32m Medicina telescope 24 million channels 24 million channels 30 megawatts 30 megawatts

So, any detected signal so far? Anything interesting?

Active SETI 1974 Arecibo message 1999 Cosmic Call Teen Age Message 2003 Cosmic Call A Message from Earth sending a message to aliens = Messaging to Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (METI) sending a message to aliens = Messaging to Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (METI) Is it safe to send a message to aliens?? Is it safe to send a message to aliens??

Optical SETI history C. Townes invented a LASER in 50s C. Townes invented a LASER in 50s In 1961, Schwartz and Townes published a science article “Interstellar and Interplanetary Communication by Optical Masers” in Nature. In 1961, Schwartz and Townes published a science article “Interstellar and Interplanetary Communication by Optical Masers” in Nature. Then, Project Cyclops in 70s shadowed the Optical SETI… Then, Project Cyclops in 70s shadowed the Optical SETI… (diameter = 16km) (diameter = 16km)

Beamed versus Omni-directional versus At 100 Ly away with an Arecibo-like receiver: omni-directional signal requires to be 66,000 MW, while a beam signal to be only MW.

Optical SETI High intensity pulsed laser beam from an alien who knows that we are here! High intensity pulsed laser beam from an alien who knows that we are here! Highly beamed laser beam can outshine the host star by times!! Highly beamed laser beam can outshine the host star by times!! No human interference!! No human interference!!

With 10m telescopes on both ends… Can send a high quality signal (large amount of info) out to ~1,000 light- years with our 21C Earth laser technology already! Can send a high quality signal (large amount of info) out to ~1,000 light- years with our 21C Earth laser technology already!

On-going Optical SETI UC Berkeley: Lick observatory (1.2m telescope) UC Berkeley: Lick observatory (1.2m telescope)

On-going Optical SETI Harvard Univ. funded by Planetary Society Harvard Univ. funded by Planetary Society Some collaboration with Princeton Univ. Some collaboration with Princeton Univ. 3 OSETI projects 3 OSETI projects 1.5m telescope 1.5m telescope

On-going Optical Search Columbus (Ohio) Optical SETI by Stuart Kingsley (Amateur Astronomer) Columbus (Ohio) Optical SETI by Stuart Kingsley (Amateur Astronomer) Using off-the-shelf instruments… (10inch reflector Meade) Using off-the-shelf instruments… (10inch reflector Meade)

Advantages of OSETI over Radio SETI 1.Visible light-emitting devices are smaller and lighter than microwave or radio-emitting devices. 2.Visible light-emitting devices produce higher bandwidths and can consequently send information much faster. 3.less Interference than radio 4.Naturally occurring nanosecond pulses of light are nonexistent. 5.unlike in microwave and radio SETI, searching for an exact frequency is not vital because the expected transmitting beam should outshine the unfiltered light from the star by at least 30 times.

Next Week : SETI debate… Read two articles before you come to the class… Read two articles before you come to the class…