Valid and Invalid Arguments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Advertisements

TRUTH TABLES The general truth tables for each of the connectives tell you the value of any possible statement for each of the connectives. Negation.
Propositional Logic Lecture 10: Oct 29.
1 Introduction to Abstract Mathematics Valid AND Invalid Arguments 2.3 Instructor: Hayk Melikya
Logic ChAPTER 3 1. Truth Tables and Validity of Arguments
John Rosson Thursday February 15, 2007 Survey of Mathematical Ideas Math 100 Chapter 3, Logic.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 01/26/12 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.
CS128 – Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.2 – 1.3 (Modus Tollens) Conditional and Valid & Invalid Arguments.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING: PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC Purposes: To analyze complex claims and deductive argument forms To determine what arguments are valid or not.
Logic 3 Tautological Implications and Tautological Equivalences
Discrete Structures Chapter 1 Part A Fundamentals of Logic Nurul Amelina Nasharuddin Multimedia Department 1.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
1. 2 Day 1Intro Day 2Chapter 1 Day 3Chapter 2 Day 4Chapter 3 Day 5Chapter 4 Day 6Chapter 4 Day 7Chapter 4 Day 8EXAM #1 40% of Exam 1 60% of Exam 1 warm-up.
1 Math 306 Foundations of Mathematics I Math 306 Foundations of Mathematics I Goals of this class Introduction to important mathematical concepts Development.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Propositional Logic USEM 40a Spring 2006 James Pustejovsky.
Through the Looking Glass, 1865
Propositional Logic Lecture 1: Sep 2. Content 1.Mathematical proof (what and why) 2.Logic, basic operators 3.Using simple operators to construct any operator.
Propositional Logic Lecture 2: Sep 9. Conditional Statement If p then q p is called the hypothesis; q is called the conclusion “If your GPA is 4.0, then.
Homework 3.
TRUTH TABLES. Introduction Statements have truth values They are either true or false but not both Statements may be simple or compound Compound statements.
Logic ChAPTER 3.
Validity: Long and short truth tables Sign In! Week 10! Homework Due Review: MP,MT,CA Validity: Long truth tables Short truth table method Evaluations!
Propositional Logic.
1.1 Sets and Logic Set – a collection of objects. Set brackets {} are used to enclose the elements of a set. Example: {1, 2, 5, 9} Elements – objects inside.
Chapter 1 Section 1.4 More on Conditionals. There are three statements that are related to a conditional statement. They are called the converse, inverse.
Chapter 3 Section 4 – Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Section 1.5 Implications. Implication Statements If Cara has a piano lesson, then it is Friday. If it is raining, then I need to remember my umbrella.
3.6 Analyzing Arguments with Truth Tables
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence.
BY: MISS FARAH ADIBAH ADNAN IMK. CHAPTER OUTLINE: PART III 1.3 ELEMENTARY LOGIC INTRODUCTION PROPOSITION COMPOUND STATEMENTS LOGICAL.
Reason and Argument Chapter 6 (2/3). A symbol for the exclusive ‘or’ We will use ұ for the exclusive ‘or’ Strictly speaking, this connective is not necessary.
Proofs1 Elementary Discrete Mathematics Jim Skon.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 2 Section 1.1 Fri, Jan 19, 2007.
The Inverse Error Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13.
Predicate Logic. TRUTH-TABLE REMINDERS The problem people had the most trouble with was 1e: construct a truth-table for: (P & (~Q & R)) Many of you only.
Logic Review. FORMAT Format Part I 30 questions 2.5 marks each Total 30 x 2.5 = 75 marks Part II 10 questions Answer only 5 of them! Total 5 x 5 marks.
LOGIC Lesson 2.1. What is an on-the-spot Quiz  This quiz is defined by me.  While I’m having my lectures, you have to be alert.  Because there are.
Conditional Statements
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
Introductory Logic PHI 120 Presentation: "Natural Deduction – Introduction“ Bring this book to lecture.
Chapter 8 – Symbolic Logic Professor D’Ascoli. Symbolic Logic Because the appraisal of arguments is made difficult by the peculiarities of natural language,
CS1022 Computer Programming & Principles Lecture 1 Logic and Proof.
How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent?
Chapter 7 Logic, Sets, and Counting Section 1 Logic.
LOGIC.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 1 Section 1.1 Wed, Jan 12, 2005.
Introductory Logic PHI 120 Presentation: "Truth Tables – Validity vs. Soundness" This PowerPoint Presentation contains a large number of slides, a good.
Formal Test for Validity. EVALUATIONS Evaluations An evaluation is an assignment of truth-values to sentence letters. For example: A = T B = T C = F.
Notes - Truth Tables fun, fun, and more fun!!!!. A compound statement is created by combining two or more statements, p and q.
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Conditional Statements Lecture 2 Section 1.2 Fri, Jan 20, 2006.
Mathematics for Computing Lecture 2: Computer Logic and Truth Tables Dr Andrew Purkiss-Trew Cancer Research UK
Lecture 10 Methods of Proof CSCI – 1900 Mathematics for Computer Science Fall 2014 Bill Pine.
Discrete Mathematical Structures: Theory and Applications 1 Logic: Learning Objectives  Learn about statements (propositions)  Learn how to use logical.
Logic and Truth Tables Winter 2012 COMP 1380 Discrete Structures I Computing Science Thompson Rivers University.
Chapter 1 Logic and proofs
Test #2 Practice MGF 1106 Summer 2011.
Logical functors and connectives. Negation: ¬ The function of the negation is to reverse the truth value of a given propositions (sentence). If A is true,
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
Lecture Notes 8 CS1502.
Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Valid and Invalid Arguments Lecture 4 Section 1.3 Tue, Jan 23, 2007

