October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice 2002 1 Information policy to Improve the Dutch Courts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice Reform The judicial perspective. Topics Common ground Managing change Budgets Four lessons Surprises.
Advertisements

Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against corruption and organized crime in Montenegro Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against.
EU structure. Parliament only directly elected body the legislative and budgetary authority 785 members every 5 years represent nearly 500 million citizens.
CSAIO13 Dispute settlement at the ECB 4 October 2012 Tillmann Frommhold Deputy Spokesperson 8th Staff Committee of the European Central Bank.
The Committee of the Regions A political assembly of the European Union, representing local and regional government.
Citizens participation in decision making processes – local context – Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations Regional Office This project.
ICGFM Conference, Miami Macedonia: TWINNING experience Dr. Dragoljub Arsovski, General State Auditor Gerrit de Jong, NCA Board Member.
Changes in the Dutch judicial system
Modern judicial-legal system of Azerbaijan and latest developments
European developments in judicial systems Pim Albers Special advisor of the CEPEJ Council of Europe.
Courts and Tribunals Operation and control of the Courts and Tribunals as well as the legal status of professional Judges and Magistrates, who shall form.
1.  Integral part of Automated court case management information system (ACCMIS) in RM :  Registering of cases  Random assignment of cases  Movement.
1 China-EU Forum Beijing, 9 – 10 July, 2010 The protection of employees Forth section.
Managing Unstructured Processes with Oracle BPM: “Lessons From the Field". Irene Tiepel, vice president spir-it, the IT service provider for Dutch Judiciary.
WEB – Extreme make-over EUPRIO 2008, Stavanger Monique Jipping Director Communications Services Utrecht University.
1 LECTURE BY DR. GERTRUDE MONGELLA (MP), PRESIDENT OF THE PAN AFRICAN PARLIAMENT AT THE UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY, TOKYO, JAPAN 16 OCTOBER 2006 “ HOW TO.
The Courts Basic principels of the judiciary Organisation and administration of the judiciary Jurisdiction on fundamental rights.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Indicators for Criminal Cases Management in Bulgaria Public Hearing: Improving Criminal Justice Systems in Europe: The Role of E-Tools and Performance.
1 The Swedish Judiciary Göran Bodin. 2 The Swedish Administrative System The Parliament Government Ministry A Government Ministry B Government Ministry.
Federal Court System Identify the source of power of the federal courts Name the various levels of federal courts and describe their jurisdictions LESSON.
1 European Lifelong Guidance Policy Network National Guidance Forum of the Czech Republic Open Session Career Guidance Council in Lithuania Aleksandra.
Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Serbia 22-26, Nemanjina Street Belgrade
General Summing up of the proceedings and debates Dr iur Julia Laffranque (Estonia) Justice at the Supreme Court Vice chair of the CCJE.
The Role of the CIOs in Korea ’ s Public Sector Kijoo Lee Senior Information Officer ISGIF, the World Bank Sep 22, 2004.
Erasmus Intensive Programme, Cukurova University, Adana Structure of EU institutions Daniel Melo Andrea Piterková Malgorzata Basak.
State Government Judicial Branch. VA Supreme Court 7 Justices (1 Chief and 6 Associates) Chosen by the General Assembly 12 year terms (8 years for lower.
1 STUDY VISIT BY THE UGANDAN PARLIAMENTARY DELEGATION ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ELECTORAL SYSTEM PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS HON ANDRE GAUM PREPARED.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 11:30-12:30 Session 5.
1. common courts military courts administrative courts tribunals The Supreme Court The Supreme Administrative Court The Constitutional Tribunal and The.
THE EUROPEAN UNION How does the structure of government within the EU compare with the structure of government in the United States?
Criminal Law Lecture 3 Cyprus Judicial System  Supreme Court  District Court  Assize Court  Family Court  Rent Control Tribunals  Industrial Tribunals.
Management System of Judicial Cases. Abstract The system A historical perspective A workflow Some figures The next steps 2.
European Labour Law Institutions and their Competencies.
European Labour Law Institutions and their Competencies JUDr. Jana Komendová, Ph.D.
Progress of Implementation by June 2015 Pre-defined project 2: “Support to the Supreme Judicial Council related to capacity building and improving the.
Meeting the court: the people and the law Prof. mr. Hans den Tonkelaar Prof.dr. Leny de Groot-van Leeuwen Food for Thought, 1 February 2016.
EU Politics CHAPTER 13: Other Institutions. Outline 1) European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) 2) Committee of the Regions (CoR) 3) European Agencies.
Participatory Environmental Governance : Role of Communities in Europe and Asia Jona Razzaque Reader in Law Bristol Law School, UWE, Bristol, UK Bristol.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
EBNA May 10, session Martin Berendse DON’T ASK WHAT EUROPE CAN DO FOR US, BUT….. ……WHAT WE CAN DO FOR EUROPE ! EBNA May 10, session 2 Martin Berendse.
MOSCOW, NOVEMBER 2007 JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROF DR JAAP W. DE ZWAAN DIRECTOR ‘CLINGENDAEL’ AND PROFESSOR OF EU LAW THE NETHERLANDS.
MOSCOW, NOVEMBER 2007 ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION LAW AND POLICY OF THE EU PROF DR JAAP W. DE ZWAAN DIRECTOR ‘CLINGENDAEL’ AND PROFESSOR OF EU LAW THE NETHERLANDS.
For more course tutorials visit PPA 403 Entire Course PPA 403 Week 1 DQ 1 Values in Administrative Law PPA 403 Week 1 DQ 2 The Federal.
State of play Belgium Conference ECLI and Beyond – Improving Online Access to Court Decisions Athens - 8 & 9 june 2017 Marc Vermeulen Johan.
Transparency Portal of the General Council for the Judiciary
Legal System of Finland
Development of mid-level managers: joining forces and promoting common values (introductory session) Estonia Anna Laido.
International Association of Tax Judges
Croatia Statistical Training
International Association of Tax Judges
Understanding the Policy-Making Bodies of the Texas Judicial Branch
organization and jurisdiction of the federal court system
Funding of the Dutch Judiciary Performance based budgeting
State governance and admiNistration of justice
DIRECTOR ‘CLINGENDAEL’ AND PROFESSOR OF EU LAW
International Association of Tax Judges
ICT in the public sector: the Dutch case
CEPEJ IN TURKEY Ismail Aksel CEPEJ Member of Turkey
How to Design and Implement Research Outputs Repositories
Transparency Portal of the General Council for the Judiciary
CSM Management Model 2017.
Content Republic of Serbia Ministry of Justice ICT infrastructure
ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY
Legislative Executive Judicial Presidential Administration President
”From Policy to Practice”
2003 eEurope Awards for General Information Christine Leitner
Prof.Dr. Jacqueline Cramer is director of the Utrecht
(Audit) Expectation Management
HWC - Brussels meeting Session 1
Presentation transcript:

