CMS 00_338 - 1 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved CMMI – What a Difference a Sponsor Makes! Ann Turner Raytheon Company

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing a Behavior Based Safety Process at Rockwell Automation
Advertisements

A BPM Framework for KPI-Driven Performance Management
Kai H. Chang COMP 6710 Course NotesSlide CMMI-1 Auburn University Computer Science and Software Engineering Capability Maturity Model Integration - CMMI.
Continuous Improvement Deployment Six Sigma Foundations Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Foundations Continuous Improvement Training freesixsigmasite.
Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) Program Update Colonel Ric Sherman, United States Army Office of the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for.
Copyright 2005 CMMI and ITIL Alison Adams & Kieran Doyle.
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved June 26, 2002 BEYOND SIX SIGMA: A HOLISTIC.
Copyright 2003, ProcessVelocity, LLP. CMM and Capability Maturity Model are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. CMMI and SCAMPI are service.
Stepan Potiyenko ISS Sr.SW Developer.
Program Management Overview (An Introduction)
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI). CMMI Enterprise-wide process improvement framework Focuses on processes for improved product Process areas:
Software Quality Processes – Part II CSSE 376, Software Quality Assurance Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology March 19, 2007.
November 2007  Purpose – Consistently provide value to customers cost-effectively in order to prosper.  Processes – Through the primary value-creating.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
CMMI Overview Quality Frameworks.
Space and Airborne Systems NDIA/SEI CMMI Technology Conference Presented by N. Fleischer 1 Raytheon’s Six Sigma Process and Its Application for CMMI By.
CMM Level 3 KPA’s CS4320 Fall Organizational Process Focus (Goals) Software process development and improvement activities are coordinated across.
Using Six Sigma to Achieve CMMI Levels 4 and 5
Use of an Organizational Process for Corporate-Wide Process Improvement via CMMI® NDIA/SEI CMMI® Technology Conference November 2003 John Evers David.
CMMI Course Summary CMMI course Module 9..
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
CMMi What is CMMi? Basic terms Levels Common Features Assessment process List of KPAs for each level.
All Rights Reserved, Juran Institute, Inc. Transforming Your Health Care System into a Baldrige Winner.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
A Project ’ s Tale: Transitioning From SW-CMM to CMMI-SE/SW Warren Scheinin Systems Engineer, NG Mission Systems CMMI Technology Conference & User Group.
NDIA Systems Engineering Supportability & Interoperability Conference October 2003 Using Six Sigma to Improve Systems Engineering Rick Hefner, Ph.D.
DRAFT – For Discussion Only HHSC IT Governance Executive Briefing Materials DRAFT April 2013.
10/16/2015Bahill1 Organizational Innovation and Deployment Causal Analysis and Resolution 5 Optimizing 4 Quantitatively Managed 3 Defined 2 Managed Continuous.
Software Process Assessment and Improvement
Managing CMMI® as a Project
Application of the CMMI SM to Plan and Control Life Cycle Costs Dr. Mary Anne Herndon Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) November, 2003.
COPYRIGHT © RAYTHEON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2/2002 Raytheon Six Sigma March, 2002.
The Value Driven Approach
Process: A Generic View
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
Alpharma Six Sigma Deployment Proposal November, 2003.
Requirements Development in CMMI
I Copyright © 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved. Module i: Siebel 8.0 Essentials Training Siebel 8.0 Essentials.
PMI is a registered trademark of the Project Management Institute Knowledge Exchange Forum October 28, 2003 Assessing Project Management in Your Organization.
An Introduction. Objective - Understand the difference between CMM & CMMI - Understand the Structure of CMMI.
December 2014Rodney Leonard, Director Global OPEX 2015 Global OPEX Executive Presentation.
CMMI ® – The Current State Presented by Gregory Shelton Corporate Vice President Engineering, Technology, Manufacturing & Quality 3 rd Annual CMMI Technology.
MSA Orientation – v203a 1 What’s RIGHT with the CMMI?!? Pat O’Toole
© 2003 Six Sigma Academy0 The Roles of Six Sigma Champion Workshop.
Rapid - Lean Six Sigma: Executive Overview Leading in a Lean Six Sigma Environment University of Washington – Tacoma Key Bank Professional Development.
CMMI Overview Quality Frameworks. Slide 2 of 146 Outline Introduction High level overview of CMMI Questions and comments.
Certification: CMMI Emerson Murphy-Hill. Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Creation of the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) at Carnegie.
Overview of CMMI Global Certification Consultant is aiming to designed CMMI Presentation to share knowledge about CMMI,
Contents Playbook Objectives Playbook Value Details Playbook Design
A Program of Training for CMMI®-based Process Improvement
Defining a World-Class Finance Organization
Data Architecture World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Automating Support for CMMI Level 5 Organizational Improvement
Using Behavior Surveys for CMMI Process Deployment
Raytheon Parts Management
Agenda Workforce Development Coaching Mentoring
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Use of Tailored PIIs November 17, 2003
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 2 Process: A Generic View copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc.
A Case Study of Transitioning: The CMMI Rosetta Stone
Process Improvements Achieved From Using The CMMI Model: A Success Story At Raytheon’s SAS Engineering Organization Presented to National Defense Industrial.
Class “B” Appraisal Implemented Lessons Learned
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Establishing a Strategic Process Roadmap
Define Your IT Strategy
Requirements Development in CMMI
Bridging the ITSM Information Gap
Presentation transcript:

