Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Barthe et al. (2009) Dynamic and Structural Characterization of a Bacterial FHA Protein Reveals a New Autoinhibition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Post-Translational Modifications: CrossTalk Robert Chalkley Chem 204.
Advertisements

Proteomics Informatics – Protein characterization I: post-translational modifications (Week 10)
Article #1: Insight into the PrP c PrP sc conversion from the structures of antibody-bound ovine prion scrapie-susceptibility variants -What was known.
By what mechanisms are calcium signals read and translated into biochemical response? What is the structural basis for the function of the proteins involved?
Chap. 7 Transcriptional Control of Gene Expression (Part A) Topics Control of Gene Expression in Bacteria Overview of Eukaryotic Gene Control and RNA Polymerases.
Folding and flexibility. Outline What is protein folding ? How proteins fold in vivo ? What is protein flexibility ?
G Proteins Part 1 Biochemistry 4000 Dr. Ute Kothe.
Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy BIOCHEMISTRY BEYOND STRUCTURE Protein dynamics from NMR Analytical Biochemistry Comparative Analysis.
Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy BIOCHEMISTRY BEYOND STRUCTURE Protein dynamics from NMR Analytical biochemistry Comparative analysis.
NMR Analysis of Protein-Ligand Interactions
vanderbilt.edu March 6-11, 2003 Biochemistry 305 Structural Mechanisms of the DNA Replication, Recombination and Repair (DNA Processing.
Books Molecular Cell Biology Lodish
Identifying New Motifs in Class 3 Inteins Mobile Elements.
By: Kristen Wade. Short (~4 bps), non- contacted DNA sequences that do not directly interact with the binding protein Image adapted from:
Signal Response and Amplification
A Case Study RPA: A Multi-domain, Multi-subunit Protein RPA70 RPA32 RPA14 Zn P  Quaternary structure unknown, partial function  Delineation of domains.
Tracking Protein Allostery in Evolution Glycogen phosphorylase frees sugars to provide energy GP orthologs diverged 600,000,000 years can respond to transcription.
Topic 2 John Markley. Task: choice of targets that meet selection criteria and are likely to yield structures Models from sequences: ORFs, intron/exon.
Anesthetic Modulation of Protein Dynamics: Insight from an NMR Study Presented by: Logan Woodall Mentor: Dr. Pei Tang.
Problem Limited number of experimental replications. Postgenomic data intrinsically noisy. Poor network reconstruction.
G 1 and S Phases of the Cell Cycle SIGMA-ALDRICH.
Solution Structure of the Integral Human Membrane Protein VDAC-1 in Detergent Micelles Presented by Lisa Nguyen Sebastian Hiller,1 Robert G. Garces,1*
Protein Kinases Web resources: PKR Kinase.com
Src Kinase Biosensor. Outline 1.Src Kinase Introduction 2.Impacts of Src 3.Src reporter components  FPs (tECFP/EYFP)  SH2  Flexible linker  Substrate.
Last Class 1. Transcription 2. RNA Modification and Splicing
Christoph H. Borchers, Roopa Thapar, Evgeniy V. Petrotchenko, Matthew Michael Easterling, Zbigniew Dominski, and William F. Marzluff Combined top-down.
How NMR is Used for the Study of Biomacromolecules Analytical biochemistry Comparative analysis Interactions between biomolecules Structure determination.
PTEN (Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog) a.k.a. MMAC1, TEP1 Raymond Stadiem.
Mechanism of Curcumin Inhibiting Amyloid-  Peptides Aggregation by Molecular Dynamics Simulations Zhenyu Qian, and Guanghong Wei State Key Laboratory.
BCB 570 Spring Signal Transduction Julie Dickerson Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Cell Communication.
A Spring-loaded mechanism for the conformational change of Influenza Hemagglutinin Mani Foroohar.
Crystal Structure of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β
Phosphorylation and sequence disorder in microtubule-associated protein Tau.A, schematic illustration of the domain profile of Tau with all known phosphorylation.
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Some examples of how NMR can provide information about biological systems.
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Mechanisms of TGF-β Signaling from Cell Membrane to the Nucleus
PKB Binding Proteins Cell
The Dynamics of SecM-Induced Translational Stalling
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2019)
Systems-wide Identification of cis-Regulatory Elements in Proteins
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structure of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Phosphorylation Primes Vinculin for Activation
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
by Miles A. Pufall, Gregory M. Lee, Mary L
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
The Conformational Plasticity of Protein Kinases
The Active Conformation of the PAK1 Kinase Domain
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Theodore R. Rieger, Richard I. Morimoto, Vassily Hatzimanikatis 
Discussion of Protein Disorder Prediction
Active and Inactive Protein Kinases: Structural Basis for Regulation
Mark A Lemmon, Kathryn M Ferguson, Joseph Schlessinger  Cell 
PubMed Research Article
Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA
Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Effects of a human FABP7 point mutation on FABP7 protein structure
Basis of Mutual Domain Inhibition in a Bacterial Response Regulator
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages (September 2002)
Conserved motifs in the ABC
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Barthe et al. (2009) Dynamic and Structural Characterization of a Bacterial FHA Protein Reveals a New Autoinhibition Mechanism. Structure, 17: Major Observations & Conclusions: OdhI protein is key regulator of the TCA cycle Unphosphorylated form of OdhI inhibits the OdhA protein  contains FHA domain highly specific to phosphothreonine  Odhl FHA domain required to bind OdhA, but OdHA phosphorylation is unknown Phosphorylated form of Odhl is inactive  conformational change between phosphorylated and unphosphorylated form  binding of the phosphorylated N-terminal part of the protein to its own FHA domain  new autoinhibition mechanism

Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Major Results: Identified the CgPknA or CgPknB phosphorylated site(s) of Odhl by MS as Thr15  y1-y4 expected mass for the sequence  y5-y10 all masses are less by 98 Da, loss of phosphate group Prior identification of CgPknG phosphorylation site of Odhl was Thr14.

Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Major Results: determined NMR structure of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated form of Odhl Phosphorylation induces folding of N-terminal region  short amphipathic helix forms A20 to S29 faces Y11 and P116  residues V12 to F18 bind to FHA phosphopeptide surface  Interaction between pT15 and R87, R72 in  3/  4 loop and Asn107 Global fold of FHA domain, a  sandwich composed of 11 strands is well conserved   3/  4 loop adopt incompatible conformation for phosphopeptide binding in unphosphorylated form

Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Major Results: N-terminal domain of unphosphorylated form is unstructured and dynamic phosphorylated form exhibits a decrease in disorder and mobility

Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Major Results: Large chemical shift changes consistent with pT15 Chemical shift changes consistent with ordering of N-terminal region Chemical shift changes consistent with phosphopeptide binding site

Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Major Conclusions Hypothesis: Phosphorylation at Thr14 by CgPknG could result in a similar inactive Odhl structure Control of OdhA activity occurs through phosphorylation of both Odhl and OdhA Could not obtain a structure with pT14 Different phosphorylation sites may resulted from different signaling pathways and stimuli Questions: The importance of the binding of the N-terminal domain to the FHA domain is dependent on the phosphorylation of OdhA. If the phosphorylation of OdhA doesn’t occur, then the conformation change and inferred autoinhibition mechanism is not biologically relevant. Does binding to OdhA occur through the N-terminal domain or FHA domain?  Is N-terminal truncation still active?  Is it the phosphorylation of N-terminal domain or the domain binding to the FHA domain that inactivates Odhl?

Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Questions: authors claim Thr15 is phosphorylated  y5-y10 all masses are less by 98 Da, loss of phosphate group  NOT TRUE -18 Da  Only evidence is  Y5, if Thr 14 is the phosphorylation site then Y5 would occur at 609  Assigned  Y5 peak is weak ~ 3 S/N similar intense peak next to it. Is this 609 peak? MW = 609 MW = 609?

Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Questions: Why are only 1 H- 15 N NOEs measured? Why not measure T 1, T 2 and order parameters (S 2 )?

Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Questions: Will the phosphorylated residue or residues next to the phosphorylated site incur the greatest chemical shift change? Is it T14 or T15?