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Information policy to Improve the Dutch Courts

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Dory Reiling mag. Iur. The Hague Court of Appeal Council for the Judiciary IT Management

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Introducing Netherlands courts Technology: What does it do for us? What can it do for us? What should it do for us? Themes

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice before Periods

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice The Netherlands Statistics European Union Member 16 mln Inhabitants Approx Judges (1:9.000) Approx. 450 Prosecutors (1:35.000) Total ( ) Employees

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Court System.nl Jurisdictions: Civil - well developed Criminal - ECHR-oriented Administrative - part of ordinary courts

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Alkmaar Groningen Leeuwarden Assen Amsterdam Haarlem Utrecht ‘s-Gravenhage Rotterdam Dordrecht Midelburg Maastricht Roermond ‘s-Hertogenbosch Breda Zwolle Almelo Arnhem Zutphen 19 Districts 5 Appeal Courts 1 Supreme Court Justice.NL Organization.nl

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Courts Governance before 2002 Judges Minister of JusticePresidents’ Assembly Dualist Structure Court Staff Court DirectorCourt President

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice What does it do? Court Technology 1986 administrative systems Word processing on stand-alone Jurisprudence by private publishers Steering and management information Windows, GUI and !

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice What can it do? Information Policy Scenario Targets for Improvement IT to support targets

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice What can it do? Court Improvement Program

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice What can it do? Characteristics co-operation support from bureaucracy to knowledge-based organization

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice What can it do? Improving case handling court management governance external orientation

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Web applications Intranet search portal access to registers and case administration

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice IT-Testing Lab Demonstrating Cockpit management info Work flow management Decision Support System Session Planning Testing Expertise

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Courts Governance before 2002 Judges Minister of JusticePresidents’ Assembly Dualist Structure Court Staff Court DirectorCourt President

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Judges and Court Staff Court Board President, Sector Presidents, Court Director Minister of Justice( Presidents’ Assembly ) Council for the Judiciary Integral Management Judiciary Governance since 2002

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Council for the Judiciary Tasks Budgeting Allocating funds to courts Supporting Court Management Promoting Quality Consultation

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Strategic Agenda Improving case handling Quality assurance Improving external orientation ….. using the possibilities of information technology

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice programs: R+D Implementation Maintenance (discontinuing) Justice.NL Improving information management

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice JustWord Intranet ICT-Proeflokaal Bistro ICTRO Standard texts Information exchange Testing new ICT Web applications/KM 1 centralized IT support organization What can it do?

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Interactivity with the citizens Electronic files Good management information Exchange of experiences Wishes for the Future

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Top level commitment User participation Roles Learning from others Information Policy Making: Lessons Learned But What Should IT Do?

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice What should IT do? Supporting fair hearing within a reasonable time by an independent tribunal! European Convention on Human Rights, article 6 Wishes for the Future

October 22, 2002 Technology for Justice Council for the Judiciary in the Netherlands Juliana van Stolberglaan 4-10 PO Box NL 2509 LP Den Haag T F