CMS 00_ Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved CMMI – What a Difference a Sponsor Makes! Ann Turner Raytheon Company

2 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved Agenda n Assessed Organization – Garland TX n CMMI Timeline n Raytheon Process Integration n Organize for Success n Garland CMMI Team Structure n Executive Steering Team Charter/Membership n Deployment Model n Action Team Structure

3 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved Organizational Characterization n Organization: Garland TX site (Dallas suburb) n Component of larger business unit n Site population: 2000 n Engineering population: 1100 n SW Engineers: 530 n System Engineers: 370 n Business base: SW intensive systems n 10 year history of SW (CMM) and SE (SECMM & EIA- 731) process improvement.

4 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved Garland CMMI Level 3 Timeline Raytheon Six Sigma (R6S) Visualize…Commit…Prioritize………..Characterize………Improve…………Achieve Class C ICPAs* Focus Programs Identified Class B L3 Ready SCAMPI Level 2/ 3 Action Plans Executive Steering Team Launched CMMI Deployment Overviews and Workshops Deployment Institutionalization EPG Established * Integrated Class C Process Appraisal

5 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved IPDS, CMMI, and R6  are Tightly Coupled IPDS is an integrated set of best practices for the entire product development life cycle. through a just-in-time tailoring process. R6Sigma is our business strategy. It guides us to use CMMI and IPDS as tools to deliver value to customers and integrate industry best practices. CMMI is a model for creating, measuring, managing, and improving processes. Each plays an integral role in the success of programs, projects and organizations Programs integrate R6Sigma, IPDS, and CMMI into their plans

6 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved Organize for Success Early Major Step: Established the EPG to focus on maturity of all engineering processes

7 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved CMMI Deployment Teams Strategic Plans Link to Tactical Execution through the Program Managers Program R6S Action Teams Org R6S Action Teams CMMI Process Area Owners sponsor and mentor through participation on Steering Teams and R6S Action Teams

8 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved IGS/NS(Tx) CMMI Executive Steering Team Charter n Sponsor CMMI deployment across the enterprise n Establish the goals for strategic process improvement for Garland and all IGS sites n Lead the enterprise to achieve CMMI Level 3 through the integrated deployment of R6S, Integrated Product Development System (IPDS) and CMMI.

9 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved IGS/NS(Tx) CMMI Executive Steering Team n One steering team member assigned to each CMMI Process Area as a Process Area Owner n One EPG member to mentor/assist each Process Area Owner n What is the role of the Process Area Owners? – Participate in a workshop with the focus programs to learn about process area goals and desired behaviors and to participate in identification of organizational and program gaps. – Work with their assigned EPG member to develop action plans based on results of two Class B assessments and EPG gap analysis – Track deployment of the action resolutions through deployment in preparation for SCAMPI – Walk the talk!

10 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved Validate Objective Evidence Implementation Workshop (1 per Process Area) CMMI Deployment Model Assign an Process Area Owner to each CMMI Process Area EPG Review of each Process Area Process Area Overview (1 per Process Area) Manage Risks Change Management Program Workload Cost/Schedule Assess Enablers Objective Evidence Enablers Identified Objective Evidence/Action Items Completed Action Items Process R6S Action Teams Characterize Improve Achieve

11 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved Garland CMMI Organizational Process Action Teams Organizational Infrastructure VP Finance EPG Facilitator R6S Specialist Organizational Training VP HR EPG Facilitator R6S Specialist Organizational Metrics R6S Exec EPG Facilitator Discipline Sub- Processes VP Engineering EPG Facilitator R6S Specialist Program Mgmt System Engineering SW Engineering Product Assurance Config Mgmt Supplier Mgmt Policy Architecture PAL Lessons Learned Organizational Metrics Policies, Plans/Procedures Metrics Repository Training Infrastructure Training Requirements Deployment Team SW Eng Director R6S Specialist Focus Program Support Mentoring Formal Training Verification Team Systems Eng Director Objective Evidence Verification SCAMPI Coordination

12 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved Lessons Learned n Support of organizational leader critical to setting goal – can’t be driven only from Software and Systems Engineering n Engage program management early n CMMI goal included in Executive Sponsor performance goals and flowed into goals of direct reports established clear responsibility and accountability n Engaging site leadership as a steering team and as action team sponsors was very effective – Resource availability – Awareness of issues/challenges – Passion! n Including focus program PMs on the steering team established accountability as well as forum for elevating issues.

13 Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved Biographical Information Ann Turner currently manages the Raytheon Garland site Engineering Process Group which was established in 2001 to better align the organizational process focus with the CMMI model. Ann has 23 years experience in software development, configuration management and process improvement. Ann has a B.S. in Business with concentration in management Information Systems and a Certificate in Program Management, both from the University of Texas at Dallas.