Statement Forms A statement is a sentence that is true or false. “If today is Wednesday, then Discrete Math meets today or I’m a baboon.” A statement form is the logical form of a statement, represented symbolically. p q  r

Arguments An argument is a sequence of statements. The last statement is the conclusion. All the other statements are the premises. A mathematical proof is an argument.

Argument Forms An argument form is a sequence of statement forms. The last statement form is the conclusion. All the other statement forms are the premises. A mathematical proof follows an argument form.

Validity of an Argument Form An argument form is valid if its conclusion is true when its premises are true. Otherwise, the argument form is invalid. An invalid argument form is called a fallacy.

Validity of an Argument An argument is valid if its argument form is valid, whether or not its premises are true.

The Form of an Argument Let the premises be P1, …, Pn. Let the conclusion be C. The argument form is valid if P1    Pn  C is a tautology.

Example I will go fishing today. If the boss is in and I go fishing, then I will get fired. The boss is in. Therefore, I will get fired.

Example p = “I will go fishing today.” q = “The boss is in.” r = “I will get fired.” Argument form: p q  p  r q  r

Example P1 P2 P3 C P1  P2  P3  C p q  p  r q r

Example P1 P2 P3 C P1  P2  P3  C p q  p  r q r T F

Example P1 P2 P3 C P1  P2  P3  C p q  p  r q r T F

Example P1 P2 P3 C P1  P2  P3  C p q  p  r q r T F

Example: Invalid Argument Forms with True Conclusions An argument form may be invalid even though its conclusion is true. If I go fishing, the boss will fire me. The boss fired me. Therefore, I went fishing. A true conclusion does not ensure that the argument form is valid.

Example: Invalid Argument Forms with True Conclusions Another example. If 1 + 1 = 2, then pigs can fly. Pigs can fly. Therefore, 1 + 1 = 2.

Example: Valid Argument Forms with False Conclusions An argument form may be valid even though its conclusion is false. If I wait until the last minute to do my homework, then it will be a lot easier. I wait until the last minute to do my homework. Therefore, it will be a lot easier. A false conclusion does not mean that the argument form is invalid.

Example: Valid Argument Forms with False Conclusions Another example. If 1 + 1 = 2, then pigs can fly. 1 + 1 = 2. Therefore, pigs can fly.

Modus Ponens Modus ponens is the argument form p  q p  q This is also called a direct argument.

Examples of Modus Ponens If it is Wednesday, then Discrete Math meets today. It is Wednesday. Therefore, Discrete Math meets today. If pigs can fly, then Discrete Math meets today. Pigs can fly. Therefore, Discrete Math meets today.

Modus Tollens Modus tollens is the argument form p  q q  p This is also called an indirect argument. It is equivalent to replacing p  q with q  p and then using modus ponens.

Examples of Modus Tollens If it is Wednesday, then Discrete Math meets today. Discrete Math does not meet today. Therefore, it is not Wednesday. If pigs can fly, then Discrete Math meets today. Discrete Math does not meet today. Therefore, pigs cannot fly.

Other Argument Forms From the specific to the general p  p  q From the general to the specific p  q  p

Other Argument Forms Elimination p  q p  q Transitivity p  q q  r  p  r

Other Argument Forms Division into Cases p  q p  r q  r  r

Fallacies A fallacy is an invalid argument form. Two common fallacies The fallacy of the converse. The fallacy of the inverse.

The Fallacy of the Converse The fallacy of the converse is the invalid argument form p  q q  p This is also called the fallacy of affirming the consequent.

Example If it is Wednesday, then Discrete Math meets today. Discrete Math meets today. Therefore, it is Wednesday.

Fallacy of the Inverse The fallacy of the inverse is the invalid argument form p  q p  q This is also called the fallacy of denying the antecedent.

Example If pigs can fly, then Discrete Math meets today. Pigs cannot fly. Therefore, Discrete Math does not meet today.